Japanese Blockade Gunman

A “man with a gun” is “holed up” in an apartment in Japan, wanted for a gun crime he should never have been able to commit, due to the tight gun laws they have there that make most violent crime “knife crime” or “bare-handed crime.” the Yakusa is known to be very violent and deadly, and rarely use guns. But the violent crime goes right on. I guess this is just more proof that all their “gun laws” are USELESS. But the politicians, all over the world, aren't listening.

FELON SINGER ARRESTED: This guy, whose name I shall not mention (but you'd recognize) because I don't want to get sued, or worse, SHOT, is (again) accused of threatening one of his women with a gun. Since he has a habit of this, he is a felon from past encounters, where he got only a “slap on the wrist.” So he shouldn't have been able to get a gun. But people with a lot of money like this guy have no problem finding a “straw purchaser” to buy one legally, or illegally. Which means all of California's gun laws mean nothing.

BACKGROUND CHECKS DON'T WORK: Mark Kelly, the former astronaut who, it seems, left his common sense in outer space after marrying former congresslady, shooting victim, and anti-gun advocate Gabby Giffords, now says, “Background checks work. And anybody who says otherwise is wrong.” Maybe somebody should ask him how so many mass shooters PASSED background checks when buying the guns they used to kill a bunch of people. People like Kelly and his wife just aren't capable of common sense, it seems.

RUINING HIS OWN CAREER: Colin Kaepernick, a “bench-warming” quarterback whose position with the 49ers is not very solid at best, has just ruined his own career by refusing to stand when the National anthem is played and the flag displayed, before a game. Seems to me a guy in his position would “keep his head down” and just play football, hoping to demonstrate his talents (if any), But, NO! This guy has got to offend a lot of people nationally with his erroneous and stupid political stance. His ignorance, apparently, knows no bounds. I wouldn't be surprised if he gets cut, soon. And for good reason.

“WHITE LIVES MATTER”: As predicted here, a new organization called, “White Lives Matter” has now been called “racist organization” by liberals. Never mind that “Black Lives Matter” is not similarly labeled. What the difference is, is a mystery. That is, it would be if you didn't understand the liberal mind (if any). “Black Lives Matter” advances their efforts to start a race war. “White Lives Matter” does too, but only if they designate it as racist. That's how they twist things so the ignorant don't really understand, while they still vote.

ANOTHER NUMBER TWO? ISIS tells us yet another NUMBER TWO man has been killed. Why do we keep killing “number two men” in the Islamic terrorist organizations? Aren't we good enough to find, and kill the number ONE man in their organizations? I'm sure we are. We just haven't done it. Every once in a while we kill somebody who is CALLED the number two while their killing goes right on, unabated. I think we're being “played.” Not by them, by Obama. He's killing nobodies and CALLING them top men so we'll think he's “doing something” to fight Islamic terrorism.

.

Japanese Gunman Sought

What? I thought Japan wasn't a “gun culture.” That's why they're so heavily invested in unarmed combat, along with the Chinese. The anti-gun laws in Japan (just like in China) are very tight, and gun crime is almost non-existent (they say). Of course, crime with many weapons less than guns is rampant. Japanese gangs are known to be deadly. And they use knives and unarmed combat. So why is this guy able to get the gun or guns he used to make m=himself a wanted man by Japanese police? I guess we've got proof yet again that laws against gun ownership make no difference to people who really want to get them, in whatever country they live. England, which has VERY tight gun laws, is complaining about high gun crime. Australia, which almost completely BANNED guns after a major shooting, saw a 300% increase in gun crime in subsequent years. Why do politicians all over the world never learn from experience? (The Japan Times)

Women Getting More Guns

Better watch out, if you're the kind of man (man?) who likes to beat on your women. Nowadays, women aren't as often getting “stay away orders” which mean NOTHING to a determined woman-beater. They're getting GUNS. You could end up DEAD! Gone is the time when a man who likes to completely control his women, making them fearful to even TALK to others and making sure they have no money OR friends willing to help them could rule their lives. You can't frighten a woman if she has a gun, and knows how to use it. Yes, you might be able to take it away from her. ONCE. But then, she'll get another. And another, however many times it takes until she can kill you with it. And she will learn all your sneaky tricks to get her gun away from her. And you thugs on the street who think all women are “easy pickings,” will soon learn they aren't. If you live long enough for the lesson to take hold. Times are “a changin' “ and you'd better change with them, or be ENDED. (Western Free Press)

No Guns, Government Rules

In communist China, the government RULES, as demonstrated in Tianenmen square a few years ago. One of the most poignant pictures was the one of the one man standing in front of a tank. But nobody knows what happened to that man, and I'd BET he was killed after the cameras went away. He was brave, but not too bright. But the simple fact that this demonstration for human rights from an oppressive government turned into a massacre of UNARMED people by soldiers, with grenades, automatic weapons, missiles, and TANKS, sent in by the communist Chinese “rulers” to put down this uprising, not  (they said) by people wanting the freedom they didn't have, but by what they called “hooligans.” They say, if those citizens had had guns, the massacre would have been even worse. They're right, but it would be worse for those troops (not the people), many of whom would have been injured or killed, instead of coming away with no injuries, while murdering their own people. This is what happens when guns are completely BANNED, as they are in communist China. Don't let it happen here! (Jerry the Geek)

Carry Your Guns!

Liberty University is getting smart. Their new policy on student safety tells students, “Go on, carry your legally carried guns on campus.” which is the ultimate answer to criminals and crazies who IGNORE their no gun policies and come on campus and kill people, no matter what their policies are. I guess they've finally figured out that restricting guns in the hands of legal carriers is counterproductive. It only costs the lives of many who OBEY them, while “active shooters” ignore them. Law-abiding people don't just “go wild” and “create a wild west atmosphere” when they have a gun. They don't shoot one another over trifles as unlicensed gun carriers do, because law breakers obey NO laws. (The Gun Feed)

Tatget On His Chest

I've talked about cops having that shiny “target” on their chests. Here's a case where a criminal took that seriously, but it didn't work out quite the way he planned. After shooting at the cops, one bullet bouncing off a cop's badge, he wrecked his car and died at the scene. The “Black Lives Matter” fools will probably play this up as the cops PUSHING him into running, when anybody with a modicum of common sense would have stopped, and “faced the music.” He ended up “facing the music” anyway, in a BIG way. He didn't manage to kill that cop, and he got himself killed while running away. Oh well, thugs have never been the smartest of people. That's why so many of them die when they attack cops. Cops are better trained, and are better shots than the average crook, who doesn't bother with such training. Which is why they usually come out on top when thugs try and attack them. It's not that cops CHOOSE black people to shoot or otherwise kill. It's because the dead criminals more often turn out to BE black. And the “Black Lives Matter” fools play up every instance of a cop coming out on top in a gun fight with an ill-trained crook, “righteous shoots,” or not! (Guns)

You Don't Always Need A Gun

Anything in reach can be a weapon. That’s what this would-be rapist found out to his chagrin. He thought he had an easy rape, but he didn’t. His intended victim put a screwdriver into his eye and ran. The cops, who are SUPPOSED to be able to protect you, got there in a hurry. Unfortunately, not in time to stop what happened. That was left up to this woman, who is the kind of woman I would like. She doesn’t “just lie back and enjoy it” when being raped. She does what she can to stop it. Maybe the legislators where she lives will ban the screwdriver. That’s what they DO: Ban ANYTHING we can use to defend ourselves. But they can’t ban ALL potential weapons. This woman proved they’re all around us if we but see them. (Opposing Views)

Lotsa New Gun Owners

Anti-gun fools worry about more people getting more guns, thinking the more guns in the house will up the chances of some untrained fool shooting himself or somebody else. Especially kids, who somehow know where each gun in the house is located. And that scares them to death. They don't think we have the responsibility to be able to have guns—all of us—except them, of course. They think ALL of us are really stupid when it comes to handing guns. They keep telling us guns in the house will probably be more likely to be accidentally used to hurt ourselves, rather than an intruder. And, as usual, they're wrong. Anybody with a lick of sense knows you have to LEARN the proper handling of a gun, in addition to how to hit what you're aiming at. The NRA takes care of that, if you just ask.They hate the NRA because they also champion our right to own and use guns in self defense, in ADDITION to teaching us how to handle our guns.

Something illegal gun owners usually don't learn—which makes them the ones who are usually GUILTY of accidentally hurting others with their guns. There are fewer people getting multiple guns than there are NEW gun owners, who see the need for self defense in the stupid things Obama is doing—like importing thousands and thousands of Islamic terrorists, PRETENDING they're “Syrian refugees,” which most of them are NOT. Then there's his practice of releasing dangerous killers to plague us. Islamic terrorists formerly imprisoned, plus many DOMESTIC killers in OUR prisons. All in all, Obama is doing everything he can to make it less safe for us, which includes trying his best to take our right to own and use guns away from us, in spite of the constitutional prohibition on doing that. If we don't “arm up,” we're going to be in big trouble when all this comes home to roost. (Washington Examiner)

Insisting On Stupid

Recently, Rep. Jim Jordan and Sen. Rubio put forth legislation to protect and restore Second Amendment rights in DC. In response, Rep. Elanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) better known as the “hairless wonder” said “The GOP defense of gun rights is like bullying.” that's a typical response from an anti-gun fool. Any defense of right GUARANTEED by the Constitution has got to be “bullying, because she doesn't like it. Never mind that the anti-gun efforts by people such as her IS “bullying.” Not LIKE bullying. BULLYING! What motivates these fools is beyond me. They just won't accept that gun rights are “settled law,” and have been since before the ink dried on the Constitution. Like other Democrats who liken the NRA to a “terrorist organization” for the same reason, they're STUPID. And, being stupid, have no idea they're stupid. She's so stupid as to suggest that protecting a RIGHT is “infringing on rights! How STUPID can you get? Where do we get these FOOLS? And how do they get elected, anyway? (Breitbart)

Kroger to MOMS: "Stick it!"

"Moms against Guns (or something like that) has been pressuring Kroger Stores to ban guns in their stores so “bad guys” can come into their stores and shoot people without worrying overmuch about there being anybody there with a gun to oppose them, since law-abiding people DO obey such rules, though “bad guys” do not. Kroger, unlike Target Stores and Wal-Mart, is run by intelligent people and told them to “stick it.” That “We obey local laws.” Which means, of course, if a “bad guy” comes in to shoot up the store, he just might run into a gun in the hands of someone who might “put a couple in his head” before he can kill many people. It's time more people like that tell people like “MOMS” to “go to hell” with their stupid pressure, making their stores safer, unlike Panera Bread did, allowing a “bad guy” who ignored their “no-gun policy” to kill two cops who came to investigate a “suspicious person” report. (Guns)

Why Do Cops Kill Blacks?

That's one of the questions being asked by black promoters of “concealed carry for blacks.” The answer is simple. With few exceptions, it's because so many blacks try to kill cops. And they kill each other in outlandish numbers, while cops try to stop it. When a cop comes on an armed black man brandishing a gun in his direction, his only option is to shoot him before he can be shot by that black man. One of the things “Black Lives Matter” fools ignore is the number of WHITE criminals that are killed by white AND black cops, as well. And for the same reasons. The black man who was recently killed during a traffic stop, for example, WAS armed, and brandished his weapon at the cops. That's one way to commit suicide, and he did it. They “cherry pick” stats about BLACK men being killed by cops, but IGNORE the WHITE men similarly killed. The same is true when they complain about so many blacks being in prison. As if there was not a good reason for them being there. They were committing a crime, were arrested, tried, and convicted of that crime, for which they were then sent to prison. They say the justice system is rigged to put black men in prison, but that is stupid. It's not rigged. There are numerous black judges and prosecutors, who would not stand for that. This article is surprisingly even-handed. But they are wrong in several places, which you can decide for yourself. (Ebony)

Is NRA Racist?

IS NRA RACIST? Of course not. But that's what liberals are saying, now. Of course, that's what they say about ANYTHING with which they do not agree. It all started with Barack Obama, who told us electing him would forever END racism in America. So we (not me) elected him, and it not only DIDN'T “end racism for all time,” it made it worse, because Obama PROMOTED racism. Racism from BLACKS against WHITES. To make it seem true, they PUSH white racism against blacks, which had all but disappeared until Obama got in. But whet is not said is that the DEMOCRAT Party is the racist party. It was DEMOCRATS that Martin Luther King marched against. Jim Crow was a Democrat! It was Democrats who voted in all those racist laws we finally got rid of. The Ku Klux Klan was the “military arm” of the Democrat Party for years. KKK members and “former” members conned themselves into high places in appointed AND elected offices in our government. They're “salted throughout our government. Robert Byrd, long time senator, was a “former member” of the KKK, and a top officer there. And they have the nerve to call US racist! The first Republican, Abraham Lincoln, fought a deadly war in which thousands of WHITE people died to free the slaves! He was assassinated for his trouble.(Wikipedia)

Taking Stupid Pills

That's what this Mexican politician must be doing. Mexico's Foreign Minister Claudia Ruiz Massieu, speaking at a UN meeting in Switzerland, says “buying a gun in the US is as easy as buying a quart of milk or a box of cereal.” Which is stupid on it's face. YOU try to buy a gun and see how the stupid anti-gun laws have made it a complicated process—unless you buy it from that “back alley gun dealer” who doesn't care abut the law. I can't see why buying guns in the US is even of interest to Mexico, except that every gun bought in the US is one less for the Mexican drug cartels, until Obama runs more guns into Mexico. Especially since the number of gun deaths and injuries is FIVE TIMES that in America. Maybe Mexico needs to clean up it's own “gun problem” before criticizing ours. I wonder where they GET such stupid people to run their country. Ours, too. (Guns)

"Just Change the Name"

That's a common government “get-around” of the law. If the law prohibits something they want to do (like gun owner databases). Just call it something else. But to me, if it “walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's a duck.” Gun owners have long feared a new database of gun owners, but it already exists. It's called a “data warehouse.” Not a database, get it? So they're not violating the “Firearms Owners Protection Act” because it's not a database. It's a data warehouse. Get it? But to me, if it looks like a database, and OPERATES like a database, it's a database, no matter what they call it to “get around.” the law. They have lots of such scams in the government. You just have to learn how to recognize them. Mostly, they're used when the public “tumbles” to what they're doing, so they change it's name to fool us. In this case however, they used a different name from the beginning because they KNEW they were violating the law and wanted “believable deniability.” Deniability is important to them. You both know they're lying, but they'll never admit it. They'll even go to court and lie under oath. (Truth About Guns)

Gittin' Tired Of It!

The writer of the article linked below is “gittin' tired” of trying to beat sense into the granite-hard heads of those who want to DISARM Americans in order to make them DEFENSELESS in the face of the proliferation of ILLEGALLY-owned guns in the hands of the “bad guys.” They think the way to self defense is to make yourself DEFENSELESS and show others you're no threat, which is a STUPID approach. If they think we're unarmed and defenseless, they're going to victimize us. They INSIST on the stupid idea that the Second amendment was not designed to recognize the inherent right of birth to self defense, and to own and use the means to that, a gun. They think the founders meant only to recognize the right of an ORGANIZED militia (which did not exist at the time) to remain ARMED, rather than of the PEOPLE, who are specifically mentioned. That could NOT be true, since there was NOT an “organized militia” in existence, at the time, so they could NOT have meant that. But they reject that, in favor of their preconceived notions, and, like this writer, I'm really getting tired of pointing this out to these stupid people and having it be roundly ignored while they try and disarm me and make me defenseless. (The Federalist)

Teach "Em How!

The best way to reduce the possibility of kids shooting each other and themselves is to make that gun hidden in the closet (where they KNOW it is) no longer an item of mystery by teaching them all about guns, their purpose, and their potential danger if “played with.” On top of that, there are many adults who know nothing about guns and might also accidentally shoot themselves of others while trying to figure them out. That possibility is put forward by the anti-gun fools, who think ALL people who have guns are MORE LIKELY to shoot themselves, or others, by accident, rather than shoot an attacker. They're right, to a degree, when talking about those who are not trained in their use. They hate the NRA, because it champions our “right of birth” to own and use firearms for protection. But part of what the NRA does is TRAIN both kids, and adults, in gun use, and gun safety, which does reduce that possibility. But the answer IS training people so they won't BE shooting themselves or others, because they don't know anything about their guns. But they think kids, if they even know a gun is in the house, will misuse it. Which they will NOT, if they're trained. But they don't like that, because it will make their predictions untrue, and they make a lot of money trying to suppress gun ownership and use. (Bearing Arms)

NRA Doing Something Right

The NRA must be doing something right, if the New York Times hates them so much. They published a recent anti-NRA screed in which they said, “Donald Trump Courts Pro-Gun Zealots.” Of course, that means he didn't “court the ANTI-gun zealots” as represented by the NYT. The article is filled with hyperbole, unsupported claims, and outright LIES. They've apparently abandoned any effort to make the public think they're neutral regarding the presidential race, OR the fight for, and against gun ownership for self defense. With this article, they ADMIT their bias. NYT says it publishes “All The News It's Fit to Print,” but that's no longer true. It may NEVER have been true, but it was better concealed. They're unalterably opposed to private gun ownership (never mind the ILLEGAL guns owned by the “bad guys,”) and the election of Donald Trump as president. What the hell they see in that GANGSTER, Hillary, I don't know. Maybe they're gangsters, themselves, and see her as their “banner-carrier.” In any case the NRA is simply championing a RIGHT guaranteed by the Constitution, for which they vilify them. This article details their LIES and myths. It will do you good, in arguing with anti-gun fools, to read it, print it out, and keep it handy. (NRA/ILA)

Is Gun Control Racist?

Liberals like to label everything that opposes their policies as racist, until the “racist label” no longer means anything. But gun control IS racist. It always has been. It BEGAN as racism, to keep blacks UNARMED, so they could be more easily “dealt with.” That means shot and hanged, with no fear of “incoming fire.” It is pretty much the same today. Realizing this makes it a little easier to move a few “fence-sitters” in the anti-gun crowd, although it will do nothing to convince the hard-headed ones who won't believe ANYTHING that doesn't agree with their preconceived notions. In any case, this article gives some very good reading suggestions for people who want to know the truth. The Ku Klux Klan started out as a “gun control” group, so they would have to fear less gunfire directed at them as they did their “night riding” to “rid the world” of black people. They believe, like most anti-gun fools, that all you have to do is make a LAW to keep people from having guns for self defense. They were wrong then, and are wrong, now. (Bearing Arms)

Gun Laws Never Work

The big problem with “gun laws” as we know them is that they don't work. They're a USELESS waste of time, money, and lives. Yes. LIVES. They get people killed, by making law-abiding people DEFENSELESS against those people who ignore them, and they are legion. Criminals, who simply want what's yours without working for it, and are willing to KILL you to get it, to “crazies,” who get their kicks from killing people in bunches, to Islamic terrorists, who want to kill you because you don't subscribe to their “religion.” All these are the best reasons I can think of for law-abiding people to own and use guns, which are the BEST tool for self defense against their ILLEGAL guns. But the anti-gun fools don't agree—for us. Many of them run around behind a WALL of armed “security” while attempting to deny us the same right, even though the Constitution GUARANTEES us that right. They can't just BAN guns, so they do everything they can to make the ones we have USELESS, or deny us the right to carry our guns everywhere, while lawbreakers IGNORE that. Result? We get killed. (Indy Star).

They Hate Guns

And they hate hunting. But they still eat meat. They don't even recognize the connection between the living animals we kill to support their wish to EAT meat. I guess they somehow think meat just magically appears in their grocery stores. They don't even think about such things as a cow being herded into a small enclosure and hit in the head with a sledge hammer to kill it, so they can cut it up to make meat for their tables. And this being done thousands of times a day, all over the world, so they can be fed. People like that should be vegetarians, but don't ask them to do so. All their ideas are based on an erroneous premise. They think HUNTERS are the only ones who KILL animals, and forget the people who kill animals by the thousands to feed their appetites. (New Jovian Thunderbolt)

White Houe Exempt

Obama has DICTATED that 9,280 federally-operated facilities MUST recognize his INSANE rules regarding “transgenders. But, of course, the White House is exempted. They can continue to use the logical method of keeping male and female bathroom operations separate, and not “knuckle under” to the wishes of .01% of the population who think what they want should always prevail. It's a continuation of the usual routine of exempting themselves from what they IMPOSE upon us.

THOUSANDS OF REGULATIONS: Obama and his accomplices in crime have created THOUSANDS of regulations (unassisted by Congress) that they have IMPOSED upon us. Regulations too numerous for anybody to understand, let alone obey. Not even those charged with ENFORCING them understand them. And not a single one was approved by Congress, as all laws must be. But these aren't laws, though they are ENFORCED as if they were. Regulations are supposed to cover the DETAILS of how a LAW is to be enforced, but these do nothing of the sort. They have no connection to ANY law. They are simply Obama's DICTATES being enforced as if they WERE law.

FIRE SALE! Hillary has just announced that IF she is elected president, she will stop accepting BRIBES through her foundation. So if you want to buy influence in her (hopefully) administration, you'd better get the money to her now. After the election, should she win, it'll be a different method used to bribe her and her minions. You didn't think she'd actually stop taking bribes, did you? Of course, if she loses (and she will), all this is moot. But if you want to “throw your money away,” feel free to do it.

OBAMA SAYS IT: It MUST be a lie. If it comes out of his mouth, or his pen, it IS a lie. That's a fact. So when the State Department says a video was NOT edited to cover up “sensitive info” that might go against him, it MUST be a lie. I'm not sure what video to which he is referring, but I do know it's a lie when he says it was not edited. The State Department is RUN by Obama, so their spoutings must be considered his. So that's it. How do you learn the truth when Obama is speaking? Just listen to what he says, and think the opposite. Works every time.

PAYING AL GORE? Word is out now that George Soros PAID AlGore to promote global warming. What? Why would he have to PAY Gore to do that, when to do so made him a billionaire? Of course I recognize that neither Gore, NOR Soros could see what a financial windfall global warming would be for Gore and all the other fools who buy that horse manure. But I wouldn't be surprised, at all, that Soros DID fund the original scam, that has grown into not only a major swindle for Gore, but for Obama and other fools, too.

OBAMA CAVES: After Trump called him out for his refusal to go to Louisiana and offer the help of the federal government in their woes, he has FINALLY decided to put his golf clubs away (for a while) and go down there to “show the flag.” It gets pretty bad when a politician needs the criticism of his enemy to do what's right. Hopefully, what he's doing is not just “window dressing” to make people THINK he's actually doing something, while he is just counting up his golf swings more secretly.

.

"Truth Is Lie!"

“Lie is truth!” It's “1984” all over again, where they tell you lies and you must pretend it's truth. They're now telling us that if Hillary, one of the biggest ENEMIES of the Second Amendment, is not elected, it would “hobble gun reform.” THEIR idea of gun reform, that is, with the Second Amendment “low-hanging fruit,” ready to fall. They make pretty speeches, designed to fool the gullible among us (those who pay no attention to politics except just before and election, then vote). She has said, several times, that she “doesn't want to take away our guns,” while she works HARD, “behind the scenes,” to do just that. And she thinks we ALL believe her while only the gullible do. The only reason “gun control” has ANY support, at all, is because of the LIES she, and other anti-gun fools tell the gullible, and which they believe. The bad thing is that there is no “intelligence test” required in order to vote. The votes of the intelligent AND the stupid are of equal value. (Time Magazine)

Gun-Free Zones

They just don't work. They're an “open invitation” to the damned fools who want to come in and shoot the place up. Panera Bread is such a place. They have declared all 1,800 of their locations to be “gun-free.” which didn't stop this guy from bringing his gun into one of their stores. And that didn't do much good for two cops who came there in response to a “suspicious person” report. He shot them both dead, between bites. He killed one in the store, and killed another when he was found hiding a short distance away, later. Two other deputies who came later shot HIM to death. I've said, many times, that “no gun zones” are a stupid idea. They do NOTHING to stop people from bringing guns in, and only get people killed. This story is a good illustration of that. Two cops are dead because of that “no-gun zone.” People who are bent on evil-doing don't bother to obey such restrictions. Only the law-abiding do, and they are not the problem. But politicians are too STUPID to realize that, and so, apparently, are the “top brass” at Panera Bread, a place I will never again enter. (Guns 'n' Freedom)

Out of Control

Anti-gun laws are “out of control.” An alligator was trying to bite off this man's leg, so he shot him. Natural, right? But NO! The local sheriff arrested him, using the “anti-poaching laws” where he lived. Now I ask you; what would YOU have done? Just let him chew your leg off? Or would you kill him in self defense, if you could? The anti-gun fools are “running wild” these days, and doing things that defy understanding. It seems like they are trying to destroy the very concept of self-defense. How else was this man to defend his own life and the lives of his livestock against a huge alligator who was apparently fearless, and wouldn't go away? It's like a case I heard about where a man killed a BEAR who was attacking him and who also got arrested. What was he to do? Let the bear maul him? Damn, there are a lot of STUPID people in this world, enforcing IGNORANT laws, including this sheriff! (Fox 13 News)

Releasing Gun Violators

If I didn't know Obama wanted to INCREASE crime generally, and gun crime specifically, so he can make even more restrictive gun laws that make our guns USELESS in the face of the MILLIONS of ILLEGAL guns held by criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists he is importing by the hundreds of thousands, I would wonder about his sanity in the things he does. He talks about “stemming gun crime,” but he releases 56 criminals CONVICTED of gun crimes, to prey on innocent people again. He imports hundreds of thousands of Islamic terrorists, disguised as “refugees.” People who have TOLD us they want to KILL all those who will not “bend to their will” and convert to Islam. People tell me I'm crazy for thinking we (not me) elected an ENEMY, who wants to DESTROY our country as it is, and make it into a “socialist paradise,” but if you accept the fact that he is a saboteur, his actions make perfect sense. But the people who could DO something about him refuse to see what's before their eyes. (Daily Caller)

"Guns Endanger, Not Protect"

This article, by an anti-gun “researcher,” says that a gun in the house is more likely to kill or wound a family member than an intruder. What the hell is he SMOKING? If I were a druggie, I'd want some. All the “stats” he cites are horse manure, as are the conclusions he reaches. He gives a list of things that “block” any “common sense solutions,” which is just a different tune added to the same old words. He says most unwarranted gun deaths or injuries are done by LICENSED individuals, which is a DIRECT LIE if you believe REPUTABLE figures, not the phony ones cited by anti-gun fools. The entire article is a collection of horse manure, as are most articles put out by anti-gun fools. Law-abiding people do NOT commit most gun crimes, as he claims. The “studies” he cites (but does not name) have a questionable methodology, which is why he only “refers” to them obliquely, without naming them. That way, we can't check their accuracy or methodology. That's an old anti-gun fool trick. (WBUR)

Mexico: Five Times Higher!

Mexico has very strict gun control laws (which affect drug cartels, NOT), but have a gun violence problem five times higher THAN in America. Why is that? Could it be because tight gun laws don't work? Or maybe the drug cartels kill enough people to make up that number, rater than other Mexican citizens? In any case, this proves that Mexico, like France and Belgium, who also have very tight gun laws, coupled with high gun violence stats, prove what I've been saying, all along, that the gun laws they make today not only don't work, they make honest people DEFENSELESS against the ILLEGAL guns held by criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists, and get people killed?. (Breitbart)

"It's Insane!"

Tom Arnold, the actor who rode his wife's skirts to an acting career, thinks it's a insane to think that owning a gun is a “God-given right.” What is this fool smoking? It's not GUNS that are a “god-given right,” it's SELF DEFENSE! And the right to own and use the means to that end, a gun, is a constitutionally-respected right. I'll bet this fool has an armed bodyguard who follows him around, as most anti-gun fools have. They think THEY have a right to self defense, but us “peasants” don't. It seems to be a malady that affects such people, and they think they have the right to DICTATE to us, what is right or wrong. I guess they love the POWER denying us the right to self defense gives them, especially when they run around with such defense, themselves. In any case, we need to ignore what these fools say, and tell them to get back to what they (may) do best, acting. They have neither the expertise, nor the RIGHT to tell us what we can do, and what is “insane. They are fools. (Breitbart)

Second Amendment Misunderstood

That's what the anti-gun fools want us to think. And, in a way, they're right. The Second Amendment does NOT give us the right to be armed in self defense. It merely RECOGNIZED the basic human right of self defense, and to own and use the means to that, a gun—or whatever else we need, to be on an equal basis to those who own and use ILLEGAL guns, or whatever. It recognizes that right, and pledges to defend and preserve it. It IS a “God-given right” (or for atheists, it is a “right of BIRTH.”) You were BORN with that right. Only would-be dictators want to take it away from you. Them and their “useful idiots.” And another thing the Founders realized, but which today's politicians ignore is the fact that if they become too oppressive, we must have the means for defense from our own government. Think want our homeland would be like today if the British were successful in taking the guns of the colonists! There would never have been a “revolutionary war,” and we would still be subject to the whims of the King of England. That IS a basic right, and politicians have been trying, since before the ink was dry on the Constitution, to take it away. If we ever allow it, we're LOST. (Eagle Gun Range)

"Ban Harpoons!"

That's what they'll probably be shouting in France soon, since some fool who wanted to hurt somebody in “gun-free France” had trouble getting a gun, so he used a harpoon to inflict injury. Wait a minute! I thought eliminating guns meant no more violence! And what started all this violence? A Muslim, of course! Some guy wanted to photograph a woman wearing one of those stupid and ugly “Birquinis” Muslim women are required to wear by Muslim “authorities” to avoid letting others see their “charms,” and somebody didn't like it. So he became violent, and some teenagers on the beach came to the photographer's defense, leading to one being stabbed with a HARPOON. NO guns were involved (surprise, surprise!) since guns are literally BANNED in France, so they picked up harpoons and hand axes. Now, THERE'S a surprise! I've said, with no effect, many times, that if guns aren't available, those wanting to commit violence WILL find a way. This proves it, again. It also illustrates the STUPIDITY of Muslims to insist on their women wearing these ugly suits. (The Mail)

"But You Can't See It!"

This “researcher” at the University of Alabama has a “credibility problem.” His “research” seems to show that concealed carriers and mass shootings are connected. Which is a FALSE finding. Legal gun carriers are NOT generally prone to mass shootings! But he says they are, and when asked to see his “research,” he said “no.” Seems to me that if his “research” was real, he'd be very transparent about it. But not this guy, which proves to me there is SOMETHING in there, perhaps his METHODOLOGY, that will disprove his findings, and he doesn't want that. So he will not let people SEE his research. If he thinks he will be believed if he doesn't, he's got another think coming. Sometimes the abject STUPIDITY of some of these anti-gun fools doing “research” amazes me. Florida State University professor Gary Kleck said, “This report is no more than junk science DISGUISED as research and should never have been published in a reputable scholarly journal.” this is an example of the kind of phony “research” the anti-gun fools rely on. (Bearing Arms)

They Need A Study for This?

I've been telling them the answer to this question for a long time, but nobody seems to be listening. Licensed gun owners are NOT the ones who use their guns to victimize others. They mostly only use them to DEFEND themselves against ILLEGAL gun owners who do! Maybe this study will convince them. But it's doubtful. Anti-gun fools have a HISTORY of ignoring data that does not agree with their preconceived notions, while telling us predictable LIES about “gun control.” They really think (or pretend they do) they can make a LAW that criminals will OBEY, when their very being is DISobeying the law. So why should they obey this one? They think putting up a sign saying, “No Guns Allowed” will keep criminals from bringing their guns. Actually, all it does is give an “engraved invitation” to criminals to bring their guns in to victimize people because they can be pretty sure most law-abiding people won't bring their guns there, so they can do as they wish with all the UNARMED people. (National Review)

Eliminating Suicide

Harvard says, if guns “went away,” There'd never be any more suicides.” How stupid ARE these people? It really disturbs me that such stupid people are charging big money to “educate our kids!” The same people think “climate change” is more of a problem than Islamic terrorism, taking a tip from Obama, who is just as stupid.. Have these idiots never heard about sleeping pills? Or knives, used to slice open their wrists? Or jumping in front of a train or a car? Or forcing a COP to shoot them? Like criminals, who will always find a weapon to use in victimizing people if there are no guns, so will people bent on “offing” themselves. Yet these stupid people pretend they are the smartest in the world—they're NOT. Not if they make such stupid statements like this, and moreover, BELIEVE it. (Harvard)

Hillary Hates the Rich

She is constantly talking about taxing the rich at higher and higher rates, and stealing more and more of the money they EARN to give it to those who don't earn it. She says they “stole” the money they get from their efforts. But she only knows about herself. Hillary is one of the richest people in the world, and she CONNED it out of people who are her constituents. So she thinks other rich people did, too. It's all she knows. But “the rich” already pay MOST of the income taxes paid. She can't deny that, truthfully. So she does lyingly. Meanwhile, IRS figures make a LIAR out of her—again. The whole idea that “the rich” got their money dishonestly is a scam, long used by liberal politicians to screw more and more money out of us. And it's no more true then the idea that all you have to do is make a LAW to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and other “bad guys.” Hillary, who SWEARS she and Bill were “not only broke, but in debt when they left the White House,” has amassed more than 100 Million dollars by making short speeches to the people who hope to gain by giving her money IF she becomes president. It's an OBVIOUS bribery scheme, but other politicians won't do anything about it, because they get their bribes the same way. (CNN Money)

Rape Whistle? Forget It!

Many pundits advise women to get a “rape whistle” on the theory that the noise made by that whistle will stop a rapist in his tracks—which it won't. All it will do is make him mad, and his rape will become more violent. It's just a theory, and will help many rapists rape more women. The NRA advises women to “get a gun.” That's NOT a “theory.” It's a FACT. Rapists who have been killed in a rape attempt don't rape many women later. And he doesn't have to “decide” not to rape her when he's dead. Women are the largest group getting “carry permits” today, and the number of guns now in the hands of law-abiding people has grown 215% under Obama. No wonder he's frustrated. Americans are used to having the constitutionally guaranteed RIGHT to be armed in self-defense, and they aren't going to give it up easily. And a gun will stop a rape attempt a lot better than a whistle, but only if the woman learns how to use it. (NRA Blog)

"Common Sense" Gun Laws

That's what the anti-gun fools always call the abortions they call “gun safety laws.” They refer to them as “common sense,” when they are anything BUT. “Universal background checks,” for example: where they are in force, just taking a gun and passing it around a room involves multiple “transfers” of the gun each time the gun passes from one hand to the other. Each "transfer" requires fees and a background check apply to each. Gun-free zones are supposed to make sure nobody brings guns into a place that is so designated. But like ILLEGAL gun owners who aren't affected by “universal background checks” because they get their guns illegally and don't bother with that folderol, criminals don't bother to observe the ”law” that tells them they can't bring their guns into a “gun-free zone.” In fact, they SEEK OUT gun-free zones, in which to “do their dirty work,” because they can be pretty sure there won't be a gun there to oppose them.

Concealed carry laws like the one in Illinois that allows a person to carry a concealed gun, but it must be UNLOADED are completely stupid. What the hell good does an UNLOADED gun do you? Trigger locks, “safe storage,” and such are designed to SLOW DOWN a lawful gun owner in getting their gun into action when attacked by an ILLEGAL gun owner, and serve only to get the LEGAL gun owner killed, since the illegal gun owner is not burdened by such things, since he doesn't bother to OBEY laws. All these laws ONLY apply to LEGAL gun owners who DO obey laws, even though they are NOT the problem. It is ILLEGAL gun owners who do NOT obey laws ,that are the [problem. None of this is “common sense,” but that's how they refer to them. My “Take” is, if you have to CALL your laws “common sense laws,” it's because they are NOT common sense. (Just real common sense)

Banning Ammunition

It's the new scam. In liberal Seattle, they gave a company a permit to import several thousand rounds of ammunition for their AR-15 rifles, and, after they were paid for and arrived, “confiscated” (stole) them (for their own use?) and designated them as “armor piercing” and thus ineligible to be imported for civilian sale. They can't just BAN guns, so they're working on excuses to ban all ammunition, making (only) legal guns USELESS. They're working all around banning guns, making them USELESS in the hands of law-abiding citizens, and/or impossible to get into action quick enough to successfully oppose the guns in the hands of criminals, who don't bother to obey such laws in using their ILLEGAL guns to victimize us. Their purpose is to make guns USELESS if they're legal, thus making us easy targets for illegally-armed criminals (including the ones wearing badges). This government is more afraid of HONEST gun owners than they are of criminals with guns. Probably because the politicians feel a “kinship” with the criminals. The guns held by government agents are “more legal” than ours. (790 KGMI)

FBI Incompetence

The anti-gun fools tell you that all we need is for everybody who wants to buy a gun to pass a background check, right? And the FBI will “check them out” and tell us which ones shouldn't be able to get a gun. Right? Then why did the FBI miss 9,063 people who “shouldn't have a gun” in just one year (2015) through incompetence? In S. Carolina, the FBI allowed the sale of a gun to a man accused of killing NINE people in a church! And many more people who should NEVER be allowed anywhere NEAR a gun were also allowed to buy guns. This is how well their laws work. Even the ones that MIGHT keep guns out of SOME hands, do not, due to sloppy work. Other laws simply work THE OPPOSITE of how they're intended to work. “Gun-free zones,” for instance, far from keeping guns out of certain areas, they are an open invitation to would-be shooters to come in and shoot the place up, since there most likely won't be any guns already there to oppose him. This is more evidence of the lack of foresight on the part of the anti-gun fools. (WLTX 19)

How Stupid Are wr?

Or better I should ask, “How stupid do the anti-gun fools think we are?” CNN recently introduced Mark Kelly, former astronaut and husband of Gabby Giffords, one of the most vocal ANTI-gun fools out there, who is right there with her” as she tries to take guns away from law-abiding people, as a “Gun owner and Second Amendment Supporter.” What FOOLS are they to think intelligent people would believe such OBVIOUS lies! Maybe fellow anti-gun fools are dumb enough to believe that crap, but intelligent people scoff when they hear it. Anti-gun fools constantly lie to us, because they don't have ANY truth on their side. But their lies are seldom so obvious and blatant. I guess they're in panic, since they have LOST most of their recent attempts to get more and more anti-gun laws passed. So much so that no less than Barack Obama has said he's “giving up” on getting any anti-gun legislation through Congress and will subsequently rely on “administrative” efforts. Meaning, of course, ILLEGAL efforts. (America's First Freedom)

It's Not Their Business

Brits are still trying to disarm Americans. Apparently, they never learn. The last time they tried that, they got a bloody revolution and lost the colonies. But they're still trying, even though it's none of their business today, as it wasn't then. On Aug. 10, Britain's “Independent” published a story on the Internet saying, “The Founding Fathers could not have foreseen the assault weapon.” Really? They didn't have to. The single-shot MUSKET was the “assault weapon” of their day, so they meant that. The same wording in the Constitution means the “assault weapon” of today, and their words about them are still operative. Yes, there are few reasons for individuals to have “assault weapons,” whatever that means. But what if a criminal or an Islamic terrorist comes at you with an “assault weapon?” All the serious criminals have them. If you don't have one to use in opposing them, you're dead. Apparently, anti-gun fools all over the world are still bent on DISARMING the American people. Making people DEFENSELESS against ILLEGALLY-armed “bad guys” seems to be their prime goal. (Breitbart)

Obvious Contradiction

“Jackson Browne and Rosanne Cash are among dozens of musicians who will take part in 'Concert Across America,' a series of 100 concerts to be held simultaneously in September to push for increased gun control measures and to urge attendees to vote for gun control-supporting politicians in November.” And all concerts are protected by ARMED security (of course). Apparently these people, like all the anti-gun politicians, take their own security seriously enough to pay big money to have armed thugs surround them in case somebody tries to hurt them. But, of course, they think us “peasants” shouldn't have the same right if we can't AFFORD to hire people to carry our guns FOR us. People like Obama, Hillary, and all the other anti-gun politicians, hire people to carry their guns for them while they attempt to make more and more laws to either BAN guns for us altogether, or make them useless in our hands if we are attacked by ILLEGALLY-armed criminals, crazies, or Islamic terrorists. They think we :peasants” don't need protecting, like they do. (Breitbart)

Twisting Things

Democrats have a habit of taking everything their opponents say in the worst possible way and “lose their minds” over it to avoid having to answer the non-softball questions some reporters ask them. When I say, “some reporters,” I mean those not under their “spell,” as are those from CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC, and like-minded reporters from liberal-oriented print publications, who are “all in” for Hillary. Reporters from Fox News, for instance, who tell BOTH SIDES of any issue, unlike the liberal media. That's what they're doing with Trump's bad joke about NRA people “doing something about” Hillary appointing liberal judges if she does manage to con her way into the White House, as Obama did. Naturally, they ASSUME he is talking about assassinating her, when he is NOT. Even if he was, the very EXISTENCE of the Second Amendment mentions defending ourselves AGAINST the government, if necessary. Maybe Democrats ought to talk about important things, like the astronomical unemployment numbers (the REAL ones, not the phony ones Obama puts out), the actual effect of the $15.00 an hour minimum wage, and other stupid things Democrats have pushed upon us, rather than pushing phony issues. (CBS New York)

The Most Law-Abiding People

This new report shows that concealed gun carriers are the most law-abiding people in the nation. Something that is indicated by the very fact that they HAVE a concealed carry permit, rather than buying a “back-alley gun” somewhere and not bothering to let the government know they have it, as criminals do. And are, according to the figures in the report by the Crime Prevention Research Center, even more law-abiding than the COPS. They found that the number of crimes (including gun crimes) committed by concealed carriers were less than a SIXTH of those committed by COPS! And the cops are supposed to protect us AGAINST crime. Those holding such permits, which can be removed sometimes for trivial offenses, makes them very nervous about how they USE their guns. Cops, not so much. Some cops are so blinded by the POWER they have as “protectors” of society they're much quicker to USE their guns in an illegal manner. (The Daily Signal)

Criminals, Watch Out!

Chances are much more possible for you to run into a citizen with a gun when you try to rob somebody. So be afraid....very afraid. If you try and hold up the wrong person, you could be dead—or at least, in prison. Because the number of “carry permits” that have been issued is at record levels, with more than 14.5 MILLION people now licensed to carry guns for self-defense. And the “wild west” atmosphere anti-gun fools predict just will not happen. Most of them will just go about their business like usual, and the gun won't make any difference at all. They won't resort to killing people for slight irritations, or something simple like a fender bender. Most people are just ordinary, responsible people and, when they get a gun, they don't “get crazy” and shoot people for looking at them wrong, as anti-gun fools keep thinking. Nothing could do more to put a stop to gun crime than this, as I've been saying, right along. (Shooting Illustrated)

Gun Control Equals Genocide

Don't believe it? Take a look at the “war” in Yugoslavia of a few years ago, where millions of citizens were told to “turn in their guns” to the UN, and they would be protected. They were NOT. When the army came in to kill citizens, the UN was asked to come to their defense. They did NOT. Their policies seem to have been to get things done without the danger of death or injury to UN personnel. So the citizens were left to die, without guns to use in defending themselves. And die, they did. Many who were refugees, tried to get help, and were massacred by the very people to whom they went for help. And the key to that genocide was “gun control.” The more guns that were taken from citizens, the more the “authorities” murdered and beheaded them. This is what you can expect from “gun control.” After “the war,” citizens were once again told to turn in their guns. Many did, and they died. But many more did not, and they will protect themselves if the “war” starts up, again. (Conservative Review)

It's Not A Database!

It's a “repository!” That's the latest scam being run by the anti-gun fools. They know it's illegal for the feds to create ANY new databases, so that's not what they call it. But if it functions like a database, and LOOKS like a database, it IS a database! No matter what they call it. When they get sued for violating the law, that will be their defense: “We didn't start a database, we started a repository.” You and I will know it's a database, and so will they. But they'll deny it to their dying day and they'll probably win in court, too, if they get liberal; judges, who will go right along with their subterfuge. That's a long used scam the government uses when something illegal they do is recognized by the electorate. They just change the name, and go right on breaking the law. Changing the name of their scam is commonly used, because it usually works. A large segment of the electorate “pays no attention to politics” until just before an election, when the lies are flying. So they don't know. So the politicians and bureaucrats get away with it. They're using that scam now so they can create databases of gun owners. (Just common sense)

An Open Invitation

The “no-gun rule” in effect at the Iowa State Fair is an “open, gilt-edged invitation” for anybody who wants to come there and shoot the place up, as is ANY “gun-free zone.” Aside from the Illinois law that allows “open carry” but requires the gun carried to be UNLOADED, this is about the stupidest thing they do. Creating “gun-free zones” where a potential mass shooter can be pretty sure there will be no guns there in the hands of possible victims. So he can go there and kill as many as he wants, and not fear opposition until the cops get there, AFTER he has killed a bunch of people, maybe including himself. They make a lot of STUPID laws, but the gun-free zone is right there at the top of the stupid list, with the Illinois “unloaded gun” rule at the very top. Then there are all the laws designed to slow down honest, law-abiding people in getting their guns in use when threatened by any one of the myriad ILLEGAL guns out there in the hands of criminals. (Des MoinesRegister)

Doc Asks About Guns

Obama's feds are now telling doctors to question patients about their gun ownership, and patients are not told that they don't need to answer. But they don't. So if your doctor asks you if you have any guns, tell him it's none of his business. And if he/she refuses to treat you without an answer, get a new doctor. “Rinse, and repeat.” It's not the business of the feds, either, although they think it is. There is a LAW against creating new databases by the federal government, which they are breaking every time they add a new name to their new databases. But they don't care. They violate laws with impunity on a regular basis. And they violate the Constitution even more often, because the Founders made a ”fatal mistake” in writing the Constitution. The only “punishment” they prescribed for violating it is that the unconstitutional law be reversed. No punishment for the politician violating it. So they do it, all the time. Example: Chicago, which has some of the toughest gun laws in the nation. Some so tough they HAVE been declared unconstitutional. But the politicians who made them are still making laws. After the previous laws are declared unconstitutional, they make NEW laws worded slightly different, and enforce them until somebody puts up enough money to bring it to the Supreme Court. Do they reverse what they did under that bad law? Never. And the politicians go right on making unconstitutional laws without punishment. (Daily Caller)

Not the "Mod Squad"

Years ago, thee was a triumvirate of lobbyists politically correct lobbyists called, “The MOD Squad.” They included lobbyists for the liquor and tobacco industries, and the NRA. These people conflated those three lobbyists together as promoting DEATH. Which, in the case of the National Rifle Association (NRA), was completely false. Yes, many people die from OVERUSE of both alcohol AND cigarettes. But NOBODY dies as a result of the NRA standing up and defending our constitutional RIGHT to own and use guns in self-defense. Short-sighted fools among the anti-gun crowd (are there any other kind?) think the NRA is supporting gun ownership by CRIMINALS, but that's not what they're doing, at all. They're supporting the right for honest Americans to DEFEND THEMSELVES against the criminals  who carry ILLEGAL guns, which their “laws” do NOTHING to stop. They ADMIT that their laws do nothing to stop terrorists from getting guns because they don't have criminal records here when they first arrive, and thus have no problem getting guns. So why should we not be able to have guns to defend against them? Add to that the fact that criminals often don't even TRY to legally buy a gun, and resort to the “back alley gun salesmen” who will sell them their guns without the bother of registering them or following any of their other USELESS gun laws. (Daily Caller)

The First Lie

The anti-gun fools are always telling us they don't want to take away our guns. While thare working HARD to take away our guns, and the right of self-defense that goes along with LEGAL gun ownership. Barack Obama is in the “front lines” of such people. Hillary is right behind him. Both have told us they don't want to take away our guns. Both have sponsored much legislation to do just that. That's the first lie they tell, There are many more lies they tell in support of their flawed opinion that the way to self-defense is to DISARM ourselves and hope the “bad guy” pointing an ILLEGALLY—owned gun at us won't shoot because he figures we aren't a threat. Which is a fantasy, because there's a reason he carries that illegal gun. So he can control the confrontation and get what he wants. And he will not hesitate to shoot, if we show ANY refusal to follow his orders. They know they can't just BAN guns, because of the Constitution, and the fact that we KNOW they can't. So most of the laws they make serve simply to slow down our ability to use a gun in self-defense, or to make the gun useless. The worst of those I've seen is the one in Illinois where you can get a concealed carry permit, but the gun you carry must be UNLOADED! How stupid is THAT? What the hell GOOD is an UNLOADED gun? The whole point here is to remind you not to believe a single word they say. They LIE, because they can't find anything truthful to say about their anti-gun operations. (America's First Freedom)

Boy, Are They Deluded!

The anti-gun fools think a majority of Americans agree with their anti-gun efforts. Nothing could be further from the truth, which is proved every day when they LOSE in trying to pass their anti-gun atrocities. Yet their small minds refuse to accept what's before their faces. If most Americans think the way to self defense is to DISARM ourselves, they wouldn't be writing and calling their lawmakers and telling them to REJECT those anti-gun measures that come before them. If they agreed that the “gun problem” was LAWFUL gun owners doing crimes with their lawful guns, they're sure demonstrating it in funny ways. The problem is with people who have ILLEGAL guns. People who don't obey gun laws, which makes gun laws USELESS in stemming gun crime. One of the most USELESS things that anti-gun fools have come up with is the “gun-free zone.” So far, every single mass shooting has happened IN a “gun-free zone.” Yet they persist in creating more and more of them. (Time Magazine)

Gun To Her Head

I don't like running stories about legally armed citizens killing “bad guys” in self defense because it's so cliche'ed. But this one is so delicious I'll run it, anyway. A woman stopped at a Ctircle K store in Glendale, Arizona, and immediately a thug (they didn't say whether he was black or white) stuck a gun in her face and demanded money. So she shot and killed him before he even knew he was in danger. That happens a lot, but this was so “delicious” I thought it would bear mention to “take a shot” at the anti-gun fools who say it never happens, showing it not only DOES, but is a complete surprise to the thugs, who think they have the only gun in the area. They need to suspect their intended victim might be armed, and that should keep them away. This woman is helping to reduce “gun crime” in the best way possible. By KILLING the ILLEGAL gun owners who try to victimize people. This guy represents one less gun-wielding thug preying on innocent people. The anti-gun fools will probably complain that she didn't have the right to kill him because she wasn't the judge and jury and he didn't get “due process.” He wasn't giving HER “due process” either, so that evens it out. Damned fools! (Bearing Arms)

Creating A Crime Wave

How do you create a crime wave? It isn't hard if you're the president. Just disarm as many honest, law-abiding citizens as you can, then release as many felons who were convicted of gun crimes in the past, to prey on them, while importing as many Islamic terrorists as you can to kill us. Then you can make even more stupid, useless “gun laws” that don't do ANYTHING to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and killers, using the crimes committed by those you released or imported as “examples” of “why those laws are needed.” That is whay Obama is doing what he does, everything he can to disarm honest citizens, then releases 105 criminals who have BEEN convicted of gun crimes in the past, to commit more in the future, as anybody with any intelligence at all knows they will do. Obama is not stupid. He knows this. That's his PLAN. Cause as much “gun crime” as he can, and work even harder to disarm us. When he finally gets rid of most LEGAL guns, he will then be able to “have his way with us” because we will have no means to oppose him, or his minions. (GunMart)

Where There Are No Guns

At least not in the hands of citizens—unless those citizens are cops, or other government agents, of course. In Great Britain, guns are mostly outlawed—except for the cops and government agents. Not only that, some cops are NOT armed. But England is learning a hard lesson: “When you're faced by an armed criminal, you need to be armed, too.” Or you're going to die. Thus, they're arming more and more cops in England so they'll quit losing them. This story is about a special detail specifically designed to combat terrorism (Islamic terrorism mostly, but they don't say so). Since the events in many places in Europe, including England, they have deployed masked, and heavily-armed, highly trained and militarized troops in response. Of course, if they allowed their citizens to be armed, they might not need so many of them. The “bad guys” never have any trouble getting their guns ILLEGALLY, so this is their answer. Don't think that politicians will EVER allow the average citizen to be armed. They're too stupid. (Daily Mail)

Mass Stabbing

Proving again what I say about bad guys who find themselves unable to get a gun, but who want to cause havoc, anyway, this guy just got a KNIFE and went out and started stabbing people in Russel Square, in London. He was quickly “taken down” and sent to the hospital, himself (he should have had to have been sent to the morgue) before ending up in jail. Anybody who tries a mass killing with ANYTHING should be killed on the spot, to make sure he will never, ever get out and be able to do it again. As I said before, “bad guys” WILL find a way to do their “dirty work,” even if they can't get a gun. And you can't BAN knives, because they are useful tools for too many things beyond killing people. But if I'm not mistaken, the politicians will try. In this country, don't be caught with a knife with a blade more than 3 inches long. Never mind you don't NEED a longer blade to kill people. (Daily Mail)

"Unconstitutionally Vague"

California’s law against “assault weapons” is so vague as to be unconstitutional and is made to prohibit ownership of “scary-looking guns.” I leaves it up to the individual arresting officer to DECIDE whether or not the gun they’re looking at is, or is not an “assault weapon” and is "scary enough." It is, like the laws covering sexual harassment, something the individual officer (or the woman) can DECIDE whether or not it is illegal. Sexual harassment is “in the eye of the beholder” and a man can be cited if the woman “feels harassed,” even if she has to twist his words and actions to BE sexual harassment. In the “test case” for the lawsuit filed by the Second Amendment Foundation and Calguns Foundation, the gun was nowhere NEAR what intelligent people would call an “assault weapon,” or scary enough, but the cop decided it was and the victim spent a week in jail on his “judgment call" and was released when “wiser heads prevailed” and charges were dropped. (Just common sense))

"Doesn't Work: Get More"

The exceedingly tight anti-gun laws in Chicago clearly don't work. Just in the last month they have had 65 murders and 362 shooting incidents. So their new “top cop” wants more of the same. This guy is an example of the kind of politician they usually put in charge of the “cop shop” in places run by liberals (Democrats). He hasn't got a CLUE about how to stop the “gun violence," but feels called upon to “do something.” So he goes out and does the same old things that didn't work before. And they won't work the next time they're tried, either. But the other liberals in power there don't know of any REAL way, either. So they go right along with it. The murders and other gun crime goes right along, unabated, even increasing. And soon we get yet ANOTHER politician, who suggests the same old things, again, while the other liberals go along with it, again until the next time. Then they all do it again. Meanwhile innocent people die because they're not allowed to defend themselves against the unregulated, ILLEGAL guns already there. He IS doing SOMETHING right. He's supporting a bill now in the Illinois legislature to keep second gun crime offenders in jail much longer. I think that should apply to ALL gun crime criminals. uUt it's a step in the right direction. (Chicago Tonight)

Huffington Post Is Stupid!

They have no idea what they're doing! To compare NRA with ISIS (or whatever other bunch of initials they're using today) is the heights of stupidity. How many children has NRA beheaded to make a point? How many crowds have they sent a member into to randomly kill as many people as they can? Or how many innocent people have they murdered because they don't believe in what they're preaching? No—they're just trying to protect our right to be armed in self defense, against all the gun-hating politicians who are stupid enough to think that DISARMING ourselves is the way to self defense? But then, Huffington Post is being run by liberals, who think ANYBODY who doesn't “toe their line” is a terrorist, or worse. And nobody with any intelligence is going to convince them otherwise. They're too damned stupid. (Huffington Post)

Germans Wising Up

Amid the importation of many Islamic terrorists, who go about raping, assaulting, and murdering people with abandon, German citizens are buying guns at a record clip, and applying for permits, also at a record clip. They know something that Angela Merkel doesn't know: that letting so many Islamic terrorists in under the GUISE of “refugees” is dangerous, and they want to have the means for self defense. In America, it's happening, too, albeit not yet in generally record numbers. Obama is as stupid as Merkel on that score. He won't even RECOGNIZE that we are AT WAR with Islamic terrorists. We're seeing more and more mass shootings every day in America, and he does everything he can to HIDE the fact that most of them are done by Islamic terrorists. Like describing that military officer who killed many at Ft. Hood as “workplace violence” even after Nidal gave every signal that he WAS a Muslim terrorist before, during, and after his shooting spree. If this government doesn't wake up soon to the fact that World War III is already upon us, we're going to end up living under Sharia Law in a few years, while covering up our women so nobody will see them and want them except the Muslim men who “marry” them for a night to avoid violating Muslim principles. (RT News)

There's No "Gun Problem"

The anti-gun fools like to refer to “the gun problem.” But there is no such thing. A gun can only lay where it was left by a human being. It can't kill anybody until a human being picks it up. Then, it can do good or evil. Usually good when it is in the hand of a police officer or other security person. Bad if it is picked up by a criminal, bent on robbing or killing somebody. So the problem out there is a “people problem.” A car, for instance, is just as big a killer as is a gun. In fact, cars kill as many, or MORE people than do guns. But nobody seriously considers banning them. Banning guns defies logic. But the anti-gun fools will never “tumble” to that. Laws need to be made to better control the CRIMINALS, crazies, and Islamic terrorists, who USE guns to victimize innocent people and guilty people, alike. Street gangs ALWAYS have many guns, when they fight over their “turf” or rob somebody, sometimes killing them. What would happen if there WERE no guns, as the anti-gun fools envision? They'd use knives. Or baseball bats. Or any one of many other deadly weapons available. We need to make more laws to control THEM, not the guns, which are innocent, inanimate objects, until USED by malevolent people. (The Daily Beast)

More Guns, Less Crime!

It's a common refrain amongst pro-gun people, and anti-gun fools ridicule it. But their biggest problem is, there is TRUTH in it, where there is NOT in their ideas. More guns in the hands of HONEST, law-abiding people who do NOT commit crimes, can cause LESS crime in several ways. Chief among them is killing armed criminals when they come to victimize them. A dead criminal doesn't shoot many people. Another way is to DETER armed criminals from USING their usually ILLEGALLY-obtained guns to victimize people. Criminals tend to stay away from people who have guns, and away from areas where more people HAVE guns. Mass shooters have ADMITTED that they SEEK OUT “gun-free zones” in which to do their “dirty work” because they KNOW there probably won't be any guns there in the hands of honest people. So the answer to “gun crime” is more guns in the hands of honest people to oppose the guns in the hands of DIShonest people. But don't tell the anti-gun fools that, Their minds are already made up. So don't confuse them with facts. Anybody who thinks they can magically eliminate guns from the world, or who thinks all they have to do is “make a law,” and lawbreakers will mysteriously OBEY it, deserve the name, FOOLS. (AmmoLand)