Disarming the Military

Sen. Schumer (D-what else? NY where else?) wants to force gun makers to the military to make only “smart guns” and “child-proof guns.” Next, he'll want to install “trigger locks” on their guns so it takes them MINUTES to get their guns into action when attacked. Then he'll probably want to force the soldiers to carry them around in locked boxes, to FURTHER slow down their response time. Part of his plan is to use the government's “power of large purchases” to “steamroll” gun makers into following his “orders. He has already told at least one gun maker that if they “follow orders,” he will “bully” buyers into buying from them only. I'd tell Schumer to stick a gun up his flue and pull the trigger. Apparently, Schumer wants to use this to gain more “press.” Bob dole once said of him, “The most dangerous place to be is between him and a camera." (Daily Caller)

Trump "Carries"

Filthy rich Presidential candidate Donald Trump has told the media he “sometimes carries.” which, of course, made the heads of the liberal media members explode and get what brains they had left all over the place. The liberal media have an agenda to disarm all Americans. I don't know why. Maybe they just want to please the liberals, many of whom, I'm sure, carry their own guns because what they do is inherently dangerous. They'd be FOOLS not to. But then, they ARE fools, by definition. Most of them vote Democrat, don't they? I once heard a liberal “reporter” admit that just about everybody he knew in “the biz” DID carry. CBS's John Dickerson asked Trump why he carried. One of the usual stupid questions usually asked by liberal reporters. Trump gave a logical answer: “For protection.” I don't know what Dickerson's answer was, but you can bet it was stupid. Trump, like most presidential candidates, goes about surrounded by armed men. But he's not a hypocrite about it, as are most politicians (Democrats, mostly). He doesn't depend ENTIRELY on them. (Daily Caller)

America Is No "Shooting Gallery"

Liberals and the gun-grabbers like to tell you there is a, “avalanche of gun violence” today. That is one of their most pernicious lies. To prove it is a recent study by Pew research, hardly a “hotbed” of pro-gun sentiment. Their findings are a lot different from what the gun-grabbers (including Obama) want you to think. Gun deaths have GONE DOWN 30% since 1993. Several mass shootings recently have made it LOOK LIKE what they say is true, but what they say is STILL false, as usual. They have no real statistics to back up their wishes, so they HAVE to lie. Contrary to the spoutings of the “Black Lives Matter” crowd, police gun slayings of black men have REDUCED in recent years. Excluding suicides, there was a total REDUCTION in gun homicides from 1993 to 2011. This puts the LIE to what the”Black Lives Matter” crowd, as well as the “gun-grabbers” say. Their conclusion is that current “gun laws” are completely ineffective in stemming gun violence. (Town Hall)

The Wrong Target

The anti-gun crowd consistently go after the wrong target in their imaginary efforts to stop violent crime. Every time they hear about a murder they want to make more and more laws to DISARM honest Americans while DOING NOTHING to disarm criminals, who obey no laws. Now we find out that there are more murders committed by UNARMED people than by those using guns, by a big margin. So what should we do? Ban hands and feet? Make a FIST illegal? The Criminal Justice Information Center has found that 11,641 murders were committed in the United states in 2014, and 31 in the U. S. Territories, and only 8,124 were committed by use of a gun. Less than HALF! So their contention that “if guns were eliminated, the murder rate would go down” is patently false. Even if it were POSSIBLE to eliminate guns completely, that would not happen. As I've said many times, people who want to do murder WILL find a way. (The Right to Bear)

Ignoring Killing of Cops

Quentin Tarantino, who has made more money than anyone else using guns in his movies,. Called cops “murderers,” just days after a cop was murdered from ambush by an ILLEGALLY armed thug. This is a good example of the practice of “anti-gun fools” to ignore things that don't advance their agenda to outlaw self-defense for honest people, while criminals have no trouble getting their guns illegally. Tarantino says, “I'm on the side of the murderers,” referring, in his feeble mind, to the cops. But actually to all the black men who are being killed by OTHER \black men. That's something people like Tarantino refuse to acknowledge, though it is a basic truth. These protesters “have no shame,” I guess. They couldn't have postponed their rally until New York had finished mourning the recent killings of FOUR innocent cops by NON-innocent black men. (Town Hall)

Obama's Bovine Excrement

He spouts it every time he opens his mouth. And he has spouted it this time too, when he tells us we're “under a siege of crime,” when all the best gauges tell us crime is at the bottom of a years-long downward spiral, as more guns become owned by HONEST people, who ”kill off”” many ILLEGALLY-armed criminals with them, preventing those criminals from victimizing them. But Obama doesn't like that. He wants to DISARM those honest people. Leaving all those ILLEGAL guns in the hands of criminals, who use them to victimize us all. He wants to make laws whose usual result is the death of honest people, and DO NOTHING to “stop crime.” Soon, we will be inundated by thousands of Muslim “refugees,” many of whom will be the Islamic terrorists, who have come here under false colors, to kill as many Americans as they can, simply because those Americans do not follow their “religion.” This is a danger we have not had before, but to repulse this “invasion” will require us to obtain more and more guns, legally, if possible, illegally, if necessary. I know that's a terrible thing to say, but it is necessary for it to be said. Our very lives and freedom are at stake. (Bearing Arms)

They Found A Weakness!

The anti-gun fools have been long trying to find a way to keep us from being able to defend ourselves from criminals (including those who wear badges) from stealing everything we have. They know as long as the Second Amendment protects our right to have and use guns in our own defense, they will always be in danger as they come to steal our stuff, so they can't just BAN guns. Now they've found a way to make our guns useless. It's called, “ammunition control.” Now they're trying to make “laws” to keep us from buying ammunition, and without ammunition, our guns are just good “door stops” so they can loot us at will. It started in Californica, of course. That's where most liberal crime initiatives originate. They're now looking at controlling the sale and purchase of all ammunition. Californica Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom filed a 33-page gun initiative, as usual with a fanciful name to make it sound “reasonable,” the “Safety for All Act of 2015,” which, of course, is NOTHING of the kind. 32 PAGES about taxing and controlling sales of bullets!

I remember one of their earlier “gun laws,” way back when I was selling gun powder fired tear gas guns. It listed, as things to be covered, “any object that can be projected at a person so as to injure or harm him,” or some such. So broad, it could mean ANYTHING, including my fist. I don't know if it's still in effect, but I wouldn't doubt it if it were. Californica is really stupid when it comes to guns. This initiative would require going to a DOJ nameless, faceless bureaucrat, “hat in hand,” tugging your forelock, begging for a “permit:" to buy some bullets. Which, of course, would allow them to create a database of gun owners, assuming that people who buy ammunition own guns. It would also ban private purchases of ammunition from out-of-state suppliers, and blatantly establish a database of (assumed) gun owners who purchase ammunition. This is the kind of stupidity that comes out of the State of Californication. (Twitchy)

Austrians Getting Smart

They're definitely smarter than Americans! I'm talking about American POLITICIANS, not citizens. They can easily see the danger they're being put in by their government allowing in thousands of Muslim “refugees,” many of whom are simply Islamic terrorists who have come there to kill people. They're going out and buying guns with which to defend themselves. Unlike Americans, many of whom have docilely allowed their government to disarm them in the face of similar danger. Our politicians daily pass unconstitutional measures to DISARM us. Now they're even trying to stop us from buying BULLETS, which have no Second Amendment protection. Guns are useless without bullets. If our danger was just from the usual armed criminals who have no trouble getting their guns ILLEGALLY, that would be one thing. But with the expected influx of Islamic terrorists that Obama is not only ALLOWING in, but is actively using our tax money to FINANCE, makes it a lot worse. I'll tell you frankly, I'm going to get a gun (maybe more than one) and I'm not going to do it legally so the government can't come and take it away from me. You might say I'm opening myself up to charges by saying that, but if those liberal fools can publicly tell people to kill cops with impunity, I shouldn't have to worry. I'm only talking about MAYBE breaking the law, in the FUTURE. Until I DO it, there's no law to be broken, though they'll probably try to make one up. (Freedom Outpost)

More Rapes And Murders

I keep talking about liberal policies resulting in more crime, and this article proves I'm right. Their policies seem to ALWAYS result in more crime, more murders, more rapes, and more of every kind of crime. In New York City, while Mayor DeBlasio is “reforming the police,” the murder rate spiked 8.3%. The rapes went up 5.8%, and other kinds of crimes went up a whopping 18%! His treatment of the cops has shown graphically that he has NO RESPECT for them, and it's getting them killed. FOUR cops have been MURDERED by BLACK men recently, and he and his friends are STILL accusing the cops of being “murderers.” And the “rules of engagement” he has imposed have, themselves, HANDICAPPED the cops in dealing with the thugs, who have no such restrictions. DeBlasio has “reformed” them, right out of business. If I were a New York City cop, I would have long since quit. The mayor didn't bother to show up for the latest cop funeral, although he did send a note. With the proliferation of guns in the hands of honest people nationwide, crime rates have gone down significantly, everywhere but liberal enclaves like New York City, Chicago, Baltimore, and Detroit. If you don't believe the backlash against the cops is at least partially responsible for the increase in crime in the big city, and the emphasis on the cops “killing black men” is not the “problem they want you to believe it is, you need several head examinations. (Hot Air)

Mass Murder With Concealed Gun

Washington Post claims they have found 29 cases where a concealed weapon holder committed “mass murder.” But their definition of “mass murder” is “iffy,” at best. Even the FBI requires that FOUR people be killed to qualify for mass murder status. A majority of people on this list killed no more than THREE, and many who DID have a “concealed carry permit” were NOT concealing their weapon. In many cases, the gun used was a rifle, or they just BEAT people to death. Which makes their CC permit irrelevant. If even the FEW people on the list who DID qualify mean anything, it is that the laws now on the books, as well as the ones they insist on passing, DO NOTHING to prevent ANY kind of gun murders. So who needs 'em? What I'm saying is that NONE of their current laws would stop ANY gun violence, so why do they insist on continuing to make the same useless laws, over and over, when they don't work? I'd be first in line to support a law that WORKED, but nobody has figured out how to make one, yet. The guy who wrote the article in the Washington Post is a KNOWN “anti-gun activist” and has been found to be lying on many occasions. In this case, he used “data” from the violently anti-gun Violence Policy Center as the basis for his lying article. (Bearing Arms)

Hillary Criticized NRA

And their membership, as well as their “favorably rating”among Americans, INCREASED—again. That's something liberals never take into account. And it's also reflected in the fact that Obama is known as the best gun salesman in the country.” The more he rants and raves about “the gun problem,” and the more he makes laws and regulations, the higher the guns sales soar. People who think he's ultimately going to ban guns altogether (which is illegal), the more guns they buy, and they hide many of them away so he can't send his thugs later to steal them. So when Hillary did her rant against the NRA, it caused nothing but good things to happen for them, something liberals hate with a passion. So much so, that some of them think all gun owners (except cops and government agents, of course) should all be shot. Really. Gun-haters think the resolution to their problems would be to use a gun to SHOOT pro-gun people. Their lack of logic is inescapable. (The Extract)

Their Favorite Lie

Gun-grabbers, like other liberals, like to tell you that, “This is settled science.” The fact that there is no such thing as “settled science” means nothing to them. They once thought the Earth was FLAT. That was “settled science” at the time. In their ignorance. Today, they say “global warming” is “settled science,” although it ISN'T. Now they say that the NRA is DOOMED. They say it is “too rural and too radical to continue.” They say that members will soon become “wiser” and reject the idea that self defense is a priority and will “embrace” taking away our gun rights (my words to describe their foolishness, not theirs). They say that's “settled science,” their usual scam. But that ignores the fact that the NRA continues to grow apace, gaining new members by the millions. That the NRA defeats their silly laws on a regular basis, and they never BECOME laws. The fact is that “gun-grabbing” legislation fails more than it ever succeeds. It's a fact that self defense it important to most INTELLIGENT people. Something they, in their IGNORANCE, can't understand as they go about attempting to make it impossible. (Ricochet)

Chicago Again

Chicago is a great showcase—for US, Every week, it seems, they kill people in large numbers, using illegally-obtained guns, in spite of the tight “gun laws” in Rahm Emanuel's town. Emmanuel says, “I'm angry.” He doesn't say who he's angry at, but it should be himself. We keep telling them their laws don't work, and they keep ignoring us, while hundreds, even thousands of people get killed due to their incompetence and ignorance. One of these days, maybe—they'll “wise up.” But I doubt it. Like most liberals, they think their ideas are superior, and won't hear any disagreement with them. Actually, I'm getting very tired of reporting about all the people that have been killed, due to the ignorance and incompetence of the liberals who have conned their way into positions of authority. What scares me is that maybe one day I will become a victim of this stupidity and incompetence. I'm getting a “little up there,” and guys like me are looked on as “easy targets” by thugs all over. I don't get out much any more, but I DO get out, some—and I see some of the thugs I talk about. I'm just hoping one of them doesn't decide to choose me. If they do, it'll be the biggest mistake they ever made. But that's beside the point. (The Right to Bear)

Anti-Gun Fallacies

The whole “anti-gun” movement is built on several fallacies, the first of them is the illusion that making LAWS against gun ownership will stop criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists from getting guns. They'll just do what they always do—buy them illegally, or just steal them. Another fallacy is the idea that if guns are removed from the legal world, there will be a lot fewer guns sold. That's true, but only for LEGAL guns. The traffic in ILLEGAL guns will not only continue apace, it will INCREASE, since there will be no other way to get them. They always forget the ILLEGAL arms trade in their fanciful thinking. This is no doubt due to their complete INCOMPETENCE in their jobs. The kind of laws they are making today will NEVER stop, or even slow down, gun violence. But you'll never convince them of that. They're convinced of their own adequacy. Their minds are made up, so don't confuse them with facts. I really get tired of repeating this over and over, but that's the only way to get to those smart enough to realize the truth of what I say. (Grudco)

Thug Culture Problem

We don't have a “legal gun proliferation problem.” We have a “thug culture problem,” and we're letting the thugs “take over” with their “Black Lives Matter” horse manure being given serious consideration, even by the Democrat Party, which plans to hold a fund-raising meeting under their auspices. We just can't convince those incompetent bozos in Congress (and other legislative bodies) of that.  And I'm talking about bozos in BOTH parties. Those who STILL believe that a LAW will stop evil-doers from getting their guns illegally. Those fools don't GET their guns legally, so NO AMOUNT of laws will curb their gun-ownership, OR the violence that comes from it. A good example of that is the guy in New Mexico who shot at a car over a “lane disagreement” and managed to kill a four-year-old girl. Nobody knows whether or not he owned his gun legally, because the liberal media “somehow” neglected to mention it. But it really doesn't matter does it? He was a THUG, in either case, and a law would not have made piffle of difference. The guy who killed a cop in New York the other day was a KNOWN thug, a “career criminal,” and you can BET his gun was illegally owned. And of course, the thugs are putting out the word that USE of the word, “thug” is racist, in an effort to stop us from using the word, altogether which, if successful, will cause a cessation of criticism of thugs, black and white, if we can't even USE the word, “thug.”. (Bearing Arms)

Ask the Criminals

Where they get their guns. They may not tell you EXACTLY which back-alley gun seller” they go to, to keep him out of jail. But they'll willingly tell you that they rarely, if ever, buy them legally. They always go to somebody who sells them out of the trunk of his car in a back alley somewhere. Mostly because most of them are felons and can't buy them legally, but also because they don't want the guns to be traceable to them after they use them to commit a crime. The “understory” here is that, NO AMOUNT of “gun laws” will prevent them from getting their guns. The “gun-grabbers” realize this unless they're completely ignorant or stupid. But it doesn't stop them from insisting on passing more and more USELESS gun laws every time a criminal or a crazy goes on a shooting rampage with a legal, OR illegal gun. They KNOW this new law won't do a damned things to stop gun violence, but that's not their goal. Their goal is to reduce the chances of Americans having guns they can use against THEM when they send their thugs (with badges) to steal what's ours in the future. They don't worry about the guns in the hands of criminals, because they are “kindred souls” who are doing their own stealing. (America's First Freedom)

They Have the Right Idea

In response top the wave of Palestinian (Islamic terrorist) personal violence against individual Israelis, the government in Israel is “relaxing” the requirements to get a “carry permit.” Would that our politicians be as intelligent. But not a chance. They don't care about how many people get killed by the ILLEGAL guns in the hands of criminals and crazies—and soon in the hands of all the Islamic terrorists Obama is importing by the thousands. Our politicians are only interested in disarming the HONEST people who OBEY their useless laws. It would be smart to elect politicians who REALIZE that we need more guns in the hands of honest, reliable people to counter the millions of guns in the hands of fools, But it ain't agonna happen as long as people who pay NO attention to politics keep voting in those idiots who think a LAW is going to stop the fools who don't OBEY laws from getting their guns. I got it! Declare Israel a “gun-free zone!” That'd do it! Er.... (Town Hall)

Open Season on Cops

What do you do if you're a cop who stops a young driver (white or black) for a bona-fide violation and he (or she) refuses to cooperate, deciding to attack you and get your gun? If it evolves into a life-threatening situation, as it did with that giant kid in Ferguson, MO, who is trying his best to kill you? What do you do? Let him/her kill you “because it's just a kid (who happens to be big as a house?)” You can get killed by a kid as easily as by an old, grizzled man. You're just as dead. He doesn't have a gun, you say? That Brown kid didn't have a gun, but he still could have killed the cop. Trevon Martin was “just a kid,” too. And while he was banging George Zimmernan's head against the concrete sidewalk, beating his brains out (he was a martial arts pro), he got shot. (Yeah, I know, Zimmerman was not a cop, but Martin WAS “just a kid” who could have killed him. I know there are other cases like these—many of them.

We don't know all the intimate details of them. Cops are out there with “targets on their backs” and, if they overdo it, there are ways to deal with that without killing them from ambush. That will only make things worse. They'll become “super conscious” of the danger and WILL “shoot first and ask questions later,” which will make it a “self-fulfilling prophecy.” And even more people will die, black AND white. Yes, don't stand by and let such things happen. But DO wait a bit until ALL the facts are in before you “go off the deep end” on an individual case, unlike the “authorities” in Baltimore when they indicted six cops in the death of Freddy Gray, who killed HIMSELF while trying to incriminate cops by banging his head against the wall, soon after his back surgery. The point is, going out and killing cops is the wrong answer, and one proffered by the criminals, themselves, to “get the cops off their backs.” Don't buy into it. (Town Hall)

"Never Touch A Gun"

They really want to brainwash our kids, don't they? Now they're sending cops into schools to con those young, impressionable students into making a pledge “never to touch a gun.” (with the collaboration of the schools, of course) What that's going to mean to those kids who grow up to. become cops and other kinds of law enforcement agents, including federal agents, I don't know. This is the same kind of thing that the old Soviet Union did. They had regular programs running to brainwash kids, as young as possible, knowing they didn't have the “fund of knowledge” to know they were being fed a bunch of horse manure, and knowing they would then be easier to con later. You people who are too young to know what the Soviet Union was, and why we should NOT attempt to emulate them, PLEASE do some research—if you can find it, since the current fools are working feverishly to eradicate it. (Tuscaloosa News)

Gun Sales Up, Crime Down

I know the anti-gun fools don't want you to know that, and they routinely deny it. But the facts are that the more LEGAL guns there are out there, the less crime there is. Why, I'm not sure. Maybe it's because legal gun owners have killed so many crooks that they can no longer commit crimes, I don't know. Maybe it's because the very thought of their intended victims being armed and able to kill them when they try and rob them scares the hell out of them. Those are both very good reasons. But the FBI report, “Crime in the United States,” has been released for 2014 and the crime rates went down, while the number of LEGAL gun sales increased. The same was true of the 2013 report. The anti-gun fools not only ignore these statistics, they DENY them. They constantly talk about the “epidemic of gun violence” that doesn't exist. (National Shooting Sports Foundation)