Strange Definition

Apparently this judge just didn’t know what a bullet was. It LOOKED like a bullet—albeit without a shell or powder and thus could not have been fired. It was accompanied by several “tubes” that COULD have been shells capable of being fired by an old muzzle-loader, most of which are LEGAL to own in DC. The prosecution came up with a list of muzzle-loaders that were NOT legal in DC, and the judge judged this man GUILTY, though he did not own ANY of those weapons. Sounds like a judge making his own definition of what is illegal and a definite STRETCH. But this is to be expected with Democrats appointing judges who think the same way THEY do. This has nothing to do with the LAW. It’s ONE MAN’S OPINION. That the man is a judge makes it something that will make another man suffer. (Bearing Arms)