"We Changed Our Minds"

Baltimore, MD residents aren't so sure they want their cops GONE any more, after murders rose 100% and arrests WENT DOWN 50% Now they're begging the cops to “do more.” Well, what do they WANT? The cops to be GONE or DO MORE? They can't seem to make up their minds, can they? I think they're finally finding out what we already knew: that without the cops standing between us and the savages, they're defenseless, since Obama and the gang have, for the most part, effectively DISARMED them. But not the crooks, who get their guns illegally and carry them illegally. They don't care about restrictive gun laws. Actually, they LIKE it that way because they can be pretty sure their intended victims won't be armed. (The Blaze)

Bypassing Congress

It was only a matter of time. Every time Obama goes to Congress to get his silly and useless gun laws passed, he has failed. In other situations where that has happened, he has groused about how Congress just hasn't followed his orders and “did it administratively.” Meaning he made “regulations” to be enforced by his nose-ring led bureaucrats as if they were law—and nobody “called him on it,” so they're now being ENFORCED as if they were law. So now he's going to do the same with regard to his anti-gun laws. He has several of them poised to be enforced, soon. He and his cronies say Sandy Hook couldn't have happened if these laws had been in effect. But that ignores the fact that the gunman STOLE the guns he used. In other cases shooters PASSED “background checks.” So what could these laws have done to stop ANYTHING? (Conservative Byte)

Oklahpoma "Got Religion"

They finally figured out that “gun-free zones” were a “target-rich environment” for bad guys, which is why would-be mass shooters choose schools, for the most part, to do their mass killings. Which is why the Oklahoma governor signed a bill into law allowing teachers and other staff who had “carry permits” to bring their guns to school. So now a potential shooter will never be sure if they come in to shoot up a school, that there won't be a dozen guns already there, aimed at him. You may wonder why I say “HIM.” That's probably because there has never been a female mass school shooter (so far). So you can count on the fact that there will not be a successful school shooting in Oklahoma in the future. The guy who tries it will quickly resemble Swiss cheese. Count on it. (Right To Bear)

One More Obstacle

The Constitution doesn't allow them to simply BAN guns, so they make many laws to put as many obstacles in the way of gun ownership as possible. Now they want to REQUIRE gun buyers to buy expensive liability insurance before they can buy a gun, with those who don't being subject to a $10,000.00 fine. Of course, the constitutional ban on “cruel or unusual punishment” doesn't apply, either. Rep. Carole Maloney (D-of course-NY, again of course) introduced legislation to do just that. It's as if people can't be liable for injuries to others if they don't have guns. She compares gun buying to buying a car, and the analogy just doesn't work. You don't buy a car for self-defense. And with such insurance, it opens the way for much more litigation as criminals who get shot by their intended victims sue the people who shoot them. This law does NOTHING to prevent that. Naturally, she completely ignores the fact that CRIMINALS, who don't obey laws, will not obey this one, either. (Breitbart)

Felon With Gun

According to this story, cops arrested a felon with a gun. How did this HAPPEN? I thought, according to gun grabbers, everybody OBEYED their gun laws! If so, a felon could never be caught with a gun in his possession! But this one was. So how did it happen? Were the gun grabbers WRONG? I wonder if they actually BELIEVE the crap they feed us in order to get their USELESS laws passed? You know, those laws that create a “target-rich environment” for criminals with their illegally-owned, illegally-bought, or STOLEN guns? All gun registration does is tell the politicians who has a LEGAL gun so they can come and “confiscate” (steal) them when they're ready to finish disarming the populace. They do NOTHING to slow gun violence because criminals don't OBEY laws. (JC Online)

"Turn In Your Guns!"

That's what a new New Jersey law proposed by Gabby Giffords says to crooks and criminals who have guns. Does Gabby really believe this law will cause criminals to say, “Boy! It's illegal for me to have this gun, so I'd better turn it in!” Boy, that bullet she took to her head must have really “scrambled her brains!” If she really believes CRIMINALS, who obey NO laws, will obey this one, she's REALLY brain-scrambled! She says, “Guns in the hands of dangerous people are a threat to women.” No sh-t, Dick Tracy! But does she REALLY think a law such as the one she is pushing will make ANY difference to a criminal, to whom a gun is an important tool in his tool kit? And since he doesn't obey ANY laws, why should he obey this one? I wonder how people who are the victims of gun violence become so STUPID! But they do, and she is but one example. (NJ.com)

...And Again

It happened again, and will happen again and again, as long as politicians think the way to end gun violence is to DISARM honest people while criminals have no trouble getting their guns illegally because they don't obey laws. That's the DEFINITION of a “criminal.” They don't obey laws. In Chicago, IL, where the gun laws are the tightest in the nation, 49 people suffered gun violence in just ONE weekend! Things like this ought to “wake up” those obtuse politicians—but they don't. They go right on pushing their USELESS laws that provide these criminals with a steady stream of UNARMED victims. They never learn from experience. They just “block it out” and keep on disarming honest people so the criminals can victimize them easier. Is there ANY way to “wake up” these FOOLS? I don't think so. (Guns 'n' Freedom)

Guns In Colorado

A small town called Rifle, Colorado, named for a trapper returning to the town to get his rifle, there is a restaurant called the “Shooter's Grill,” where everybody working there is “packin'.” It's a lot of fun watching those pretty young waitresses walking around wearing shorts with a .45 on her shapely hip. The owner, who is just as shapely, and just as armed, says she was surprised at the response from the public when she opened it on this concept. But the place is full of armed customers every day, who are ecstatic that it exists. According to liberal blather, there should be a bloody shootout every day there. But the truth is, there has never been a “shootout” at this restaurant, and a robber wouldn't dare show his face there. And they run “concealed carry” classes for those who want to get a concealed carry permit. I've been to Rifle, but that was before this one opened. What I found was a “veggie” restaurant that was all that was open that night in town. I had my first “veggie burger” that night, and it was surprisingly good. I'm hoping to go back to visit this restaurant. (You Tube)

"Concealed Carry Causes Bikers"

According to the “Violence Policy Center,” biker gangs are all told by their leaders to get “carry permits” where they can. Which makes it easy for them to kill each other. But this ignores the fact that there were just as many shootings among biker gangs BEFORE the concealed carry laws were made. And where they can't get licenses to carry they just get them illegally and kill each other, anyway. And if they can't GET guns, they use knives and heavy chains—and in some cases, their bare hands. As with any group of people, if they want to kill each other, they'll do it, if they have to use a SWORD or a baseball bat. You can't keep misfits and malcontents from killing each other by making laws against the tools of violence. They'll just “go around” the law, one way or the other. But anti-gun fools will never “tumble” to this. They just want to “disarm America,” whatever they must do or how many lies they must tell to do it. (Gun Free Zone)

No "Gun Control" Groups

Remember those “gun control outfits” that are always working to disarm honest Americans by “hook or crook?” Outfits like “Moms Against Guns” (or some such), Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, and “Everytown,?” Most of which are financed by former NYC Mayor Bloomberg, the biggest, and best known anti-gun troll in the nation, are no longer “gun control” groups. Now they're “gun SAFETY” groups, since they know so much about gun safety, and all, ya know? At least before, they were honest enough to describe themselves as what they were, but now they're trying to masquerade as gun SAFETY groups. People who don't know which end of the gun the bullet comes out of PRETEND to tell us how to handle guns! I guess nothing worked when they were “gun control groups,” so now they're going to try another scam. (Second Amendment Insider)

Crooks Love Gun Laws

Wherever gun laws are the tightest, the instance of gun violence is highest. This is something the “anti-gun fools” won't admit, but which criminals KNOW. They LOVE tight gun laws because they have no intention of obeying them, while law-abiding folks WILL, and thus will be largely disarmed. The politicians making those laws really think that the way to self defense is to DISARM yourself. Liberals used the same “reasoning” in their efforts to get Russia to agree to nuclear disarmament in the past by unilaterally disarming ourselves. What they don't realize is that criminals (and Russians) do not OBEY such things and to disarm ourselves in hopes of getting them to do likewise is a “pipe dream.,” Criminals in prison readily tell you they feel the most comfortable “plying their trade” in areas with tight gun laws because they can be pretty sure their intended victims will be unarmed, and thus helpless. The writer talks about the dangers he incurred by leaving that gun untended, but ignores the fact that to be dangerous that gun would still need human intervention, as usual. (Political Forum)

Guns Don't Kill

To listen to the gun grabbers, guns are the most dangerous thing going. But, as illustrated here, guns, without a human being holding them and pulling the trigger, are completely inert. They are an inanimate object. There are more people killed by cars than guns, and they're an inanimate object without human intervention, too. Why aren't people trying to get rid of cars? Oh, right—they are. But not because they kill people, because they POLLUTE. Liberals are deathly afraid of things like that. They completely ignore the fact that both need human intervention for them to do any damage. And that includes polluting. To pollute, they need to be driven, which requires a human being at the wheel. If they were smart, they'd aim their “gun laws” at the CRIMINALS using them for nefarious purposes instead of disarming honest, reliable people who DO obey laws while CRIMINALS do not. But they aren't smart. (Inquisitr)

Microcosm for America

Obama wants to emulate Jamaica in its handling of “the gun issue.” So do all the other anti-gun fools. Some time ago they had such a problem with violence in Jamaica, gun violence and otherwise, that you took your life in your hands if you went to the grocery store if you were white or “beige.” The government spewed so much white hatred that a white man couldn't walk down the street without taking a chance on being shot or killed in another way. So they decided to DISARM the whole country "to solve the gun problem." They decreed that ALL guns and bullets should be “turned over” to the government unless they were government-owned, or in the hands of the cops. Then the only people to fear were the cops or “government agents,” who were known for their white hatred and were not above PLANTING guns so they could send people to what amounts to a “concentration camp.”

“So there we all were - government-disarmed, sitting-duck, law-abiding citizens and expatriates. Anyone can guess what happened next: the rampant and unfettered carnage began in earnest.“Robberies, kidnappings, murders, burglaries, rapes - all committed by the vast populace of still-armed criminals. Doubtless the criminals were positively ecstatic that the government had been so helpful in creating all these juicy and utterly defenseless victims for their easy prey.” That's the basic fallacy in today's “anti-gun laws.” The CRIMINALS remain armed. Because they don't OBEY laws. They CREATED a lawless society of criminals who KNEW their potential vicrims were most likely disarmed, and naturally “went wild,” running around in pickup trucksful of thugs, who picked houses at random, breaking in and raping, robbing them, and sometimes killing them. All this because the government DISARMED the honest people who DID obey laws. That's what Obama and his crowd want for America, Make no mistake. That's what he's working toward. We have to STOP HIM. (Varmit Al)

"Gun Violence Is Rare"

That's the actual headline in a liberal media source recently after the “big shootout” between motorcycle gang members and the cops. No, they kill each other in other ways: mostly with knives and heavy chains, which can't be easily defined as weapons until used as such. And therein lies the fallacy in ALL “gun control legislation.” It assumes that if people don't have guns, they won't kill and maim each other. Nothing could be further from the truth. If guns didn't exist, they'd find other ways to kill each other—and these people have. Which is why “Gun Violence Is Rare” among them. That headline is misleading, as it assumes that the lack of GUN violence is a lack of all kinds OF VIOLENCE. It isn't. Way back when, most men carried swords or some kind of a knife, and when they wanted to kill each other, they used their swords or knives. Notice in this case, the guns didn't come out until the cops arrived with THEIR guns. (10 News)

Making Guns Useless

Obama can't just BAN guns. So he does the next best thing: he makes them useless. Without bullets, all they are is inefficient clubs. Bullets aren't protected by the Constitution, so he can do what he wants with them. So he's starting the process of banning them by first, forcing people to “register” them. If he's successful, every bullet you buy will have to be registered in your name, It won't stop you from killing anybody, but it WILL make sure you get caught when you do—unless you can find a way to negate the registration, something I'm sure criminals will find a way to accomplish. Meanwhile, people will continue to die as a market for illicit ammunition grows, and the cost of bullets goes sky high so criminals can go on committing their violent crimes with seeming impunity. And if Obama thinks criminals can't find a way around his “registration” of ammunition. Meanwhile, nothing gets done to reduce gun violence and the government, as usual, spends a lot of money making it LOOK like they're doing something real when they're not. (Right to Bear)

MOMS Lie to Texas

One of the “ladies” from “Moms Against Guns" (or some such) LIED to the Texas Senate when she tried to convince them her son killed his dad with a gun. Actually, he killed him with a pipe wrench and a knife. But truth apparently means nothing to these people. The lies they tell all the time mostly go unnoticed by many people. Maybe their next target will be pipe wrenches and knives. She also played up the fact that her son “had an arsenal” of guns, which had NO BEARING on his killing his father. All members of this group who testified were obviously reading from a prepared script given them by Bloomberg. It even had blank, underlined spaces for their individual names, some of which had their names handwritten in the space. Maybe they needed it to remember who they were. (Breitbart)

But Does It Work?

Apparently that doesn't matter to a court in Illinois. If it “makes people feel better,” it's okay to violate a very basic constitutional right. How STUPID are some judges? They suppose that bans on weapons make sense because it “makes people feel safer.” Only one problem: it doesn't stop people from being victimized by criminals with their ILLEGAL guns, as gun ownership will do. Owning and carrying their own guns will ALSO “make people feel safer.” Especially the ones who do have their own guns. But that is not even considered by this kind of a fool. I don't know what's wrong with these anti-gun fools—which this judge seems to be. They can't see reality. They only see what they WANT to see. It's a malady that seems to be common with them. I wonder which came first: stupidity, or gun control? Or are they the same thing? (The

(Right to Bear)

No Coverage

As more and more concealed carriers and their guns stop mass shootings, the liberal media IGNORES it. The more often people who have “carry permits” strop shootings, the less media coverage it gets. Why is that? So people like the liberal magazine “Mother Jones,” can falsely claim “there hasn't been a case where a concealed gun carrier has stopped a shooting.” What about New Holland, SC, where two firefighters with permits stopped a shooting? Or in Chicago, where an Uber driver used his gun to stop a shooting? How about the time in Philly when a permit holder saved a lot of lives by killing a would-be shooter outside a barber shop? And again in Chicago (with it's tough anti-gun laws) where a man with his own gun stopped four gang members from killing a woman for removing a cup from where they had placed It on top of her car. There are so many such instances, I can't even mention them all—and the liberal media doesn't even TRY. They just don't want you to know about them, that's all. (Fox News)

Can't Undersatand Reality

Liberals talk a lot about our “heavily-armed culture,” as if it's something REAL. What they ignore is that the shootings they talk about are those done by CRIMINALS, who don't OBEY laws. The theater shooting, for instance, in Aurora, Colorado, was done by a guy who HAD the right to own guns, but should not have had it. But most legal gun owners do not go out and shoot up theaters full of people. Even most of ILLEGAL gun owners don't. It's only those “looney-tunes like the Aurora theater shooter who do, and they would get their guns anyway, anyway they can. Most mass-shooters don't HAVE gun permits and steal their guns or have people buy them for them. There's even a name for that: “straw purchase.” Or they BUY them ILLEGALLY in a back alley somewhere. Meanwhile, honest, reliable, law-abiding people can't get guns to use in defending themselves because of all the stupid laws that keep only honest people unarmed. It's not our “heavily armed society” that's at fault, it's the gun-grabbers who keep good people unarmed who do the damage. (Dallas News)

He Really Belives!

Country music star Brantley Stewart really believes in guns. And he proves it. Just look at his back. I believe in our right to own and carry guns for personal protection, too. But I don't think I'd go THAT far. I wouldn't get ANY tattoo, pushing ANYTHING. If Obama has his way, just having a tattoo like that would get him a prison term. And in this day and age with people being PROSECUTED for flying the AMERICAN flag—in AMERICA, I don't think it will be too long. Obama is losing BIG on the legislative front, when it comes to banning guns. But he's making advances in the bureaucratic front, where all it takes is his WORD to make something SEEM like law and be ENFORCED like one as long as corrupt bureaucra6ts will ENFORCE them as if they were. (The Right to Bear)