It wasn't your average school shooting. The
shooter didn't come there to shoot as many students as he could. He
was a "jilted lover" who killed the girl who ended her
relationship with him. In the process
he wounded another student, and ended up killing himself when the
school resource officer confronted him, That officer actually shot
the gun out of his hand, but it was too late--he'd already fired his
"death shot." The liberals predictably blamed the gun, and
people immediately (I'm sure organized
by anti-gun
fools) started demonstrations to promote the making of yet more
USELESS, ineffective "gun laws," completely ignoring the
fact that this kid was "mentally disturbed." Why do we
figure that, you say? Because sane people don't get a gun and kill an
ex-girlfriend. And what good would gun laws do? The gun he used HAD
to be illegally carried, probably stolen, because a boy that young
CANNOT buy a gun, legally. So he broke the law in getting that gun.
Surprise, surprise! Liberals count this shooting as a "school
shooting" because it happened in a school. But it could have
happened anywhere. And no amount of anti-gun laws would have stopped
it.
Somewhere there is evidence of this kid's mental deficiency, but it
is not mentioned in the story. This could not have been the first
time he displayed being a "troubled teen,"
(Mommy Underground)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment