It's really stupid to ask your policemen to go up against possibly
ARMED criminals without having guns, themselves, to oppose them. That
fact was displayed grossly in London the other day, when an UNARMED
cop tried to stop a killer from killing any more people, and became
the next victim to be killed by him—just before he, himself, was
shot to death by other cops who HAD guns. The cops' guns ENDED the threat.
The unarmed cop only could give his own life in defense of the
public, without being able to stop the killer. In France earlier,
when Islamic terrorists were intent on killing people at a newspaper
for printing a PICTURE of Mohammed, the first responders, being
unarmed, could do NOTHING to stop the carnage. Thus, 11 innocent
people were cruelly murdered, while they watched, while hiding behind
their cars. This is not a criticism of the cops, for to have engaged
the killers would have only meant their own deaths, without stopping
the killing. Politicians who even CONSIDER disarming their cops are
ignorant—no, they're STUPID. And any UNARMED cop killed in the
performance of his duty will be “blood on their hands.” (Just
common sense)
Thursday, March 23, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment