The Sky IS Falling!

Because the voters in this country (a majority of whom seem to be ignorant MOOCHERS who want only to live at the expense of others, and elect FOOLS who will “keep the goodies coming” while our economy collapses from incompetent governing. And really ignorant people do things like “gun buyback programs” for not only REAL guns (which allows criminals to sell their broken guns to others and use the money to buy guns that WORK on the black market), but also for TOY GUNS, which is about as STUPID as I can think of. Soon this country’s government is going to collapse from incompetent governing and we will sink into COLLECTIVISM, which is a STUPID system that has been DISCREDITED in practice, everywhere it has been tried. Most notably lately in Russia, where its socialist “Soviet Union collapsed because there was no longer any INCENTIVE to produce anything, and everybody was just TAKING without producing. (Just common sense)

"Second American Revolution"

 That’s what the Milwaukee County sheriff says will happen if the “gun grabbers” have their way – and I agree with him. If Obama’s “gun grabbers” succeed in their efforts to disarm legally the HONEST, responsible people in America, those people should STILL “arm themselves,” however they can do it, legal or illegal so that, when Obama’s thugs come to steal their property they have recourse. I see a revolution coming, and I welcome it. If I were younger, I’d be one of the LEADERS. The gun laws as currently constituted (and how they will be constituted in the future under Obama and his “gang of thieves”) violate the Constitution’s Second Amendment in every way. But there’s no punishment for politicians who violate the Constitution, even though each one of them took an oath to DEFEND it. They could be impeached for violating it, but that takes people with “intestinal fortitude” to institute the action, which we do not have. (InfoWars)

What FOOLS They Be! (Again)

I think I’ve used that title before. But this story illustrates it better than anything else out there so far. I thought there was no limit at how STUPID liberals could be, and I was right. NOW A St. Louis pastor is sponsoring a “gun buyback program” . . .for children’s TOY GUNS! That’s right. You read it right—TOY GUNS! How STUPID is that? Buyback programs for real guns are stupid, but this takes the cake. This is an obvious attempt to BRAINWASH children against guns. It has no other purpose. Why do I automatically name them as liberals? Because only a liberal would be this stupid. As usual, they blame the gun, not the gunner. The true solution to gun violence is more guns in the hands of honest, reliable people. Then criminals would more often run into an ARMED person when they tried to victimize people. They would either change their way of living, or be dead and no longer a problem. Current gun laws do nothing but assure a criminal his intended victim will probably not be armed, and will be a defenseless victim. But don’t try and tell a liberal politician that, they’ll laugh at you and continue making their stupid laws to disarm the victims. I ran around "shooting" toy guns when I was a child, and I've never shot anybody with a real gun. Playing with toy guns does not pervert minds. The only perverted minds here are in the heads of people like this ignorant pastor. (The Blaze)

They Just Make It Up

If politicians (mostly Democrats and other liberals) can’t come up with real statistics to prove their point, they just make them up. Democrat Rep. (soon to be retired, thank Goodness) Charlie Rangel recently claimed that “MILLIONS of kids have been killed by automatic weapons.” That is such a STUPIDLY wild figure that even other DEMOCRATS don’t believe it, But Charlie “stands by it” even though he couldn’t prove it in a MILLION years. He blames the NRA, politics, and money for the failure of the new “assault rifle ban” bill. Personally, I “blame” the resurgence (somewhat) of common sense in Congress. Charlie repeats again the fantasy that the Second Amendment was written for hunters. It was NOT. It was written so that the people would be armed for the most part and not COMPLETELY defenseless when “government agents” (thugs) come after their property.

The facts are these: most murders are NOT committed by people with “assault weapons.” They are committed with HANDGUNS and knives. Guns criminals, who do not obey laws will get, whatever the law says. As politicians (mostly Democrats “flail around” doing their best (which isn’t very good) to disarm us all, criminals are improving the market in illegal weapons. Just as Al Capone did NOT want the repeal of the alcohol ban (it would ruin his business), criminals want weapons to continue to be banned for most honest people so they won’t meet a gun when they attempt to victimize people. (The Blaze)

Learning A Lesson

This guy learned a hard lesson in a few seconds when he tried to shoot a cop in the back while he was questioning a suspect. Of course, the lesson won’t help him much because he died learning it. He tried to kill three cops from behind with the usual illegally-gotten gun. He shot them but didn’t do them much damage because of his lack of skill with that gun. The cops were better and, though one was slightly wounded, their shots were right on target and he was killed. Which reinforces my opinion that most criminals, even if armed, aren’t very good with their guns. This situation also proves that it’s not a good idea to shoot at cops. I remember, many years ago, another guy made the same mistake while standing next to my car. He ended up dead with his hand leaning on my car. Fortunately, I was at home a few doors away. The cops had chased him for three miles before he crashed his car and aimed his gun at them. (The Blaze)

Why Are Politicians So Stupid?

I don’t know. Maybe it’s something in the air that only affects politicians. Unfortunately, it affects people like Michael Moore, too. People who want to make money on the STUPIDITY of certain people. It makes them think CRIMINALS, who break laws for a LIVING, would OBEY a law that says they can’t be armed. It causes those politicians to make laws that only disarm responsible and HONEST people and provide an unending stream of defenseless, UNARMED people for them to victimize. Their laws only apply to HONEST people, not to CRIMINALS, who don’t OBEY laws. They need to pass laws that give criminals stiffer sentences for USING a gun in the commission of a crime; laws that PREVENT cops from using those charges as “throwaways” to obtain a conviction in other crimes. They should be ADDED to the violent crime statutes in such a way that they CANNOT be discarded to obtain a conviction in other crimes. But if you suggest this to our INCOMPETENT politicians, they’ll laugh at you and continue on their INCOMPETENT ways, making laws to DISARM the populace. (Coloradoan)

Why Are Politicians So Stupid?

I don’t know. Maybe it’s something in the air that only affects politicians. Unfortunately, it affects people like Michael Moore, too. People who want to make money on the STUPIDITY of certain people. It makes them think CRIMINALS, who break laws for a LIVING, would OBEY a law that says they can’t be armed. It causes those politicians to make laws that only disarm responsible and HONEST people and provide an unending stream of defenseless, UNARMED people for them to victimize. Their laws only apply to HONEST people, not to CRIMINALS, who don’t OBEY laws. They need to pass laws that give criminals stiffer sentences for USING a gun in the commission of a crime; laws that PREVENT cops from using those charges as “throwaways” to obtain a conviction in other crimes. They should be ADDED to the violent crime statutes in such a way that they CANNOT be discarded to obtain a conviction in other crimes. But if you suggest this to our INCOMPETENT politicians, they’ll laugh at you and continue on their INCOMPETENT ways, making laws to DISARM the populace. (Coloradoan)

"One Bullet At A Time"

An 81-year-old man was confronted by an armed robber (or at least a man who wanted him to THINK he had a gun) who told him, “I want everything you’ve got.” So the old man gave him a couple of bullets, one at a time. A neighbor thought the robber was dead and called 911. they “saved” him and sent him to the hospital, where he is now recovering. I hope this man has learned his lesson, that he should not assume his intended victim is unarmed. If he comes after this man for shooting him, he might not survive the next time ha is shot. This again proves my thesis that an armed man, even an 81-year-old man, can stop a crime if he is armed. The news item doesn’t say if this man is LEGALLY armed, but being in Florida, I’d guess he was. In  any case, according to the cops, no charges have been filed against this man for defending himself, at least for now. (The Blaze)

Gaily (Daily) Making Useless Laws

That’s what Colorado lawmakers are doing. They recently considered SEVEN anti-gun laws (most of which failed), none of which will do ANYTHING to stop, or even slow down gun violence because criminals do not OBEY laws, taking advantage of recent mass shootings that creates an atmosphere favoring SOME KIND of “gun control. I’m sure legislators in other states, as well as Congress, are doing the same. The problem is, they don’t give a damn about criminals having guns. They want HONEST people not to have guns so criminals won’t fear DEATH at the hands of their intended victims. They want NO GUNS in the hands of honest citizens so that those criminals (some wearing BADGES) won’t meet DEATH when they come to take those honest people’s property. They KNOW their laws won’t do ANYTHING to stop CRIMINALS from getting guns because criminals don’t GET their guns legally. Nor do they OBEY laws. But disarming honest citizens will make those people DEFENSELESS against ALL criminals. (Just common sense)

The Gun Scam

What the politicians are doing right now is simply part of the scam to disarm the citizens of the United States so they cannot defend themselves when criminals (some wearing badges) come after their property. Those politicians don’t care about getting guns out of the hands of criminals, NOR stopping violent crimes. They just want to DISARM as many HONEST people as they can. They KNOW their laws so nothing to disarm criminals, who will get their guns in any case. Frankly, I don’t think there is a SINGLE criminal whose gun is legally owned. Nor do I think criminals REGISTER their gun ownership. But that’s what politicians concentrate on: taking guns away from RESPONSIBLE people. They KNOW increasing the penalty for USING a gun in a crime DOES work, but they ignore it and even use the CURRENT laws that do that as “throwaway charges” to obtain convictions for other crimes. There should be a law PREVENTING deals that cancel convictions for gun use. That targets GUN USE instead of DISARMING their victims. (Just common sense)

I'm Gonna say It Again

Again and again until it sinks into the feeble minds of all those FOOLS who blame the GUN when some ignorant FOOL takes a gun and kills a bunch of innocent people they find in bunches. We need more people in those groups with “carry permits.” People these “shooters” don’t know are there, who can shoot them before they can kill more than one or two people. Getting rid of guns isn’t going to solve the problem. Guns EXIST. You can’t “uninvent” them. “Bad guys” will ALWAYS be able to get their guns while people who OBEY laws won’t. If Frank DeAngelis, principal at Columbine High School, had had a gun when he “looked around a corner and watched one of the shooters killing people” he could have “put a couple in the head of the shooter” and ended at least that one shooter’s “kill score,” then go after, and kill the other. As it was, all he could do was “hide and watch” as the shooter murdered students and teachers. One of these days we MIGHT find a COMPETENT politician who will realize this and put a stop to “no gun zones,” which are “open invitations” to shooters who want to spray bullets into crowds of people. (Just common sense)

Liberals Say: "More Guards At Schools"

The Fox News best-known liberal, Alan Colmes, the one who was “bounced from the Hannity and Colmes show and is now only a “radio host,”  says the answer to school shootings is “more guards.” What KIND of guards? ARMED guards in uniform, so a potential shooter can locate them first and kill them before killing other innocent people? So they can become their FIRST targets? What they NEED is more teachers, principals, janitors, and the like with “carry permits” who can “put a couple in” a potential shooter before he can kill more unarmed innocent people. Like happened at that church in Colorado Springs, Colorado when a crazed killer came in without knowing she was there. They CALL her a “security guard,” but she wasn’t. She was a parishioner who happened to be legally armed, and who they ASKED to “act” as a security guard. But the thing that allowed her to stop this shooter is that he didn’t know there was anybody there who was armed. And that was the “secret.” (Just common sense)

Guns SAVE Lives!

 Don’t tell liberals, but guns SAVE lives. Oh, hell. Go ahead and tell them. They won’t believe you, anyway. They believe too much in THEIR truth. They still think guns kill people on their own, without the intervention of those eeeevil humans. They still think a CRIMINAL, who does not OBEY laws, will OBEY a law that says they cannot be armed. They still believe a CRAZY, who wants to shoot up a school or a shopping center will be deterred by the though of breaking a law from his plans to break MANY laws. What FOOLS they be! And no amount of logic will change their minds as they go about making more and more laws that keep guns out of the hands of RESPONSIBLE and law-abiding people, but which do NOTHING to keep guns out of the hands of CRIMINALS. This illogic is lost on them. (Gun Owners of America)

"Gun-Free Zones"

Except for those carried by criminals and crazies wanting to shoot everybody in sight, that is. People who obey laws obey gun laws. Criminals don’t. Recently, such a fool murdered 19 CHILDREN, some as young as 5. the day before another killed at least two people in another shopping center. The news media went “wall-to-wall with it. In Denver, at least one radio station spent the entire DAY into the night talking about it. I’m sure this happened all over the country, maybe even the world. And they should, because somebody killing a bunch of CHILDREN is a real tragedy. What did these two shootings gave in common? They were both “gun-free zones.” But what about that shooting last year in a GUN SHOP where the guy shot a clerk and was instantly made into “Swiss cheese” by the rest of the clerks and customers, including the one he shot? It was a news item for a few hours and then “sank like a stone.” Except for the Indianapolis media, nobody was interested in the story. Why? Because the victim was armed and able to defend himself. Even the “anti-gun crazies” shut up about it because this kind of story, where the victim was armed just didn’t fit their narrative. I’ve always noticed that such shootings ususally didn’t happen at gun shows or anywhere else where everybody was armed, and for a good reason. In “gun-free zones” like schools and the like, they might as well put up a sign saying, “No guns here. We’re defenseless. Come on in and shoot us.”

Yes, such shootings are bad. But trying to eliminate guns to stop them is illogical and STUPID. The GUN didn’t kill these people. The man HOLDING the gun did. If he couldn’t get a gun (doubtful) he’d find something else to use in killing innocent people. Anybody who BELIEVES that a CRIMINAL, who violates the law for a LIVING, will OBEY a law saying he can’t be armed is STUPID. And that includes all those stupid politicians who think so, including our illustrious President Obama. I’m getting very tired of repeating this and having it fall on deaf ears while more and more people DIE because of this rampant STUPIDITY. I’m still waiting for our incompetent politicians to WAKE UP and realize that the ONLY WAY to eliminate such atrocities is to allow as many GOOD people as possible to be armed, including in those ubiquitous “gun-free zones” for self defense so the crazies and criminals won’t be FREE to kill innocent people. It is a PROVEN FACT that where there are MORE GUNS in the hands of innocent people, violent crime goes DOWN. In Florida, where getting a carry permit is easy, the violent crime rate has PREDICTABLY gone DOWN wile the deaths and injuries to armed CRIMINALS has gone UP. There cannot be more OBVIOUS evidence this is true. But our anti-gun politicians are blissfully IGNORANT of this fact. They’re PURPOSELY ignorant of facts that do not advance their narrative. (Mail.com)

Too Far the Other Way

Incompetent politicians in Nelson, Georgia, instead of simply making it easier to get a “carry permit,” want to FORCE residents to BUY a gun. That’s how incompetent politicians with delusions of grandeur ALL seem to think: got a problem? FORCE somebody to do something, even if it’s the right thing. Thinking of the RIGHT WAY to limit gun violence, such as punishing USE of guns in crimes with no ability to “drop those gun charges” to obtain the criminal’s cooperation in convicting him in other crimes just seems to be something they cannot even THINK about. When are we going to start electing COMPETENT people to office? The new Nelson, GA ordinance specifies NO penalty, which makes it useless. And all you have to do to be allowed to ignore it is to object. They say they’re “just making a point.” What point does a stupid, AND useless ordinance make?(Mail.com)

"Changed the Gun Control Debate"

Mark Kelly, Gabby Gifford’s husband, in testifying before Congress, says the shooting in Sandy Hook, Connecticut, where 20 children and 6 educators were killed, “changed the gun control debate.” In what way, Mark? Did it “change it” in such a way that the only measures liberals are taking about violate our Constitutional right to “keep and bear arms?” Or maybe to recognize that DISARMING the responsible, HONEST people is NOT the way to go? That recognize that CRIMINALS and crazies don't OBEY gun laws? Maybe to make laws that punish the CRIMINALS by making it a more severe sentence to use a gun in a crime (to keep armed criminals in prison longer) rather than make it harder for people like him and his wife to get guns with which to defend themselves against the ILLEGAL guns criminals and crazies never seem to have any trouble getting, no matter how many ignorant laws are passed by ignorant politicians supported by ignorant people? How about laws making it a more severe crime to SELL guns to people who only have criminal intent, and for people to BUY them to commit crimes? When are people like this (and the people who MAKE such laws) going to WAKE UP? When are they going to start APPROACHING “gun control” from the RIGHT (not necessarily "right wing") direction? He says the NRA needs to "wake up." actually, it's people like HIM who need to "wake up." (Huffington Post)

A "Turning Point" in Gun Control

Damn, I hope not! That would be STUPID. That’s what they are now saying of the mass shooting in Portland, Oregon. Like a LAW will stop people like this shooter from STEALING the gun he used to murder at least two people at that mall. As I predicted, they want to ban all “assault weapons,” using this as an opportunity to advance their agenda, and without knowing just what an “assault weapon” is. They seem to forget that people who want to do such things WILL get a gun if they have to buy it illegally or STEAL it. The “toothpaste is out of the tube.” Guns exist, and you’re not going to be able to UN-invent them. If they exist, people WILL be able to get one. Ban them and people will make their own. And if they can’t, they’ll use something else such as a sword, as did yet another (Unsuccessful) would-be mass murderer recently. (Just common sense)

Blame the Gun, Not the Man

 That seems to be the thing to do these days. When something happens, ANYTHING, involving a gun, people blame the GUN, not the man holding it. What they refuse to acknowledge is that a gun cannot hurt ANYBODY if there isn’t a PERSON holding it and pulling the trigger. I get so tired of hearing about situations like this, where a black thug argued his way into an open door to a CLOSED convenience store and attempted to INTIMIDATE the clerk. He got in his face, not an inch away. Then without warning he punched the clerk in the face while his buddies pulled their guns. The clerk, frightened for his life, pulled out his own gun and shot the thug, leaving him in critical condition. This should be the end of it, except for the jailing of the thugs involved. The cops, after watching the security tape, declared it a “self defense” action.

The thug’s father, however, wasn’t so charitable. Notwithstanding the fact that his boy was the aggressor, along with his armed friends, he (and others in the neighborhood) are demanding the clerk be charged and sent to prison for defending himself from several armed and obstreperous opponents. I guess he thinks his son was in the right in his unprovoked attack on this clerk, backed up by his armed friends. The clerk (so far) will NOT be charged, but he has lost his job and probably will have to move away to avoid retribution by other thugs in the neighborhood. The clerk is white while the thug is black, which makes it worse. I’m on the clerk’s side (black or white), which will cause people to call me a racist, no doubt. But I think the racism is on the black side for thinking ANYBODY who shoots a black man should be punished, even if he WAS the victim. Frankly, I’d have punched the thug as soon as he got in my face so closely. (Last Resistance)

HAMAS Kills Baby

Then blames it on us. And this is so typical of Islamic terrorists, it doesn’t even need to be said. But the United Nations has proven it (maybe they’re good for something, after all). The liberal American media dutifully reported it the way they were told to, even though the report was wrong. They called it “Israeli aggression,” even though it was “Palestinian aggression gone wrong.” HAMAS is well known to hide rockets in private homes where children live (from which they fire them into Israel private homes), as well as close to schools, according to the UN. It’s obvious they have no regard for human life. They use their own people as “human shields.” They fire THOUSANDS of rockets from these private homes, and if Israel responds, they put out announcements that Israel has fired on innocents, completely IGNORING their own firing of rockets (from within private homes) into Israeli private homes. This time, they were caught. But only a small number of media outlets have carried this story after telling the world that the ISRAELIS are “firing into private homes.” They think we’ll keep buying this BS forever. That shows their IGNORANCE. (The Blaze)

Infected By Stupid

Colorado Governor Hickenlooper has always struck me as an intelligent man. Especially when, after the Aurora theater killings, he “famously” said. “No amount of anti-gun laws would have prevented that shooting.” When I heard that, I actually thought he was not the usual brand of incompetent politician and that he maybe realized what I’ve been preaching for years, that CRIMINALS, who don’t obey laws, will NOT obey a law that says he can’t be armed. But then stupid intervened, and he began acting like your usual ignorant politician, blaming the gun and signaling that he will sign some of the stupidest, and most difficult to enforce gun legislation that ever came down the pike. I have now lost all confidence in this typical Democrat, who, up to now gave a good imitation of an intelligent man. Her doesn’t even realize it, but this action will probably send him back to making beer while the Republicans will take over in currently Democrat-controlled Colorado. (Mail.com)

Criminal Learns Lesson

The lesson is, not everybody is an ”easy target” for a home invasion. But the lesson is lost on this criminal; he’s dead. But it is a lesson other criminals can learn from; don’t break into this guy’s home and start beating him up. He’ll KILL you. This is a lesson that needs to be learned by more criminals, hopefully for them, without them being killed. This criminal broke into a man’s home in Hickory, NC, and started beating the owner, one Paul Ohla, who had a gun and shot him. Ohla is a “senior citizen” and was slightly injured. But the  attacker is dead. More proof my contention that more guns in the hands of “goods guys” will either convince criminals to go into another line of work, or make them dead. The criminal’s family will probably say Ohla should have “warned” the criminal that he had a gun and would shoot him, which says it was HIS fault, not that of the criminal. Some things never change. (The Blaze)

Another Crime Stopped

A son used his father’s gun to stop a home invasion in Texas, where criminals ought to know better. Three men pushed their way into this home and started pushing people around, starting with this boy's mother.  Meanwhile, the son was in the bedroom, getting his dad’s gun, with which he shot and killed one of the intruders while the others “lit out for the tall timber.” The cops found them soon after and they are now in jail, feeling lucky to be alive. They found out what ALL criminals need to learn, that not every one of their intended victims will be unarmed, and thus defenseless. I’d wager the two who survived will go into another line of work after they get out of the slam in a few years. The lesson here is, “Don’t mess with Texans, most of whom are armed.” This father laments the loss of a young life, but I don’t. This “young life” was lost the minute he decided to go into a life of crime and it would have happened sooner or later.(KHOU TV)

What's WRONG With These Politicians?

Our illustrious politicians ALL seem to be under the DELUSION that the way to self defense is to DISARM us. That notion is not only IGNORANT, it is DELUSIONAL. Yet these INCOMPETENT politicians “cling to their gun bans” and other laws that make it impossible for honest people to defend themselves against CRIMINALS, whether or not they wear badges. It’s not that they aren’t aware that gun laws as they make them DON’T WORK. They do know. They just don’t CARE. They just keep making these laws that are IMPOSSIBLE to enforce upon CRIMINALS, who don’t OBEY laws. Do they really BELIEVE their laws will stop “gun violence?” No; they’re not STUPID, just IGNORANT and their laws DO work to enforce THEIR will upon us, since law-abiding Americans DO abide by the law, even if they think it is WRONG. Meanwhile, our incompetent politicians go about, merrily making more and more laws to prevent law-abiding citizens from defending themselves. They say, “let the cops defend you.” But we all know the cops can NOT defend us. They can only “take names” after the crime has been committed. We need to GET RID OF those incompetent politicians who are AFRAID of “armed citizens” and elect some who have some common sense. (Just common sense)

Citizens 4, Robbers 0

Four would-be robbers in Detroit were shot down by two legally-armed citizens who decided, some time ago, not to “bow down” to robbers. One of the robbers was killed. Those robbers left alive will, when released from prison, no doubt go into a different business than armed crime. This proves my theory that more armed citizens will seriously reduce the amount of armed violence created by criminals. Sometimes by convincing them of the “folly” of their ways, and other times by simply KILLING them. In any case, violent crime WILL be reduced. By allowing Americans to DEFEND themselves, not by DISARMING honest people and giving criminals an unending supply of UNARMED victims. (The Blaze)

Another Criminal Killed

This is another case that will not be covered very much in the national liberal media. Because it does not promote their agenda to make you think that NOBODY ever used a privately-owned, legal gun in self defense. The LOCAL media will cover it, at least once, but the national media will not. Gun haters want you to think that if you have a gun, YOU’RE more likely to be hurt than anyone else. NOT SO. If you’re properly trained, the people who need to be afraid of your gun are the CRIMINALS who try to victimize you. This man was “protecting his property” in a state (Texas) which allows it. Some states would charge this man with murder for shooting a criminal that wasn’t “threatening his life” at the tine he shoots. Which is STUPID. They can go in an instant from threatening your PROPERTY to threatening your LIFE in an instant. (KENS5)

Gun-Hating Paper Has Armed Protection

Remember the Journal News, the newspaper in New York state that published the names and addresses of those who held gun permits in their area? They’ve gotten so much backlash they have hired ARMED SECURITY. One wonders if the staff of the Journal have applied for their own licenses to carry guns in response to the supposed “danger” they fear from all those scary “armed people.” Or are they going to just HIRE people to carry the guns FOR them, as do anti-gun politicians. Or if they do, are they going to publish their OWN names and addresses? The Journal is following the “time-honored” method of all gun-haters; they hate them until they need to use them themselves. Then, since most of them are rich, or well-to-do, they HIRE people to carry their guns FOR them or, like one of the best-known gun haters, Senator Diane Feinstein, carry their own guns. These people are such hypocrites they make me want to barf. But they’re apparently not smart enough to recognize that. (ABC News)

All They Can Think Of Is "The Guns"

Every time somebody commits a mass shooting, all our INCOMPETENT “leaders” can think of is “BAN GUNS.” They’re all about “getting rid of guns.” They don’t even THINK about the SHOOTERS. Some people “give lip service” to improving mental health. But what they really want to do is BAN GUNS. That’s ALL they’re interested in. People like Wayne LaPierre (perennial VP of NRA) says there should be an armed cop in every school, but even a NON-uniformed one costs a lot of money because that will be all he/she does. Simply ALLOWING one or more STAFF to be armed and TRAINED costs a lot less and would work well. But they ridicule that, saying that staff member would be a “source of danger.” When are these incompetent people going to WAKE UP and get rid of the “no-gun zones” that are an OPEN INVITATION to people who want to come in and shoot up the schools? (Just common sense)

"Mother Jones" Lied

They did an article that concluded that “civilians with guns have never stopped a mass shooting.” WRONG!  The only reason there are very few instances of this is that they are not ALLOWED to be armed, so CAN’T stop mass shootings. But I know of a few instances where armed civilians HAVE stopped mass shootings. One of those was in Colorado Springs, Colorado, where a guy who had already shot up one church, attempted to do it again and ran into a parishioner who had her own gun and shot him. He then killed himself after only killing two other people in that church. They CLAIM she was a “security guard” hired by the church, but that’s a LIE. She was a parishioner who was armed, and they ASKED her to FUNCTION as a security guard while there. That’s a whole lot different. She was armed, and the shooter didn’t know it. That proves my theory. (Weekly Standard)

NRA: "More Guns for Good guys"

As predicted, the National rifle Association (NRA) recommends “more guns in the hands of good guys” to protect our children from the “guns in the hands of bad guys.” He asked if you would have guns in the hands of good guys ten minutes away (as with calling the cops) or a gun in the hands of a good guy standing beside the bad guy? The cops are always at LEAST ten minutes away and this “bad guy” can kill a lot of people in just a few minutes. The shooter in Newtown, CT killed all 26 CHILDREN in 3-1/2 minutes. Had there been a “good guy with a gun” there, that number could have been a lot less as that “good guy” put a couple in his head” as soon as he started shooting. The “anti-gun freaks” have always ridiculed this idea, but it is the ONLY idea that can be successful in dealing with these indiscriminate shooters.

An armed civilian is NOT as crazy as are these shooters just because they aren’t cops. This is the solution I have recommended all along. But nobody (in charge) is smart enough to take me up on it. Wayne LaPerre, perennial vice president of NRA, recommends armed police officers in every school—which is pretty much what they have now. But these officers are usually IN UNIFORM, which makes it easy for potential shooters to “take them out” FIRST, from ambush. I say they should be in civilian clothes, and people not suspected of being armed so a potential shooter cannot “single him out” and eliminate him before “doing his dirty deed.” Schools should NEVER be “gun-free zones.” That is an OPEN INVITATION to people who want to shoot them up. (Huffington Post)

School Shooting In California

In a state where the gun laws are the tightest, a student at Taft high School in Kern County, California managed to get a gun and came into the school shooting, hitting at least two people. If this doesn’t prove my contention that tight gun laws don’t stop such things, I don’t know what will. But the anti-gun freaks will ignore it, and deny it if we bring it up. The shooting ended when the shooter shot himself. The REPORT is he used an “assault weapon,” but I doubt it, since they don’t even know how to DEFINE what an “assault weapon” even IS. Some people say we need to get rid of all guns, but not only will that never happen, if we were somehow able to get rid of all guns criminals and people determined to go into crowds and shoot people WILL still be able to get guns. I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but there’s something very suspicious about the increase in shootings in SCHOOLS lately. I think somebody is PROMOTING people to DO these shootings to “whip up” support for tighter gun laws—and the anti-gun freaks are cooperating nicely. (International Business Times)

"Gun Free Zones" Cause Deaths

People who wish to go into crowds and shoot people indiscriminately rarely go into gun stores or gun shows, or even police stations to kill people. That shows at lease SOME intelligence on their part. That’s because they KNOW there will be no guns there that they don’t know about so they’re free to kill as many people as they can without somebody shooting THEM. One man made the mistake of trying it IN a gun store and was made into “Swiss cheese” by everybody in the store who was armed. Another went into a church to kill people and found ONE GUN there in the hands of a small woman he didn’t know about, who ENDED his shooting spree after only two deaths. That’s what it’s going to take to put a stop to these shooting sprees: people shooters don’t realize are there who have guns to oppose them. If these people knew there was a great possibility there would be someone there to shoot THEM before they could kill very many people, maybe they’ll think again about doing it. But anti-gun laws will NEVER stop such shootings because people like that will ALWAYS be able to get a gun or guns, one way or another, REGARDLESS of the law. Criminals don’t OBEY laws that say they can’t be armed. (Just common sense)

Bank of America Freezes Gun Mfg. Account

They told them, “You shouldn’t be selling guns and parts on the Internet.” Who the HELL do they think they ARE? They don’t get to decide what’s right and wrong and freeze people’s accounts because of it. This is just as bad as STEALING their money because they don't like them. This gun manufacturer needs to quickly SUE this bank, get their money back, and move the money to another bank that isn’t run by FOOLS. And when they do, they’d better hope they don’t get a liberal judge who rules on his OPINION, not on the Constitution, as he is SUPPOSED to do. One of the shortcomings in our system is allowing a JUDGE, by himself, to REVERSE things that were passed LAWFULLY, just because he doesn’t agree with it. There should be a review process to GUARANTEE the judge does NOT rule according to his OPINION, not the Constitution. The law should “go after” this bank for VIOLATING the law by their action. (Patriot Action Network)

I'm Gonna Say It Again

And again and again until it sinks into the feeble minds of all those FOOLS who blame the GUN when some ignorant FOOL takes a gun and kills a bunch of innocent people they find in bunches. We need more people in those groups with “carry permits.” People these “shooters” don’t know are there, who can shoot them before they can kill more than one or two people. Getting rid of guns isn’t going to solve the problem. Guns EXIST. You can’t “uninvent” them. “Bad guys” will ALWAYS be able to get their guns while people who OBEY laws won’t. If Frank DeAngelis, principal at Columbine High School, had had a gun when he “looked around a corner and watched one of the shooters killing people” he could have “put a couple in the head of the shooter” and ended at least that one shooter’s “kill score,” then go after, and kill the other. As it was, all he could do was “hide and watch” as the shooter murdered students and teachers. One of these days we MIGHT find a COMPETENT politician who will realize this and put a stop to “no gun zones,” which are “open invitations” to shooters who want to spray bullets into crowds of people. (Just common sense)

Chinese Media Demands U. S. Gun Control

What the hell business is it of theirs? Who do they think they ARE? They want us to violate one of our most basic precepts, the right to be armed for self-defense. There is no Second Amendment in China. No First Amendment, either. Anything in their press is “approved” by their government, so that’s their government attempting to tell US what to do. They don’t have that right, and should just SHUT UP! When the human rights of their citizens begin to be respected, maybe we MIGHT listen to them. Until then, they can just STAY OUT OF OUR BUSINESS! Even if banning guns would work (which it won’t), it’s not their business to tell us how to run OUR country. (English News.cn)

Our Moron Government

We’re being governed by MORONS. Obama’s “big thing” is taxing “the rich” at a higher rate than anyone else. These are the people who CREATE JOBS and make the economy grow. And “Obama the stupid” wants to punish them for that because when they do it they tend to make a lot of money for themselves as well as the rest of the country. Such thinking is simply JEALOUSY by people who haven’t been able to make as much as they do, therefore they want to PUNISH them for doing it. Taxing the rich at higher rates doesn’t even make the government a lot of money, What Obama proposes will, if he does it, allow him to run the government for 12 DAYS. So it doesn’t even solve most of his financial problems, which are OVERSPENDING. He spends money like it was water and expects others to pay the bills he (and his wife) builds up. Taxing the rich at a higher rate is an old communist tactic, and has never worked anywhere they tried it.

France, which is now run by an open socialist, are doing the same thing, and that is GOING TO ruin their economy, just as Obama’s socialist policies are ruining ours. How do we get such incompetent, stupid people running things? They appeal to the MOOCHERS of society; the people who want a “free ride” at the expense of others. And they VOTE. So they can continue to vote such stupid fools as Obama into office so he can STEAL from the very people who keep the economy going while claiming they “don’t pay their fair share” while they ARE. The “rich” pay their fair share and a LOT more. The top 25% earners in this country pay 86% of income taxes paid! How much more does it take for you to realize they pay MORE than “their fair share? We need to get rid of the FOOLS running our government, as soon as possible or we will go down along with the European socialist governments that are going down like dominoes. How many more times must I write this before SOMEBODY listens and does something about it? (Just common sense)

"Gun-Free Zones"

Except for those carried by criminals and crazies wanting to shoot everybody in sight, that is. People who obey laws obey gun laws. Criminals don’t. The other day, such a fool murdered 20 CHILDREN, some as young as 5. the day before another killed at least two people in another shopping center shooting. The news media went “wall-to-wall with it. In Denver, at least one radio station spent the entire DAY into the night talking about it. I’m sure this happened all over the country, maybe even the world. And they should, because somebody killing a bunch of CHILDREN is a real tragedy. What did these two shootings gave in common? They were both “gun-free zones.” But what about that shooting last year in a GUN SHOP where the guy shot a clerk and was instantly made into “Swiss cheese” by the rest of the clerks, including the one he shot? It was a news item for a few hours and then “sank like a stone.” Except for the Indianapolis media, nobody was interested in the story. Why? Because the victim was armed and able to defend himself. Even the “anti-gun crazies” shut up about it because this kind of story, where the victim was armed, just didn’t fit their narrative. I’ve always noticed that such shootings didn’t happen at gun shows or anywhere else where everybody was armed, and for a good reason. In “gun-free zones” like schools and the like, they might as well put up a sign saying, “No guns here. We’re defenseless. Come on in and shoot us.”

Yes, such shootings are bad. But trying to eliminate guns to stop them is illogical and STUPID. The GUN didn’t kill these people. The man HOLDING the gun did. If he couldn’t get a gun (doubtful) he’d find something else to use in killing innocent people. Anybody who BELIEVES that a CRIMINAL, who violates the law for a LIVING, will OBEY a law saying he can’t be armed is STUPID. And that includes all those stupid politicians who think so, including our illustrious president . I’m getting very tired of repeating this and having it fall on deaf ears while more and more people DIE because of this rampant STUPIDITY. I’m still waiting for our incompetent politicians to WAKE UP and realize that the ONLY WAY to eliminate such atrocities is to allow as many GOOD people as possible to be armed, including in those ubiquitous “gun-free zones” for self defense so the crazies and criminals won’t be FREE to kill innocent people. It is a PROVEN FACT that where there are MORE GUNS in the hands of innocent people, violent crime goes DOWN. In Florida, where getting a carry permit is easy, the violent crime rate has PREDICTABLY gone DOWN wile the deaths and injuries to armed CRIMINALS has gone UP. In Israel, where EVERYBODY is armed (even school teachers) there ARE no mass shootings. There cannot be more OBVIOUS evidence this is true. But our anti-gun politicians are blissfully IGNORANT of this fact. They’re PURPOSELY ignorant of facts that do not advance their narrative. (Mail.com)

Learning From Israel on Gun Control

Yes, they have gun control in Israel, but theirs is more logical and workable. Thus, guns are EVERYWHERE in Israel. That’s because gun permits are EASY to get there and their requirements are both reasonable and logical. One of my favorite news items featured an Israeli woman standing astride a Muslim terrorist pumping bullets into his head. SCHOOLTEACHERS are armed in Israel because teaching school is considered a dangerous profession. Consequentially, mass shootings in “gun-free zones” are almost non-existent because there ARE none. Whenever anybody tries a mass shooting he winds up looking like a piece of “Swiss cheese” because there are so many guns there. But do Israelis go about shooting one another with abandon? No. But if you take a gun to an Israeli, you’re going to die. (The College Conservative)

Some People Should Die

Others don’t even deserve to have ever LIVED. One such is the man who murdered his own SISTER (after murdering his own grandmother and spending time in prison for it), then set his own house on fire to lure UNPAID firemen (who only do good, and don’t even get paid for it) to his home so he could kill them. The only reason he only killed TWO of these “good Samaritans” is that an off-duty policeman showed up and stopped him, making him commit suicide. The liberal media didn’t report that, because it doesn’t fit into their anti-gun narrative. Others are Islamic terrorists, who only LIVE to KILL people who don’t believe exactly as they do; another is the shooter who murdered 20 innocent CHILDREN who has never done him any harm, and all the other shooters who lately have PROVEN to me that we need to not only have the RIGHT to keep a gun and carry it without restriction for our own protection, it needs to happen, NOW. The “anti-gun fanatics” decry that, saying, “Why should we allow everybody to be armed? That would just create a 'wild West atmosphere' where more people will be killed.” Not so! And a stupid statement, at best, because it’s a proven fact that where “gun laws” are the tightest, the easier guns are to get illegally.

Anybody who WANTS a gun, for good or evil, can get one easily, NOW. And it’s much better for responsible people to be armed, so as to defend themselves and make illegally armed criminals DEAD. Robert Heinlein said, “An armed society is a polite society” and the “wild west” proved it. Bad guys who misused their guns were soon DEAD, making gun misuse a disappearing problem. Yes, there would eventually be some gun killings—in self-defense more than for any other reason. And that’s a GOOD thing, for it quickly thins the ranks of ILLEGALLY-armed criminals. Some people are only still alive because it is ILLEGAL to kill them. Some of those people are the liberal media who consistently MIS-report, or do not at all report stories that would tend to prove their anti-gun rhetoric false. But even if I DID have a gun “legally,” I wouldn’t kill such people because it is ILLEGAL to kill them and I am a responsible human being. The kind of person they don’t understand. They think if people were allowed to carry their own guns, that people would be shooting each other with wild abandon, all over the place. And they’re WRONG. Responsible people don’t do that and they don't understand that.

These people are FOOLS and shouldn’t be allowed to be in a position to REPORT the news. But we have a First Amendment, which is just as important as the Second, which they’re trying their best to eliminate. Frankly, if they EVER get rid of the Second Amendment, they should do likewise with the First, at the same time, because the First made it POSSIBLE to get rid of the Second. When you talk about getting rid of the First, they whine about it, all the while trying to get rid of the Second. The fact is, the Second Amendment is there ONLY so we can defend ourselves from IRRESPONSIBLE people who do not OBEY any laws, let alone ones that say they can’t be armed while they commit their crimes. It’s not there for hunters, though it DOES protect them, as well. The “toothpaste is out of the tube.” Guns EXIST. They cannot be “uninvented.” So we have to DEAL with them logically. Making laws against them is NOT logical. It not only does not work, it causes more people to be KILLED by those unscrupulous criminals who will ALWAYS be able to get them ILLEGALLY. (Just common sense)

Beating It to Death

I know the mass shooting in Connecticut is a major tragedy, having ended so many lives, particularly of those small children who can’t have done ANYTHING to have hurt the shooter. But, as with the Columbine shooting and all the others, the news media “beats it to death” until we are TIRED of hearing about every belch uttered by ANYBODY that has ANY connection to the shootings. Three days after the Connecticut shooting (as this is written), I STILL can’t avoid more and more stories about really tiny things connected with it on every station I turn to. It’s disgusting. It’s as if there isn’t any other news in the world. Some of those shooters do it for the notoriety involved, and the fact that the media "beats it to death" makes them very happy. It's now Christmas day and there have been several more mass shootings since, including the one in New York, where a guy set a house on fire to draw firemen, then opened fire on them, killing two, before he killed himself and most likely his own sister, as well. I don't know who he is, and I don't care. On that somber note, I want to wish everybody a MERRY CHRISTMAS! None of that "Happy Holidays" crap here. Any celebration of the birthday of Jesus Christ ought to carry His name, whether you believe or not. This will be the only post today, as I celebrate Christmas with my family. (Just common sense)

Criticized For Common Sense

Perennial NRA VP Wayne LaPierre spoke common sense and has been vilified for it by the ignorant people who think the way to self defense is to DISARM themselves and hope the illegally armed criminals will leave them alone, a forlorn hope. In his press conference the other day he said what amounts to one thing: “The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to oppose him with a good guy with a gun.” There is NO other way. When such a shooter starts shooting, what do they do? Call for somebody with a gun to oppose him. Unfortunately that doesn’t work, because the nearest good guy with a gun is usually at LEAST ten minutes away while an armed and trained EMPLOYEE of that school or shopping center is RIGHT THERE; a lot closer than the nearest cop. Such shooters can kill a lot of people in the first couple of minutes while the cop drives to the scene. That supposed NRA member who cut up his NRA membership card on television is STUPID. He has no other answer to this problem, but he condemns the answer the NRA gave him out of IGNORANCE.

Nobody else has a viable answer, but THEY criticize LaPierre for providing the ONLY viable answer there is: at least ONE PERSON at every school, unknown to the shooter, with a gun, trained and ready to oppose would-be mass shooters. Such people can’t offer their own solution, and criticize LaPierre’s solution out of IGNORANCE. Yes, a UNIFORMED cop at every school would stand out, and become the FIRST TARGET of a would-be shooter. But a teacher or other staff member people are used to seeing around, but who don’t know are armed, CAN stop a would-be shooter by killing him before he can shoot a lot of people. John Lott, author of “More Guns, Less Crime,” has PROVEN that more guns in the hands of responsible people who are trained in its use, can, and DOES reduce crime, wherever it has been tried. On the other hand, it has been PROVEN beyond doubt that “gun-free zones” are an OPEN INVITATION to people who want to come in and murder masses of people. The only answer our government offers is MORE GUN CONTROL and that doesn’t work. The literal definition of INSANITY is to do the same thing over and over, expecting a different result. That’s all they can offer, yet the world seems to accept it. (The Philly Post)

Anti-Gun Lies

Some time ago, the liberal magazine “Mother Jones” did a “study” that showed that in not one case had a multi-victim killing been stopped by an armed citizen. Only one problem: that’s a lie, told by simply ELIMINATING all shootings that were stopped by a gun in the hands of a citizen. Not reported in ANY news source is the fact that in Portland, there was a man there who had not noticed the signs saying that mall was a “gun-free zone” and carried his licensed gun into the mall. Everyone wonders why this shooter committed suicide after killing only a few people while firing a lot of shots. What nobody reported is that while reloading, he saw this man taking aim at him and committed suicide. In Colorado Springs, Colorado, a shooter coming into a church to do a mass killing was shot by a lone armed woman the church CLAIMS was a “security guard,” but who was in actuality simply a parishioner who happened to be armed and was asked by the church to “act as a security guard” while there. Other cases are: The Mayan Palace Theater in San Antonio, TX where an off-duty cop shot the shooter, preventing any civilian deaths; A Winnemucca, NV restaurant shooting where a licensed gun owner killed the would-be mass killer before more than two were killed;

The Appalachian School of Law, where two armed students stopped a would-be mass killer and captured him before he could kill more than a few people; In Santee, CA, a “trained campus supervisor (an off-duty cop bringing his daughter to school) “threw down” on the shooter, holding him for the cops after he was only able to kill two fellow students; At Pearl High School in Mississippi, the principal armed himself from his car when a student started killing his fellow students and held him for the cops after only two deaths; In Edinboro, PA, a student starts shooting up a restaurant gathering of students, and is stopped by a shotgun-wielding restaurant owner. By contrast, shootings at other places where NO GUNS are allowed report many deaths. In another case, a man tried to shoot up a GUN STORE and was made into “Swiss cheese” by the store employees and their customers. This sounds like “Mother Jones” is LYING to support the “anti-gun” agenda. Other anti-gun freaks likewise LIE when they release the “results” of THEIR phony “studies.” The lesson to be learned here is that these people don’t hesitate to LIE to  support their agenda, so never believe ANYTHING they tell you. (Ann Coulter)

"Mall Shooting!" "Ban Guns!"

That’ll be the cry; mark my words. The anti-gun fanatics ALWAYS “blame the guns” whenever some crazy goes out and shoots some innocent people. But the gun didn’t go crazy, a PERSON did, then picked up the gun. The gun didn’t do anything but what it was DESIGNED to do. We’ll either find out the gun was legally bought by a guy who “had no priors,” or ILLEGALLY by either somebody too young to own a gun, who is already a criminal or a known crazy. They won’t admit that gun laws can DO NOTHING to stop people who are DETERMINED to kill people from doing it. If they can’t get one legally, they’ll go out and buy one ILLEGALLY in a back alley somewhere, out of another criminal’s car trunk I really get tired of making this argument and being ignored, while honest people (including me) are kept from owning and carrying the means to their own self defense while criminals go about carrying their illegal guns hunting us. I’m still waiting for a politician, ANY politician, to answer the question, “What makes you think a CRIMINAL, who breaks laws for a LIVING, will OBEY a law that says he can’t be armed?” (Huffington Post)

What Was Different in the Forties?

In the forties [when I went to school –RT] there just WERE no school shootings like the Sandy Hook school shooting that claimed the lives of 20 small children and six adults. There were NO such shootings then, and it was not unusual for children to actually bring guns to school with them. Those kids often used those guns to provide food for the table.  Then they made a law against it and opened the floodgates. Writer Dave Kopel wrote about that very thing. “Kopel says that for most of America’s history ‘it was not uncommon for students to bring guns to school.’ He cites a column in which John Lane reminisces about his youth in the 1940s and 1950s, and says that he ‘attempted to find a school shooting from that era,’ but ‘came up empty.’ On the following page Kopel goes further, passing on the claim that ‘before the 1990 [Gun-Free School Zone Act], there had been only seven shootings at an American school in the previous 214 years,’ and that ‘in the 17 years following the GFSZA, there were 78 such incidents.’ ’’ Something’s wrong here. without such laws, there were NO such shootings, and after that law was passed there were 78, compared with only SEVEN in the previous 214 years! The difference is such shooters now KNOW there will be NO GUNS in schools so they are PRIME TARGETS. That’s the difference. (Student Activism)

Ending With A Big Lie

Obama has ended his presidential re-election campaign with one of the biggest LIES I’ve ever heard him tell. We all know he has spent more money than there IS and gotten nothing for it. That our unemployment numbers are as high as they’ve EVER been; that MILLIONS are out of work and are losing their cars, houses, and other things that are important to them: that the real estate market is DOWN; people are SUFFERING from the effect of his ignorant policies and he DID NOT "save" the auto industry. GM is still on the brink of bankruptcy He says he created 5 MILLION jobs. WHERE? WHEN? That might sound good when he says it, but it's not enough to even KEEP UP with the birth rate.That in the midst of a big oil crisis, he has made policies GUARANTEEING we will be dependent on people who HATE us for our oil, for years to come. Then he runs an ad saying, “We’ve tried our way and it has worked!” WORKED? When and WHERE? I haven’t seen a single idea he’s tried that worked (If anybody can show me one I’ll be grateful). “We tried their way and it DIDN’T work.” WHEN and WHERE did they EVER “try their way? He shut Republicans OUT  of every important decision. He says, “We won two wars in the Middle East.” WHEN? WHERE? We RAN from both Iran and Afghanistan! Then he said, “We brought our troops home.” Right; we did it by “running for the hills” while the terrorists were blowing up our consulate and MURDERING our diplomats. Obama LIES bigger and bigger every day. I thought he was a FOOL when he claimed to be able to “lower the sea level,” but nobody ever took that seriously. I’ll tell you what, folks’ if you give him another four years to screw us even more, you’re FOOLS and deserve the biggest FOOL to ever occupy the White House and what that will bring you.. (Just common sense)

Misplaced Priorities

Many Americans claim they have “other priorities” than keeping track of what their politicians are doing to them. Many keep track of EVERY MOVE of their favorite football or basketball player. They know how many times that player has the ball in his hands and what he does with it each time and they can recite the figures to you ad nauseum from memory,. But they don’t have time to know what their politicians are doing to them. Thus, those politicians are screwing them royally every day and these Americans don’t even know it. So they vote those politicians back into office, time and time again and wonder why their money is worth less every day. They wonder why their “tax bite” is getting bigger and bigger every year as politicians tax them more and more to pay for their “giveaway programs.” They wonder why they can't seem to do ANYTHING these days without going to a bureaucrat, "hat in hand," and ask permission to do things they have always had the RIGHT to do without question.

My own SON is more interested in how many bucks he can make than in what Obama does to him with his socialistic policies (which is okay, but he should do both). We have the opportunity tomorrow to do what the Russian people DIDN’T do when Vladmir Lenin was solidifying his power. We can vote Barack Obama OUT and GET RID of him. Will we? Only time will tell. But if we vote to keep our own “Vladmir Lenin” in office tomorrow, how many years will we have to suffer under a socialist government that sucks all that is good out of us as the Russian people have suffered under 75 years of a socialist (Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics) government that remains until this day SUPPOSEDLY under a “no longer communist government” with the SAME PEOPLE running things now as then who SAY “they’re no longer communists.”

We need to WAKE UP and get these socialists (Democrats) out of office and take our country BACK from those who would ENSLAVE us. THINK, people! Do you WANT a socialist government that sucks the good out of every man and woman who becomes  dependent on government for their very daily bread and thus MUST “follow orders” as to how to live their lives? Do you WANT to have to live life as some nameless, faceless bureaucrat tells you to live it? Or do you want to be free to make your own decisions and have the INCENTIVE to do your best? Socialism DESTROYS incentive because who wants to work for anything if the GOVERNMENT will take it away from them to pay for somebody else's needs? The only problem is, it only "takes care of them" at a SUBSISTENCE level. All while those who are still able and WILLING to WORK under these conditions pay the bills (as long as they continue to work under a system that robs them). Soon they will figure out that they are BEING suckered and robbed and will join the ranks of those wanting the GOVERNMENT to "take care of them" and there will BE no money for the GOVERNMENT to use to pay the bills for everybody. (Just common sense)

Gun Laws CREATE "Gun Problems"

The “anti-gun fools” and their tight gun laws actually CREATE the “gun problems” they profess to want to stop by creating more and more unarmed victims for CRIMINALS, who don’t obey gun laws to take advantage of. Gun laws are tight in New York City, but they have one of the highest gun violence rates in the country. Chicago, too, has very tight gun laws, but is ALSO laboring under a “shooting problem” with gun violence being one of the highest in the nation (second only to New York City). In Simi Valley, California, gun crime is low. Why? They’re subject to the same stringent anti-gun laws as the rest of California, aren’t they? The reason is that a LOT of ARMED police officers from other jurisdictions LIVE there. Criminals know this and stay away. They are AFRAID of guns in the hands of their intended victims. Kennesaw, Georgia REQUIRED all heads of households to have guns (except for felons, religious objections and handicaps, etc.) Critics predicted a rise in gun violence. It didn’t happen. Instead, gun violence went down significantly. Why is this? Because for some reason, criminals don’t want to get shot by their intended victims and tend to go where anti-gun laws are the tightest. (Political Outcast)

I'm Getting A Gun

Frankly, up to now, I haven’t really felt the need to own a gun, or carry one. I thought my disguised self defense items (which I sell) would be sufficient. Items such as stun guns disguised as cell phones and pepper sprays disguised as lipsticks and other items. But after the Aurora, Colorado killings in a movie theater, I see that death can be dealt out by crazies anywhere, and might some day be dealt out where I am. I know that ONE GUN in the hands of a person who knows how to use it and is willing to do so, can end the life of someone who would randomly kill people before he can complete his plan, by putting a bullet in his brain after his first shot. I want to be that person if a shooter ever starts shooting where I am. I want a result like we saw in Colorado Springs some time ago where a lone woman who had a gun shot a “random killer” before he could kill more than two people in a church. If someone starts shooting at me, I want it to be the last thing he does in his life. Oh, and why do I say “he?” Because there has never been a female shooter commit a mass murder that I know of. So far, it is completely a male activity (Just common sense).

This Is Gun Control

The pictures this link will lead you to will show you what gun control can (and will) lead to. WARNING: they're graphic. Do you think this can’t happen here? Germans and Chinese thought so, too. Right up until the bullet entered their brains and they fell into the open mass grave. How stupid ARE people to allow the government to disarm them so they will not be “a problem” when their thugs come to steal what’s theirs? The men pictured may not be familiar to many of you, since the liberal media has stopped talking about the best-known dictators and mass murderers of the past.  So look them up. Yes, all those pictures are old. Which is because the more recent dictators don’t allow pictures to be taken when they kill people. (The Right Planet)

"Granny Get Your Gun!"

No less than FIVE armed thugs came into a store in Garden Grove, California and tried to rob it. But they didn’t plan on anybody there being armed (they never do) and willing to use her gun. But this little old lady did, and watching them trip all over each other trying to get out the door is hilarious. This just proves (again) my theory that ONE GUN in the hands of an honest person with the will to use it in self defense will make robbers (who are essentially cowards) think carefully about their chosen field of “work.” It happened in Colorado Springs, Colorado, when a would-be mass murderer was shot before he could kill more than two people by a pretty little lady with her own gun. And the more guns there are in the hands of honest people, the more often we’ll see such stories. (KTLA)

Georgia Grandma Shoots It Out With Robbers

The “bad guy” told her to give him her money so she gave him her gun, instead; one bullet at a time. He filled her car with bullet holes but failed to hit her. If he’s going to continue as an armed robber (after he gets out of jail) he’d better learn how to hit what he aims at. He’s “in custody,” but his accomplice (who fled when the shooting started) is still at large. This woman owns several convenience stores and never goes out unarmed. I presume she is licensed because nothing was said about charges against her (surprise, surprise!). The “accomplice” better stay away from this grandmother if he wants to stay healthy. (CBS Atlanta)

"Bloody Gun-Free Zones"

“Gun free zones” are anything but that. They are the scenes of bloody mass murders all over the world. Gunners do not go to gun shows or police stations where they know there are plenty of guns carried by people who not only know how to use them, but aren’t afraid to do so. One such “gun free zone” was the theater in Aurora, Colorado, where a Jim Holmes opened fire and murdered ten people while putting another 50 or so in the hospital. This theater has a “policy” of not allowing guns into the theater in the hands of individuals (even if they have a “carry” permit).He did not go to a police station, which was close by because he knew he wouldn’t survive his first shot. He went where he KNEW there was only a SMALL possibility of ANYBODY in the theater being armed. Think about that as you look at just where the “gun-free zones” are, and compare that with the locations of the mass murders. (Just common sense)

Why More Gun Crimes?

Seems like every day or so, somebody takes a gun and starts shooting people at random. Is this a reason to make the gun laws tighter? Not even! It’s because of the LACK of guns in our society in the hands of honest people. A situation CREATED by the anti-gun fools. You don’t defend yourself by disarming yourself. You get more guns into the hands of honest people and shooters like the one in that Denver-Area theater will think twice before attempting his evil plans. Notice they never go in and shoot up gun shows or police stations. That’s because they know there are many loaded guns there in the hands of people who know how to use them and are willing and able to do so. They go where they KNOW there will be no guns to oppose them. Remember that shooter who went into a church in Colorado Springs to kill people? ONE WOMAN there who shot him after his first two victims probably prevented the killing of many people. EVERYBODY in Israel is armed and are considered to be part of their army, man or woman. My favorite memory is of a woman standing over a Palestinian who tried to take her hostage, pumping bullets into his brain. More honest people having guns is NOT going to create the “wild west atmosphere” they predict. As writer Robert Heinlein observed, “an armed society is a polite society.” (Just common sense)

It's Not the Gun's Fault

I’m actually a little surprised that the anti-gun fools aren’t out “singing their tunes” more about all their stupid reasons why we should BAN all guns—which, of course, will NOT do ANYTHING to stop such things as the Aurora theater slayings. Anybody who thinks a CRIMINAL, such as this shooter, will OBEY a law that says he can’t be armed, is about as ignorant as they come. Anybody who is determined to KILL, will find a way, in spite of hell.. In places where gun laws are the tightest, that’s where illegal guns are the EASIEST to get your hands on. Criminals don’t OBEY laws. But more guns in the hands of people willing to use them in their own defense or even the defense of others (that such shooter don’t know are there) would make a big dent in their ability to kill at will. I’d like to have been in that theater with my own hog-leg. That shooter would have died after firing his first bullet and maybe 10 of those 12 dead would have survived. (Just common sense).

The Right to Self Defense

That’s what the Second amendment is all about. Yes, it does protect your right to hunt. But that was NEVER the primary reason for the Second Amendment. At the time, people were worried about the GOVERNMENT “coming after them for their views” and wanted to be able to meet the government thugs with their own guns. The primary reason was to defend themselves against THE GOVERNMENT! Today, the government is STILL working very hard to take as many guns as possible out of the hands of individual Americans. Their current con is that “Even though Americans have the right to bear arms, reasonable limitations still can be placed on gun ownership.” “Reasonable limitations” such as gun locks that make your guns useless against an illegally armed criminal since he doesn’t have to use one. Then there is the requirement that guns and ammunition be stored SEPARATELY, again making the gun useless. “Fast & furious” was a government scheme to make us believe the LIE that most of the guns used by the cartels in Mexico came from the United States. When it failed, that scam was revealed. The Republicans might not be much better than the Democrats, but at least they are not DETERMINED to disarm this nation’s citizens to make it easier for their thugs to come in and take what’s ours. “Joe the Plumber” says gun control by the Nazis was responsible for the “Holocaust,” since Jews could not defend themselves against their GOVERNMENT. Do you want to be put in a similar position to the Jews if, and when THIS government “comes after you?” (Just common sense)

No "Cooperation" At All

The “Twister-In-Chief, Jay Carney, says Holder and the DOJ “have cooperated with Congress.” They have not. They have spent MONTHS “stonewalling” on “Fast & Furious” while attempting still to throw all the blame for their problems AND "Fast & Furious" onto Bush and the Republicans. They say they have sent 7,600 documents in response to Congress' “demands.” They have not. They have created a “document dump” of thousands of documents that have nothing to do with what Congress asked for. Something to waste their time and advance the investigation not at all. Holder is an expert at deflecting questions with 50,000 word essays that do not address the questions asked. He has been rightly designated in contempt of Congress. But will it stick? Doubtful. Obama will come up with SOMETHING to “make it go away.” He’s good at twisting things like that. (The Hill)

Keeping Guns Away From Blacks

The Democrats keep trying to paint Republicans as racists, but if you do some research, you’ll find that the REAL racists, as a group, are liberals (Democrats). It was the DEMOCRATS that blacks were demonstrating against in the sixties. Martin Luther King was against DEMOCRATS, not Republicans. The KKK was started by the DEMOCRATS, and that was a well-kept secret. It was the REPUBLICANS who got the “equal rights law” passed, over stiff DEMOCRAT opposition. The Democrats passed all kinds of laws keeping guns out of the hands of Americans for one reason: so blacks would not have guns. But it didn’t work. Blacks probably have more illegal guns in their hands than whites because anti-gun laws DON’T WORK. The tighter anti-gun laws are in ANY area, the easier it is to get ILLEGAL guns. CRIMINALS do not OBEY laws that say they can’t be armed. They disobey laws for a living. (Ann Coulter/Human Events

Why So Many School Shootings?

The recent mass shooting in Oakland at a small Christian school has again raised the questions: “Why so many school shootings? And “What can we do to stop them?” The answer is easy, though today’s liberals won’t hear of it: Stop telling crazy shooters there will not be ANY guns in the school in the hands of people they don’t necessarily KNOW to be armed. In the hands of people licensed to carry concealed, and trained to use them if necessary. They could be janitors, teachers, principals, even counselors. But NOT people these crazies would expect to be armed, so they can’t “target” them early on and get rid of them, such as armed police officers. At Columbine, the shooter did just that, making that armed person’s contribution minimal, at best, if not killing them outright. Banning guns outright except in the hands of known security officers tells those who want to do so to “Come on in and kill us. We have no guns.” This is ignorant, even a STUPID policy and has contributed to these shootings. (CBS News)

Obama "Whips Up" Racism

Along with every other liberal race-baiter out there, including Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, “Calypso Louie” Farrakhan, and many others, they are making a “mountain out of a molehill” about the killing of a black teenager in Florida. I don’t know ALL the details, and nobody else does, either. The incompetence of the cops “investigating” this situation has GUARANTEED nobody ever will. In any case, George Zimmerman has been “judged” guilty of premeditated murder by everybody concerned, right up to the President of the United states, who took the time and trouble to CALL the parents of the “victim,” something that, while not unusual for this president, is not proper in a local incident. While he didn’t make a stupid remark, as he did in the case of a black professor who was arrested in the break-in of his own home, just the fact of WHO he called tells us his opinion, all the “race-baiters” mentioned above have jumped in the fray, condemning Zimmerman to death, even if an “investigation shows he is innocent of guilty intent.

The “New Black Panthers” have “put out a hit” on Zimmerman, and if he IS found not to be guilty of a crime likely will not change their $10,000 offer for him, “”DEAD OR ALIVE.” (I will watch carefully to see if Obama or his black attorney general charge them with a crime for ordering this murder or if they will reject any charges against them, since they are “their people"). If people would just SHUT UP about this (which will not happen), maybe some REAL investigation could be done and some real facts be unearthed. Although any facts finding Zinmmerman not guilty of a crime will not be believed by these “race-baiters.” I looked at just the CNN web site and EVERY story on the side was about this shooting, and ALL were against Zimerman. The unappointed judges have decided he's guilty of murder, without facts. (Just common sense)

Anti-Gun Laws Contribute to Mass Shootings

There was another mass shooting on a campus today; where it is KNOWN that guns are not allowed to be in the hands of honest people to allow them to defend themselves against such attacks. Such shootings and killings will not only continue, but will increase in numbers and intensity as long as we continue to deprive honest people of the right to carry the means of self defense, their own guns. It can only get worse. The “anti-gun fools” think making a LAW against gun ownership will stop CRIMINALS, who break laws for a LIVING will obey one that says they can’t be armed. Anti-gun laws do one thing: create an abundance of unarmed victims that illegal gun carrying criminals can exploit, while crazies go into crowded spaces with their ILLEGAL guns and start shooting everybody in sight, with no fear that someone close by might have their own LEGAL gun and shoot them dead. That’s the SINGLE RESULT of keeping guns out of the hands of honest people so they can’t defend themselves. And don’t tell me the cops can do it; they can’t. All they can do is document the crime and identify the body or bodies killed by illegal criminal-carried guns AFTER the fact. John Lott (“More Guns, Less Crime” said that if armed criminals feared death at the hands of an armed potential victim, they’d go into another line of work. That depriving honest people of the means to their own self defense was tantamount to saying to criminals, “Come on and victimize us. We won’t shoot you, we have no guns.” That’s common sense and logic, but is denied by those who want to get rid of all guns. That will never happen, but they deny that, too. They even deny the very EXISTENCE of common sense and logic! (University of Chicago)

Typical Liberal Swindle

They wanted to get a lot of guns into the Mexican drug wars so they could SAY that “most of their guns come from the United States” and use that to strengthen anti-gun laws. They screwed up. It didn’t work. They didn’t tell the media the guns that came from the U. S. were sold by this government itself, but they found out. After the conservative media broke it, they HAD to cover it, and it has become one of Obama's biggest scandals. I hope it sinks him. This is how the liberals in our government try to fool us into letting them do things we normally wouldn’t allow. When are we going to wake up and question their every action? And I mean even when the Republicans are in power because they do it, too. (American Thinker)

No Guns Needed

A man walked into a school in China, and killed eight (count ‘em, EIGHT) children. NOBODY in the school was armed and able to stop him because of STIFF anti-gun laws in communist China. “SHANGHAI — A former community doctor allegedly stabbed to death eight children and injured five others at a primary school in east China's Fujian province, the authorities said, as China grapples with a rise in high-profile criminal violence in its cities.” Notice, in a country with “no-nonsense” anti-gun laws for its citizens, criminals find a way to increase the violence. This proves my thesis that if there were NO GUNS in society, the “bad guys” would find a way to kill, maim, and intimidate people. The answer is to allow RESPONSIBLE people to get “carry” permits easily, or just make carrying guns “under cover” legal so those (usually) illegally armed criminals cannot ever be sure their intended victims will not be armed and able to defend themselves. There's certainly nothing out there to keep criminals from getting their illegal guns. This would cause most of them (criminals are basically cowards) to go into other lines of crime. (Wall Street Journal)

What You don't Know About Islam

They SAY it’s a “religion of peace.” But to them, peace is only possible when ALL countries are under Sharia Law and ALL people have converted to Islam, willingly or not. The Koran allows Muslims to LIE to “Infidels” (unbelievers) to conceal their goals. There are other things you need to know and this video tells you about many of them. Islam is NOT a “religion of peace.” Not by OUR definition of peace. It is a religious DUTY for Muslims to work to impose Islam on the entire world. They say one thing in their own meetings in their own language and quite another here in a language we understand. (Patriot Action Network)

Typical Expectations

"I'm confident of winning a second term.," Says Obama. The way Obama’s dupes talk, this sounds a bit like what they probably expect. They think he’s the reincarnation of the Messiah and can do anything. His failure to do so in so many cases doesn’t seem to disabuse them of this notion (or maybe what he HAS accomplished, that WE deplore, is counted as success to these ignorant people). I feel sorry for those people who are still driving with “Obama 2008” stickers on their cars. It will be even harder for me when I start seeing "Obama 2012" stickers begin appearing. If I had done something as abysmally stupid as voting for Brraaaccck Obama I certainly would not be advertising my stupidity this long afterward. I feel even more sorry for them because they STILL can’t see their error. (Mallard Fillmore)

Hillary Commits to UN Gun Ban

Obama has been heard to tell "gun banners" that the US is working "behind the scenes" (in secret) to support a national gun ban. The UN wants to ban guns in the hands of ALL citizens. Not the cops or “federal agents,” of course. They don’t care that we have a Constitution that guarantees our right to “keep and near arms.” They don’t think much of our Constitution and think they can get around it easily. Hillary has “committed” to support this gun ban. Maybe if she gets shot at she’ll change her mind. But I don’t think so. liberals ALL “blame the gun,” not the gunner. She thinks (like all liberals) that a LAW will keep criminals (who break the law daily) will OBEY a law that says they can’t be armed. The day possession of a gun becomes illegal, I will become a criminal. I will NOT give up my right to self defense and the right to own and use the means to that defense. Where the hell does HILLARY get off “committing” the U. S. to ANYTHING? (National Association for Gun Rights)

TR UC

Is Obama Helping Drug Cartels?

Sure seems like it. He’s done all he can to GUT border control, and must have APPROVED the action to actually SELL GUNS to the drug cartels; guns that have been used to KILL many innocent people, among them several border control officers and ranchers. Does he figure his actions will help create the chaos that will help him impose a socialist government upon us? I don’t know. All I know is that these actions have had the EFFECT of doing that very thing. He has DENIED the KNOWN FACT that over-the-border violence by those cartels is rising precipitously while CUTTING the number of border control officers in the area. What is WRONG with this idiot? Is he STUPID? Or does he just not care? I can’t believe it! The Washington Post actually reported the news correctly, once, when it didn’t make Obama look good. (Washington Post)

Pharmacist Imprisoned for Killing Robber

This is the direction our Justice system has taken under the liberals. “On May 19, 2009, [Jerome –RT] Ersland went from unassuming pharmacist to killer. Just before 6 p.m., 16-year-old Antwun and a 14-year-old accomplice rolled into the Reliable Pharmacy, waving guns and demanding cash and drugs. Ersland’s co-workers escaped through a back entrance. Ersland, unable to flee due to crippling disability, fought back. Ersland shot Antwun first, and then chased Antwun’s accomplice for a short time before returning to find Antwun was still alive. A terrified Ersland retrieved a second weapon and emptied it into Antwun, killing him.” Ersland was afraid for his life when he killed Antwun, but that made no difference to the liberal judge and a largely liberal jury, who sent him to prison for life. I shudder to think of how this system will victimize us in the future as they further evolve. Personally, I believe a robber deserves what he gets when he enters a store waving a gun around. (Personal Liberty Digest)

UN Wants to Control Guns in US

They want a “global gun treaty” so Islamic terrorists won’t be able to get guns to use in killing innocent people. Yeah, that’ll work well. What the hell makes them think such a treaty (which they hope to slip by our Congress) will work any better on the terrorists than anti-gun laws already on the books IN the United States works to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, who break laws for a living? It’s already against the law in most countries to sell guns to terrorists, so how is this different, except it gives the UN control over guns in the United States? Anti-gun freaks in the US still can’t answer the question: “What makes you think that CRIMINALS, who break laws for a living, will OBEY one that says they can’t be armed?” The same question applies to terrorists. (Forbes)

Revoke Rate Miniscule

Florida has issued 1.9 million “concealed carry” permits and only FOUR have been revoked for cause. This puts the lie to the liberal (anti-gun freaks) admonition that Florida has created “a wild-West atmosphere” where people will wantonly kill each other. Actually, it proves that “an armed society is a polite society,” as Robert Heinlein said. As John Lott said, “More guns means less crime.” And he’s right. Florida’s violent crime rate is WAY down from what it was before that law was made. (John Lott)

Hard to Arm Themselves

Drug cartels find it easy to get American arms to use in killing anybody they wish. They get them from American dealers, at the behest of the Obama administration. This administration SAYS they allow it so they can “track” where the guns go down there. But they’re not “tracking” anything, and many of the guns sold down there have turned up in murder cases on both sides of the border. But U. S. citizens can’t seem to get a gun to use in defending themselves against those Mexican bandits who rob and kill on both sides of the border, despite the lies told by Obama. Obama says violent crime rates in border states are going down. Anybody who lives there know what a LIE that is. Just ask some of the ranchers who have been murdered when they objected to the illegal aliens crossing their land and making a mess as they do. (John Lott)

Schumer Wants ACCUSED to Lose Gun rights

Never mind that until they are CONVICTED of a crime, they are INNOCENT. Next, he’ll want to bar anybody that somebody pointed to and said “he’s guilty of a crime” from having a gun. Then it’ll be somebody ANYBODY just doesn’t like. Meanwhile, like many other politicians, he either has a carry permit or hires people who do to keep him safe. Like most politicians, he wants rules for US, but not for HIM. He thinks people “in his position” should be above laws for us “little people.” (John Lott)

Obama Approves Gun Sales for Mexico

They called it a “sting.” They said it was to “trace” the movement of guns in Mexico, but they did not “trace” anything. Now Mexico is blaming the United states for the number of guns available IN Mexico that came from the U. S. why would Obama DO that? So he could “crack down” on gun dealers in the U. S. Gun dealers who did nothing but what Obama wanted them to do. It’s the old “bait and switch.” Tell them it’s okay to sell guns to Mexican drug cartels because it’s a “sting.” Then come back and “crack down” on them for DOING it. (Prison Planet)

Laws Don't Apply to Them

California lawmakers, who have made some of the tightest “gun-control laws” in the nation, now get to carry their own guns, since so many Californians hate them for destroying the state’s economy. This is typical. Politicians just don’t want to be forced to OBEY the laws they make for the rest of us. So they don’t. They either specifically EXCLUDE themselves from the law or make another law to do it. We need to find a way to make a law forcing legislators to LIVE by the laws they make. But it’ll probably never happen, since it’s the legislators that will have to MAKE that law. (The Sacramento Bee)

Again, Blame the gun

That’ll be the response from the “anti-gun Nazis” when they hear about the gun attack in Philly that injured nine and killed one at a party. As usual, nothing is being said about the legality of the shooter carrying the gun he used. That’s because one: if he had a “carry permit” that’s an illustration that anti-gun laws don’t stop such shootings and; two: if he didn’t, how easy it is for criminals to get guns in “tight” gun law areas like Philly. But you can count on them to “blame the gun,” which is an inanimate object that cannot kill anybody unless in the hand of a human who can pull the trigger. (Fox News)

She Could Have Stopped It

Dr. Suzanna Hupp is a licensed gun carrier. She could easily have “put a couple into” a man who crashed his car into a Texas Luby’s restaurant, got out, and started shooting people at random. But Texas has a law that makes it a felony to carry a gun into a restaurant, even if you’re licensed. So she had left her gun in her car. That cost a lot of people, including her father and mother, their lives. That short-sighted law cost these people their lives when if she had had her gun with her, she could have put an end to this madman’s massacre before he killed any more people. Instead, he randomly killed a lot of people, unopposed. She made a point to tell these lawmakers a simple thing: hunting is not the reason for the constitutional guarantee of the right to carry the means to personal protection, a gun. It is so we can defend ourselves against criminals, including those sitting on that dias. A judge recently ruled that states have the right to “regulate” guns. He’s wrong. The Constitution of the United States is the BASIS for ALL laws in the country. Federal AND state. But he’s a judge; so who’s going to tell him he’s wrong except another judge? (YouTube)

Blame the Gun

A gunman opened fire at a Brazilian school recently and 13 people were killed. Nothing has been said about whether or not the gunman had the guns legally, or was breaking the law just by carrying them. This shooting just shows one thing: laws against carrying guns around would not have done ANYTHING to keep this shooting from happening. But the anti-gun Nazis won’t consider that. To them, it’s “the gun’s fault” whenever a human being takes an inanimate gun, which can do nothing without a human pointing it and pulling its trigger. I’m waiting for the next report about somebody going into a school with a kitchen knife (again—it happened in Korea) and killing people so the “anti-knife” people can have their day. (The Blaze)

U. S. Supplies Guns to Mexican Drug Cartels

NRA perennial vice president Wayne LaPierre called Glenn Beck to reveal a shocking and unbelievable story: the United states government provided illegal guns to Mexican drug cartels. But he did not make it clear, as I did last week, that it was done to discredit America by providing proof that most of the guns used there came from US sources. I don’t know if Glenn understands it yet, but this is the kind of thing Obama would do. Provide guns to murderers to prove a lying point he has been trying to prove. (Glenn Beck)

Anti-Gun Freaks

Someone asks if you would like to be in a store where everyone has a gun. My answer is “yes.” If I’m in a store where only one person has a gun, everybody could easily be killed by that one person with a gun. With ten people armed, if that one person starts shooting at people, he can be stopped before he CAN kill everybody in the store. That was amply illustrated last year when a man came into a Colorado church and started shooting people. He ran into a woman who had her own gun and she shot him. Then he committed suicide and was only able to kill two people at this church. He had already killed several people at another church where there was nobody else with a gun, earlier. But thanks to this courageous woman, he will never kill again. (Yahoo Extra Answers)

CNN Invokes Reagan

Reagan used to be a liberal—before he “saw the light” and became more of a conservative than a liberal. Back then, he “followed the liberal line” somewhat, and was somewhat in favor of gun control laws. But like all the other liberal ideas he spurned when he “woke up to reality,” he spurned the gun control laws that controlled everything BUT guns. They SAY more than 24,000 people have died of gunshot wounds, just since the Tucson shooting. So what? If there were not guns, people would find other ways to kill people. Gun control jerks just won’t realize the simple fact that CRIMINALS, who break the law for a LIVING, will NOT obey a law saying they cannot be armed. People who want to kill, will KILL, whatever they have to use to kill with. Maybe we should ban all PEOPLE. Guns cannot kill without a PERSON pulling the trigger. (News Busters)

"Guns Walking"

They called it a “sting” to find out where the guns would go. But what it amounts to is that ATF was SUPPLYING guns and ammo to Mexican drug cartels. Agents were against it, but were ORDERED to “stand by and let it happen.” I wonder how many people, both in Mexico and the United States, are dead because of this policy. At least one Border Patrol agent has been killed by a gun traceable to this "program." Yes, intelligence is needed. But we don’t have to SUPPLY guns for Mexican drug cartels in order to learn it. Now an ATF agent is risking his job and maybe his life by “opening this can of worms.” Do you expect anything substantive to be done about it? I doubt it. They will “convene” panel after panel, none of which will come up with anything, nor punish anybody. But they will be able to point to them and say, “We’re doing something.” Meanwhile this agent, if he manages to keep his job, will be shipped to Nome, Alaska or maybe further away. (You Tube/CBS News)

"Getting Around the Constitution"

This is how liberals operate. Work within the Constitution if you can, find “ways around it” if you can’t. “WASHINGTON -- Faced with a Congress hostile to even slight restrictions of Second Amendment rights, the Obama administration is exploring potential changes to gun laws that can be secured strictly through executive action, administration officials say.” This is a direct quote from the Huffington Post, hardly a “conservative bastion.” I print it here because I went to the page where the story about this was, and there seems to be a problem loading it. Is it a “technical problem?” Or is Obama ordering them to remove it? Here’s the link; it may or may not still be there when you go there. Or Obama might want to imprison me for linking to it. (Huffington Post)

Criminals Push Gun Control

Why? Because they know gun control will mean fewer guns in the hands of honest people and will foster a “safer workplace” for them. It’s a known fact (but not to the “anti-gun freaks”) that tighter gun control laws makes for better violent crime without worry of danger for the criminals. They also know guns are EASIER for criminals to get in areas where gun control laws are the tightest. I don’t know why politicians can’t understand the simple thought that CRIMINALS, whose entire lives are dedicated to breaking the law, will NOT obey a law that says they cannot be armed. This video is an obvious parody. But it says a lot. (YouTube)