Hillary (and other anti-gun fools) say that “If guns weren't so
readily available there'd be fewer killings. ” What a bunch of
horse manure! If there weren't guns, those who wanted to kill would
just find something else to kill with. Before guns were knives and
swords. Back in “cave-man” days, it was clubs. But nobody ever
suggested making clubs less easily available. Maybe they were smarter
back then. At one time, everybody carried some kind of a blade. You
can't stop the killing by getting rid of the TOOL. Only by getting
rid of the killers. What they don't understand, and what they never
WILL understand—they're not smart enough—is that the gun is not
the culprit. The culprit is the PERSON. If there were no guns in the
world (their major goal) they'd find another way to kill. If they
couldn't find an INSTRUMENT with which to kill, they'd do it with
their bare hands—and HAVE done so when guns or other killing tools
could not be obtained. If they did manage to get rid of all the guns
in the world—and that's an impossibility, guns exist, and there's
no going back to a time when they didn't, killing would still go on.
That's a truth these fools will NEVER understand. Feel sorry for
them. It's a “forlorn hope.” (Story Leak)
Thursday, August 27, 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
You really make it seem so easy with your presentastion but I find this topic to be actually
something which I think I would never understand. It seems tooo complicated annd
extremely broad for me. I am looking forward for yyour next post, I will try
to get the hang of it!
Post a Comment