Stupid Crack of the Day

Gabby Giffords must have gotten her brain scrambled good when that jerk shot her in that parking lot. The other day she said, “Background checks are not required of felons.” Np kiddin’ Gabby! Maybe that’s because they aren’t supposed to HAVE guns—period. But they always seem to have them when they want to victimize honest, law-abiding people. How do you do a background check on somebody who has an ILLEGAL gun, as most criminals do? So what’s your point, Gabby? You want to make a law REQUIRING felons to get background checks? How do you intend to enforce it? Most felons DO have extensive background checks. They’re called, “records.” Which is why your laws don’t allow them to have guns—which does NOTHING to keep them from HAVING the guns they use to victimize us, while, as law-abiding people, we OBEY your stupid laws, and are DEFENSELESS against those felons because of it.

She even gets Hillary wrong when she tells us she’s stupid enough to vote for her. She calls her a former U. S. Representative. She is NOT, and never has been. She has been a senator. The Democrats bought that for her. She has been Secretary of State, Obama gave that to her to keep her mouth shut. She failed miserably at both, although she played it for all it was worth to solicit bribes through her "foundation.". And she has been “First Lady,” for which she did nothing except be married to the fool who was president, and stayed married to him through all his sexcapades, even DEFENDING him by “demonizing” the women he screwed, even the one(s) he RAPED!. I’ve never seen a SANE woman do that. Giffords says current law ALLOWS felons to get guns without background checks. Nothing could be further from the truth! Felons aren’t “ALLOWED” to have guns, PERIOD! So they get them ILLEGALLY, and “skip” the background check. She criticizes Sheriff Arpaio for wanting to enforce the law Obama wants to ignore. Talk about STUPIDITY! (Just common sense)

Calif. Gun Laws Don't Work

They have failed miserably. Just look at one city: Sacramento cops are confiscating an average of one new gun per 6 hours, and just about all of them are ILLEGAL. They’re confiscating more guns every year, which means their laws against felons being able to get their guns are totally INEFFECTIVE. In spite of all their laws, gun sales to felons continue apace, increasing every year. The cops attribute the increase in confiscations of guns to “better police work.” More likely, it is due to more guns being sold out of some crook’s car trunk in a back alley somewhere, to another crook. Crooks don’t obey laws. That’s why we call them crooks. They’re also known as “lawbreakers.” We need laws that add significant time to their convictions for other crimes if they use a gun, and a PROHIBITION on cops or prosecutors “waiving” those “gun crime law charges” that do exist, to get convictions in other crimes, as they often do, now. That’s just laziness on the part of the cops. (Sacramento Bee)

Invoking Trevon Martin

Hillary Clinton says, “I want to protect Americans from the epidemic of gun violence that is stalking our country.” And she mentioned Trevon Martin as if his death was not a “righteous shooting” by a man whose head he was banging against the sidewalk, trying to kill him. But there IS no “epidemic of gun violence!” Gun violence is at its lowest ebb EVER ( by government figures). Like most anti-gun fools, she uses false figures to make uninformed people BELIEVE there is an “epidemic of gun violence” so she can do more to disarm Americans so she and her liberal pals can better victimize them. It really amazes me how people like her can continue a LIE, even after it has been DISPROVED many times. They just keep repeating the lie, over and over. And uninformed people who never heard the refutation of the lie believe them. (Washington Examiner)

"I Support Second Amendment"

That’s what Tim Kaine (Hillary’s VP choice) says. Meanwhile, he writes an anti-gun op ed for Time Magazine. He has ALWAYS been an anti-gun fool, and he doesn’t even hide it very well. But like all Democrats, he makes flat statements that deny reality, and expect us “dumb-butts” to believe him. That’s what he, Hillary, and all liberals think we are. They can say ANYTHING, and we’ll “lap it up” like a puppy laps up ice cream. You know you’re not dumb, I know you’re not dumb. But Democrats (liberals) have no respect for the American voter and think they can fool you, at will. You need to show them they can’t. Go to the polls and OUTNUMBER the fools who pay no attention to politics until just before an election, and are therefore ill-informed. The Democrats’ biggest strength is those who “pay no attention to politics” and believe their lies. (Time Magazine)

Blaming the Victim

As usual, anti-gun fools blame the legal gun owners for those who get their guns ILLEGALLY. In Britain, they say legal gun owners need to be more careful so as to keep guns out of the hands of jihadists and other fools. That’s the kind of TWISTED REASONING anti-gun fools use. It’s not the fault of the legal owners that their guns get stolen, it’s the fault of the cops and government agents who don’t do a good enough job of preventing it. I guess they’re too busy trying to keep law-abiding people from getting guns, to worry about how ILLEGAL gun-sellers get their inventory. So naturally, they blame the victim: the legal owners, who never even SEE their guns before the crooks intercept them. (Telegraph of London)

"Huge Gun Violence Problem"

England has a “huge gun violence problem.” WTF? They have almost total “gun control!” How is that even possible? What? Do you mean some people don’t obey their draconian gun laws? What a surprise! They’re even afraid there is a connection between armed gangs and Islamic terrorists! Apparently, there’s a lively illegal gun sales business in England, in SPITE of all their laws. Whatta surprise! They found that fully HALF the terror plots in England involved terrorists trying to buy guns, with which to kill people who won’t “convert” to their phony “religion.” “Counter terrorism officers think that, since England is surrounded by water, that gives the ‘authorities’ an advantage in controlling the entry of guns into the UK.” Really? How has that worked, so far? (BBC News)

"Murderers Don't Obey Gun Laws"

They needed a “study” to discover that? Damn! A Texas radio station, ABC 13, sent a questionnaire to all gun murderers asking this: “How did you get your gun? What did you pay?, and “How often, if ever, did you go through a background check? 90% got it illegally. 90% were ineligible to have a gun, due to past crimes. And 100% carried concealed despite not having a CCW Permit. Surprise, surprise! They violated the law when they set out to MURDER someone! It’s amazing! They found that these murderers had no intention of following the law! Isn’t that what criminals DO? It amazes me how STUPID some of the “studies” people do are! What did they expect from a murderer! That he followed the law while getting his gun? (America’s First Freedom)

"FBI Cleared Her!"

That’s the narrative the Democrats are putting out after the FBI reopened their “investigation” into Hillary’s crimes. But he didn’t. He listed all her crimes and said he wasn’t going to pursue charges “because she didn’t mean it.” But now 600,000 PLUS e-mails that were NOT turned over have been discovered. More than have ever been found before, on a system the Congress wouldn’t have discovered if they weren’t investigating the husband of her closest aide, and his sleazy sex texts. Of course, she never told them about those, and I’m sure she knew they were there, but kept them hidden.

A COUNTRY WITHOUT GUNS: Without LEGAL guns, anyway—except for cops and government agents. That describes Venezuela, where it is a CRIME for a private citizen to have a gun. So they kill cops and steal THEIR guns. You can bet there are plenty of ILLEGAL guns there, but they don’t help the 80% who want President Nicholas Maduro OUT. But they can’t do anything to make that happen as long as he controls “the men with guns.” That’s what our politicians fervently wish for here, which is why they try so hard to DISARM us.

3,000 SHOT IN CHICAGO: Just this year. 19 of them just since early last weekend. Why, oh why is Chicago one of the most dangerous places in the country to live, since they have such tight gun laws? That’s a question being asked by many anti-gun fools who just can’t figure out that if you disarm honest people, the criminals “run wild.” And that’s what all Chicago’s “tight gun laws” do. Law-abiding people obey their laws, while criminals do NOT. They call them CRIMINALS for a reason.

PUT ‘EM IN PRISON: Like Mexico does. In Mexico, if people they deport return, they give them a stiff prison sentence before deporting them, again. They’re pretty tough on returners, but we’re not. No wonder we have so many deportees who have been deported many times, come back and commit more crimes. Like that guy in San Francisco who murdered that defenseless girl, right in front of her father. He was deported FIVE TIMES. Many others see our border as a “revolving door.” So when are we going to do something about it? (AFTER Obama's gone, IF Hillary doesn't get elected)/

DID COMEY BREAK THE LAW? I guess the best defense is an offense. Which is why Hillary is accusing FBI Director Comey of violating the Hatch Act by releasing an announcement about reopening the investigation into Hillary’s crimes, just before the election. Maybe his best next move is to have her INDICTED before the election. I’d hate for her to be elected and have to resign. There’d still be a Democrat in office to replace her. And we don’t want that. You can bet they’ll pick the most dedicated socialist.

TRUMP ONE POINT BEHIND: Donald Trump is now just ONE POINT behind Hillary in “the polls.” In spite of all they did to twist the polls to help Democrats demoralize potential Republican voters, so they wouldn’t vote for Trump. He still overpowered them. The only poll that counts is the one on Nov, 8, and if Trump overpowers them there, Democrats lose. And that possibility makes them wet their jammies.

.

"Get Around the Constitution"

They can’t just BAN guns. So they do everything they can to first, make guns UNUSABLE, and then they do everything they can to make gun use a “hardship” by passing laws to make gun makers and sellers liable for damages in every case where a gun they made or sold was used to commit a crime—like they are really responsible for MISUSE of the guns they’ve sold, LEGALLY, following all the stupid “gun laws.” Next, they'll let auto victims sue makers and sellers of CARS any time there's an accident. Many of their “gun laws” work to make it impossible to get a LEGAL gun into action fast enough to defend against an ILLEGAL gun in the hands of a “bad guy,” which gets honest, law-abiding people KILLED. Others only give authorities a list of LEGAL gun owners, completely IGNORING the fact that the MAJORITY of crimes are committed by people with ILLEGAL guns. They haven’t figured out a law yet that can do ANYTHING about “gun violence,” but they keep making them, anyway, DISARMING honest people, while criminals still get their guns, and there is NO RECORD of who has an ILLEGAL gun, anywhere. Until AFTER the crime. Meanwhile, half of the ”anti-gun organizations” who support Hillary Clinton only exist on paper as a name, and use of a fax machine probably that can be found in Mike Bloomberg’s office. (America’s First Freedom)

"Men With Guns"

How long can Nicholas Meduro remain in power in Venezuela after 80% of the citizens signaled they wanted him out? Quite a while, I guess, as long as he continues to have the loyalty of “men with guns.” Government guns, that is. No one else is supposed to have any, since the government made private gun ownership a crime. This shows you what will happen if there were no legal guns in a country, except those in the hands of cops and government agents (except for illegal guns, of course). Now they’re killing cops for their guns! The “will of the people” is IGNORED. What would happen if Venezuela had the equivalent of the Second Amendment, you ask? He wouldn’t be around for long, and that’s what OUR politicians fear. That’s why they try so hard to DISARM us as they work HARD to take away one right after another, and take more power over us, while making us pay for it. They know the only thing that keeps them from taking COMPLETE power is the fact that so many people have LEGAL guns. So they want to put a stop to that, as quickly as they can. And failing that, they want to make the guns we do have USELESS. (Gun Watch)

"It's Not A Right!"

That’s what they say in England about gun ownership. They say it’s a “privilege.” Which means it can be given or taken away by the politicians, at will. Of course, they don’t have a Second Amendment in England, so they know NOTHING about a human right to self defense, and to own and use the means to it, a gun. They say “the NRA is always coming up with new ways to be nasty,” completely ignoring the fact that the NRA is protecting a right GUARANTEED by the Constitution, which is the BASIS for all our laws. Since they don’t have such a thing as the Second Amendment, created by wiser men than they, before they were even born, they think they know more than people who simply are DETERMINED to maintain the constitutional RIGHT to defend themselves with whatever tool is necessary—in this case, a gun. Back when there were no guns, that right would involve the right to carry a sword, in order to defend oneself. We fought a war for independence from these people because of their ignorance of human nature, so let’s not allow them to tell us what is, and is NOT a “right.” (The Guardian of London)

Creating A Crime Wave

It’s becoming more and more clear that Obama wants to do as much DAMAGE to this country as he can, as long as he can. So he’s releasing as many criminals from prison, on specious reasons, as he can. Earlier this month he released 102 criminals, many of them with gun convictions. Then just the other day he released another 98, and 19.8% of them had gun convictions. This action GUARANTEES a significant rise in the crime rate, especially the GUN crime rate, as those “career criminals” continue to ply their trade. Couple that with his importing hundreds of thousands of Islamic terrorists, who have PROMISED to kill as many Americans as they can if they don’t “convert” to their phony “religion,” disguised as ”refugees, and a new “crime wave” is guaranteed. Of course, as a former president, he will live behind a wall with his own ARMED security, provided by the government, so he isn’t worried about being victimized. Besides: most of them are his friends, or just grateful to him for their freedom to victimize us some more, (Bearing Arms)

Criminals For Gun Control

Did you know that one of the most powerful “anti-gun politicians” is barred, himself, from carrying or owning a gun do to past crimes? And he reports DIRECTLY to the president on his work. It’s a known fact that some of the hottest proponents of “gun control” are criminals, because what PASSES for “gun control” only benefits the criminal? Criminals LOVE gun control, because it makes their jobs easier, knowing their victims most likely won’t be armed, and able to kill THEM instead of being intimidated by THEIR guns. But it’s strange to me that a TOP “gun control” proponent is, himself, a criminal, who is not allowed to have a gun. This is the kind of anomaly that makes people wonder about government efforts to DISARM the populace, KNOWING it can only benefit criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists, who are coming her by the hundreds of thousands, on OUR dime, thanks to Obama. (The War on Guns)

"Get Around the Constitution"

They can’t just BAN guns. So they do everything they can to first, make guns UNUSABLE, and then they do everything they can to make gun use a “hardship” by passing laws to make gun makers and sellers liable for damages in every case where a gun they made or sold was used to commit a crime—like they are really responsible for MISUSE of the guns they’ve sold, LEGALLY, following all the stupid “gun laws.” Many of their “gun laws” work to make it impossible to get a LEGAL gun into action fast enough to defend against an ILLEGAL gun in the hands of a “bad guy,” which gets honest, law-abiding people KILLED. Others only give authorities a list of LEGAL gun owners, completely IGNORING the fact that the MAJORITY of crimes are committed by people with ILLEGAL guns. They haven’t figured out a law yet that can do ANYTHING about “gun violence,” but they keep making them, anyway, DISARMING honest people, while criminals still get their guns, and there is NO RECORD of who has an ILLEGAL gun, anywhere. Meanwhile, half of the ”anti-gun organizations” who support Hillary Clinton only exist on paper as a name, and use of a fax

machine probably that can be found in Mike Bloomberg’s office. (Just common sense)

"It Doesn't Happen!"

That’s what the anti-gun fools tell us. They desperately want us to believe that defensive use of guns doesn’t happen. That the only thing guns are used for is to create “gun violence,” or for kids to kill themselves, or others, through ignorance. But then a respected organization like "National Academy of Sciences” (NAS) comes out with the fact that there are 500,000 to 3 MILLION defensive uses of guns, in SPITE of the restrictive gun laws all over the country. The report also noted that mass shootings are rare in the United States, though even the way they’re hyped when they DO happen makes it seem otherwise—which plays right into the hands of those who want to DISARM all honest, law-abiding people, leaving the field wide open for the criminals, crazies, and even Islamic terrorists (who are coming by the hundreds of thousands, at Obama’s invitation), who get their guns ILLEGALLY. They found, to Obama’s and the other anti-gun fools’ horror, gun use against crime was “commonplace” in the United States, contrary to the claims of the gun-grabbers. (Breitbart)

Teacing Our Kids

This is the kind of thing they teach our kids in schools these days. The question, “Do guns have a place in our society today?” gives you an idea how IGNORANT are the people deciding on the curriculum. Guns DO “have a place in our society!” LEGAL guns, to oppose all the ILLEGAL guns that are already out there in the hands of the “bad guys.” If (legal) guns were removed from society (even if that were possible), those with ILLEGAL guns would simply “take over.” And there would be no way to stop them, except maybe with more ILLEGAL guns in the hands of honest people who were forced to BECOME criminals, in order to to defend themselves. This very question reveals the kind of BONEHEADS who are deciding what to teach our impressionable kids, who haven’t been on this Earth long enough to know better. (University News)

Worse Than They Thought?

Liberals and other gun-grabbers tell us there are about 300 million guns in the U. S., and they’re WRONG, as usual, mostly due to lack of proper research, of course. There are NOT 300 million, there are at least 412 million, and maybe up to 600 million. Boy! That must make Sen. Feinstein and Gabby Giffords cringe! And most of those guns are ILLEGALLY-owned, which are usually the only ones used to do “gun violence” while all their “laws” only apply to LEGAL gun owners, who are not the problem, at all. As usual, their numbers are faulty. Sometimes because of faulty research, but other times due to them LYING to “buttress” their figures to make us think “guns are taking over.” Their entire narrative is based on the false premise that, if they can “get rid of guns,” that will also get rid of CRIME. And that all they have to do is make a LAW that LAWBREAKERS will obey. (Weapons Man)

"More Guns Won't Help"

That’s according to a “Johns Hopkins/ BLOOMBERG) (of course) “study.” They also concluded that mass shootings NEVER occur in “gun-free zones,” which we all know is a LIE. ALL mass shootings have happened in “gun-free zones!” Potential mass shooters SEEK OUT “gun-free zones” because they can be pretty sure there won’t be any law-abiding people there with their own guns. KNOWN mass shooters, when questioned, SAY they do! The anti-gun fools must really think Americans are STUPID! The LIES they tell are easily disproved, but they tell them, anyway, and those who ARE gullible believe them. It’s not surprising that a “survey” by BLOOMBERG people would have such “findings.” That’s what the gun-grabbers DO. Lie to you, because there AREN’T any real figures to back them up. They say that “best evidence" doesn’t support our contention that getting rid of no-gun zones would reduce gun crime, but “best evidence” DOES support our claims. (The Hub)

Flawed Thinking

It should be easy to dissuade the anti-gun fools from their intended path because their entire movement is based on not one, but MANY flaws in their thinking. We should be able to show them these flaws to get them to abandon their efforts to take guns away from honest, law-abiding people, leaving them DEFENSELESS against the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there, in the hands of those who will only use them to victimize them. But that isn’t possible, because they just aren’t smart enough, and they firmly IGNORE all our efforts to reason with them. Their first faulty thinking involves disarming law-abiding people who AREN’T the problem, while ignoring the “bad guys” who ARE. That gets people killed. Next is their firm opinion that all they have to do is get rid of all the guns and that will stop the “bad guys” from committing their crimes, including murder and MASS murder. Even if that were possible (which it isn’t), crime would continue, using other weapons, or even their bare hands. Then comes their firm conviction that all they have to do is make a LAW against gun ownership, and CRIMINALS, who obey NO laws, will somehow obey it, and get rid of their illegal guns. That’s just a pipe-dream. There are many more examples of their ignorance, but I just don’t have room here to list them all. (Just common sense)

Australia Repeats Their Failure

They instituted a “MANDATORY” gun-buyback program a few years ago, after a particularly disturbing mass shooting. It didn’t work. So now they’re going to offer “amnesty” for those who didn’t obey the first law, who give up their guns. “’There is little evidence to suggest that (the Australian mandatory gun-buyback program) had any significant effects on firearm homicides,’ University of Melbourne researchers Wang-Sheng Lee and Sandy Suardi wrote in 2008. ‘Although gun buybacks appear to be a logical and sensible policy that helps to placate the public’s fears, the evidence so far suggests that in the Australian context, the high expenditure incurred to fund the 1996 gun buyback has not translated into any tangible reductions in terms of firearm deaths,’ they added.” In other words, it didn’t work. Today, they ADMIT that there are 260,000 ILLEGAL guns in Australia, and are going to offer amnesty to anyone who will turn in their guns. Like a CRIMINAL will “turn in his guns,” just because they “offer amnesty.” What FOOLS these anti-gun idiots be! (Truth About Guns)