What fool decided that cops should not be allowed to carry guns when
they confront criminals, who have no qualms in carrying their guns?
In Great Britain and
Scotland, many cops DON'T carry guns, while criminals DO. In France
too, apparently some cops are unarmed, which was revealed when some
cops could do nothing but cower behind their cars and WATCH while a
couple of Islamic terrorists killed 11 people at a satire newspaper
for having the temerity to publish a DRAWING of their "prophet."
Now Scottish cops are crying out to be allowed to carry guns, so they
can defend themselves against the criminals,
who HAVE guns.
In Scotland, the police union says their cops "feel vulnerable
and ill-equipped." Ya THINK? Why any cop would want to go up
against an ARMED criminal without his own gun is ignorance, and
"natural selection" will rid us of their presence. In
Scotland, there are about 600 armed cops, who are only deployed in
situations where there is a serious possibility of violence. But what
about situations where violence was not expected, but breaks out,
anyway? What happens to those cops SUDDENLY faced with an armed
suspect? Do
they die, while the armed cops (many of whom are part-time) are
deployed? (Keep and Bear)
Friday, December 1, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment