Gabby Giffords was shot in the head and survived. Six others at that
time and place did not, including a federal judge and a 9-year-old
girl. The
shooter was a felon and thus not allowed to have a gun. But he did,
and he killed many people in his abortive effort to assassinate
Giffords. What anti-gun law would have stopped these killings? None
of them. But Giffords has spent much of the rest of her life trying
to get more of them passed, mostly unsuccessfully because most
lawmakers (who are not Dumocrats) realize there is NO LAW they could
pass that would have any effect. Therefore, they resist passing more
laws that put people like her, that judge, and that child in deadly
danger by disarming them. Her entire life after being shot is a
fantasy, thinking she can get laws passed to stop such shootings, and
her efforts have been largely futile. There
are many like her, mostly Dumocrats, who believe the fantasy that
they can make a law that will stop such shootings, and they con lots
of money out of other gullible people to finance their abortive
efforts. They say they are “concerned with pubic safety,” but
they’re not. They are concerned with gaining the power to tell you
what you can, and cannot do. (Wikipedia)
Friday, July 26, 2019
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment