"Ask the average gun buff if we need new gun laws and the
knee-jerk reaction is, 'Not just no, but hell no!' That’s followed
up with, 'What part of Shall not be infringed don’t you understand?
All those gun laws on the books are illegal and should be repealed!'
Let’s just think about that." Each and every "gun law"
on the books INFRINGES"
on our constitutional right to be armed for self defense. That means
they are UNCONSTITUTIONAL. But,
for some reason, the Supreme Court has not declared them ALL so. And
every time some fool misuses a gun, they demand that we make even
MORE useless "gun laws" that do NOTHING to reduce "gun
violence." Why? Because they're AFRAID of the law-abiding people
who might shoot them when
they send their thugs to steal ("confiscate") what belongs
to them. NONE of the existing laws do ANYTHING to "reduce gun
crime," so what GOOD are they? And why do we need more of them?
The answer is, we don't need more of them, and we don't need the ones
on the books now. We need to let law-abiding people be armed in self
defense. They will take care of the ILLEGAL gun problem by killing
those who point their ILLEGAL guns at them. (JPFO)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment