On Vacation

I will not be posting for most of the next week, starting Saturday. I will be on probably my first ever vacation. I will be there for most of the week, at least until Wednesday, maybe longer. But I'll be back the next Monday, rarin' to go. This may be my last chance before “the big eight-oh.”

WaPo Pushes False Figures

In an obvious effort to make gun control look good, the Washington Post says that most of the 1,300 fatalities they mention are accidental deaths of CHILDREN. What they fail to mention is that a lot of them were suicides of people in their late teens, and of the others, most are gang members killed by other street gang members in “drug buys gone wrong.” Like all anti-gun fools, they regard guys up to 19 as “children.” This gives a false perception that this many TODDLERS are getting killed by guns. The “bad guy” in this case is, as always, the NRA, which teaches that public EDUCATION, which they provide, results in fewer suicides. Gun control, as we know it, DOESN'T WORK. It only serves to make the anti-gun fool think they're doing something REAL to stop gun crime—but they're not. They actually INCREASE gun crime, because they DISARM honest, law-abiding people while doing NOTHING about all the ILLEGAL guns in the hands of the bad guys. We keep telling the anti-gun fools that, but it's like bouncing a rock off a boulder. They just aren't listening. (America's First Freedom)

Thank God for Scalise!

If Rep. Scalise hadn't been at this charity baseball practice for congresspeople, what we would have now been reading about would be a mass murder case. Rep. Scalise is the Majority Whip, and gets a security detail consisting of two Alexandria cops. That way, when this deranged Bernie Sanders supporter and Trump hater started shooting at this “target-rich environment,” there would have been nothing there to stop him killing everyone there in the time it took for other cops to respond to the 911 call. TWO guns, in the hands of trained cops, made all the difference, killing him before he could shoot any more people. Forget the fact that they were cops. They were two “good guys with guns,” and they stopped his plans from fruition. In reality, there should have been MANY people there with guns to protect against such an occurrence. Anti-gun fools dirty their drawers at the very thought of average Americans being armed for self defense. Never mind that, without them, more people would suffer. But anti-gun fools don't have the INTELLIGENCE to figure that out. (USA Today)

Misguided Lawmakers

In California, they passed a law allowing teachers and other school staff to be armed, so that, if some crazy came to their school to kill children, they could shoot back, Now, you'd think that would be a good idea, wouldn't you? But Assemblyman Kevin McCarty (Dumocrat, of course) doesn't think so. He has introduced a measure that, if passed, will DISARM those teachers, who are NOT the problem, and leave them DEFENSELESS when that crazy comes to their school to kill children, which IS the problem. When that happens, they'll just have to wait until the cops (finally) get there to dispatch the crazy with THEIR guns. Meanwhile, the crazy will have killed many children, and probably some staff, as well.

I don't know what's wrong with people like McCarthy, but it's catching. Lawmakers all over the country have succumbed to it, and are getting people killed in large numbers. McCarthy says, “It is essential for there to be a 'safe environment' in which children can learn and that is not possible when civilians are allowed to 'roam the halls,,' armed.” What makes him think teachers and other staff who have been deemed sufficiently responsible to be ALLOWED to carry their guns on campus are a problem is beyond me. But the thinking of ALL anti-gun fools escapes me. They're just not logical in their thinking. I would even go so far as to say they are STUPID. (Breitbart)

Stabs Mom, Shoots Himself

In Chicopee, Mass. A 15-year-old boy stabbed his mom to death and then used a gun to end his own life. But, how is this POSSIBLE? Like in Chicago, they have all those tight gun laws in Massachusetts! His mom shouldn't have even been ABLE to get a gun! But, as usual, all those tight gun laws don't do a thing to keep guns out of the hands of law-abiding, OR lawless people. Anti-gun fools will no doubt include this instance in their “gun violence” stats, even though the gun part was a suicide. They do that, you know, to make their stats look worse than they are. This again proves that all their ignorant gun laws do NOTHING to stop such actions. But do they pursue other means and methods? Nope! They keep making the same USELESS laws over and over, and get more and more people killed, since they're made DEFENSELESS in the face of all the ILLEGAL guns already out there in the hands of people who don't bother with permits or registration of their guns. (U. S. News & world Report)

Violent Politics

Have you ever heard of violence being committed by REPUBLICAN politicians or their supporters? Have they ever gone “into the streets” and RIOTED? I don't think so. But the same can't be said for the Dumocrats. There have been many riots in support of their efforts to dislodge Donald Trump from the office he LEGALLY earned in the 2016 election, and, while it has not been PROVED, there is word that there are many PAID demonstrators among them, paid by the Dumocrats. Then there are the individuals who are moved by the Dumocrat rhetoric to do violence. Such as the shooter in Alexandria, VA, who, following Bernie Sanders' advice, put several Republicans in the hospital before the cops killed him. This guy actually made sure they WERE Republicans before he started shooting. He actually had a LIST of Republicans he wanted to kill! He “camped out” at that park in his van for THREE MONTHS before he did his “dirty work,” showing a complete premeditation and dedication to his wish to kill Republicans because he didn't agree with their politics, and he BELIEVED the crap the Dumocrats put out. (National Review)

Shutting Down A Politician

The wife of the police chief in Hartford, CT knows whereof she speaks. After an ignorant anti-cop politician made some particularly ignorant statements about cops in her support of a bill that, if passed, would further hinder the cops in doing their jobs, she sent her a letter. That politician referred to the cops as “cowboys with bats and guns” and said, “too many cops are killing kids and this has to stop.” In her letter in response, this wife told that politician that she was ignorant, and could not pass “situational training” and make the instant decisions made every day by a cop. That she should be ashamed of herself, and wondered how this ignorant politician even stayed in office with all her conflicts of interest and ignorant decisions. That cops had gotten into “shooting scrapes in Hartford only 20 times recently, and only killed one person in the last four years—and that shooting was entirely justified. Follow the link to read her letter completely. It's very satisfying to those who prize our police and wish them well. You know--those of us with intelligence. (Bearing Arms)

"Americans Want Gun Control"

At least that's what Dumocrat pollster Maggie Omero says. She recently took part in a poll to promote gun control. She said they fielded 16 different proposals on gun control, and THAT was assumed to be proof that “Americans want gun control.” Of course, she gave no details on those proposals, because there probably weren't any. Nor was there any mention that any such proposals (IF they actually exist) came from people who took part in their poll BECAUSE they were anti-gun in the first place. They were only in her imagination. CNN commentator Marc Lamont Hill said “We need to get beyond the power of particular lobbies if we're going to get anywhere,” not mentioning the fact that that the top “lobbyist” organization is the NRA, which is supported by millions of Americans who don't agree with their fantasies. The unfortunate part, for them, is that that statement revealed their bias in FAVOR of more limiting gun control laws. Anti-gun fools like to fool themselves that a majority of Americans really WANT gun control, but it just is NOT true. And their continued losses when attempting to make such laws is proof of that. (News Busters)

A Study for THAT?

A “new study” by anti-gun fools says, “Pro-gun people are motivated by fear.” And, of course, they used a NAZI to illustrate the story. They needed a “study” to prove that? For a change, they're right, but not in the way they think. Yes, people are scared—scared of being DEFENSELESS when faced by a “bad guy” holding an ILLEGAL gun. Their “gun laws” do NOTHING to stop criminals and other bad guys from getting their guns, but only stop law-abiding people from getting them for self defense, making it easier for the bad guys to victimize us. They have a RIGHT to be scared—I'M scared. At my age, criminals regard me as “easy pickings.” I want to disabuse them of that opinion—permanently. I want the tools to be able to do that, which is being denied me by the “powers that be.” Every law or regulation they make is DESIGNED to make it easier for illegally armed criminals to victimize me, and that infuriates me. (Truth About Guns)

Just Like I Said

Private gun owners DO make a difference in crime, contrary to what anti-gun fools say, and here is yet another example: two bloody murderers escaped prison after murdering two guards with their own guns. They ransacked a house for clothes, food, and money. Fortunately for the owners of the house, they weren't at home, or they'd have been killed, too. Then they stole yet another car so the cops wouldn't know what they were driving. But that didn't do them any good, either, for they were soon involved in a gunfight with cops that had them fleeing through the woods to yet another house, where they tried to steal yet another car. But the homeowner, a “badass” himself, stopped them and held them at gunpoint until the cops arrived and took them into custody. They wisely did not name the homeowner in the news reports, apparently to keep from making him a target for their friends. “Don't mess with Texas,” of course, but don't mess with this Tennessee resident, either. (The Daily Wire)

Kardashian Gun Control

Kim Kardashian, like most anti-gun fools, wants ARMED security for herself, while denying it to the rest of us. That seems to be a “hallmark” of many anti-gun fools. One anti-gun columnist (now dead) actually SHOT at a teenager that he found using his pool without permission. Fortunately for the teen, he was a lousy shot. Many anti-gun politicians run around behind a WALL of armed protection—again, while denying that right to the rest of us. Sen. Diane Feinstein, one of the most outspoken anti-gun fools out there, in ADDITION to her armed security, has her own gun permit, and carries her own gun. Such things illustrate the hypocrisy of the anti-gun crowd. They think there is no “disconnect” here, since most of them (Feinstein excepted) don't carry guns, themselves, but HIRE armed security for protection from “the masses.” All this in VIOLATION of the Constitution of the United States, which recognizes the inherent RIGHT of ALL Americans to be armed in self defense. (Daily Caller)

Unarmed Cops Baffle Citizens

They just can't figure out WHY several countries put UNARMED cops on the streets, KNOWING that most, if not ALL neer-do-wells are likely to be armed. And they can't figure out the fuddled thinking of politicians who think DISARMING their citizens is the way to self defense. It frightens me to see unarmed cops running AWAY from a couple of men in London who are STABBING people in the streets, or cowering behind the doors of their patrol cars watching in France, while Islamic terrorists kill eleven people at a satire newspaper who had the audacity to draw a PICTURE of their “prophet.” And I'm not scared of much of ANYTHING. But the world that the ignorant politicians we have elected are creating scares the hell out of me. For only the second time in my life, I want to get a “carry permit” and carry a gun, so I won't be helpless if attacked. My own BROTHER, an ex Marine who is 70 years old, repulsed two would-be muggers who had knives, with his "sword cane" and now carries HIS gun when he goes out in case they were gang members who might come back with reinforcements. It's a scary world we're living in now, due in no small part to those IGNORANT politicians who think the way to self defense is to DISARM ourselves. (Glenn Beck)

Ignoring the Proof

In Alaska, Arizona, and Wyoming, they made laws that made carrying a gun, openly or concealed, legal without a “permit.” And gun murders PREDICTABLY dropped significantly. We told the anti-gun fools, and they yawned. It was like throwing a rock at a brick wall. It didn't even make a dent. Which is proof of something else: that they aren't interested in “reducing gun crime,” they're only interested in disarming law-abiding citizens, making it easier for armed criminals to victimize people. They'll deny it to their dying day, but that's the real life result of their stupid “gun laws.” They're trying now to stop people from calling it “gun control,” wanting them to use the term, “gun safety,” instead. A typical liberal way to change people's thinking through changing the words they can use. (Breitbart)

Another Shooting

There's been another major shooting in Alexandria, VA. One of the injured is a U. S. congressman. It happened at practice for a baseball game between congresspeople, and I predict it will be used by the anti-gun fools to make sure NOBODY who is law-abiding is ever allowed to have a gun to defend him/herself from such attacks. That's what the anti-gun fools do: make sure everybody is DEFENSELESS if they OBEY laws—which it is obvious this shooter does NOT. The anti-gun fools have no imagination. They know only one way to MAYBE stop “gun violence” in America. That is to take away the means of self defense from people who obey laws. That this makes those people DEFENSELESS means nothing to them, apparently. Lawless people are not bothered by their laws. They just go out and shoot people and DAMN their laws! (Yahoo)

"Target-Rich Environment"

It was a “target rich environment” in Alexandria, VA, where Republican congresspeople were practicing for a charity baseball game when shots rang out, seriously wounding one congressman and two cops, among others. There were MANY congresspeople there, most without any kind of protection from people such as this Bernie Sanders supporter/Trump hater. Scalise has a security detail, and they sprung into action, killing the shooter before he could hurt any more people. Two “guys with guns” stopped this from becoming a massacre of specifically Republicans. It is said that he specifically ASKED if these were Democrats or Republicans before opening fire. When innocently told they were Republicans, he happily opened fire, hoping to kill as many as he could. This proves again what I've been saying, all along. That one or two guns on the premises can STOP such shootings in their tracks. But the anti-gun fools still aren't listening, and are already demanding more of their USELESS laws keeping honest citizens unarmed and defenseless. (CNN)

"Common Sense Solutions"

They call their USELESS gun laws” “common sense solutions” to gun violence, which seems to be “out of control.” Only their solutions AREN'T “common sense,” don't work, and gun violence is NOT “out of control. It's DOWN. And they are now saying that “70% of NRA members support MOMS.” Hoo, ha! Giggle, giggle! Thanks, people, I needed a good laugh, and you've provided it again. They SAY they support the Second Amendment, but they're LYING. One of the things they inadvertently brought out in this article is that every instance of “gun violence” happened where the “gun laws are the tightest. And, of course, the anti-gun fools are still counting people up to age 19 (street gang members) as “children,” and including suicides to make their figures look more alarming. (The Baltimore Sun)

Dancing In Their Blood

The anti-gun fools are “dancing in the blood” of the Pulse Night Club victims in Orlando, FL. Florida lawmakers gathered NEAR that club to demand even more of the INNEFFECTIVE gun laws that FAILED to stop the killers of 49 people there. Now they want to make a law to keep even people who commit misdemeanor hate crimes from owning a gun. Such a law depends on those people actually OBEYING their law; something they have already demonstrated they don't care about. That's the basic problem with ALL the current anti-gun laws: they DEPEND upon lawbreakers to OBEY them, and they DON'T. They ignore their insignificant laws and commit more serious crimes. We tell them and tell them, but telling these gullible politicians that is like throwing rocks at a boulder; it just bounces off without making a dent. It's not like laws against murder or rape; those laws are made to PUNISH the perpetrators. The anti-gun laws are made to “stop gun violence,” and do NOT. They INCREASE it. (Guns)

"This Is WAR!"

That's what Florida Sheriff Wayne Ivey, in Brevard County says, when he told his citizens to “arm yourselves,” after another shooting in Orlando killed FIVE people. “Folks, now more than ever is the time for our citizens to be prepared to serve as the first line of defense, not only for them, but for their families,” Sheriff Ivey said, in his post on Facebook. He says, among other things, that they must be prepared to be “the first line of defense” in what constitutes a WAR. “What they (terrorists) don’t count on is being attacked themselves, having to become defensive to save their own lives,” Ivey argued. They don't count on being attacked in return, and having to worry about losing their own lives before the cops arrive to kill them. He told them that those precious minutes that go by before the cops can arrive can mean life or death for everybody who isn't armed, and he couldn't be more right. This guy is a “gem” of a police politician. He must be a former “cop in the trenches” to know so much. Police politicians usually aren't that smart. Some people applauded this, but others (fools all) said he was “fear mongering.” Since when is it “fear mongering” to tell people the truth that may keep them alive? (Fox News)

They're Smarter Than Politicians

Gullible politicians buy the bullsh-t put out by the anti-gun fools and become anti-gun fools themselves. They lie, alter statistics, and fill us full of bulldung to support their mistaken notions. In Great Britain, they basically BANNED guns for the populace after a major mass shooting. They DISARMED their populace, making them literally DEFENSELESS against all the ILLEGAL guns already in the hands of “neer-do-wells” who only want to do us ill. They THINK they're doing a “good thing,” but they're not. They're getting people KILLED by disarming them while IGNORING the menace of criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists, who have no trouble getting their ILLEGAL guns wherever they live. They look in HORROR at the very idea of the average citizen being armed in self defense. In England the people want their gun rights back after THREE major terrorist strikes in three months. But will the politicians listen? Probably not. That would take INTELLIGENCE. (Tribunist)

Gun Law Frenzy

The Los Angeles Times actually said recently, that “The right to bear arms is more dangerous than terrorism.” They're in PANIC, folks! They see state after state realizing reality and approving concealed carry for law-abiding human beings, and that frightens them. Never mind the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there in the hands of people who want what's yours and are willing to just TAKE it. They apparently WANT those crooks, crazies, and Islamic terrorists to prevail. Every law and regulation they pass or support DISARMS honest, law-abiding citizens and makes it easier for the “bad guys” to victimize them. And if we come up with something less than a gun that is an effective way to defend ourselves, such as the disguised stun gun, they want to make THAT illegal for us to have and carry, too. I was once told by a cop that the metal two-cell flashlight in my back pocket could be considered a weapon. I told him, “If I ever USE it as a weapon, we can discuss it, then.” (America's First Freedom)