Customer Surprises Robber

Ashton Macaffee decided to rob a Waffle House. He went in, flashed his gun around, and demanded money. Whereupon an off-duty cop sitting in a back booth shot him. What a surprise! Atlanta is pretty good at disarming its citizens, so he didn’t expect any armed resistance when he went in. And if there hadn’t been an off-duty cop in there, he’d have been right. Instead, he’s in the hospital and will soon be in prison. He’ll likely have a long time to think about his chosen field of “work.”  There are no charges being considered against this cop, and that’s only right. (The Blaze)

The Real Trayvon

“Someone should ask (his so-called “mother”) why Trayvon was expelled from his Miami high school after numerous warnings to clean up his act. That's expelled as in get out and don't come back! Why did his mother kick Trayvon out of her house and send him to go live with his father who was unemployed and living with his girlfriend in Sanford, Florida? There was a 14 minute video on my Facebook of a Florida black preacher who called Trayvon a wannabe thug who probably would have been killed in Miami had he stayed there...Now Trayvon's mother is running all over the country with her crocodile tears telling everyone who will listen that Trayvon was a good son and that he will never be able to give her grand children. Boo Hoo. This from a mother who kicked her son out and locked the door behind him. (Thanks to Tom Wags2 on “The Unrepentant Patriots”)

Militarizing the Cops

 “Posse Comitatus” forbids the use of U. S. soldiers against the American people. So to get around this, the feds provide local cops with free equipment to make THEM into soldiers, and they tend to “go wild” with the power. They burst into private homes WITHOUT WARRANTS and KILL those who oppose them. They wear black clothes with POLICE in big letters on the BACKS of their shirts, wearing masks so they can’t be identified, and KILL anybody who gets in their way. In one case, they broke into the home of a “war hero” and, when he appeared with a rifle, they pumped him full of lead (60 bullets of 90 fired). Turns out they were at the wrong house and he was innocent of all charges. The cops refused to allow medics to attend him (which is CRIMINAL) and allowed him to bleed to death while they stood around. Yes, his family sued. And if they collected, the TAXPAYERS paid. Not the cops who MURDERED him. Were they EVER punished? No. They’re still “on the job,” brutalizing the innocent and guilty alike. They SAY this, and other raids were to “break up a home invasion ring.” But what about the one run by the sheriff? They’ve sealed the SUPPOSED warrants and are “investigating themselves.” Why is this being allowed? As usual, they CLAIM to have found illegal arms in the home, but nothing they found was illegal—or unusual in the home of a military veteran. They’re “refusing to comment on an ongoing investigation (of themselves), which is a good way to “stonewall.” This sheriff should be removed from office and imprisoned himself for acting like a criminal thug. (Huffington Post)

Ths Shouldn't Even Be News

An Arkansas school district has armed 20 of the teachers in one school after several school shootings. This is good. It shows that not ALL “school authorities” are stupid. But this kind of thing should not be in the news. It should be done quietly so a potential shooter will not know he will possibly meet an armed teacher if he comes in to kill people. The first school shooting in history resulted in a dead shooter when all the students, who were routinely armed in those days, shot him to ribbons before he could harm anyone. Schools claim that to have anybody armed will result in higher insurance rates. That’s wrong. Armed people don’t create danger, they mean security. I would bet there will never be a mass shooter at this school because they will go elsewhere; somewhere they have a “gun-free zone” and they can count on the fact that nobody will be there to shoot back, except maybe for one or two armed cops, who can be dealt with first, because they stand out like a “sore thumb.” (Mail.com)

That's A Hint, Congress

A government trying to remove guns from its citizens triggered a successful revolution that REMOVED that government from power over them. That’s a hint, Congress. The more you pass laws to take guns away from Americans, the closer you get to yet another successful revolution in America. Most people have no idea that it was GUN CONTROL that caused THE American Revolution. The one that created this republic, remember? Take a hint, Congress (and Obama). We’re not going to allow you to take our guns away. The idea that there would be a gun behind every blade of grass is what stopped the Japanese from invading the mainland in WWII. Keep that in mind as you think of more and better ways to disarm Americans. (Just common sense)

Fact: He Can't Prove It

Obama claims he is a U. S. citizen. I don’t think so, and I demand he provide proof of his U. S. citizenship. He should be removed from the White House in irons by federal marshals and kept from signing ANYTHING as president until he does. He likes to insult those who demand he prove it and calls them names, such as, “birthers.” But the unalterable fact is, he has NOT proven it. He provided an obvious forgery of a Hawaiian “birth record” one time that raised more questions than it answered. He has used several Social Security numbers, one of which was issued in Connecticut to a man now dead. This is an obvious criminal act that nobody has called him on. He should have been forced to provide this proof before he was allowed to even RUN for president. Why he wasn’t is a mistake of historic proportions. Why he isn’t forced to do so now is another. Somebody needs to do it NOW before he spends us into infinity. Why is this in a blog about guns? Because Obama is an implacable enemy of guns in the hands of honest people and wants to disarm honest people to make it easier for armed criminals to victimize them, Getting rid of him will make it a lot easier to keep our gun rights. (Just common sense)

What Happened Yesterday?

You're probably wondering what happened yesterday. Well--I gave my computer keyboard a "milk bath" and was afraid to do ANYTHING on it until I was pretty sure what I didn't get had dried up. Apparently it worked, because the computer was still working this morning.

The Media Lynching

The attempted lynching of George Zimmerman (which still goes on, with every day something in the media showing Zimmerman, who was raised with black people and was the only one who objected when another young black boy was beaten) in a bad light and Trayvon, who was a mixed martial arts-trained thug trying to make some cheap drug with his purchases and was a known thief and burglar who go himself killed. He was WAITING for Zimmerman—laying for him, attacked him, and was in the process of killing him when he was, himself, rightfully killed. This video gives facts the media HID from us and continues to hide from us, still hoping for a now FEDERAL lynching. (The Afterburner/Bill Whittle)

It Happened Again!

A guy tried to rob a gun store and he didn’t even have a gun! He had a baseball bat and a knife. The result is completely predictable. The store clerk pulled his gun and detained him until the cops arrived (sometime later). He is now a resident in the local pokey. I’ve talked before about the “half-brains” who try to rob gun stores or even police stations. I might like to interview one of them, but they’re all in jail and aren’t talking—if they aren’t dead. One wonders about the intelligence of someone who would try to rob a GUN STORE. But even moreso a guy who tries to rob a gun store with a BASEBALL BAT. I wish all criminals were this stupid. We could rid ourselves of them quickly. (CBS Seattle)

Illegal Mayors Against All Guns

That’s what they need to call Bloomberg’s “Mayors Against Illegal Guns,” when you think about the lawlessness that prevails in this organization. The Examiner says, “Many have noted that the rabidly anti-gun group Mayors Against Illegal Guns (a wholly owned subsidiary of Michael Bloomberg, Inc.) is inaccurately named, with "Mayors Against Guns" being far more honest. Some wags note that given this group's disturbing pattern of illegal behavior (which is ongoing, and more sordid every day), something like "Illegal Mayors Against Guns" would be the most honest.” There are many examples of this, not only their adding the name of the Boston Bomber (killed by the cops) to their list of “victims of gun violence.” As usual, I have to ask the question: “What makes them think a CRIMINAL, who obeys NO laws, will obey one that says he can’t be armed when he commits his crimes?” No one has been able to answer it yet, because to do so would undermine their agenda. They just "blow me off" when I ask it. (Examiner)

Using Gun Violence to Promote Anti-Gun Laws

He tells the country that since Zimmerman was acquitted, the law has spoken “And we are a nation of laws.” Then he says the feds need to get the not guilty reversed by finding him guilty of violating Trevon’s “civil rights” (which can get him life in prison) by defending himself from being killed by this “mixed martial arts” trained man who was bigger than him and in better shape, who was a KNOWN burglar. He’s trying his best to LYNCH Zimmerman while making sure others do the talking in favor while he pretends to be against it. This is our “anti-gun” president. (Reston Connection)

Liberals Against Everything Good

They’re against everything that’s good for us, and FOR everything that’s BAD. We have plenty of oil in the ground to last a thousand years or more. But they oppose every attempt to get at it. Fracking, for instance: it is new technology designed to “get around” the liberal BAN on drilling ANYWHERE we run things, and they immediately try to BAN it. What kind of FOOLS are they? We’re IMPORTING oil at ever higher prices from people who HATE us. Why? Because incompetent politicians FORCE us to do so for STUPID reasons. “Climate Change" is a scam to make AlGore super-rich, and it has done so. Climate Change fools say WE “ignore science when it disagrees with our thinking. It is those fools who do. There IS no “science” to back up their claims—except that false “science” people have ADMITTED putting forward to attempt to con us into believing this fairy tale. I could go on and on, but I don’t have room here. then there is their efforts to disarm us supposedly to "stop gun violence." What part of "criminals don't obey laws" do they not understand? (Just common sense)

Teaching Jihad Here

You think budding Jihadists have to go to Afghanistan or Iran to learn how to be “good Muslims?” And how to kill people who don’t believe the exact same way they have been conditioned to believe? You’d be wrong. They just have to go to 1857 Mt. Eaton Road in Saylorsburg, Pennsylvania, where Fethullah Gulen not only teaches them all this, but he oversees the teaching of it in schools all over the country. You think liberals are conditioning our children, read this article. And we (not me) allow it. It’s like allowing Nazis to run schools all over the United States to teach our children how to be “good Nazis” during the Second World War. How stupid are we (not me)? (Family Security Matters)

Imbeciles to Limit TOY Gun Sales!

I played with toy guns on many occasions when I was a child, and I have not gone out and killed anybody with a real gun. The same is true of most human beings capable of intelligent thought. Apparently this juvenile court “master” (whatever that is) is not. He says toy guns should be a different color altogether so people will not think they’re real. He says the “orange tip,” which can be removed, is not enough. Has he not heard of paint? Anti-gun fools continue to blame the guns whenever somebody uses one to hurt somebody. They fail to consider the other half of the equation, the person who owns the hand holding the gun. Instead of punishing the PERSON who uses the gun to commit a crime, just for using a gun, or a felon for just HAVING a gun, they victimize ALL of us by limiting our ability to have the means to self defense, a gun. They paint a picture of “crazies” going out and shooting up the landscape, just because they have a gun, which is about as phony as you can get. We need to get rid of these fools. (WBAL TV)

"Getting Around Gun Laws"

The feds are trying many ways to “get around” the laws passed in the victory of the “pro-gun” crowd have enjoyed recently in Congress. “First of all, it’s pretty clear by now that the goal of Obama and Schumer is, in the words of the Brady Campaign, to put “points on the board” so they can maintain their momentum for more gun control demands.  Mark Glaze of Mayors Against Illegal Guns said on MSNBC that they would be back with new demands “the day after” background checks are signed into law. So, now that we are on the verge of winning, why, in heaven’s name, would Pat Toomey try to snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory, hand a “win” to Barack Obama so he can credibly say he “broke the back of the gun lobby,” invigorate fundraising for anti-gun groups in 2014, let red state Democrats who are up in 2014 off the hook, and create a platform for unending gun control demands that will resume the day his bill is signed into law?” They will NEVER give up. No matter how many victories we get, they’ll be ready, the next day, with their next try. (GOA)

Baltimore Gun Laws Fail

Baltimore has made some pretty tight anti-gun laws, so the number of deaths by gun should be going down, right? WRONG! These new laws have not made one whit of difference in the gun death figures in Baltimore. One of those laws requires that anybody buying a gun be treated like a felon, and be fingerprinted. But that doesn’t apply to those guns bought out of the trunks of cars, “on the street,” does it? That’s where most criminals get their guns. Of course, our incompetent politicians never think about that, so you can depend upon the fact that, no matter how many peripheral laws they make, they “ain’t agonna work.” But they can tell their constituents they “DID something” about gun violence by passing these laws, even KNOWING they aren’t going to have ANY effect on gun violence. (Washington Examiner)

An "End-Run" Around the Constitution

Colorado has passed several laws that are “anti-gun.” They can’t ban guns outright, so now they’re trying to make the guns in your possession useless because they will soon be without ammunition. That’s what ALL their ignorant laws do: make it hard or impossible for you to use your gun in self-defense, while no such limitations ever seem to be on the criminals, because they don’t obey laws. This approach is IGNORANT, but if you point that out to the anti-gun freaks they just call you names and walk away. They never try to REFUTE what you’re saying with facts, because there aren’t any they can use. (Fox News)

Trayvon No Case for Gun Control

Trayvon Martin was a local thug who was known to be a petty thief who had broken into more than one house to steal things. He attacked Zimmerman for doing no more than watching him and was in the process of beating him to death when Zimmerman shot him to death and ended his criminal career. NO gun laws were violated and Trayvon was in the process of committing a felony. So where is the need for new gun laws? Only crazed anti-gun fools would think so. They twist ANYTHING to suit their agenda. (The New American)

"Atlas Shrugged" All Over Again

Ayn Rand wrote her landmark book as fiction; but it has become fact. This is a partial description of her fictional “Starnesville,” home of the fictional “Twentieth Century Motor Company where an experiment in local socialism that mirrored what was happening world-wide caused the inventor (finally) of a “perpetual motion machine” to “withdraw from society” and begin calling upon other key people to “go on strike” and stop allowing themselves to be looted by the moochers of that society: “What isn’t dumped is stolen. Factories and homes have largely been stripped of anything of value, so thieves now target cars’ catalytic converters. Illiteracy runs at around 47%; half the adults in some areas are unemployed. In many neighborhoods, the only sign of activity is a slow trudge to the liquor store. Now have a look at the uncannily prophetic description of Starnesville, a Mid-Western town in Ayn Rand’s dystopian novel, Atlas Shrugged. Starnesville had been home to the great Twentieth Century Motor Company, but declined as a result of socialism:” Detroit is today’s Starnesville, and is crumbling to dust as we watch, as we all slow down to watch a wreck on the highway.

Further description of Starnesville fits Detroit today: “A few houses still stood within the skeleton of what had once been an industrial town. Everything that could move, had moved away; but some human beings had remained. The empty structures were vertical rubble; they had been eaten, not by time, but by men: boards torn out at random, missing patches of roofs, holes left in gutted cellars. It looked as if blind hands had seized whatever fitted the need of the moment, with no concept of remaining in existence the next morning. The inhabited houses were scattered at random among the ruins; the smoke of their chimneys was the only movement visible in town. A shell of concrete, which had been a schoolhouse, stood on the outskirts; it looked like a skull, with the empty sockets of glassless windows, with a few strands of hair still clinging to it, in the shape of broken wires.” Many people like to ridicule Ayn Rand, but she had an uncanny way of seeing what’s in our future while others refuse to believe it. It pains me to see this happening, and makes me glad I'm old enough that I won't have to live through what I know is coming. It does concern me that my descendants will have to live through it. You may think, "What's this doing in a blog about the Second Amendment?" Believe me, if such people come to power, your guns will be long gone. (London Telegraph/Daniel Hannan)

Stun Guns Can Save Lives

Stun guns have the advantage that they can bring down an adult male INSTANTLY while shooting him with a gun may not. If you shoot him, you MAY kill him in the long run, but he may still be able to do you harm before he collapses from being shot. Anti-gun fools say just call the cops. But does that work? Not usually, because the cops are usually a few minutes away (In Detroit it's an HOUR away). They can’t be everywhere at once, and that’s a fact. But if you have a stun gun when attacked, you can help yourself and let the cops “pick up the pieces” later, which is usually all they can do. (STOP Security Services)

They Call This Bullsh-t

"Gun control supporters have the blood of little children on their hands. Federal and state laws combined to insure that no teacher, no administrator, no adult had a gun at the Newtown school where the children were murdered. This tragedy underscores the urgency of getting rid of gun bans in school zones. The only thing accomplished by gun free zones is to insure that mass murderers can slay more before they are finally confronted by someone with a gun." Who do you call when people attack you with guns? More people (on your side) with guns. But they usually get there too late and can’t do anything but “write it up” and clean up the bloody mess. What if some teachers HAD been armed at Sandy Hook and been able to kill the shooter before he could kill so many CHILDREN? They never answer that because they HAVE no answer. They just ridicule you for even suggesting it. Fact is, responsible people do not go around shooting people “willy-nilly” just because they’re armed, as people like this crazed shooter did. They still think (stupidly) that laws keeping guns out of the hands of responsible people will stop gun violence. I'd hate to be that stupid! (Just common sense)

Bloomberg's Anti-Gun Group

Like most anti-gun freak groups, they can’t come up with enough statistics to support their claims, so they make them up. Apparently they couldn’t get enough names of “gun violence victims” to name by simply taking names of people shot by criminals, so they included at least one “victim” who was shot by cops as they tried to apprehend him for the Boston Marathon bombing and the murder of a cop while trying to get away. The inclusion of this name is not surprising to me, as I know they twist all kinds of stories to suit their purpose to disarm Americans so we won’t be armed when their thugs come to take what’s ours. We should make a detailed check of EVERY name they mention to find out the details of the shooting to make sure they weren’t shot by the cops or private individuals with legal guns, in defense of their lives or property. (Pat Dollard)

They Didn't Know He Was There

Thugs tried to victimize Jaquetta Lattimore as she came home with her children. They thought they had it covered, but they did not. Her boyfriend, Johnny Bridges, saw what was happening, and shot one of them. One was wounded, but they all took off for the “tall timber” and were soon captured by the cops. Nowadays, with all 50 states making laws to make it easier for honest people to be armed for self-defense, they really ought to make sure nobody there is armed before they try to use their ILLEGAL guns to victimize people. They’ll stay alive longer. (NRA/ILA)

Sharpton Against "Stand Your Ground"

He wants people to RUN from armed thugs and NOT fight back when threatened. He thinks we should all just cower in a corner when we’re threatened by a thug with an illegal gun. He wants to do away with the right to deal with a criminal with our own guns. He’s painting a picture of Trayvon Martin, a known thug in the area, as an “innocent teenager,” which is wrong. Martin was a thug who was known to have broken in several houses and stolen things. He set out to beat the hell out of Zimmerman and it didn’t work out well for him because Zimmerman was legally armed; when Martin tried to break his skull by pounding it on the sidewalk, Zimmerman shot him to death, which was what he deserved. Trayvon's girlfriend couldn’t inject race into it, so she tried to inject “homophobia” into it (on Zimmerman’s part, of course). This AFTER the trial, in the media, which she KNEW would run with it. (Orlando Sentinel)

Bloomberg's Anti-Gun Group

Like most anti-gun freak groups, they can’t come up with enough statistics to support their claims, so they make them up. Apparently they couldn’t get enough names of “gun violence victims” by simply taking names of people shot by criminals, so they included at least one “victim” who was shot by cops as they tried to apprehend him for the Boston Marathon bombing and the murder of a cop while trying to get away. The inclusion of this name is not surprising to me, as I know they twist all kinds of stories to suit their purpose to disarm Americans so we won’t be armed when their thugs come to take what’s ours. We should make a detailed check of EVERY name they mention to find out the details of the shooting to make sure they weren’t shot by the cops or private individuals with legal guns, in defense of their lives or property. (Pat Dollard)

More Zimmerman!

I’m getting so sick of hearing the name Zimmerman I want to barf every time I hear it—which is often today. His face appears before me more often than Obama's--and that's a LOT.  But it’s important to point out that the not guilty finding in this case is important to everyone who carries a gun legally for self-defense. If he had been found guilty it would have been a signal victory for those who would deprive us of this basic constitutional right. The reason they pushed this case so hard is that they WANTED a guilty verdict to use in passing more laws to restrict our right to self defense and the ownership and use of the means to it, a gun. They lost. So they’re now trying to “spin it” in their favor, even though they can’t. They’re trying to paint this acquittal as a “travesty” that makes the killing of Trayvon Martin into a real tragedy—which it is NOT. Trayvon was a young thug bent on beating up a man he thought was gay. Martin chose to engage Zimmerman, an aging, out-of-shape man, and was beating the hell out of him while threatening to “beat him to death.” So Zimmerman shot him to save his own life, just as a cop would in the same situation. Both men could have chosen to “walk away,” but neither did. They made their own decisions and Trayvon’s death resulted. Had Zimmerman died, would there even been such an outcry? Doubtful. It would not have helped in their agenda. (Just common sense)

This Is Real Racism

They accuse us of racism. But the worst racism ever is right now being demonstrated by the very people who should NEVER be racist—black preachers. Rev. Aaron Williams, pastor of the Mt. Zion Baptist Church in Seattle, Washington, told parishioners to “raise Cain” (code words for "riot") because of the Zimmerman verdict. If that doesn’t represent “fomenting violence,” I don’t know what would. But black pastors all over the country are preaching violence while wearing hoodies. Racism used to mean violence against blacks. But we’re turned it around backwards and it now means black violence against whites—and the government is not stopping it, it’s “whipping it up.” Obama said that if we elected him, we’d “destroy racism forever.” At the same time he is trying his best to take our guns away so we'll be defenseless when the black racists and other criminals come after us and our property.

But we didn’t. We CREATED a NEW racism, blacks against whites, but with the blacks wearing the hoods and “riding in the night” in cars instead of on horses. I judge people as individuals; I don’t see blacks as something less than human as people used to think of them. But I do think they are “easily led” into violence because of PAST racism against them. They think that makes it right to be racist against whites. Whites, too, and that's going to create trouble, which works right into Obama's hands. I think we’re heading into a period of lots of violence against both blacks and whites, “whipped up” by our “first black (half black, anyway) president. Obama is the biggest “divider” we’ve ever had in the White House, and I hope this country survives that monumental mistake we (not me) made in electing this “Fuehrer” to the presidency. (The Blaze)

It's Hopeless If We Don't Wake Up

I’m reading a very prophetic book by (now deceased) author William W. Johnstone, by the name, “Phoenix Rising.” The plot closely follows what is happening NOW under Obama, although a little further along. The new president is an Islamic, from an Islamic country, allowed by a foolish electorate that repealed the Constitutional Amendment that prevented the foreign born from being president (a very slight difference from reality) He is quickly making this into a dictatorship with himself as dictator while destroying this country with his fool edicts. This plot is only one step forward from what we’re experiencing now. All the things this fool enacted were APPROVED by a liberal Congress, including the law that DISENFRANCHISED them. You can probably find copies of this book in used bookstores, and you should find, And buy it, and read it before it’s too late. I’m very sorry this author is dead, and I can only hope his nephew (J. A. Johnstone), who worked with him in has last years, is as good a writer and is as prolific as he was. So he can continue the important work he did in his novels. I am going to try and buy up as many copies as I can, and I hope you can get one from me soon. Let me know if you want one. The price will be right. (Just common sense)

Still Fighting About Gun Control

A year after the Aurora, Colorado theater killings, which were carried out by a guy who does NOT obey gun laws, our incompetent politicians are still trying to DISARM us so we will not be armed when their thugs come after our property. If I didn’t know the REAL reason for them trying to disarm us, I’d wonder at their STUPDITY in thinking that a LAW will stop criminals, who don’t OBEY laws, from getting the illegal guns they use to victimize us. What really DOES amaze me is that people buy their BS that they want to “stop gun violence” and do not remove them from office. Every time I hear an anti-gun politician speak, my BS Meter goes crazy. I hope they don’t break it. (Mail.com)

Twisting Zimmerman to Anti-gun Rhetoric

Leave it to Obama to further politicize the Zimmerman/Martin case to his own ends. In a speech, right after Zimmerman’s acquittal, he asked, “Are we doing what we can to stem gun violence? The answer is, NO. What people like Obama are doing will INCREASE gun violence, mostly black against white and black against black, while he and his henchmen make more and more laws to DISARM honest people and make them more vulnerable to gun violence from criminals, who obey NO laws, let alone gun laws. Obama and his “gang of thieves” worked HARD to get Zimmerman convicted of SOMETHING, even if it was just “bleeding on the sidewalk” or “screaming too loud,” and he lost. Now he’s trying to “snatch victory from defeat” by turning it into his typical; anti-gun rhetoric. (The Blaze)

Something Wrong in Lib Media

All we hear about recently in the liberal media is the backlash from something a television cook, Paula Deen said twenty years ago because she praised a restaurant that is non-union. I think what she said 20 years ago is not the problem; it is that she praised a NON-UNION restaurant and the pro-Obama unions don’t like that. So I guess she makes a good pawn to keep our minds off four dead victims of Obama’s incompetence and inattention in Benghazi, Libya, and their attempts to hide the facts surrounding it; the IRS “targeting” conservative organizations and delaying their applications for tax-exempt status while asking hundreds of inane, unanswerable questions; the author of that outrage “taking the fifth” and walking out on a congressional investigating committee after refusing to answer any questions; the government spying on all Americans, using the terrorists as an excuse, while insisting they have WON the war on terrorism. Her problems also keep our minds off Obama’s “war on power” and his promise to “bankrupt the coal industry,” which, if he is successful, will be a disaster. (Just common sense)

50 States Rebuke Obama

Obama, along with a lot of other Democrat politicians, is working HARD TO KILL America’s right to defend itself by making as many laws as it can to “get around” the Second Amendment. Meanwhile, the states are moving, en masse, toward a more intelligent solution to the “gun violence” problem. They’ve ALL (without exception) passed laws making it easier for intelligent and law-abiding citizens to own and carry the means to self-defense, a gun. Now criminals all over (not just in Florida and Texas) will have to fear that their potential victims will be armed. More and more criminals (including those wearing badges) will die while attempting their crimes, and others will be captured and put in prison, while crime rates predictably go down. Washington politicians will moan about it, but it will happen. (American Thinker)

"Can't Get Their Guns Out Quick Enough"

The Florida Attorney General says “Even a cop who is on the ground with a criminal on his chest beating his head on the sidewalk can’t get his gun out as quickly as Zimmerman did.” WRONG! This fool statement comes from someone who has never been in that position. It all depends on the situation. If the guy is concentrating hard enough on killing that cop, maybe he doesn’t notice as he reaches for a gun. They’re still doing everything they can to criminalize Zimmerman even after he has been found not guilty. Charging Zimmerman with “civil rights violations” is a BIG stretch and is purely political. Obama and his "gang of thieves" want Zimmerman convicted of SOMETHING and they're pulling out all the atops and spending taxpayer money like water in their unending attempts to do so. They figure if he's convicted of something, it will help their agenda to DISARM all (law-abiding) Americans. (Just common sense)

The Gift That Keeps on Giving

Like Vice-President Joe Biden's mouth, the “Fast & Furious” scandal keeps “rearing its ugly head” as more and more people are murdered, using Obama’s “gun running to the Mexican drug cartels scam's guns, continues to plague Obama’s administration. They try HARD to ignore the ramifications, but it’s getting more and more difficult to put off any real “investigation” of the case. Obama and his flunkies keep on trying, but it’s getting harder and harder. As the bodies pile up (some drug dealers, and others being cops) it’s getting harder and harder for Obama and his “gang of thieves” to ignore it and pretend it will “go away.” The question is, when will the Republicans “grow a pair” and REALLY investigate it? Probably not as long as Obama is “in power” and controls the means of prosecution. (Just common sense)

Missing the Point

In Chicago, the most gun violence is committed by CHILDREN: teenagers in gangs; people who are NOT legally allowed to even HAVE  a gun, let alone be licensed to do so. So how are laws keeping honest, law-abiding adults from carrying guns for self-defense going to stop this gun violence, which is threatening to overrun Chicago? Chicago has some of the tightest anti-gun laws going, but they accomplish NOTHING. Intelligent people can figure out that these laws will do NOTHING to stop gun violence, but our politicians can’t seem to get it. Are they incompetent, or just stupid? I think both. We tell them and tell them and they ignore us, call us names, and keep on making stupid laws that cause more people to die. We need to find out their views on “gun control” before we elect them. AFTER we elect them, it’s too late. (Just common sense)

Indiana Man Kills Burglar

A hatchet-wielding man broke into this man’s house with a hatchet and ran into a bullet because the homeowner (who is not named) used his legally owned gun to kill the intruder (who is named). Thus again has proved my insistence that honest people should not ever be barred from being able to own and use the means of self-defense, a gun. If this homeowner had not been armed, he (and his family) would be dead by now, instead of the intruder. What is WRONG with politicians, who work HARD to disarm us to let people like this prevail? What STUPIDITY abounds in politics! They’re not only stupid when it comes to economics, they’re even more stupid when it comes to our self-defense. The problem is, there’s no way to keep stupid people out of office without finding some intelligent people to make big changes in election laws. and stand back and let them do it. (The Blaze)

72 Shot in Chicago, Media Yawns

This is our liberal media. Seventy-two people are shot over the four day 4th Weekend and all the liberal media can see is the TWO (now 3) people who were killed in the crash of an airplane by an inexperienced pilot who “happened” to OWN the airline for which he was flying. He was “trying to learn” how to land the 777 on one of the most difficult airports anywhere at which to land and managed to kill three people and put many more in the hospital while destroying his airplane. Meanwhile, 72 people are shot in the city with some of the STRONGEST anti-gun laws in the nation and that’s “not news.” How do we GET such fools in charge of these news agencies? I know; they’re hired by the fools who OWN them who are not even as smart as the fools running the city. (Rush Limbaugh)

Govt. finally Accepts Rights

In Illinois, the legislature has made a law recognizing the unfettered right of the people to carry the means to their self-defense, a gun: something the Constitution guarantees them, anyway. Why do they have to pass a LAW to force cops to RECOGNIZE a right we already have, and which is FETTERED in many states? Gov. Pat Quinn tried to add fetters to it, but the legislature overrode him. Chicago politicians are horrified and think that will mean even more gun violence there. I think it will be just the opposite and gun violence will go down as the “bad guys” get killed off by honest and responsible gun owners when they try their crimes. I’ll be watching. (The Blaze)

"Convict Him of Something--Anything!"

“Sanford, Florida (BHN) - In obvious anticipation of George ZImmerman being likely found innocent of murder charges, Judge Debra Nelson ruled Thursday that the jury will now have the option to convict Zimmerman of any number of lesser charges, including manslaughter, slavery, excessive noise (gunshot), personal property damage (hoodie), public property damage (head hitting sidewalk), littering (Trayvon), and felony screaming like a girl. The defense unsuccessfully objected to the additional charges, as well as the fact that all jurors are now wearing hoodies. On a lighter note, a Zimmerman defense attorney was chided by the judge for agreeing with the prosecution's demand of "justice for Trayvon" by suggesting they "dig up his body and shoot him again."

This may be satire(the tipoff is that BHN stands for “Big Hairy News”)—I don’t know. But it does sound much like the “lynch mob attitude” of the people who want George Zimmerman convicted of ANYTHING, including spitting on the sidewalk. In addition, I really get tired of the news media (including Fox) OBSESSING on this, as they commonly do on news that appeals to them, to the EXCLUSION of other important things (playing right into Obama’s hands willingly), such as Obama’s many crimes while moving us ever closer to socialism while spending money that no longer exists and COUNTERFEITING more (every day) to make it LOOK like he has real money to spend. (Just common sense)

Army Sgt. Denied Gun Rights

Why? He was convicted of a minor pot charge in 1971! He didn’t think much about it, and after serving his country with distinction for 20 years, he was turned away when he tried to buy a .22 cal. rifle because of it. He found out, many years later that this minor offense BARRED him from owning a gun FOREVER. Another “back door” method of denying responsible people their gun rights. I’m sure the “statute of limitations” would deny the government the prosecution of this man for this “crime” today, but it appears there’s no statute of limitations on denying an essentially good and responsible citizen who served his country with distinction for 20 years the right to self-defense,” hunting, or any other reason for which he wanted this gun. (The Blaze)

Did DOJ Foment Racial Violence?

Did they pay for transportation for, and train “protesters” to make racial trouble in the Zimmerman/Martin case? Is this government so invested with convicting Zimmerman with a crime that they spent thousands of taxpayer dollars to train and transport “demonstrators” to Florida to foment violence? I don’t really know, and I’ll probably NEVER know, as good as Obama is with obfuscating the issues on everything. But knowing how Obama works, I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if it were true. This isn’t the first time this story has come to light, and nobody did anything about it the first time after the media reported that this organization was actually HELPING to “keep violence down” while it was really fomenting violence. I won’t attempt to report this as “fact” because I can’t prove it. But it IS “something to think about” as you look at the Zimmerman/Martin case. (The Blaze)

Gabby Lies About guns

Apparently, she thinks ALL conservatives are religious fanatics, so all she has to do is “invoke Jesus” to get us on her side, panting like excited dogs. She emphasizes the “responsibilities” involved in gun ownership over the RIGHT to gun ownership. RIGHTS do not depend on “responsibilities.” If you break a law with a gun, you’ll be punished. That’s already on the books. We don’t NEED more restrictive laws to accomplish it. She thinks all she has to is speak the words “patriot” ans “responsibility:” and we’ll follow her, lemming-like, off the cliff. Like most liberals, she thinks we’re stupid, and easily led. She’s wrong. She thinks getting shot gives her more credibility than others. Again (like most liberals) she’s wrong. (Town Hall)

Cop's Life Saved By Gun Owner

This happened in Texas (where else?) where a crazed gunman got mad about a dog pooping in his yard and started killing people. The story doesn’t say how such a man got a gun, but it doesn’t matter. If a local gun law prohibited people with mental problems from getting a gun, they didn’t work in this case. He killed two people and two dogs (who will never poop in anybody’s yard again, I guess) and was trying to kill a police officer who responded, and discounted a “spectator” who has a good view of him from the side. This guy figured he’d better do something, so he shot him; and when the shooter started shooting at him, put two more in him while the cop added two more. But for this guy and his willingness to use his gun in self-defense and defense of others, that cop would now be dead. Which means, regardless of “anti-gun laws,” people who want to do bad things WILL get their hands on guns (even if they're crazy) and if innocent people don’t have their own guns, the wrong people will die. (Guns.com)

I Can't Abide Stupidity!

A man well known for being a “conspiracy theorist” went out on a beach one day and got a lot of signatures for his petition. That’s not a problem. What IS a problem is that the petition was to REPEAL THE BILL OF RIGHTS! What kind of FOOL would sign such a petition? People who KNOW NOTHING. People who “don’t pay attention to politics” and have no idea what they did. People like a man who sent me a message the other day saying, “I think Obama is doing a good job.” This kind of stupidity is going to create another “Soviet Union” or the “Fourth Reich,” here in the United States! It was just this sort of stupidity that allowed Hitler to become a dictator in Germany and allowed Vladmir Lenin to create 75 years of tyranny in Russia. And there seems to be nothing we can do about it. Damn! (The Blaze)

Is This Billboard "Offensive?"

Yes. It is. But not for the usual reason. Why? Because it tells a basic truth, not because it pictures INDIANS, who WERE “protected” out of existence by this government. It proclaims for all to see the FALLACY of allowing a government—ANY government—to disarm us on the promise they will “protect” us. The truth is, not only WILL they not, they CANNOT. When danger strikes, most of the time, there are only SECONDS before somebody is hurt, while the cops (those representatives of government who HAVE guns) take MINUTES to respond (it's not their fault). So the cops can only “take names” and MAYBE someday arrest the culprits. Just using pictures of Indians is not enough, in my mind, to “offend:” intelligent people. People who get mad because of the use of Indians on that billboard are FOOLS and are using that as an excuse not to discuss the REAL issue. Yes, I used the term “Indians,” not that phonied-up term, “Native Americans” the PC Police order me to use. I don’t obey “orders” from self-appointed fools not qualified to give them. (The Blaze)

Man Shoots Armed Robber

A man who says he only tried to rob the store because he was unemployed and needed money was shot as he ran away from the robbery, which he did with a shotgun held to the store owner’s head. The store owner pulled his own gun and shot the robber, who then went home where he and the shotgun, plus the loot were found by police. The store owner says the robber’s story is bogus because he, himself, lost his job, but did the HONEST thing and opened his own business. He didn’t try and rob somebody for his own good. Anti-gun freaks will hate this story because it does not support their phony theories that people who own guns will more than likely shoot THEMSELVES or “go wild,” shooting others, just because they have a gun. They say stories like this don’t happen, but I find them every day—although not in the liberal media. I guess they figure if it isn’t covered, it doesn’t happen. (The Blaze)

Fool Actors Want to Get Rid of Guns

They haven’t a clue about reality. They live in a world of make believe. They actually think it’s possible to “get rid of guns.” It is NOT. How will you accomplish it? Point guns at gun owners and demand they give you their guns? That’s not going to work because what do you do with the guns that you pointed at them after they give theirs up? What about the guns owned by criminals illegally? How about those owned by foreign governments? Get them to agree to give up their guns? Ain’t agonna happen. You don’t defend yourself by disarming yourself. Only fool politicians and actors (a contradiction in terms, that) think that. Say you DO manage to collect all legal guns in the world. How do you keep people from making more? How do you keep CRIMINALS from getting them illegally? I’d say somebody needs to fill these actors in on that if I thought they’d listen. But they won’;. they are fixed in their fool opinions and don’t listen to anything else. Like ALL anti-gun freaks who want to use THEIR guns to take away OUR guns. (The Blaze)

The Gift That Keeps On Giving

Obama had high hopes that we had forgotten about ONE of his scandals, the “Fast & Furious” scandal where he supplied guns to the Mexican drug cartels for the purpose, supposedly, to track their usage and find out where they were. One little problem: there was nothing on or in the guns to do that “tracking,” so basically Obama was “gun-running” to drug dealers. He ignored it and ignored it so long that it wasn’t mentioned much in his “compliant media” these days so he could “breathe a sign of relief.” Then one of those guns was used to kill a Mexican police chief in the State of Jalisco and it all came to the surface again. I guess that will happen again each time the Mexicans use one of his illicit guns to kill somebody; sometimes in Mexico, and sometimes even back here in the United states, If I didn’t know the reason (Obama controls the means of investigation and prosecution), I’d wonder why nothing had ever been done about this. There has been no REAL investigation in ANY of his scandals and I guess he hopes he can stall until he MUST leave office in 2016 (unless he figures out a way to get around the Constitution—you know, that document he ignores every day) so he can stay in power longer. At least 211 people including one Border Patrol agent, have been murdered with guns from this collection. (The Blaze)

They Don't Enforce Current Gun Laws!

That’s one of the major problems with “gun control laws.” They don’t enforce the ones already on the books, while RUNNING to pass new ones after EVERY shooting. They KNOW they don’t work, but they want it to LOOK like they’re “doing something.” They don’t care that their laws don’t work because they go in the wrong direction. They punish HONEST PEOPLE by making it harder, or impossible for them to get guns with which to defend themselves Meanwhile criminals go into back alleys and buy illegal guns out of the trunk of another criminal’s car. Even the background check laws aren’t prosecuted in most cases; it’s against the law for someone not qualified to buy a gun to even TRY. But that law is not usually enforced. There were 76,142 denials in 2010, but only 62 prosecutions and only 13 convictions or pleas. Those are miserable figures. (My Fox Tampa Bay) Why is this stuff only reported by Fox?

"Backdoor" Gun Control

Doctors are now REQUIRED to “report” any patient that they think MIGHT be a danger to themselves or anybody else, or that they just can’t manage their own financial issues. Whether or not they “think” those patients need to be reported isn’t up to the doctor, it’s up to the DEFINITION of an unnamed, faceless bureaucrat who is “outside looking in.” If there’s ANY POSSIBLE CHANCE (even if the doctor doesn't think so he MUST " "report" this patient or be in trouble himself) there’s any danger the doctor MUST report him/her, even if that doctor feels that might be wrong. It’s the same way the “child protectors” get so many “reports” of child abuse by doctors, who are afraid of being punished themselves if they don’t “report,” even if they don’t believe it, themselves. (GOA)

Guns Frighten Them

People with guns don’t frighten liberals, the guns themselves (even if they’re unloaded) frighten them. Even if they’re just lying on the table, guns stir an unreasoning FEAR in the minds of the “anti-gun fanatics” who are trying to make guns not exist any more (except for those in the hands of cops and government agents). A Tea Party group in a small Colorado town planned a demonstration in which they were to carry UNLOADED guns and the anti-gun fools are “freaking out.” One pro-gun local said this: “Even if they were loaded, I'd still feel safe around people who are familiar with firearms. But the reaction to the group's plans is incomprehensible. Do residents know that a gun needs, like, you know, bullets to be even remotely threatening? Are they really frightened of a piece of metal with a wood stock?” Yes, they are. The gun itself frightens them and they want to do away with it. (American Thinker)

"Backdoor" Gun Control

Doctors are now REQUIRED to “report” any patient that they think MIGHT be a danger to themselves or anybody else (or they even IMAGINE might be), or that they just can’t manage their own financial issues. Whether or not they “think” those patients need to be reported isn’t up to the doctor, it’s up to the DEFINITION of an unnamed, faceless bureaucrat who is “outside looking in.” If there’s ANY CHANCE there’s any danger the doctor MUST report him/her, even if that doctor feels that might be wrong. It’s the same way the “child protectors” get so many false “reports” of child abuse by doctors, who are afraid of being punished themselves if they don’t “report,” even if they don’t believe it, themselves. (GOA)

Guns Frighten Them

People with guns don’t frighten liberals as much as the guns themselves (even if they’re unloaded) frighten them. Even if they’re just lying on the table, guns stir an unreasoning FEAR in the minds of the “anti-gun fanatics” who are trying to make guns not exist any more (except for those in the hands of cops and government agents). A Tea Party group in a small Colorado town is planning a demonstration in which they plan to carry UNLOADED guns and the anti-gun fools are “freaking out.” One pro-gun local said this: “Even if they were loaded, I'd still feel safe around people who are familiar with firearms. But the reaction to the group's plans is incomprehensible. Do residents know that a gun needs, like, you know, bullets to be even remotely threatening? Are they really frightened of a piece of metal with a wood stock?” Yes, they are. The gun itself frightens them and they want to do away with it. (American Thinker)

Happy Fourth!

Well, we’ve reached another Fourth of July. But how much longer will we be “allowed” to celebrate this important date in our history with such as Obama in power? He has already stated his opinion that “we didn’t need a revolution” to get free of England. What kind of STUPID PILLS has he been taking? Anyway, let’s celebrate it as long as we can. I’m taking the day off. You’ve probably noticed that I’m now posting 7 days a week and in FOUR blogs instead of three. That’s because I’m no longer able to do the job I was paid to do and had to quit. Now ALL my work is FREE. You can find my books on Amazon or Barnes & Noble. I may even write another one.

Pen-Shaped Gun

 There is now a fully operational gun on the market shaped like a fountain pen which you can carry in your pocket. It is a single-shot gun, but one bullet an save your life if you use it properly. I’m not going to tell you exactly where you can get one, but I will tell you that you can “Google” the words “”gun looks like pen” and find where to buy it. It wouldn’t be much good in a gun fight, but it could make all the difference is you’re being attacked on the street by anybody using less than a gun. A fully operational gun with more than one bullet without reloading is still the best thing to have, but there are SOME places where you can’t carry it, that this item would not be detected. And that one bullet could make all the difference in keeping you alive. (The Blaze)

"Knife Control"

In communist China, which has the toughest anti-gun laws anywhere, murder still abounds. People have a hard time getting guns, so they use knives of some kind. Never mind that knives have other uses besides killing people. They’re going to ban them (No more cooking will go on). Of course, banning knives won’t do any more than banning guns did to keep people from killing each other, but they’re going to do it anyway. And they can, since they have no Constitution that’s worth anything. They make laws like that for the same reason dogs lick their penises; because they can. (The Blaze)

Cops Drop Charges Against Teen

Remember Jared Marcum, the teenager who got in trouble at school for wearing a NRA t-shirt? Who was even ARRESTED on a made-up charge that could have gotten him A YEAR in the slam (you can imagine what he'd go through there; he'd have been "prime meat" for the other convicts) and a $500 fine for refusing to violate his own rights by removing it on demand? Well, the cops have dropped the charges. Apparently, “wiser heads” have prevailed and reversed the actions of those fools with badges who arrested him. I don’t know for sure, but I think the school has continued to pursue the punishment they “meted out” for his refusal to “follow orders” for which there are no laws. They suspended him from school and the cops even tried to get a judge to issue a “gag order” to keep the family from even talking about it. That order failed. A reporter who tried to fight the gag order was himself ejected from the courthouse. Talk about a “police state!” His family is now ready to pursue legal action against this school, and should win a LOT of money, putting a  black spot on the records of those “school authorities” and the teacher involved. Frankly, this is just one example of "school officials" taking in a little bit too much territory. (GOA)

Again, Don't Mess With Texas

In Houston, three men burst into the apartment of Javier Ortiz and demanded money, pointing a gun at him. So he killed two of them with his own gun and the other is probably still running toward the tall and uncut timber. The cops haven’t figured out yet whether or not he shot in self defense, but that will be figured out later. I guess it just takes them a little longer than other people to figure things out. But when they finally arrived, they started looking for the third man, but he was too far away and they haven’t found him yet (if ever). You can expect to see many more of this kind of story in the near future, where responsible people are allowed to keep the means for self defense, a gun. (The Blaze)

Two Senators Surrender

“Senators John Hoeven (R-ND) and Bob Corker (R-TN) have made anti-gun New York Senator Chuck Schumer a very happy man.  They are frantically working to give Schumer the 70 votes he needs to send his amnesty bill to the House with momentum. And, if that bill were to be signed into law, it would add 8.4 million anti-gun voters to the rolls, and make gun registration, bans, and confiscation inevitable within 20 years.” All in return for a border fence and a few more border agents. This is something we should not have had to surrender our gun rights for. These senators are both Republicans, but are acting like Democrats. They should be sent home with their tails between their legs, next election. (Gun Owners of America)

Don't Mess With Texas!

When will criminals learn? In Texas, just about everybody is armed; at least in their homes. So if you want to break in and burglarize a home, make sure nobody is home. For a change, this crook (who is not named in the story) will benefit by this advice because he is expected to survive. If this homeowner had not been armed, what would have happened? He’d have been robbed, and possibly assaulted, maybe killed. But, contrary to what the anti-gun fanatics say, it is the robber who is in the hospital and destined for a long jail sentence when he recovers. This homeowner didn’t shoot himself, nor did the bad guy take his gun away from him and shoot him with his own gun. (The Blaze)