Killing Self Defense

Do the anti-gun fools really think that eliminating guns will stop all violent crime? They can’t be that stupid… can they? But apparently, they are. They have to be aware that violence predated guns. That before guns were the chief instrument for violence, that position was held by a sharp blade. People injured and killed each other very efficiently with knives and swords. And if they actually succeed in eliminating guns, knives will again come to the fore and violence will continue. The obvious solution is to find out why so many people want to commit violence and get in the way of that violence. Eliminating the TOOL for that violence is NOT the answer. But they don’t know that, and they actively resist admitting it. Why? I don’t really think they are all stupid, although they act as is they were. We need to stop them from making all their stupid anti-gun fool laws that only get honest, law-abiding people killed. People are saying the head of “MOMS Against Guns” (or something like that) has killed more people than guns not in the hands of fools, and they’re right. That also applies to politicians who follow her lead and make stupid anti-gun fool laws. (Just common sense)