The chairman of the House Judiciary Committee says a “Democrat
president could declare a ‘gun crime’ emergency and take your
guns away. Apparently, this member of Congress doesn’t know the
Second Amendment exists, and any president who tried would be
stopped. that’s
the major difference between what President Trump did, and a future
Dumocrat president “taking away our guns” using the same thing.
There is a specific law ALLOWING Trump to do what he did, than does
NOT exist to allow a future president to “take away our guns” the
same way. The Second Amendment gets in the way. Nancy Peelosi
(Majority Leader in The House) feels the same way, and is just as
clueless. This is the problem we have with ALL those who wish to get
rid of our constitutional right to be armed for self defense. They
think they can “get around it” by simply making a law. They
can’t. ALL laws MUST conform to the Constitution, and ANY law
limiting, or denying our right to be armed do NOT. (Washington Free Beacon)
Friday, March 8, 2019
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment