Oregon Getting It Right

They’re now telling school teachers that if they wish, they MAY carry their guns to school is they are licensed to carry; thus returning to them the same rights enjoyed by the average American, even if the “authorities” don’t agree. Now would be school shooters have no way of knowing that if they go into a school to shoot people, they won’t be met with a gun in the hands of someone they didn’t suspect had one. This, more than anything else, will ensure fewer mass shootings in schools—at least in Oregon. In Arkansas, they’re doing the same, and the Attorney General (who is apparently an anti-gun fool) objects. But school officials say they will allow teachers and school staff to be armed, and the AG can go to hell. (Daily Caller)

Deadly LAX Shooting

It’s happening right now, as I write this. Early reports say multiple people shot by at least one man with a rifle at the Los Angeles Airport. Anti-gun fools will use this as yet another excuse to make yet more crappy laws that make it more difficult to get and use guns for self-defense. They don’t know yet if there was more than one shooter, who has been wounded in the leg and “taken out.” They STILL think the way to self-defense is to make laws that DISARM everybody but the criminals, who never have any trouble getting their guns. Stupidity remains among the anti-gun fools. Stupid people are too stupid to know they’re stupid and they think they’re smarter than anybody else. They deny the whole idea that ONE person in the crowd with his own gun and the will to use it could easily stop such a shooter who, in the absence of that person, could kill at will as people cower under benches until he gets to them. Politicians NEVER LISTEN to reason and some even deny the very EXISTENCE of reason and logic. It’s time we elected some INTELLIGENT politicians who can see reality and make laws punishing the USE of guns in crime and so make sure such people are in prison for longer periods. They currently use such laws as DO exist as “throwaways” to get convictions on other charges. They need to stop doing this. (4 NBC LA)

"Hob-Nailed Boots"

That’s the best way to describe the pre-dawn police and federal agent raid on the home of a reporter recently. They were there (they said) to look for “unregistered guns and a potato gun.” They didn’t find any. But they “confiscated” (stole) unrelated documents and everything else they could get their hands on. She said, “I think they found a great way to get into my house and get a hold of my confidential notes and go through every other file in my office." And that’s what it was: a transparent raid to get their hands on her confidential and private information: information she is not required to divulge under constitutional law. But I’m sure their warrant (if they even HAD one) covered going through everything they could find. This is how Obama is operating today, and he has way too many “willing accomplices” to his crimes. That’s how it works as you solidify your power as a dictator.

   They also “confiscated” (stole) her properly REGISTERED firearms, according to court documents. She told us that she figured it was a “fishing expedition” and they took only notes regarding a story she wrote critical of the Federal Air Marshal program way back in 2008. And many of what they took were not even noted on the inventory of what they DID take, while such inventory is REQUIRED by any such warrant. They told her she could “come and get” some of the papers after they had had WEEKS to copy them, forgetting entirely that they ought to BRING them to her. But then, that’s the arrogance of government employees. No charges were (so far) filed against her or her husband, which means it WAS a “fishing expedition.” One member of the  “break-in team” even told her that story “embarrassed the agency.” Which told the story. (Fox News)

The Mayflower Compact

Aside from the Constitution, the Mayflower Contract, which EVERY potential colonist signed before being allowed to set foot on land, bound them to accept ANY government created by the “Civil Community Politic,” which was empowered to make “just and equal laws, ordinances, Acts, compacts and Constitutions and Offices.” It was this “Civil Community Politic” that created and enacted the Constitution if the United States to be the BASIS for any and ALL laws for the United Sates. What has not been taught is that the original system, which was inherently collectivist, caused the first year there to be a DISASTER because it kept all the land as being owned by the entire group and all persons were given one section (collectivism). He/she would enjoy the “fruits” of EVERYBODY’S LABOR, whether he/she worked or not. This removed any INCENTIVE to work and is why most of the colony, including the governor’s wife, to die of starvation or of illness brought on by malnutrition. So Governor Bradford changed it. The land was still divided up, but the colonist who did not work would have no part in the “fruits” of other’s labors. With incentive returned, the colony prospered. This has purposely not been taught by those who favor collectivism over the free market. And as long as those people (the liberals) control most of the media and education, it will NEVER be taught. (History)

Interpol "Wakes Up"

 Many anti-gun fools think the way to self-defense is to DISARM ourselves. But when we do, we make it EASY for Islamic terrorists to come here and kill us. Interpol now says this: .“For many years, the anti-gun establishment has been putting forth the idea that gun control is necessary for public safety. During an Interpol conference in Cartegena, Colombia, Noble indicated that in an open society an armed citizenry can protect people from terrorist attacks.” This points out something that anti-gun fools will never understand: that an armed populace can ENSURE self-defense. The Japanese realized this during WWII when they refused to attack the American mainland “because there would be a gun behind every bush.” Some liberals say this is a “generalization” and not right. But just the IMAGE of that was enough to keep the Japanese away from the American mainland. We should maintain that image and project it to Islam. While giving our citizens the right to defend themselves from  domestic AND foreign enemies rather than present these vipers with “Easy targets.’ (Eurasia Review)

The Unarmed Citizenry

In Russia under the communists, and still under the socialists (which is the same thing with only cosmetic differences) it’s ILLEGAL to have a gun for anybody BUT their “leaders” and the “apparatchik.” And those “leaders MURDERED millions of people who showed ANY tendency to criticize the leadership. I don’t blame this writer for getting mad while reading this story, written by an American who moved to Russia on “phony promises,” which is much like in the United States today with Obama promising everything and delivering nothing. We are entering a period that will, if it is allowed to continue, put us under similar laws and I’m sure our politicians will take full advantage of it. (Gun-Free Zone)

Gun Death Exaggerations

As usual, the anti-gun fools do everything they can to make things look worse than they really are. The feds are now considering people children up to 26 years of age so the anti-gun fools take this up in their figures and include everybody who was hospitalized for a gunshot wound up to that age (even if they were shot by the cops in the process of arresting them). That includes many that the world recognizes as adults in every way BUT buying health insurance, AND the thousands of gang members who are shot (by each other AND the cops) each year. Gang members are usually “underage” and cannot buy guns. Thus, their ownership of guns is ILLEGAL under CURRENT law. So what good do the kind of laws now made DO? Yes, a few REAL children get hurt by guns. But people who have nefarious wishes WILL get guns regardless of laws. Where anti-gun laws are the tightest, it is the most easy to find places to buy ILLEGAL guns. So what they need to do is give people who USE guns unlawfully MUCH longer prison sentences (instead of using current laws that do that as "throwaways" to get convictions in other crimes) rather than penalize HONEST people by disarming them and making of them “easy targets” since they are unarmed. (Gun-Free Zone)

No Gun Needed

This woman doesn’t need a gun to deal with most purse-snatchers. She just kicks him in the gonads, punches him in the face, and takes back her purse. This guy tried to rob the wrong woman and is now sitting painfully in jail. She hit him in the eye so hard she broke her hand and nearly unmanned him) and the doctor who treated her said, “You’re my hero! The treatment is on me.” The robber was restrained by two men who witnessed the whole thing, while a woman vacuuming her car nearby called the cops. When they (finally) arrived, they took the man into custody, and stopped by the hospital to get stitches for his eye. And I don’t think that treatment was free. This brings up a point: most people who do things like this aren’t armed, because they can’t afford guns. And if they have anything less than a gun, you can beat them. Especially if you are carrying a stun gun or pepper spray. Lacking that, just beat the hell out of them. (The Blaze)

"Squad Car Or A Box":

That’s the choice one concealed carry holder gave a would-be rapist/burglar who was in the process of breaking into his daughter’s bedroom. The main thing behind the crime rate being so high was revealed in this case, where the perp was well-known to the police, since they had dealt with him many times—but he was still free. If the “justice system” was a little more efficient and kept criminals in prison a little longer, this guy might still be in prison and not breaking into young girls’ bedrooms at night and rifling cars next door. This was the kid’s first arrest as an adult, but might not have happened if he had been dealt with a little more severely before. After knocking on doors, cops lodged charges in 11 different crimes (8 felonies, 3 misdemeanors) committed that night, as he went up and down the street, breaking into things. This kid lived in the neighborhood, as is usually the case, and knew most of the people he was robbing. With all his previous brushes with the law, why was this kid not still in prison? (The Blaze)

Intimidation Attempt

What the Texas Rangers were doing here is simple intimidation. They KNEW the so-called “laws” under which they arrested two demonstrators did not apply, thus their arrests were false. But they did it anyway, just to intimidate the crowd. But in fact, the crowd was NOT intimidated, though most of the cops there did their level best to LOOK intimidating while the demonstrators called them the mist vile names. If anybody should have been intimidated here it was the cops. I’m not too sure of the “Daily Sheeple,” but the video speaks volumes. I saw a couple of times when a cop started to hit a demonstrator, especially when one of them made reference to his wife. But undoubtedly he was instructed to ignore ALL insults to avoid a bloodbath. It is just such a thing as this that prompted the American Revolution, and I believe we’re getting close to another one. One of these days a cop isn’t going to “take it any more” and will shoot or assault someone—then it will be ON! It’s a “powder keg” ready to go “BOOM.” (The Sheeple)

Not In Business Much Longer

Well, folks—I may not be in business much longer. Obama doesn’t have the power to make a law against saying anything bad about Muslim extremists. But he wants to. And if he manages to get it done, he will come to me with his guns in the hands of his thugs and I will go to prison because there is NOTHING good I can say about these fools who just want to KILL everybody who doesn’t believe the EXACT same way they do, even other Muslims. And I will continue to report the truth about them. If he doesn’t like that, he can go sit on a spear, sideways. I will never allow ANYBODY to tell me what I can say as long as what I say is not a lie—as is most of what comes out of this fool’s mouth. But he has the guns, and the APPEARANCE of “enforcing the law,” even if the “law” he is enforcing is ILLEGAL. He won’t enforce our immigration laws, but he WILL when it comes to controlling our speech. (Just common sense)

They'll Try, Anyway

The most recent mass killing, involving a woman and her children, ages 1 to 7, didn’t involve a gun. But the anti-gun freaks will try anyway. I don’t know how they’ll try and twist things to blame guns, but I just know they will. That’s their “modus operandi.” They may try to blame this on “the will to kill” because of “the ready availability of guns and other weapons.” I don’t know what impels these fools, but they have an unreasoning FEAR of guns and a hatred for them, even though without a human holding them, they cannot harm anyone. They’re inanimate objects. There have always been such people around, even back in that vaunted “wild west,” but they hadn’t gained as much power as they have, now. And they only “held sway” in the big Eastern cities, not in the West. Westerners thought they were fools, and they were right. They’ve had an unreasoning fear of guns since the day the first gun was made. (Mail.com)

And Guess Which Cities

Many American cities have more gun violence than do entire countries. And guess which cities they are? The ones with the tightest anti-gun laws, like Chicago, New York City, Los Angeles, etc. Aand guess who runs ALL those cities? DEMOCRATS, of course! These figures show conclusively that the gun laws they have made not only don’t work, they CREATE more violence and kill more people. But the fools making these laws aren’t listening. Their minds are made up, so don’t confuse them with facts. What we have to do is start electing intelligent politicians who know what they’re doing, and don’t just “make laws” to make it LOOK like they’re “doing something.” All we have to do is that. But WILL we? (Policy Mic)

Will You Shoot Americans?

That’s a question being asked of soldiers in the military. It is also being asked of their officers and those who answer “no,” are fired. Obama is preparing for a revolution and is trying as hard as he can to CREATE one so he can have an excuse to MURDER civilians and make it LOOK legal. Boy, am I glad I’m old and tired and will probably not survive the war anyway. Obama is a criminal and a fool. It might just be more of a job than he can handle to “put down” the “Second American Revolution.” This has been Obama’s plan since he came out of nowhere and conned his way into the presidency after “buying off” the Democrat Party and “elbowing” Hillary aside (No one knows where he money came from, but  have a good idea). Every move he has made since reinforces his effort to turn this into a socialist nation and with him in charge. Disarming  us is just part of his scheme. He will soon see that I can see through his scam and will probably come after me. But I don’t care. I don’t want to live under what he plans, anyway. Obama is a criminal, like a mob boss and just "gets rid of" his enemies. And that definitely describes me. But I'm old enough not to care. (Just common sense)

More That A Gun Lobbyist

The National Rifle Association in Florida (where they make intelligent gun laws) is much more than a lobbying group. As it is all over the United states, it is a premier gun safety instructing group. It is responsible for millions of well-trained shooters and its training also includes how to know when NOT to use a gun. Anti-gun fools like to make the NRA out to be the “bad guy” because they promote laws that ALLOW honest people to own and use the means to self-defense, a gun. That’s absurd. But then, the anti-gun fools ARE absurd, as we all (except anti-gun fools) know. Other states could well look to Florida for competent gun laws. (WJCT News)

Obama's A Collectivist!

That’s the same as socialist, communist, Fascist, Progressivist. They all involve STEALING from people who EARN and giving that EARNED to those who do NOT earn. There are only “cosmetic differences” between them. And if you don’t understand what collectivism is, and why it’s BAD for you, you’d better find out—quick, because if you don’t you’ll fall for the “key words” and propaganda they use to fool you into APPROVING your own enslavement. I used to not be able to understand why many people DID approve of collectivism (until they had to live under it), but that was before I figured out that a majority of Americans PROUDLY “don’t pay attention to politics.” They figure they’ve got other things more important to think about, like living their lives. Combine that with those who only want “a free ride,” And you have a majority voting bloc, able to win elections and NOT holler when their elected politicians exceed their authority.

I really get tired of saying this, and “preaching to the choir.” But the people I really NEED to get to will not listen. They listen to the crap the liberals (socialists) put out and their minds become closed to reason—even to the point where they believe that reason and logic don’t even exist! Young people today have no idea what collectivism IS. They never had to live under it or even side-by-side with it. They’re blissfully IGNORANT. Yeah, I know that sounds like the “prattling of an old man,” but what they don’t know is that this old man LIVED through it and I KNOW what it is—and I want no part of it in this country. But that’s what Obama is pushing, and pushing it faster and faster. If we don’t watch out, we will be a collectivist country before he finishes his second term and gets re-elected to a THIRD term after getting the law changed. Then a FOURTH, and a fifth, or however many he needs to be “president for life.” Tking our gun rights away is just one of the FIRST things they have to do. (Just common sense)

Charged After Following Veep's Advice

Maybe what she had wasn’t a shotgun, but it seems to me that firing a gun in the air to protect her child should not get HER charged. A group of TEN boys attacked her daughter and, to stop the attack, she shot a handgun into the air, therefore dispersing the attackers. What should she have done? Shoot one or more of them? That would be self-defense, except for the atmosphere created by anti-gun fools. Did she have a license to have the gun? You shouldn’t have to have a license to do what the Constitution guarantees you as a RIGHT. Cops say she should have called 911. And waited . . .and waited while her daughter was being beaten up. Yes, firing in the air isn’t safe. But firing into the attackers is not safe for him. She could have fired into the soft ground just as easily. But it looks to me that the cops just wanted SOME KIND of a charge to put on HER. (Washington Times)

Carry Permits for Politicians

Politicians make many laws to make it hard for you to get the right to carry a gun (a right guaranteed by the Constitution), but THEY (and their spouses) are granted license to do so on a regular basis. “Franklin D. Roosevelt is considered a pioneer of gun control, passing legislation during his presidency that “imposed a tax on the making and transfer of firearms defined by the (National Firearms Act of 1934).” In light of that, it might come as a surprise to some that his own wife possessed a license to carry.” And he’s not the only one: Senator Feinstein (former Mayor of San Francisco, which has very tight gun laws), who is known for waving loaded machine guns around at anti-gun meetings had had her own license to carry and DOES carry her own gun. Other politicians HIRE their guns and people to use them, at YOUR expense. But don’t worry: they work HARD to keep you from doing the same! Click the link and see a facsimile of her license. (The Blaze)

You Need That Many Guns?

That’s a question often asked of people who buy more than one gun. Especially by anti-gun fools. The answer is, “What’s it to you?” Like in other areas where they try and belittle what we do by saying we don’t NEED to do it, it’s not their right to decide what we NEED to do. Thought they try and TAKE that right, simply by asking that question. More people need to answer simply, “It’s not your business.” They hope to “shame you” into thinking their way in areas where they can’t make LAWS to do so by asking you, “Do you NEED that? (The BangSwitch)

Thinking In the Right Direction

In Chicago, they're STARTING to think right. Yes! Chicago’s top cop is now saying "tougher sentences would make fewer gun victims." That’s right! He says Kevin Johnson wouldn’t have been on the street to be shot; he’d have been in jail, and so would the shooter. But he’s right, in a way; both participants in that shooting WOULD still be in jail if the sentences for gun violence had been longer because just before the shooting, BOTH were in jail for OTHER shooting incidents. At least in Chicago, they’re STARTING to think in the right direction for gun laws. What they don’t say is that both participants are gang members. So why don’t they make better laws to control gang activity? (Huffington Post)