The
writer of the article linked below is “gittin' tired” of trying
to beat sense into the granite-hard heads of those who want to DISARM
Americans in order to make them DEFENSELESS in the face of the
proliferation of ILLEGALLY-owned guns in the hands of the “bad
guys.” They think the way to self defense is to make yourself
DEFENSELESS and show others you're no threat, which is a STUPID
approach. If they think we're unarmed and defenseless, they're going
to victimize us. They INSIST on the stupid idea that the Second
amendment was not designed to recognize the inherent right of birth
to self defense, and to own and use the means to that, a gun. They
think the founders meant only to recognize the right of an ORGANIZED militia
(which did not exist at the time) to remain ARMED, rather than of the
PEOPLE, who are specifically mentioned. That could NOT be true, since
there was NOT an “organized militia” in existence, at the time,
so they could NOT have meant that. But they reject that, in favor of
their preconceived notions, and, like this writer, I'm really getting
tired of pointing this out to these stupid people and having it be
roundly ignored while they try and disarm me and make me defenseless.
(The Federalist)
Wednesday, August 24, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment