Intent vs, Effect

The anti-gun fools will confidently tell you that they INTEND to get rid of guns, period, and thereby "stop crime in its tracks." But they don't know how to stop CRIMINALS, who don't obey laws, from getting the guns they nuse to victimize the law-abiding, so they content themselves with disarming the law-abiding. The net EFFECT is to INCREASE crime by making the law-abiding people DEFENSELESS against the ILLEGAL guns held by the criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists, who have pledged to kill as many "unbelievers" as they can. They will tell you confidently that, if they can get rid of all the guns not in the hands of "the authorities," crime will stop. This is a "Pollyanna effect." First of all, they will NEVER be able to get rid of ALL the guns not in the hands of the "authorities." And if they could, who will then put limits on "the authorities," some of whom commit their own crimes? They really think that the way to self defense is to become defenseless. That's another "Pollyanna idea." I think, way down deep, they WANT the criminals to succeed, and this is the way to do it. (Just common sense)