NY Times Promotes Racism

Every time a black kid gets hurt or killed trying to rob a white man (or even a black man) the Times (and all the “race whores,” Al Sharpie—er—Sharpton, Jesse (Jerkson) er, Jackson, “Calypso Louie” Farrakhan scream “RACISM” while even their black neighbors tell us they’re thugs and got just what they deserved: a bullet in the gut. In one case in particular, where a black kid tried to rob a cop and got killed. The Times ran a story about “Murder Without A Motive.” Only problem is, it wasn’t murder, it was self-defense against black thugs who wanted to rob him. That was the motive. The court knew it, but the Times apparently didn’t want to know it. It wouldn’t have advanced their agenda to help the anti-gun freaks make more laws to disarm more people. I’m ashamed of our liberal news media, who have abandoned truth to support the criminals (in political office). (Human Events/Ann Coulter)

Black Teen thugs Get Beat Up

They picked the wrong victims.They attempted a home invasion with three thugs. The people in the home took their guns away and beat them bloody and held two of them for the cops (Who got there way later). If you think the picture accompanying this story looks bad, you should see what his buddy looks like with his right eye swollen clear closed and other assorted bumps and bruises. The one pictured asked for bail because he “had panic attacks” when he was in jail. Maybe he should have thought about that before he set out to rob this home. I have no sympathy for him after the judge denied him bail, which means he and his friends can’t gang up on the witnesses to keep them from testifying. (NBC29)

Gun Control Study

Obama himself commissioned the Centers for Disease Control study on gun control (although I can’t see what “disease control” has to do with GUN control) with great fanfare and it didn’t back up his lies; so he BURIED it. It was started with much fanfare and finished with none. NO media covered the report it came up with (except maybe the conservative media). After the child killings in Sandy Hook, when Congress didn’t work to suit him, he signed 23 EXECUTIVE ORDERS on gun control that made things (predictably) much worse. The CDC study found that guns were used in SELF-DEFENSE more often than to commit crimes, and that didn’t sit well with Obama, so he buried it. (Biz-Pac Review)

Politicians Pander to Anti-Gun Groups

After Sandy Hook, where many CHILDREN were murdered by a publicity-seeking fool, they IGNORED good suggestions from NON anti-gun groups: suggestions that could actually HELP in the suppression of gun violence, rather than disarm honest, reliable people and make them “easy targets” for criminals, who don’t obey laws. All most politicians are interested in doing is APPEARING to be “doing something.” When making new laws, they don’t even bother to see if the old laws worked when USED. We have enough laws now, but most are not being used. Even those laws that add more time in prison for criminals who use guns in the commission of a crime are usually used as “throwaway” charges to be “thrown away” in plea bargains to get other convictions. This is NOT working. But try to tell “tone-deaf politicians” that. (AmmoLand)

Video Propaganda Against Guns

This video (I presume financed by the government) shows a kid going off to school with a t-shirt holding a target under a flack jacket, indicating that he is a “target” with the message being that there are too many guns out there. But it’s wrong: there are too many guns out there in the hands of criminals, and not enough in the hands of honest, responsible people. They say that “anybody who isn’t for more gun control must be for more violence,” which attempts to label everybody who doesn’t agree with them as stupid. They say the only way to stop gun violence is to ban guns in every way possible, which is just OPPOSITE of the truth. You can’t ban guns by making laws against ownership. That only disarms HONEST people. Criminals don’t obey laws. These people also think “no gun zones” are a good thing, too. But those zones only INVITE armed criminals in to kill us. This is the kind of propaganda that will convince weak-minded people to “go along” with their idiocies. (Huffington Post)

Teen Routs Criminals

His dad (a deputy sheriff) had an AR-15 and the 15-year-old kid knew how to use it. So the criminals who broke into the house where the boy and his 12-year-old sister were alone to do who knows what to them left a trail of blood as they lit out for the tall and uncut when he fired at them. They showed up later at a hospital. Liberals ask, “What do people need with an AR-15?’ The answer is simple: self-defense against illegally armed criminals. It’s our constitutional and natural right. The right to have and use guns in self-defense reduces crime; while current anti-gun laws do not. They help INCREASE violent crime. With a majority of states now making it easier for reliable, honest citizens to be armed, violent crime is predictably going down precipitously. Where the usual politician laws that disarm citizens reign, violent crime is predictably going up significantly.(Breitbart)

Pueblo Chieftan Lies to Readers

It told them that Coloradoans were against more loose gun laws when they were NOT. People wonder why newspapers are going broke today. It’s because they can’t depend on what their newspapers tell them to be the truth; and they’re right. This isn’t the only story about a newspaper LYING outright to its readers in this country. It’s common for that to happen if the story, if truthfully run, would not advance their known agenda to limit gun ownership for honest people (but not to crooks, who will get their guns). (Media Matters for America)

Surprised the Life Out of Him

The man who tried to rob pizza delivery man Byron Park, 54, (shame a man that old should have to deliver pizzas in Obama's world) he got a bullet for his trouble. Frederick Lorenzo approached Park with a knife and demanded money about midnight in Melbourne, Florida and got killed instead. Domino’s didn’t say if Park would keep his job. I don’t know what their rules are. Do they have one that says, “let him rob you?” Or “let him kill you?” Probably. Domino’s has stupid rules like that, even though their employees do a dangerous job. Lorenzo was pronounced dead on the scene. Good riddance. One less violent criminal. (The Blaze)

Man Shoots Bear In NM

A bear was trying to get into a man’s house in Tijeras, NM and the homeowner shot him to death, according to the sheriff. The fish & Game Service is still investigating at the time of this report. Will the homeowner face charges for killing this bear? You never know. I guess the best path to follow any time is to let the bear eat you. Then you won’t face charges. Did he have his gun legally? Probably; this IS New Mexico, you know. Their gun laws are much more reasonable there. But the feds are the ones to decide if he will face any charges for shooting the bear (and they're Easterners, after all). And the bear had not been scared off by a previous “warning shot.” Any intelligent person would have shot him, but intelligent action means nothing to federal agents. They don’t operate with intelligence. They only operate “by the book,” which is usually written by people of NO intelligence. (Eye Witness News 4)

Delui Owner Uses Boiling Oil

Sometimes you don’t even have to have a gun to stop an armed robber. This intended victim stopped him with boiling oil. The guy tried to rob a deli in Linden, NJ just after lunch. The owner happened to be carrying a container of boiling oil, with which he doused the gunman, who ran away without the money. The cops say they didn’t get a good face shot on the security video, but “other obvious injuries” will probably identify him when he seeks treatment. Good for this fast-thinking deli owner. Thanks to him, this robber’s “career” will soon be interrupted by a long jail sentence (after he recovers from his burns, that is). (Short News)

Teen Thugs Beat War Hero to Death

But the liberal media isn’t interested. It’s a “black on white” crime and doesn’t advance their agenda to demonize guns. They painted Trayvon Martin as an “innocent boy” who was “callously shot to death by a white man for no reason.” The fact that this “innocent kid” (who was hand-to-hand combat trained and was a known local thug) was beating the hell out of him and threatening to kill him didn’t seem to bother the liberal press, who just wanted a white scapegoat even if he WAS a minority they could CALL white). In this case, TWO “innocent kids,” 15 and 16, beat an 88-year-old war hero to death, “just for fun.” Delbert Belton, who “fought on” after being wounded at Okinawa, but was beaten to death by two young thugs with long criminal histories. If this man had had a gun, maybe things would be different. And the liberal media would again be “crying” about an adult killing two “innocent kids.” One of these "innocent kids" danced and sang at his fingerprinting and made a joke of it. (The Blaze)

Hispanic Kills 91-Year-Old Man

And robs him. I don’t think it was racial though.. I think it happened to him because he was 91 and an “easy target” for a criminal who couldn’t buy an illegal gun out of some guy’s auto trunk at inflated prices. Which just goes to prove that “getting rid of guns” won’t have any effect on violent crime. Just as before guns were invented, they used swords or clubs, they’ll use similar weapons or their bare hands on people they know can’t fight back, such as a 91-year-old man. Senior citizens are prime targets for cowardly criminals, who don’t want to attack a “hard target.” They might get hurt. They want it easy. (ABC 10 News)

These Are the Muslims

The Muslims whose “rights” liberals are so worried about. You don’t hear much about what’s going on in Nigeria today, but approximately 1,700 civilians have been massacred in the military’s efforts to put down political dissidents. In one village  Islamic militants slit the throats of 47 people and gouged the eyes out of others. No guns used to avoid notice by “security forces,” it seems. This is another place where Muslims are fighting the military and BOTH are committing atrocities, so you don’t know who to root for. They call Islam a “peaceful religion,” but who is it fighting with EVERYBODY, including other Muslims? I say get out of those countries where Muslims are fighting the government and each other, and just let Muslims kill each other. Saves us the trouble. They SAY they’re “fighting for God (Allah),” but I don’t THINK so. Our own government wonders why we want to keep our guns. This is why. We can see this kind of thing coming here as the Muslim influence increases in this country--and it will. They might not be able to beat us militarily, but they can outbreed us, and are working hard at it.  And with Obama's government being so friendly to Muslims, it's only going to get worse. (The Blaze)

If He Hadn't Had A Gun...

This homeowner would probably have lost a lot when three burglars tried to burglarize his home and had broken into three storage sheds and three cars before he confronted them and held them at gunpoint until cops could arrive (some time later). They tried to claim they had permission to be there and collect “scrap items.” Then they changed their story and tried to tell cops they were “trying to entice a donkey with a cracker.” When both stories were proven false, the cops arrested them on many charges; charges that should interrupt their “criminal careers” for a long time to come. (The Blaze)

Forced "Home Inspections" (Searches)

That’s one measure included in Obama’s health care swindle law. They SAY they’re to “search for dangerous practices evidence,” but one of the things they have orders to search for are GUNS in the home. These are “inspections without warrants,” understand. All that has to happen is for some unnamed, faceless bureaucrat to put your home on a list” of “suspect homes” and you get a visit from “jack-booted (armed) thugs” looking for your guns. The mechanism for taking your guns is in place. (Personal Liberty Digest)

John Lenon's A Criminal

And he supports “gun control.” At least, the kind of gun control that keeps guns out of the hands of his intended victims. We’re not talking about THE John Lennon. We’re talking about a career criminal of the same name, who is now touting the “gun control laws.” I guess he figures they can make life easier for guys like him by disarming his potential future victims—and he’s so right! Most criminals are in favor of “gun laws” for the same reason. It makes their jobs easier and they can always get their guns in some back alley somewhere from some guy who sells them out of the trunk of his car; and the tighter the gun laws, the easier it is to get illegal guns. (Examiner)

The Right Idea

Somebody finally had the right idea. Arm and train school employees (not necessarily teachers, but SOMEBODY who carries a gun who is THERE when a would-be shooter comes in to shoot. But to put up a sign WARNING bad guys? Not so much. It works best when the would-be shooter DOESN’T KNOW there are non-uniformed people there who are armed. But this is better than schools being “no gun zones.” That’s just like posting a sign saying, “No guns here. Come in and shoot us.” Some schools like to post a uniformed, armed guard in schools—which isn’t very good, either. A would-be shooter could seek him out and shoot him FIRST. He (or she) is a walking target, to be “dealt with” FIRST, before beginning to kill students. (Cowboy Byte)

Media Isn'r Interested

Fifteen-year-old James Edwards, who murdered an Australian citizen because “he was bored,” has elicited a diatribe from the Australian Vice-Premier against guns. The Vice-premier says they literally BANNED guns there and there have been NO increases in gun violence in Australia since—which is a LIE. Gun violence there has TRIPLED since then (They're doing their best to hide that).  The media isn’t interested because this is a “black on white” incident, on which reporting does not advance their agenda to demonize guns, Banning guns only creates a “black market” in illegal guns. He hits out at America’s “gun laws,” not mentioning that NO LAW would have stopped this kid from murdering this man. This killer is only FIFTEEN, fergwad’ssake! He cannot legally OWN a gun. Something politicians (in both countries) conveniently ignore. This is no “innocent kid,” no matter what his age and can’t be painted that way, as was Trayvon Martin when he tried to beat an unrmed white man (or one who appeared unarmed and white) to death. Maybe if politicians got smart and punished USE of guns in crimes more severely rather than disarm innocent people (without using such laws as “bargaining chips” to get convictions in other crimes), things would change, But banning guns does NOT work. Something politicians refuse to know. (IJ Review)

Security Guard Shoots Burglar

He was on his way home. From work, I imagine, since he was armed. He saw several thugs breaking into cars in a parking lot, and confronted them, They attacked him and he shot one of them. The rest are still running and have yet to be found. This proves again that ONE PERSON “on the scene” who has a gun and isn’t afraid to use it, can make all the difference in the world. If this guy, who was a civilian, NOT a cop, had been unarmed, the thugs would have just assaulted him, maybe killed him and gone on with their crime. He DID have a gun, and the outcome is a lot different. He put two slugs in one who was found soon after, close by. (NBC)

Obamacare Is Anti-Gun

One of the relatively unknown provisions in Obama’s health care swindle law is the one causing the removal of gun rights from ANYONE ever diagnosed with PSTD; people who have served honorably in our armed services carrying guns and killing our enemies—heroes. But Obama wants to take away their right to have and carry a gun in their own self-defense after returning home safe. Most people who suffer from PTSD never do anything violent, but that makes no difference to Obama—it’s an EXCUSE to take guns away from a large segment of our population, the very ones who USED government-issued guns to defend our rights. (GOA)

Homeowner Kills Escaped Shooting Suspect

What if this homeowner (who was not named in the news report) had not been armed when 38-year-old Rodney Long (an escaped prisoner who had already shot a deputy in the face) broke into his home in Bedford, Idaho the other day? Rodney had already tried to kill this deputy. How long would it be before he killed this homeowner if he had not had his own gun? More evidence that responsible people who are legally armed can lower crime rates—by either killing or capturing criminals, rather than being victimized by them. Something ignorant politicians who spend their time DISARMING such people and making them “easy targets” should take note of; but they won’t. These politicians are too ignorant to notice any evidence contrary to their preconceived notions. Rodney will never shoot another deputy in the face. He's dead.  (Quad City Times)

Bloomberg's Big Mistake

Bloomberg’s forces recently conned underworld gun sellers out of smuggled guns and showed them off at a meeting, where every gun pointed AT the press, which was gathered to help them sell their anti-gun message. Seems to me I remember a maxim that you should “consider every gun loaded.” This display was a mockery of every good gun rule there is—and illustrates the total IGNORANCE of people like Bloomberg concerning gun safety. No wonder they’re frightened of all guns not in the hands of cops or government officials. (The Blaze)

Alternative Self-Protection

With all the stupid anti-gun laws liberals (and some conservatives) make, sometimes it’s impossible to be able to carry the means to self-defense, a gun. In fact, some people even feel uncomfortable doing so. There is an alternative: the stun gun or pepper spray. “The basic idea of a stun gun is to generate a high-voltage, low-amperage electrical charge that has a lot of pressure behind it, but not that much intensity. When you touch the stun gun on any part of an attacker’s body and hold the trigger, the charge passes into the attacker’s body. Since it has a high voltage, the charge will pass through heavy clothing and skin, yet the charge is not intense enough to do long-term damage to the attacker’s body unless it is applied for extended periods of time. If you use the gun for a second, the attacker will feel a painful jolt that will startle him.

"If you zap him for two seconds, he will experience muscle spasms and become disoriented. And if you zap him for more than three seconds, he will become unbalanced, fall on the ground and lose muscle control for 15 minutes to an hour. Attackers who are high on drugs or out of their mind may keep coming at you despite any shock to their system. That is when you zap them again.” These devices work. And they can give you that precious “spit second” while an attacker is disoriented to get away. I’m 74 years old. I was attacked by a man on the street one day who took offense to my shaking my head at his silly driving antics and jammed my car to the curb and came at me with “blood in his eye.” He reached through my car window to pull me out of the car and beat the hell out of me and I zapped him with my 800,000 volt cell phone-looking stun gun. The last I saw of him, he was standing in the street, wondering what just happened, as I drove away. Think about it. (Personal Liberty Digest)

Guns In Church?

Sure; why not? A church in Colorado Springs, Colorado sure was glad that one of their parishioners was legally armed; so much so that they asked her to be “unofficial security” while there. She agreed, and when a shooter who had already killed several people in another church came into her church to do the same there, she shot him. That ended his ambitions. While it didn’t kill him, he did that himself when he realized his game was over. “Pastor Ken Pagano provoked a firestorm when he invited members of Louisville, Kentucky’s New Bethel Church to celebrate the 4th of July and their Second Amendment rights by bringing their firearms to church.” The liberal media “opened fire” immediately, asking why “good church people” needed guns? The answer is simple: to keep armed crazies from killing them. But anti-gun fools don’t agree. They don’t have a logical answer, but they don’t agree. (The Blaze)

Ex-Seal Gives Gun Haters Hell

The first thing he says is that they don’t have any idea what they’re talking about, which is so right. He brings out the fact that they all have their own agenda that has nothing to do with “gun safety,” but everything to do with DISARMING Americans so they can get away with anything without fearing a gun in the hands of their intended victims. Intelligent people know you can’t stop criminals (including those who wear badges) by making a law against what they do because they break laws as a matter of course. But the people who want to take away our ability to defend ourselves aren’t intelligent enough to know that. (YouTube)

He Didn't Know He Was Armed

The guy who tried to mug a man in Pasadena didn’t think his intended victim would be much trouble, and that was a mistake—his last one. His intended victim was a cop who shot him to death. Of course, he didn’t need to be a cop to make this work. He could have just been an armed civilian. But the way our fool lawmakers look at it, none of us should be armed and able to defend ourselves against an illegally-armed criminal. So if this guy hadn’t been a cop, he’d have been robbed Maybe killed.. More proof that more honest, responsible people with their own guns would slow crime a lot. Either by putting crooks in prison or the morgue. (Pasadena Star-News)

Peirs Morgan Lies On the Air

He claimed (falsely) that the State of Virginia had the highest murder rate in 2008 to answer  his guest’s assertion that Virginia, which now has very loose gun laws, caused violent crime to diminish. The truth is, the states with the highest violent crime rate in 2008 were Louisiana and New Mexico. Source, the FBI. Virginia was a distant 23rd. Morgan said that Connecticut firearms sales “going through the roof” after the Newtown murders was “disconcerting.” Of course, it would be to a fool like Peirs Morgan. But his action is indicative of all liberals in the news media: if they can’t come up with a TRUE figure to refute someone, they’ll make one up. (News Busters/CNN)

Self-Defense: A Human Right

Self-defense is a BASIC human right and no politician, anywhere, should have the power to deny it to you. Which makes what anti-gun politicians are trying to do WRONG. They all go around with armed security all around them to keep them safe, while denying the same right to people who can't afford to hire armed people to carry their guns for them. All efforts to limit your right to own and carry the means to self-defense, a gun, are misguided and WRONG. But don’t try to tell those fool politicians that. They won’t even bother to argue with you on the merits. They will simply call you names and walk away. If you try to get a liberal to argue on the merits of ANY case, that’s what they do. They won’t argue on the merits because they HAVE no arguments and they know it. Their position is untenable because it’s the position of a FOOL and they know it, But they’ll never admit it. (Just common sense)

Florida Sheriffs: "Keep Stand Your Ground"

As liberals try and try to stop you from being able to defend yourself against illegally-armed criminals and crazies, Florida sheriffs speak out on “keeping stand your ground” laws as they are so Florida residents will not be required to “run away” when confronted with an illegal gun. They will be able to pull out their own guns and plug the criminals. Requiring innocent people to “run” when confronted with an illegally-armed criminal is stupid; but it is something you can expect when dealing with a liberal, most of whom are irrationally afraid of even being AROUND a gun, thinking that gun will, with nobody touching it, hurt them. Florida sheriffs are smarter than that. (NRA-ILA)

Newtown Grandma Arms Herself

Unlike fool liberals, this grandma knows the best way to self-defense is to be able to defend YOURSELF. Liberals almost ALL think the way to self-defense is a quick phone call to people who have guns to come and rescue them when an illegally armed criminal attacks. It’s not; cops are usually always minutes away (except in Chicago and Detroit, where they’re almost an HOUR away), while that armed criminal is THERE. So the only sure way to defend yourself is for someone (you) to be armed, who IS there. Waiting on the cops to save you will get you killed. (AmmoLand)

Crook Made A Big Mistake

A man tried to carjack a car in Las Vegas and it was a big mistake. The car was owned by an off-duty cop who shot him when he refused to exit the car and reached for what might have been a gun. Yes, this was a cop; but what if it had not been? The car would have been gone and it’s owner maybe dead. You don’t have to be a cop to own and use a gun responsibly as anti-gun fools deny you can. But with more and more people legally carrying guns, the chances of a criminal meeting one when trying to commit a crime increase. Punishing CRIMINALS for USING a gun in the commission of a crime and not using that charge as a "throwaway" charge to get a conviction in other crimes is the way to go, not prohibiting the carrying of guns for self-defense by honest people, which does nothing but give the illegally-armed criminal many "easy targets" in their quest to rob them.(Fox 5)

Enslaving A People

The Russian communists were able to subdue the Russian people—after they took away their guns. The Czars might have been bad, but they did not stop their people from being armed—until the communists came along. They took away the people’s guns and enslaved them for 75 years, murdering MILLIONS (If you don't know about the communists, you'd better find out, before they kill you). Obama is ready to sign the UN gun treaty, which will lead to gun confiscation after they create a massive database of gun owners. They will know where the guns are, and will come for them—bet on it. Obama WANTS Americans to be disarmed so they can’t fight back when HIS thugs come for their property and their rights. Don’t believe it? Nobody believed Lenin wanted to be a dictator, and they didn’t believe Hitler wanted to be a dictator—until it was too late. Don’t stay blind until it’s too late. Put a stop to Obama’s attempts to disarm US. (Gateway Pundit)

A "Reason to Buy A Gun?"

Anti-gun fools talk a lot about your need to “have a reason to buy a gun.” That’s stupid. We ALL have a reason to buy a gun. Basic self-defense against criminals who have no problem getting their guns out of the trunks of another criminal’s car in a back alley somewhere. They ridicule us for saying,” criminals don’t obey gun laws so why make them?” (Which is not what we're saying. We're just saying their target is wrong.) As usual, that’s a twisting of the facts. We simply say their DIRECTION in making laws is wrong: their laws need to punish the USER of a gun who uses is to commit a crime, not make “blanket laws” that disarm honest people and make them “easy targets” for criminals who NEVER have a problem getting guns. And it’s getting worse, with Islamic extremists pouring through our porous borders (thanks to Obama) and getting ready to make war on “soft targets.” We need to “stiffen up” their targets as they do in Israel, which has been closest to Islam’s ways for a long time. My favorite picture is of a middle-aged, overweight woman standing over an Islamic extremist in Israel, pumping bullets into his head. The source for this is the NRA. Even if you hate the NRA because liberals have lied about them long, and often, you need to listen to the COMMON SENSE these people are talking. (NRA Commentators)

Don't Know What They're Talking About

That’s the “common denominator” when talking about the “anti-gun freaks” out there talking about guns. They just don’t have any idea what they’re talking about. But they pontificate on it as if they did. Meanwhile people are dying because of the laws such people get made to disarm honest, responsible Americans. Yes, guns are for killing people. But they’re also for self-defense against people who WOULD kill us. Guns, like fire, are for both good and bad. Fire, when misused, can hurt us. So can guns. But when used by responsible people (which includes most honest people), can be very beneficial. Just because fire can burn us, you shouldn’t try to ban fire—which would be just as foolish as trying to ban guns to keep people from misusing them. FOOLS blame the gun when a fool hurts somebody using a gun (who has no gun to use in opposing him because of foolish laws) when it is the person USING the gun that needs to be dealt with. A gun is an inert object until somebody picks it up and misuses it. Laws need to be made to punish a criminal for USING a gun in the commission of a crime, and those laws need to be strictly enforced, not used as “bargaining chips” to get convictions for other crimes. Even if the liberal media has made you hate the NRA by lying about them, you need to listen to the COMMON SENSE words these people say. (NRA Commentators)

America Needs to Be Armed

There are many reasons for the “average American” to be armed. The Japanese, during WWII found one: ”We didn’t invade the American mainland because there would be a gun behind every blade of grass.” Today, the people who must know that are the Islamic extremists who are pouring through our porous borders (thanks to Obama) and making their plans to make war on us on our own soil. In Israel, everybody is armed because ALL Israelies are in the Army to repulse attacks by Islamic terrorists. We should all be armed, too, for the same reason. Yes, armed criminals are a problem, but the Islamic extremists who live here are an even bigger problem that must be dealt with—and disarming honest Americans will not do it. My favorite picture is the one of a middle-aged, overweight woman in Israel standing over a terrorist, pumping bullets into him. Terrorists living here need to know there “will be a gun behind every blade of grass” when they try and kill innocent people here. (Just common sense)

Didja See This In the Lib Media?

I didn’t think so. It doesn’t advance their agenda to demonize white guys while pretending all black youths are “innocent, abused boys.” Many are, as are white youths. The main problem is, abused white youths are abused by black youths (thugs) in most cases. Liberals whine about blacks being the most-imprisoned group, while ignoring the fact that most CRIMES are committed by black men. They’ll call me a racist for saying this truth, but I couldn’t care less what liberals call me. In this case, three “innocent” black youths (thugs) beat a white boy almost to death because he would not buy their drugs. This will not be reported much in the liberal media. These boys look no more like thugs than did Trayvon Martin until he tried to neat the hell out of a white man and got himself killed. They remain alive because this white kid didn’t have a gun, as Zimmerman did. (Gateway Pundit)

High School Opens Shooting Range

It’s for the use of the ROTC students and the rifle team, and is strictly controlled. There won’t be students walking around the school carrying a “locked and loaded” long gun. They will all be locked up when not in use and will not be allowed outside the range. Students who use the range will be supervised by an instructor certified by both the Army Cadet Command, ad the Georgia High School Athletic Association. This action is a complete departure from what schools normally do concerning guns. Most get all upset if a student points his finger like a gun and suspend him for life while trying to get criminal charges against him. It is a move in the right direction by some rare “enlightened” school authorities. (Daily Caller)

Obama Promises to Kill "Carry Laws"

He seems to think that a MAJORITY of Americans “Can’t be trusted” to carry guns after an incident in Milwaukee where two men with “carry” licenses had a “running gun fight” in traffic. He plans to use his “executive order” powers to “cancel out” a state’s right to issue such licenses. He has an inflated image of what he can control under those powers. They ONLY cover federal employees and what THEY may do; not that of the states and what laws THEY can make. This is how dictators are made: misusing limited powers of government and claiming them for himself in an inflated way. National Report is a satire site. this is not necessarily true. But it follows Obama's "modus operandi" so well it is easy to fool people. (National Report)

Stalling, Stalling

The City of New York is using the time-honored scam to avoid turning over documents about Mayor Bloomberg’s “Mayors Against Illegal Guns” organization under the Freedom of Information Act, claim they “need more time.” Another scam is to charge an enormous fee for “copying.” Politicians have all kinds of scams they use to avoid telling the citizens what they’re doing. And they call US criminals! Gimme a break! (Second Amendment Foundation)

The "Black Hole" of Journalism

In Great Britain they did a poll, asking what were the six things they’d like to see repealed, and the 1996 gun ban was high on their list. Because of this, you won’t see much about it in the American liberal media: “Of the six suggestions that included setting a flat tax and placing a term limit on the office of Prime Minister, what drew more than 86 percent of the reader support was a proposal to repeal the handgun ban of 1997 [Which caused a marked increase in gun violence in the UK. –RT]. Because this is an unscientific poll, the results will be doomed to a media black hole, but it should send a clear signal to gun prohibitionists in the United States that their habitual use of the United Kingdom as an example of domestic tranquility where guns are concerned just took a direct hit in the credibility department.” But of course, those of us who pay attention already knew they HAD no credibility. (Second Amendment Foundation)

No Safer Place in All of Connecticut

That’s what the promoter of a special event honoring Starbucks for allowing armed patrons in their coffee shops says about his event, which invited people to come and bring their licensed guns; and he’s right. Not wherever there are “gun control laws” ruling things. The average “gun control law” only keeps guns out of the hands of honest, responsible people and makes them “easy targets” for criminals, who are usually illegally armed with guns bought out of somebody’s car trunk in a back alley somewhere. Figures show that illegal guns are easiest-found in places where “gun control laws” are the strongest. In fact, MOST mass shootings are done where there are “anti-gun laws.” Criminals do not go where there is any possibility that there might be guns to oppose them in the hands of somebody not in uniform that they do not suspect are armed. Uniformed cops in attendance can be “dealt with” early by a would-be shooter by ambushing them. (The Blaze)

Gun Owners Against Illegal Mayors

You’d think politicians who work to remove our right to carry guns for self-defense would at least be clean themselves. But they aren’t. Eighteen of the current or former mayors in his group are felons and cannot own guns themselves—so they want to remove your right to do so. I wonder why nobody in Bloomberg’s organization did anything about that? I wonder how many other politicians are guilty of the very things they’re trying to make illegal for us? This pretty much proved our contention that corruption is rampant among politicians. (Second Amendment Foundation)

1,000 Terrorists Escape

Hidden in this story about the closing of 19 American embassies (running from trouble instead of defending against it) is the escape of 1,000 Islamic terrorists; allowing them to return to their murderous ways. I’ve said the best way to stop terrorists is to kill them on the spot when they’re caught in the act. Then other terrorists cannot work to free them; not by negotiations OR by simply breaking them out. We now have 1,000 more Islamic terrorists out there killing innocent people until we can find them and kill them. (Town Hall)

Don't Mess With Texas--Again

Bank robbers kidnapped a man and his wife because they knew she worked in a bank, then drove them to the bank, forcing her to withdraw a large sum of money for them, threatening to kill her husband if she didn’t, Then they made their SECOND mistake of the day when they left the bank in the husband’s truck, where he kept his gun.. Her husband took it out and shot both bank robbers, killing one. When the cops got there, they found him standing over both robbers with his gun in his hand. The surviving robber may even benefit from this lesson (when he he gets out of prison), while his former friend and henchman won’t, since they buried him soon after. The lesson is, make SURE your intended victim isn’t armed. (Fox News)

Another Fool Bans Guns

And this time it’s not a politician. It’s an apartment manager in Castle Rock, Colorado. Note to self: Never move to the Oakwood Apartments in Castle Rock, Colorado. Not because I am a gun owner, but because this apartment is going to become a “shooting gallery” as criminals realize there won’t be guns there to oppose them when they come to steal the property of residents. It’s like all “gun-free zones”; an “engraved invitation” to crime. And of course the owner is not going to hire armed security to protect his residents. One man, a 67-year-old man on a fixed income, will be forced to give up his guns (he’s licensed to carry) because he cannot afford to move and cannot afford to fight this in court. He says he “no longer feels safe in his apartment” because of this. I suspect though, from what I’m hearing, he will soon be able to afford it because donations are “pouring in” to help him sue for the return of his Constitutional rights from an overly-officious apartment manager who shouldn’t be allowed to run an apartment. Damn, I swear! Some people get a little authority and MUST exercise it. I'm thinking about sending him some money myself. I'm not in much better shape than he is, and I'm older. (Denver Channel 9)

Moving Out of New York

The Kahr Firearms Group, of Pearl River, NY is moving to Pennsylvania because of New York’s new “Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act,” which Kahr says, “We’re all for stopping criminals, but this law isn’t going to do that. It’s only going to penalize honest people.” This is a well-known fact, but one not recognized by the incompetent politicians who make such laws. The law was passed after many CLOSED sessions, at which representatives of the gun industry were excluded—as usual. This is going to happen more and more as anti-gun states lose firearms and firearms appliances manufacturers and other, smarter politicians woo them. Meanwhile criminals get their guns out of the trunks of cars owned by other criminals, Illegally—and more easily in states with the tightest gun laws. (Fox News)

Killing Withut A Gun

One man wanted to kill a lot of people, but he didn’t have a gun. So he used his car as a deadly weapon and just drove over a bunch of people on he Boardwalk. Viola! No guns involved! So the gun-haters can’t use this action to advance their agenda as they always do whenever a gun is involved in a mass killing. This proves my contention that not being able to buy a legal gun will NOT stop somebody determined to kill people. They’ll just use something else—like a car. People who make laws against guns are STUPID. But you can’t convince them of that. Stupid people are too stupid to ever realize they ARE stupid. And that applies to ALL people who think a law against being armed will EVER stop a criminal from armed crime. (Fox News)

Lose Your Self-Defense Rights?

That’s what will happen if Obama signs the UN Arms Trade Treaty. It will be presented to you as a “necessary step in curbing gun violence,” but don’t believe that LIE. If he signs it, the Second Amendment will be TRASHED. It’s the ONLY WAY he can do that; the only way he can “get around” the Second Amendment and see to it you’re DISARMED and unable to defend yourself against an armed criminal—even one wearing a federal badge. Congress doesn’t even have to approve it. If he signs it, it will go into effect right then. It can be enforced in the INTERIM between him signing it and its being approved by Congress. All he has to do is NOT present it to Congress and it will be the law of the land. Then, any criminal (even ones with badges) will be able to victimize you under that UN treaty. Don’t let that happen! If you do, the gun-haters will have realized their dream. (Town Hall)

Crooks Always Get Guns

Incompetent politicians will always use “mass shootings” to get impetus to pass laws to take guns away from all of us. And there’s never any shortage of them. Such laws don’t work, and intelligent people know that. But ignorant politicians don’t. Or they do, and they have an ulterior motive in trying to disarm us while maintaining their OWN right to own and carry guns to defend themselves. Some just hire gun-toting men to do the defending. But the fact is, they DEPEND on people with guns to keep them safe while denying us that right. In Pennsylvania, a gunman with a long-time grudge in Ross Township in a rural area, politicians had been attempting to “confiscate” (steal) a man’s property for years and their “chickens came home to roost.” He came in shooting and even left to get another gun (and no police yet). He was taken down by somebody inside with a gun, thus proving my theory that ONE guy with his own gun can stop such shootings before they have even more victims. This one claimed four lives. And had wounded more. I don’t know if his grudge was, or was not justified, and it wasn’t told if his guns were legally or illegally owned. But this guy had demonstrated that laws didn’t mean much to him, so they were probably illegal. (CNN)

"More Guns, Less Crime"

 That is the name of John Lott’s landmark book; a book that liberals love to hate and love to ignore because he hit the nail right on the head with just his title alone. Florida and other states have made gun ownership and concealed carry easier, and violent crime statistics have predictably gone down while liberal gun-haters try their best to ignore it. This article tells about yet another instance of gun violence going down when laws were made making it easier to own and use guns for self-defense. Virginia law allows citizens to carry concealed AND openly and gun violence went down. Liberals are horrified! They’ve been proven wrong—again. (Breitbart)

Message to Today's Youth

“Hey kid: yea you; the one with those tattoos and piercings that are supposed to make you look big and tough. Yea you; the one that never finished college, the one that’s still living with Mom and Dad in the basement. Yea you; the one who likes his pot early in the morning while the rest of the world passes you by. Yea you; the one who voted for Barack Obama! Okay genius let’s take a retrospective look at your life over the past five years. Oh and to help you out the word retrospective means going back and evaluating. Listen up numb-nuts! Have there been any changes [ for the better RT] in your life and for that matter your family’s life since you helped elect President Obama? Let me jog your clouded memory to give you some help. Remember that beautiful home you used to live in a few years ago before it was foreclosed on by the bank after your father lost his job? Remember when your father never drank, but after being unemployed for two years he just couldn’t take it anymore?

Remember the once fat 401-K your parents had but were forced to withdraw it to keep food on the table, food for you? Remember when you used to go to college but your Father said he could no longer pay of your tuition? Remember after he told you that you dropped out, smoked 5 joints and never got at least a part time job to help yourself through college. And let’s not forget the car you used to have, you remember the one you were able to fill up every week for $25 but now would cost you $60, so you sold the car for scrap. Are you getting any of this pal? You’re life has turned to sh-t, you have no idea why, you have no future and frankly you could care less while you helped reelect the same POS that put you and your family in this predicament. When will you wake up? When it’s too late? But it’s already too late you dumbass!!! (Thanks to N.P.Contompasis) Don't forget: Obama is the biggest enemy to your right to self defense and to own and carry the means to that defense, a gun.

Too Many Hate Tea Parties

There are no shortage of fools in this nation, and there always has been, There were the “Tories” in the lead-up to the American Revolution, who wished to remain under the rule of the King of England, and worked tirelessly to thwart efforts of the Founders. The same kind of people dislike the “Tea Parties.” They have no idea what they dislike, however, because all the Tea Parties want is a return to smaller government and less regulation of our lives, lower taxes, and more freedom and the right to self-defense and the tools to that end. If there’s something wrong with that, I’d love for them to detail it for me. Most who don’t like the Tea Parties are the same kind of people who hate Rush Limbaugh, but who have never listened to him. They hate him based on what they’ve been TOLD by liberals. If they’d LISTEN to either, many would likely agree with them. Instead, they listen to liberals, who seem to have a near monopoly on the media. These people, like the Tories, need to “wise up” before we go the same way that Russia did when Vladmir Lenin came to power. (Just common sense)

I Was Lazy!

I admit it. I was lazy yesterday. When it came time to update my blogs, I just didn’t have the energy. That comes, it seems, with old age; and I am OLD. I’ll be 75 soon, and that’s the age my mother was when she died. Age takes a toll on all of us. There is much more I could be doing to open people’s minds to the danger of accepting the atrocities Obama is wreaking upon this country, but I just don’t have the energy to do them. I need an “apprentice;” somebody like William W. Johnstones’ nephew, J. A. Johnson, who can help me in my later years and take over when I’m gone. But there is nobody, so far. My son agrees with me mostly, but he is blazé about it. My grandson even worked to elect Obama to a second term although he SAYS he agrees with me (he said it was “just a job” when he needed one). But I know nobody with the “heat and fire” I’d trust to continue my work, and that’s sad. I won’t have to live under what’s coming—they will. And when I’m gone, that will be one less voice to say the truth. (Just common sense)

Gun Permits Skyrocket in Newtown

In Newtown, CT, the place where a number of CHILDREN were murdered by a man with an ILLEGAL gun, the number of new gun permits demanded has surged. With residents hoping to get their guns before tighter gun controls demanded by incompetent politicians go into effect. And this is not restricted to Newtown. There is an increase in gun purchases all over the country, for the same reason. Politicians are working overtime to pass more and more laws to take guns away from honest people while criminals, who obey NO laws, will still be able to get their guns out of the trunk of another criminal’s car in a back alley somewhere. (Wall Street Journal)

Liberals Lying, As Usual

Rachel Maddow and NY Mayor Michael Bloomberg, talking about mass shootings, say, “It only happens in America.” That’s an easily refuted lie. It happened in Utoya, Norway in 2011, where a gunman killed 69 and wounded 110. Then there was Winnenden, Germany in 2009, where a gunman killed 15 at a school; and Mumbai, India in 2008, where terrorists killed 164 and wounded 308. How about 2002 in Erfurt, Germany, where a gunman killed 18 in a high school? Or Dunblaine, Scotland in 1996, where a gunman killed 16 kindergartners and their teacher. Only happens in America? Google it. Come on, people! If you must lie, don’t tell those that are so easily refuted. (Just common sense)

Gun Sales Skyrocket

Which makes a lie our of news reports that gun sales are going down. They’re not. For Sturm-Rueger, they have increased 50%! The highest sales have been since 1990. Which tells you a lot about how “out of touch” the news media is—ON PURPOSE. It’d be interesting to know how many of these guns are registered and can be STOLEN by the government in its effort to get guns out of the hands of civilians. I’d bet that most will be “hidden away” in anticipation of the government taking away our guns. And I don’t blame them. England made a big mistake when it tried to disarm Americans before the American Revolution. What many people don’t even know is that gun control attempts are what STARTED the war that CREATED this republic. Congress (and Obama) should take notice if they want to stay in office, and maybe even alive. (Bloomberg News)

How Hard They Fight

To keep us unarmed and helpless before the illegally-armed criminals. Now the Attorney General in Arkansas says schools can’t use that “little-known law” to allow them to arm their teachers so there will be somebody (not in uniform and easily dealt with by ambush) with a gun and the will to use it. Democrat Attorney General in Arkansas Austin Daniel, wrote an “official opinion” that schools could not use that “little-known law” to arm their teachers. Where the HELL does he get off saying that? It’s a LAW, little-known, or not. And as such CAN be used to arm teachers, Daniel notwithstanding. He can’t stop them from arming their teachers by SAYING they cannot use a LAW that’s “on the books.” What a FOOL he is! (Fox News)

I Can't Abide Stupidity

A man well known for being a “conspiracy theorist” went out on a beach one day and got a lot of signatures for his petition. That’s not a problem. What IS a problem is that the petition was to REPEAL THE BILL OF RIGHTS! What kind of FOOL would sign such a petition? People who KNOW NOTHING. People who “don’t pay attention to politics” and have no ideas what they did. People who think crooks will OBEY a law saying they can't be armed. People like a man who sent me a message the other day saying, “I think Obama is doing a good job.” This kind of stupidity is going to create another “Soviet Union” or the “Fourth Reich,” here in the United States! It was just this sort of stupidity that allowed Hitler to become a dictator in Germany and allowed Vladmir Lenin to create 75 years of tyranny in Russia. And there seems to be nothing we can do about it. Damn! (The Blaze)

A World Without Winners

That’s what liberals want. I just finished watching Ryan Newman win the “Brickyard 400” in my home town and his, Indianapolis. (South Bend, actually for him) and I wonder what they would do if winners and losers were eliminated from the equation. An auto race without a winner is an effort in stupidity. Think about a shooting without bullets. Just as sports events without winners. Liberals come up with some STUPID ideas, but this is one of the ABSOLUTE stupidest. Like thinking a CRIMINAL, who breaks laws for a living, will OBEY one that says he can't be armed. What liberals want is to enshrine MEDIOCRITY. What intelligent people want to do is enshrine EXCELLENCE. Everything the liberals do is to promote mediocrity and penalize excellence and achievement. They want to “make all people equal” by lowering the standards everywhere. That does not advance ANYTHING, anywhere. That is the main difference between liberals and the rest of us: conservatives, Libertarians, or “rational individualists” like me. We want to promote EXCELLENCE while they want to promote MEDIOCRITY. And that’s wrong. (Just common sense)