Tuesday, February 4, 2020

The Party of Fools

That’s the Dumocrat Party. Oh, not necessarily all those who count themselves as Dumocrats and vote that way. Most of them are just not paying attention, and vote the way they’re told. And the Dumocrats are ready and willing to tell them how to vote. First of all, the Dumocrats are socialists, which, in itself, is stupid. Anybody who really LOOKS at socialism wants no part of it, unless they’re promoting it to gain power over others. It’s a system BASED on the theft of the fruits of production of new wealth from the producers, for the benefit of those who, for whatever reason, do NOT produce, but only consume. And then there are the silly ideas they promote, such as that there are more than 2 sexes. They insist on it in the face of biological proof that it would be impossible.

They say sex is “assigned” at birth, which is false. It is DISCOVERED at birth by observing which of TWO sex organs the baby has. Nothing else can “assign” a sex, no matter how much they protest. They claim, transsexualism (where a man dresses like a woman and pretends to be a woman, or likewise a woman dresses like a man and pretends to be a man), is a different sex, but it is NOT. It is a mental aberration. They claim bigotry if men pretending to be women aren’t allowed to compete against real women in sports, and even SUE to get their way. Too often liberal judges agree with them and they prevail. But that doesn’t make it so. As Ayn Rand said, “A is A.” A can never be B. It is foolishness to try and make it B

Just as it is foolish to try and say there are more than 2 sexes. They try and convince us of other foolish things including believing they can stop violent crime by eliminating guns—which is an impossibility. Especially in this country, where we have the Second amendment guaranteeing the fact that we have the inalienable RIGHT to “bear arms.” Even so, the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there makes it an impossibility. Even if that were possible, violent crime would continue, just using something else as a weapon, as they did before guns were invented. They try and convince is that “there ae no absolutes” so they will not be bound by an absolute. But their very statement SAYING there are no absolutes is a “statement of an absolute.” They refuse to believe it and continue to insist they are right. Stupid. (Just common sense)

No comments: