Guns SAVE Lives!

 Don’t tell liberals, but guns SAVE lives. Oh, hell. Go ahead and tell them. They won’t believe you, anyway. They believe too much in THEIR truth. They still think guns kill people on their own, without the intervention of those eeeevil humans. They still think a CRIMINAL, who does not OBEY laws, will OBEY a law that says they cannot be armed. They still believe a CRAZY, who wants to shoot up a school or a shopping center will be deterred by the though of breaking a law from his plans to break MANY laws. What FOOLS they be! And no amount of logic will change their minds as they go about making more and more laws that keep guns out of the hands of RESPONSIBLE and law-abiding people, but which do NOTHING to keep guns out of the hands of CRIMINALS. This illogic is lost on them. (Gun Owners of America)

"Gun-Free Zones"

Except for those carried by criminals and crazies wanting to shoot everybody in sight, that is. People who obey laws obey gun laws. Criminals don’t. Recently, such a fool murdered 19 CHILDREN, some as young as 5. the day before another killed at least two people in another shopping center. The news media went “wall-to-wall with it. In Denver, at least one radio station spent the entire DAY into the night talking about it. I’m sure this happened all over the country, maybe even the world. And they should, because somebody killing a bunch of CHILDREN is a real tragedy. What did these two shootings gave in common? They were both “gun-free zones.” But what about that shooting last year in a GUN SHOP where the guy shot a clerk and was instantly made into “Swiss cheese” by the rest of the clerks and customers, including the one he shot? It was a news item for a few hours and then “sank like a stone.” Except for the Indianapolis media, nobody was interested in the story. Why? Because the victim was armed and able to defend himself. Even the “anti-gun crazies” shut up about it because this kind of story, where the victim was armed just didn’t fit their narrative. I’ve always noticed that such shootings ususally didn’t happen at gun shows or anywhere else where everybody was armed, and for a good reason. In “gun-free zones” like schools and the like, they might as well put up a sign saying, “No guns here. We’re defenseless. Come on in and shoot us.”

Yes, such shootings are bad. But trying to eliminate guns to stop them is illogical and STUPID. The GUN didn’t kill these people. The man HOLDING the gun did. If he couldn’t get a gun (doubtful) he’d find something else to use in killing innocent people. Anybody who BELIEVES that a CRIMINAL, who violates the law for a LIVING, will OBEY a law saying he can’t be armed is STUPID. And that includes all those stupid politicians who think so, including our illustrious President Obama. I’m getting very tired of repeating this and having it fall on deaf ears while more and more people DIE because of this rampant STUPIDITY. I’m still waiting for our incompetent politicians to WAKE UP and realize that the ONLY WAY to eliminate such atrocities is to allow as many GOOD people as possible to be armed, including in those ubiquitous “gun-free zones” for self defense so the crazies and criminals won’t be FREE to kill innocent people. It is a PROVEN FACT that where there are MORE GUNS in the hands of innocent people, violent crime goes DOWN. In Florida, where getting a carry permit is easy, the violent crime rate has PREDICTABLY gone DOWN wile the deaths and injuries to armed CRIMINALS has gone UP. There cannot be more OBVIOUS evidence this is true. But our anti-gun politicians are blissfully IGNORANT of this fact. They’re PURPOSELY ignorant of facts that do not advance their narrative. (Mail.com)

Too Far the Other Way

Incompetent politicians in Nelson, Georgia, instead of simply making it easier to get a “carry permit,” want to FORCE residents to BUY a gun. That’s how incompetent politicians with delusions of grandeur ALL seem to think: got a problem? FORCE somebody to do something, even if it’s the right thing. Thinking of the RIGHT WAY to limit gun violence, such as punishing USE of guns in crimes with no ability to “drop those gun charges” to obtain the criminal’s cooperation in convicting him in other crimes just seems to be something they cannot even THINK about. When are we going to start electing COMPETENT people to office? The new Nelson, GA ordinance specifies NO penalty, which makes it useless. And all you have to do to be allowed to ignore it is to object. They say they’re “just making a point.” What point does a stupid, AND useless ordinance make?(Mail.com)

"Changed the Gun Control Debate"

Mark Kelly, Gabby Gifford’s husband, in testifying before Congress, says the shooting in Sandy Hook, Connecticut, where 20 children and 6 educators were killed, “changed the gun control debate.” In what way, Mark? Did it “change it” in such a way that the only measures liberals are taking about violate our Constitutional right to “keep and bear arms?” Or maybe to recognize that DISARMING the responsible, HONEST people is NOT the way to go? That recognize that CRIMINALS and crazies don't OBEY gun laws? Maybe to make laws that punish the CRIMINALS by making it a more severe sentence to use a gun in a crime (to keep armed criminals in prison longer) rather than make it harder for people like him and his wife to get guns with which to defend themselves against the ILLEGAL guns criminals and crazies never seem to have any trouble getting, no matter how many ignorant laws are passed by ignorant politicians supported by ignorant people? How about laws making it a more severe crime to SELL guns to people who only have criminal intent, and for people to BUY them to commit crimes? When are people like this (and the people who MAKE such laws) going to WAKE UP? When are they going to start APPROACHING “gun control” from the RIGHT (not necessarily "right wing") direction? He says the NRA needs to "wake up." actually, it's people like HIM who need to "wake up." (Huffington Post)

A "Turning Point" in Gun Control

Damn, I hope not! That would be STUPID. That’s what they are now saying of the mass shooting in Portland, Oregon. Like a LAW will stop people like this shooter from STEALING the gun he used to murder at least two people at that mall. As I predicted, they want to ban all “assault weapons,” using this as an opportunity to advance their agenda, and without knowing just what an “assault weapon” is. They seem to forget that people who want to do such things WILL get a gun if they have to buy it illegally or STEAL it. The “toothpaste is out of the tube.” Guns exist, and you’re not going to be able to UN-invent them. If they exist, people WILL be able to get one. Ban them and people will make their own. And if they can’t, they’ll use something else such as a sword, as did yet another (Unsuccessful) would-be mass murderer recently. (Just common sense)

Blame the Gun, Not the Man

 That seems to be the thing to do these days. When something happens, ANYTHING, involving a gun, people blame the GUN, not the man holding it. What they refuse to acknowledge is that a gun cannot hurt ANYBODY if there isn’t a PERSON holding it and pulling the trigger. I get so tired of hearing about situations like this, where a black thug argued his way into an open door to a CLOSED convenience store and attempted to INTIMIDATE the clerk. He got in his face, not an inch away. Then without warning he punched the clerk in the face while his buddies pulled their guns. The clerk, frightened for his life, pulled out his own gun and shot the thug, leaving him in critical condition. This should be the end of it, except for the jailing of the thugs involved. The cops, after watching the security tape, declared it a “self defense” action.

The thug’s father, however, wasn’t so charitable. Notwithstanding the fact that his boy was the aggressor, along with his armed friends, he (and others in the neighborhood) are demanding the clerk be charged and sent to prison for defending himself from several armed and obstreperous opponents. I guess he thinks his son was in the right in his unprovoked attack on this clerk, backed up by his armed friends. The clerk (so far) will NOT be charged, but he has lost his job and probably will have to move away to avoid retribution by other thugs in the neighborhood. The clerk is white while the thug is black, which makes it worse. I’m on the clerk’s side (black or white), which will cause people to call me a racist, no doubt. But I think the racism is on the black side for thinking ANYBODY who shoots a black man should be punished, even if he WAS the victim. Frankly, I’d have punched the thug as soon as he got in my face so closely. (Last Resistance)

HAMAS Kills Baby

Then blames it on us. And this is so typical of Islamic terrorists, it doesn’t even need to be said. But the United Nations has proven it (maybe they’re good for something, after all). The liberal American media dutifully reported it the way they were told to, even though the report was wrong. They called it “Israeli aggression,” even though it was “Palestinian aggression gone wrong.” HAMAS is well known to hide rockets in private homes where children live (from which they fire them into Israel private homes), as well as close to schools, according to the UN. It’s obvious they have no regard for human life. They use their own people as “human shields.” They fire THOUSANDS of rockets from these private homes, and if Israel responds, they put out announcements that Israel has fired on innocents, completely IGNORING their own firing of rockets (from within private homes) into Israeli private homes. This time, they were caught. But only a small number of media outlets have carried this story after telling the world that the ISRAELIS are “firing into private homes.” They think we’ll keep buying this BS forever. That shows their IGNORANCE. (The Blaze)

Infected By Stupid

Colorado Governor Hickenlooper has always struck me as an intelligent man. Especially when, after the Aurora theater killings, he “famously” said. “No amount of anti-gun laws would have prevented that shooting.” When I heard that, I actually thought he was not the usual brand of incompetent politician and that he maybe realized what I’ve been preaching for years, that CRIMINALS, who don’t obey laws, will NOT obey a law that says he can’t be armed. But then stupid intervened, and he began acting like your usual ignorant politician, blaming the gun and signaling that he will sign some of the stupidest, and most difficult to enforce gun legislation that ever came down the pike. I have now lost all confidence in this typical Democrat, who, up to now gave a good imitation of an intelligent man. Her doesn’t even realize it, but this action will probably send him back to making beer while the Republicans will take over in currently Democrat-controlled Colorado. (Mail.com)

Criminal Learns Lesson

The lesson is, not everybody is an ”easy target” for a home invasion. But the lesson is lost on this criminal; he’s dead. But it is a lesson other criminals can learn from; don’t break into this guy’s home and start beating him up. He’ll KILL you. This is a lesson that needs to be learned by more criminals, hopefully for them, without them being killed. This criminal broke into a man’s home in Hickory, NC, and started beating the owner, one Paul Ohla, who had a gun and shot him. Ohla is a “senior citizen” and was slightly injured. But the  attacker is dead. More proof my contention that more guns in the hands of “goods guys” will either convince criminals to go into another line of work, or make them dead. The criminal’s family will probably say Ohla should have “warned” the criminal that he had a gun and would shoot him, which says it was HIS fault, not that of the criminal. Some things never change. (The Blaze)

Another Crime Stopped

A son used his father’s gun to stop a home invasion in Texas, where criminals ought to know better. Three men pushed their way into this home and started pushing people around, starting with this boy's mother.  Meanwhile, the son was in the bedroom, getting his dad’s gun, with which he shot and killed one of the intruders while the others “lit out for the tall timber.” The cops found them soon after and they are now in jail, feeling lucky to be alive. They found out what ALL criminals need to learn, that not every one of their intended victims will be unarmed, and thus defenseless. I’d wager the two who survived will go into another line of work after they get out of the slam in a few years. The lesson here is, “Don’t mess with Texans, most of whom are armed.” This father laments the loss of a young life, but I don’t. This “young life” was lost the minute he decided to go into a life of crime and it would have happened sooner or later.(KHOU TV)

What's WRONG With These Politicians?

Our illustrious politicians ALL seem to be under the DELUSION that the way to self defense is to DISARM us. That notion is not only IGNORANT, it is DELUSIONAL. Yet these INCOMPETENT politicians “cling to their gun bans” and other laws that make it impossible for honest people to defend themselves against CRIMINALS, whether or not they wear badges. It’s not that they aren’t aware that gun laws as they make them DON’T WORK. They do know. They just don’t CARE. They just keep making these laws that are IMPOSSIBLE to enforce upon CRIMINALS, who don’t OBEY laws. Do they really BELIEVE their laws will stop “gun violence?” No; they’re not STUPID, just IGNORANT and their laws DO work to enforce THEIR will upon us, since law-abiding Americans DO abide by the law, even if they think it is WRONG. Meanwhile, our incompetent politicians go about, merrily making more and more laws to prevent law-abiding citizens from defending themselves. They say, “let the cops defend you.” But we all know the cops can NOT defend us. They can only “take names” after the crime has been committed. We need to GET RID OF those incompetent politicians who are AFRAID of “armed citizens” and elect some who have some common sense. (Just common sense)

Citizens 4, Robbers 0

Four would-be robbers in Detroit were shot down by two legally-armed citizens who decided, some time ago, not to “bow down” to robbers. One of the robbers was killed. Those robbers left alive will, when released from prison, no doubt go into a different business than armed crime. This proves my theory that more armed citizens will seriously reduce the amount of armed violence created by criminals. Sometimes by convincing them of the “folly” of their ways, and other times by simply KILLING them. In any case, violent crime WILL be reduced. By allowing Americans to DEFEND themselves, not by DISARMING honest people and giving criminals an unending supply of UNARMED victims. (The Blaze)

Another Criminal Killed

This is another case that will not be covered very much in the national liberal media. Because it does not promote their agenda to make you think that NOBODY ever used a privately-owned, legal gun in self defense. The LOCAL media will cover it, at least once, but the national media will not. Gun haters want you to think that if you have a gun, YOU’RE more likely to be hurt than anyone else. NOT SO. If you’re properly trained, the people who need to be afraid of your gun are the CRIMINALS who try to victimize you. This man was “protecting his property” in a state (Texas) which allows it. Some states would charge this man with murder for shooting a criminal that wasn’t “threatening his life” at the tine he shoots. Which is STUPID. They can go in an instant from threatening your PROPERTY to threatening your LIFE in an instant. (KENS5)

Gun-Hating Paper Has Armed Protection

Remember the Journal News, the newspaper in New York state that published the names and addresses of those who held gun permits in their area? They’ve gotten so much backlash they have hired ARMED SECURITY. One wonders if the staff of the Journal have applied for their own licenses to carry guns in response to the supposed “danger” they fear from all those scary “armed people.” Or are they going to just HIRE people to carry the guns FOR them, as do anti-gun politicians. Or if they do, are they going to publish their OWN names and addresses? The Journal is following the “time-honored” method of all gun-haters; they hate them until they need to use them themselves. Then, since most of them are rich, or well-to-do, they HIRE people to carry their guns FOR them or, like one of the best-known gun haters, Senator Diane Feinstein, carry their own guns. These people are such hypocrites they make me want to barf. But they’re apparently not smart enough to recognize that. (ABC News)

All They Can Think Of Is "The Guns"

Every time somebody commits a mass shooting, all our INCOMPETENT “leaders” can think of is “BAN GUNS.” They’re all about “getting rid of guns.” They don’t even THINK about the SHOOTERS. Some people “give lip service” to improving mental health. But what they really want to do is BAN GUNS. That’s ALL they’re interested in. People like Wayne LaPierre (perennial VP of NRA) says there should be an armed cop in every school, but even a NON-uniformed one costs a lot of money because that will be all he/she does. Simply ALLOWING one or more STAFF to be armed and TRAINED costs a lot less and would work well. But they ridicule that, saying that staff member would be a “source of danger.” When are these incompetent people going to WAKE UP and get rid of the “no-gun zones” that are an OPEN INVITATION to people who want to come in and shoot up the schools? (Just common sense)

"Mother Jones" Lied

They did an article that concluded that “civilians with guns have never stopped a mass shooting.” WRONG!  The only reason there are very few instances of this is that they are not ALLOWED to be armed, so CAN’T stop mass shootings. But I know of a few instances where armed civilians HAVE stopped mass shootings. One of those was in Colorado Springs, Colorado, where a guy who had already shot up one church, attempted to do it again and ran into a parishioner who had her own gun and shot him. He then killed himself after only killing two other people in that church. They CLAIM she was a “security guard” hired by the church, but that’s a LIE. She was a parishioner who was armed, and they ASKED her to FUNCTION as a security guard while there. That’s a whole lot different. She was armed, and the shooter didn’t know it. That proves my theory. (Weekly Standard)

NRA: "More Guns for Good guys"

As predicted, the National rifle Association (NRA) recommends “more guns in the hands of good guys” to protect our children from the “guns in the hands of bad guys.” He asked if you would have guns in the hands of good guys ten minutes away (as with calling the cops) or a gun in the hands of a good guy standing beside the bad guy? The cops are always at LEAST ten minutes away and this “bad guy” can kill a lot of people in just a few minutes. The shooter in Newtown, CT killed all 26 CHILDREN in 3-1/2 minutes. Had there been a “good guy with a gun” there, that number could have been a lot less as that “good guy” put a couple in his head” as soon as he started shooting. The “anti-gun freaks” have always ridiculed this idea, but it is the ONLY idea that can be successful in dealing with these indiscriminate shooters.

An armed civilian is NOT as crazy as are these shooters just because they aren’t cops. This is the solution I have recommended all along. But nobody (in charge) is smart enough to take me up on it. Wayne LaPerre, perennial vice president of NRA, recommends armed police officers in every school—which is pretty much what they have now. But these officers are usually IN UNIFORM, which makes it easy for potential shooters to “take them out” FIRST, from ambush. I say they should be in civilian clothes, and people not suspected of being armed so a potential shooter cannot “single him out” and eliminate him before “doing his dirty deed.” Schools should NEVER be “gun-free zones.” That is an OPEN INVITATION to people who want to shoot them up. (Huffington Post)

School Shooting In California

In a state where the gun laws are the tightest, a student at Taft high School in Kern County, California managed to get a gun and came into the school shooting, hitting at least two people. If this doesn’t prove my contention that tight gun laws don’t stop such things, I don’t know what will. But the anti-gun freaks will ignore it, and deny it if we bring it up. The shooting ended when the shooter shot himself. The REPORT is he used an “assault weapon,” but I doubt it, since they don’t even know how to DEFINE what an “assault weapon” even IS. Some people say we need to get rid of all guns, but not only will that never happen, if we were somehow able to get rid of all guns criminals and people determined to go into crowds and shoot people WILL still be able to get guns. I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but there’s something very suspicious about the increase in shootings in SCHOOLS lately. I think somebody is PROMOTING people to DO these shootings to “whip up” support for tighter gun laws—and the anti-gun freaks are cooperating nicely. (International Business Times)

"Gun Free Zones" Cause Deaths

People who wish to go into crowds and shoot people indiscriminately rarely go into gun stores or gun shows, or even police stations to kill people. That shows at lease SOME intelligence on their part. That’s because they KNOW there will be no guns there that they don’t know about so they’re free to kill as many people as they can without somebody shooting THEM. One man made the mistake of trying it IN a gun store and was made into “Swiss cheese” by everybody in the store who was armed. Another went into a church to kill people and found ONE GUN there in the hands of a small woman he didn’t know about, who ENDED his shooting spree after only two deaths. That’s what it’s going to take to put a stop to these shooting sprees: people shooters don’t realize are there who have guns to oppose them. If these people knew there was a great possibility there would be someone there to shoot THEM before they could kill very many people, maybe they’ll think again about doing it. But anti-gun laws will NEVER stop such shootings because people like that will ALWAYS be able to get a gun or guns, one way or another, REGARDLESS of the law. Criminals don’t OBEY laws that say they can’t be armed. (Just common sense)

Bank of America Freezes Gun Mfg. Account

They told them, “You shouldn’t be selling guns and parts on the Internet.” Who the HELL do they think they ARE? They don’t get to decide what’s right and wrong and freeze people’s accounts because of it. This is just as bad as STEALING their money because they don't like them. This gun manufacturer needs to quickly SUE this bank, get their money back, and move the money to another bank that isn’t run by FOOLS. And when they do, they’d better hope they don’t get a liberal judge who rules on his OPINION, not on the Constitution, as he is SUPPOSED to do. One of the shortcomings in our system is allowing a JUDGE, by himself, to REVERSE things that were passed LAWFULLY, just because he doesn’t agree with it. There should be a review process to GUARANTEE the judge does NOT rule according to his OPINION, not the Constitution. The law should “go after” this bank for VIOLATING the law by their action. (Patriot Action Network)