"Militia Clause" Misunderstood

Purposely misunderstood, that is. It isn't hard to understand that there was NO SUCH THING as an “organized militia” at the time the Second Amendment was written, so they couldn't have meant that. The only other thing they COULD have meant is that the entire population is considered to be a “militia,” ready, able, and armed to respond in the government's need. This is why they made such a big thing out of the entire population remaining armed, so they could be “called up” if the need arose and would have their own guns. But the “anti-gun fools” are so bent on DISARMING the honest people of this nation that they purposely misunderstood it so they could CLAIM that people who were not members of an ORGANIZED militia did not need to be armed. This argument has gone on since before the ink dried on the Constitution, and will probably go on long after most of us are dead. Those “Gun-grabbers” are nothing if not determined to disarm Americans. (Daily Record)