It's
a question usually never asked of an anti-gun fool when they screech
about making more and better gun laws every time somebody misuses a
gun. The question is, “Specifically, what law would have stopped
this killing?” This question is now being asked of the anti-gun
fools as they clamor for more laws in the wake of the UCLA killing
that started in Minnesota, where the killer (now dead) killed a woman
whose name appeared on his “kill list.” It's a question they
can't answer truthfully, because all the laws they passed in the past
have failed to do so. But they persist in making their USELESS “gun
laws,” and those laws continue to fail to do ANYTHING about “gun
violence.” That's because they target the GUN, not the person
HOLDING the gun. They make laws that people with evil intentions
IGNORE as a minor irritant when they want to do murder or mass
murder. (National Review)
Sunday, June 5, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment