When Are Liberals Going to Wake Up?

Their entire system is against human nature. It guarantees failure in the future. Like their dedication to collectivism (socialism) and their continuing effort to make this into a socialist country. It’s based on the ignorant idea that ONLY the government can run things while the government screws up everything they touch (except raising taxes and conning your way into office). Socialism (in all its forms) involves TAKING from those who EARN and GIVING to those who don’t It “enshrines” mediocrity. It DEPENDS on TAKING the profits EARNED by people. It NEEDS people who earn profits for its very survival. Their position on guns is just as stupid. They try to promote the idea that CRIMINALS, who break laws for a LIVING, will OBEY a law that says they can’t be armed! People who have an unshakable belief in something that can be refuted in ONE SENTENCE aren’t too bright, are they? Or they’d be able to see it for themselves. (Just common sense)

Yet Another Gun Story

I don’t know if the incidence of people using legal guns to foil criminals are becoming more, or if they’re just being reported more. What IS happening is that they are appearing more often in places other than the NRA’s “Armed citizen” web site. At one time, I picked up a lot of stories from that web site, but I don’t have to any more. They are sufficiently numerous in general news sites (albeit mostly conservative) that I don’t have to resort to that site any more. This is one such story. Mauricio Esquivel pulled into his driveway and saw a broken window in his house. He got his gun out of his car, pointed it at the burglar and called the cops. For a change they got there quickly ant took Orlando Ortega into custody. At least he was smart enough to surrender when he saw Esquivel’s gun, so he will live to rob again after he gets out of prison in a few years. (The Blaze)

Always Trying

Obama is trying to find out as much about people who own guns and those who FAVOR owning guns as he can, hoping to find SOMETHING to use against those who would oppose him on that sham “gun control” he keeps pushing. We keep telling him what WILL work, but he ignores it and continues the "gun control swindle" he's been pushing for years. “The research agenda is intended to produce mammoth amounts of raw data on American gun owners, users and their circumstances, meaning that violence resulting from firearms use will be studied for “its causes, approaches to interventions that could prevent it, and strategies to minimize its health burden.” He loses in the gun control war, but he NEVER GIVES UP. He figures he will win, eventually, and all he has to do is win ONCE. One of the things he wants to know is where people KEEP guns so when he’s ready, he can confiscate (steal) them. The King of Britain tried that at Lexington and started a WAR that he lost. Will Obama? I can see it coming, and I welcome it. (Fox News)

It Doesn't work--Do More of It

Chicago has one of the highest gun death rates in the nation, coupled with the strongest anti-gun laws in the nation. They don’t work. So what does Rahm Emanuel do? He makes more of them like most INCOMPETENT POLITICIANS do. And gun deaths will predictably rise even more. What does it take to convince ignorant bast-rds like Emanuel that he’s going in the wrong direction? Nothing. He doesn’t want to stop gun violence. He wants to DISARM everybody and make gun ownership ILLEGAL co he can CRIMINALIZE people for wishing to defend themselves and having the means to do so. Like most liberals, he FEARS an armed populace because he thinks they will kill his thugs when they come after their property and their freedoms. (WGN TV)

Report Won't Make Obama Happy

The “report” coming from his Institute of Medicine and the National Research Council, (though I don’t see what MEDICINE has to do with this) isn’t going to entirely support his position on gun control. First,  it shows that instances of gun violence are getting BETTER, not worse—mostly because of better laws in 39 states); mass shootings are NOT the problem, and guns are used for self defense often, and effectively (something the anti-gun freaks say never happens). It is NOT true that the blame for most gun violence falls on a few “bad gun dealers.” That’s because most of the guns in use by criminals come from “back alley criminals” who sell guns out of the trunks of their cars. This item appeared in Slate, one of the most liberal sources. They must have had a gun to their heads. (Slate)

Hollywood Loves Guns--for Profit

They HATE guns—if you listen to some of their best-known actors, male and female, most of which employ their own ARMED security, who carry guns. But if you look at the movies they make, those same actors probably spend more time with a gun in their hands than a cop does in his daily work. Maybe they think because those guns only shoot blanks, that’s okay. I guess that represents the level of intelligence of the average liberal Hollywood actor. It really pains me to hear actors talk about how bad guns are while they pay armed security to keep them safe. It’s like talking out of both sides of their mouths. But then, they all live in a world of “make-believe,” so you might be able to “give them a pass” if the subject weren’t so important. I can’t believe NYT actually published this. I guess they figure one article won’t hurt their agenda. (New York Times)

Obama Arms the Beheaders

He’s sending money to the “rebels” in Syria, who (since Islamic extremists took over) BEHEAD their enemies (with a rusty knife) without any sort of trial and throw their headless bodies to their dogs. He’s helping to support barbarians who KILL indiscriminately, rape women while charging THEM with a crime, and BEHEAD people “on camera” for the whole world to see. They have no shame. They think people who do not believe EXACTLY the same way they do can be MURDERED with impunity (and in countries run by Muslims, they can). They think people who convert to another religion likewise can (And should be) MURDERED. In Egypt, where Islamic terrorists who operate the same way, are getting American troops to be “under their command” in “putting down” the demonstrations against the dominance of the Muslim Brotherhood, one of the most deadly bunch of Islamic terrorists going—which Obama will NOT admit. If we keep doing things like this, it won’t be too long before Islamists are BEHEADING American citizens in Kansas City or Chicago and throwing their headless bodies to the dogs.(Political Vel Craft)

Backing Up Your Threat

Every parent knows (though some ignore it) that when you threaten to do something if your children act up, you need to DO IT. Not to do what you promised tells them they can get away with ANYTHING because you won’t do what you promised. The same applies to PROMISES you make if they do something good. If you don’t keep your promises, your credibility disappears. The same applied when a president promises to do something if another COUNTRY “crosses a red line.” If he then “backs away” from that promise as Obama is now doing concerning use of “chemical weapons” in Syria. Assad now knows he can continue to use them to kill his people with impunity if he keeps their use “questionable.” Obama will do nothing. (LA Times)

Another Homeowner Shoots Armed Thug

This time in Arizona. I guess the Western states are a little smarter about allowing their citizens to be armed than those Eastern states that have such high “gun violence” stats. This guy pointed his gun at the homeowner and threatened him with his gun. Then he made the mistake of insulting the homeowner’s wife and the homeowner shot him. They found him on a golf course ten hours later still trying to get away. This is just one more occasion of proof that more honest people allowed to carry guns will lower the violent crime rate. But will incompetent politicians who run places like Chicago, which has some of the tightest anti- gun laws in the nation coupled with the highest gun violence in the country listen? I don’t think so. They’re either too stupid or have a different agenda than they claim. (The Blaze)

Call People With Guns

What do you do when a crazed gunman carrying an illegal gun starts shooting at you in a public place? Why, call someone who HAS guns and HOPE they get there in time to take down the crazed gunman before he kills you. While you’re waiting, HIDE. That’s the fallacy in what the politicians tell us while they make all kinds of laws to keep us from being able to defend OURSELVES. In this case, like all the others, ONE PERSON with his own gun and the will to use it could have saved at least the last three people shot from BEING shot. Fortunately, the “people with guns” they called (the cops) got there in time to limit this crazed shooter’s victims to four. But way too often, they don’t. Someone with a gun who is ALREADY THERE would be better, but our incompetent politicians never listen to reason. Some even deny the EXISTENCE of reason and logic—which demonstrates their ignorance. (The Blaze)

Fewer People Owning More Guns?

Huh? “Caroline Brewer of the anti-gun Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence has reported that “The research we’ve seen indicates fewer and fewer people owning more and more guns.” Yet one can only wonder where they are getting that information [They’re making it up, as they do with most of their statistics to support their agenda.-RT]. In reality, public support for personal gun ownership is growing. According to Steve Sanetti, president of the National Shooting Sports Foundation, a trade group that represents about 7,000 firearms manufacturers and related companies, in 1959 some 70% of the American public favored handgun bans, whereas today that number has flipped. This support is reflected in the marketplace. Sanetti observes that the $4.1 billion gun industry “has had nineteen months of growth in an otherwise anemic economy.” They can't lie to us forever. (Forbes Magazine)

Robber Made Big Mistake

This is getting boring. The stories of people exercising their Second Amendment rights have become so numerous I can’t even report them all. Maybe it’s the rise of the “alternative media, which DOES report these incidents while the anti-gun media does not; I don’t know. But in Atlanta, a gunman tried to rob everybody in line to buy a pair of $180 shoes and got killed for his trouble when somebody in line decided he didn’t want to be robbed and shot him to death. I guess the robber figured everybody in line had at least $180 to give him. But one of them had one bullet, which he gave him without even being asked. No charges being filed against the man who killed the robber. It was “self defense.” (The Blaze)

Don't Disarm for Self Defense

That’s about the silliest thing I’ve ever heard of, but it is the almost unshakable position of our incompetent lawmakers who keep making laws to do just that. But other smarter politicians have significantly increased the number of guns in the hands of responsible people and caused the violent crime rate to “nosedive.” Forbes Magazine says this: “As much as gun control advocates might wish otherwise, their attacks are running out of ammo. With private firearm ownership at an all-time high and violent crime rates plunging, none of the scary scenarios they advanced have materialized. Abuse of responsibility by armed citizens is rare, while successful defensive interventions against assaults on their lives and property are relatively commonplace.” Such instances of successful intervention are DENIED by anti-gun freaks but people are starting to ignore them more and more. (Forbes Magazine)

Biden Shows HIs Ignorance (Again)

That fool, Joe Biden is opening his stupid mouth again, showing his ignorance (as usual). He’s telling politicians who oppose the administration’s stupid gun control laws that if they oppose them, they’ll “pay a political price” for their opposition. Really, Joe? With gun ownership at it’s highest in years, and a majority of states making “concealed carry permits” a lot easier to get while the violent crime rate plummets, do you really think your support is strong enough to promise that? Joe, you’d be much better off if you’d keep your mouth shut. Conservatives call you “the gift that keeps on giving,” referring to your penchant for making illogical and stupid statements. I guess they can add this one to the list. (Washington Post)

The Supremacy Clause

They’ve been trying or years to establish the supremacy of the federal government over the states. The original Constitution made it clear that the states were supreme. But politicians found a way around that and passed the “Supremacy Clause,” making the feds “supreme” in CERTAIN cases, creating a BONANZA for constitutional lawyers. Lately, several states have made laws that allow federal agents to be ARRESTED for enforcing certain federal laws within their states, principally in the case of anti-gun laws. They really need to resolve this issue so the confusion can’t ruin the lives of federal agents who are only doing their jobs and gun owners who are wrongfully arrested, (Mail.com)

Another Bad Guy Learns A Lesson

The lesson is, if you’re gonna do a “home invasion” with a gun, make sure you know how to handle a gun. In this case this fool put a gun to a woman’s head and she fought him off, making him drop his gun. Her husband picked it up and gave it back to him; one bullet at a time.” His buddy is probably still running while he is being taken to the city morgue. He wasn’t much of a thug if a woman could disarm him, but she did. The lesson won’t do him much good though, because he’s dead. (The Blaze)

Two Senators Surrender

“Senators John Hoeven (R-ND) and Bob Corker (R-TN) have made anti-gun New York Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) a very happy man.  They are frantically working to give Schumer the 70 votes he needs to send his amnesty bill to the House with momentum. And, if that bill were to be signed into law, it would add 8.4 million anti-gun voters to the rolls, and make gun registration, bans, and confiscation inevitable within 20 years.” All in return for a border fence and a few more border agents. This is something we should not have had to surrender our gun rights for. These senators are both Republicans, but are acting like Democrats. They should be sent home with their tails between their legs, next election. (Gun Owners of America)

Don't Mess With Texas!

When will criminals learn? In Texas, just about everybody is armed; at least in their homes. So if you want to break in and burglarize a home, make sure nobody is home. For a change, this crook (who is not named in the story) will benefit by this advice because he is expected to survive. If this homeowner had not been armed, what would have happened? He’d have been robbed, and possibly assaulted. But, contrary to what the anti-gun fanatics say, it is the robber who is in the hospital and destined for a long jail sentence when he recovers. This homeowner didn’t shoot himself, nor did the bad guy take his gun away from him and shoot him with his own gun as they say will usually happen. (The Blaze)

Progressivism IS Communism!

You may wonder whi I post this in a blog about government taking your guns away. But believe me, this IS relevant. I know that most people’s “eyes glaze over” when they hear the word, “communism.” But make no mistake; communism IS “alive and well” all over the world. They just call it “progressivism” today to fool those who don’t know any better. The whole “communism collapsed” thing in Russia was a “set up.” “Two steps forward and one step back” is a well known scam the communists use to make us think we have “won a great battle” while they still make progress. The then communist boss in Russia, Mikhael Gorbachev, once told his “ruling body,” not to worry about such things as “Peristroika.” They are merely something to “put the Americans to sleep.” And, for the most part, particularly among our “leaders,” it has been spectacularly successful. They equate communism in Russia as being the only communism that meant anything and when it “failed,” communism was dead the world over. It is NOT.

It has just taken a new name and continues on, unabated. They just don’t call it COMMUNISM any more. Notice that in Russia the SAME PEOPLE are still running things as under communism. Vladmir Putin (now president--again) is the former head or the SECRET POLICE (NKVD or whatever else they called it) under communism. They're now a SOCIALIST country. Communism and socialism are merely two different kinds of COLLECTIVISM. There are only cosmetic differences between the two. (Naziism is another. Nazi stands for “National SOCIALIST.” The Soviet Union was the “Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics.” It is a “thin disguise,” but our politicians and most of the “lesser people” in this country have “bought it. ” COLLECTIVISM is the enemy, and our own president is one of collectivism’s highest-ranking promoters. He is working day and night to impose it upon us. He has already succeeded in “taking over” 1/7th of our economy, the medical profession.

He has also taken over most of the auto industry (the government now OWNS General Motors, and CONTROLS large segments of the other auto companies—that part he hasn’t allowed to be sent to China, of course). What part of the “private sector” he doesn’t OWN, he CONTROLS, through regulations. He is well on his way to creating “The American Socialist Republic.” We stupidly (not me) re-elected him to another four year term so he could complete the job he started. He even THREATENED to do so when he said, “I need another four years to finish what I started.” Make no mistake; he means to complete the job of SOCIALIZING America and becoming our “Vladmir Lenin” with that clown, Joe Biden as his Josef Stalin. People will say that what I say is just “the ravings of a dotty old man,” so they can dismiss it. But nothing could be further from the truth.

I’m one of the FEW people in this country who REALIZES what they’re doing. I doubt if I will be alive much longer. If I don’t die from old age, I believe this government will do something to “get rid of me” because I “know too much,” as did Peter McWilliams, whom they murdered by putting him in prison for using the ONLY thing that kept him from vomiting up his medicine until he was found one day drowned in his own vomit. Look his name up on the Internet (if you can still do it) or in the library (if you can’t) if you don’t believe me. Look up his book, “Nobody’s Business If You Do.” My own grandson worked for a thinly disguised “Re-elect Obama” organization during that recent interminable election. When I asked him why he was helping Obama spew his poison he told me “It was a job when there were no others.” That might be a good excuse for somebody who doesn’t know just who the enemy is, but not for me. If we don’t wake up soon, we’ll be the next “collectivist showcase country.” When the communists (under whatever name they use to confuse us) take over here, guess what will be the FIRST casualty? Don't know? It'll be gun ownership. (Just common sense)

NY To Tie Cops' Hands

In New York City (under Mayor Blunderberg), the cops will no longer be able to use a suspect’s race, age, and even gender as an identifier if a bill now in Council passes. Without those identifiers, what’s left? Boy, liberals like Bloomberg sure know how to tie the cops’ hands. Tell me, without those identifiers, how are they going to describe the suspects at all? Talk about incompetent politicians who have NEVER been “in the trenches” making impossible rules for those who are! NYPD Captain’s Endowment Association subsequently ran an ad showing a cop in uniform with a blindfold over his eyes, which pretty much describes how he will have to work if this bill passes. If the mayor finds out who this cop is, no doubt he will either lose his job or be demoted to the lowest rung on the NYPD roster. To my way of thinking, if this bill passes, every cop in NY should resign, en masse. Such rules will get them killed and make their jobs impossible. What kind of damn FOOL is this mayor? I'm glad this fool is in New York, and not where I live! (The Blaze)

He Learned A Hard Lesson

But it won’t do him any good; he’d dead. 28-year-old Mustafa Sheffield, of Newark, NY brandished his ILLEGAL gun and demanded his “victims” fill a bag with money, threatening to kill the shop owner and his family if he didn’t. Whereupon the shop owner took out his own LEGAL gun and put a bullet in the robber, which killed him. But other would-be robbers can take a lesson from this: go into another line of “work,” or YOU might get killed. The more guns in the hands of HONEST people, the more times this will happen. And if they try anyway, we’re going to lower the numbers of such robberies by killing the perpetrators off. That’s the ONLY gun control there is: the victims being armed. (The Blaze)

Taking Guns On Thin Pretexts

Arthur Lovi, a resident of Arlington Heights, IL, was talking to a psychiatrist about some tragedies in his life, including the loss of his wife of 33 years. So he was “crazy,” according to unqualified “officials” who were “investigating” him. He told that psychiatrist he “still had hard feelings toward a doctor whose misdiagnosis led to her death. That psychiatrist reported that as a “possible threat” to that doctor” because he/she was “required by law” to do so if even the POSSIBILITY of a threat was present. So they came in and took ALL his guns, even a flintlock musket under this THIN pretext. He had to pay a lawyer to get his guns (all of which were antiques, some 100 years old and not even friable) back after being deemed NOT a danger to ANYBODY by another psychiatrist. This is because of a “loophole” in the law that I’m sure the anti-gun politicians will eliminate. (World Net Daily)

Chicago Warfare

Obama talks about all the people that get killed in “war zones” in the Middle East, but he never says a word about all the people who get killed by guns in the “gun-free” City of Chicago. In the city with some of the tightest anti-gun laws in the nation, more people are killed at any given time than in many “war zones.” Just this last weekend, SEVEN people are dead, and 30 wounded by gun violence there. How did those people GET their guns with all the laws against gun buying and ownership? It’s a mystery to incompetent politicians how so many people can die by gun violence in a land with such tight gun laws; but it’s not a mystery to intelligent people who know DISARMING people will not keep guns out of the hands of criminals (who break laws for a living), and only gives them an unending stream of unarmed victims. And we (not me) keep electing these FOOLS. They call it a “rash of shootings,” but it’s just a standard weekend in Chicago. (The Blaze)

Surprise! The Sun Will Rise!

The Mail.com reports on the NRA convention, noting that the new president (James Porter, attorney and son of a former NRA president) “came out swinging” and “fanned the flames of an emotionally combustible debate.” The article says that, “The NRA finds itself in a national fight over gun control in Washington, DC.” Oh, Really? Isn’t that something they have been in the middle of for years? Isn’t that their JOB? The article reports that, “Porter has called Obama a ‘fake president” and AG Holder as ‘unAmerican’.” As if he were wrong. Clue, people: he’s RIGHT. Yes, he also calls the Revolutionary War “the war of northern aggression,” which shows he’s a “southerner.” So what? You can’t be right on everything, but two out of three isn’t bad. He called for training every American in the use of standard military firearms so they could defend themselves, even against an “out-of-control government,” which we are rapidly gaining. I’m happy to see the NRA realizing that the right to wn guns is NOT just about hunting and shooting sports.

It’s MOSTLY about SELF-DEFENSE, even from the GOVERNMENT, if necessary. That’s not a radical position; it’s merely COMMON SENSE. It’s only radical to liberal FOOLS who think we can achieve self-defense by DISARMING ourselves in the face of an ARMED enemy. Josh Horwiz, a top “anti-gun freak,” says, “Porter as president pulls the NRA further into the extremist camp and they have gone full crazy.” This from Horwitz is a high compliment (he didn't intend it that way), It shows how much Porter frightens him and other anti-gun fools. I’d say Porter is a good choice. People thought Keene was a weak president. They are right, and his policies caused me to move AWAY from the NRA. Now, maybe I can support the NRA if Porter's policies live up to the billings.  (Mail.com)

Telling Mexico "The Lie"

He even BRAGGED about it to the Mexicans during his recent stupid speech given in Mexico. But he didn’t say, in so many words, that most of them were sold at the ORDERS of the U. S. government (meaning himself) just so he could say that. What kind of a FOOL is this guy? Does he really think he can violate the law with impunity? I guess he does, since he violates the law daily and BRAGS about it. He tells gun dealers in Arizona to sell guns destined for the Mexican drug cartels to make the “drug wars” deadlier, then tells the world “moat of the guns in Mexico came from the U. S., not mentioning the fact that HE ordered them sold so he could now back up the FICTION. (Cowboy Byte)

They Never Give Up

Many of the recent gun control efforts failed. Why? Because the American people didn’t want them, and Congress recognized that, and voted accordingly. But the Democrats never give up when it comes to IMPOSING upon us things we’re violently opposed to. So they failed. But Democrat Senator Joe Manchin is not giving up. He has VOWED to bring it up again and again until it passes. He doesn’t care if nobody wants it but the “anti-gun freaks” like himself. He’s going to push it until it passes. He says he will “urge senators to read the bill (which is very unusual) and tell me what they don’t like.” If they DID read it, likely the answer would be the WHOLE CONCEPT of the bill that the way to stop gun violence is not to punish USE of guns in crimes, but to punish innocent VICTIMS by disarming them in the face of ILLEGALLY-ARMED criminals. (The Blaze)

Incompetent Politicians

I’ve written about this before and I’ll write about it again until people start listening. Not every politician is incompetent, but enough are to create havoc all over the world. That’s why Greece is bankrupt; and why many American cities (including Detroit, Michigan) are broke. It’s why AMERICA is broke. Our incompetent politicians think the way to prosperity is spending money like water. Any individual who lives in the real world could tell them otherwise, but they don’t listen. They think the way to self-defense is to DISARM ourselves. And they don’t believe that just for us; they believe it for themselves, too (except for their own protection from us; for that they keep guns handy). They constantly speak of DISARMAMENT if our enemies would just AGREE to disarm themselves, too. They don’t even CONSIDER making armed crimes rate stiffer punishment, instead of keeping us from being able to defend ourselves, while waiting for people WITH guns to come and protect us (or “write it up” after the crime has occurred and we're hurt or dead).

They say “guns won’t help us” and tell us to call and WAIT while people WITH guns come to defend us AFTER the criminal with his ILLEGAL gun has victimized us. They ARM drug cartels in Mexico and terrorists in Egypt and elsewhere while taking our guns away in America on the thinnest pretexts. They allow Islamic terrorists to come here to settle, hiding among refugees from war-torn nations, most of whom are “war-torn” because of Islamic terrorists. They think profit is unnecessary but have no idea how to MAKE money except to TAX people who DO make a profit. Our current incompetent president denies the very EXISTENCE of Islamic terrorists, while sending his drones out to kill their leaders. I could write BOOK about the irrational ideas and actions of just this ONE politician. But I won’t, because nobody would listen—at least, not enough to matter. I’ve written TWO BOOKS on it (just enter my name in Amazon to find them), but not enough are reading them to make a difference. I’ll keep writing a bout this until I die, whether or not ANYBODY listens. (Just common sense)

Fools At Work Again

The fools running the school system and some cops in Logan, WV have gone stupid, just like the fools running schools in several places, and have suspended and arrested an eighth grader over an NRA t-shirt he refused to stop wearing. There’s no law against wearing NRA t-shirts, but they “made up” some charges to lay on him when he wouldn’t stop wearing it. They arrested him for “disturbing the education process (I’d really like to see the LAW for that) and obstructing an officer (who had no need to be there at all).” He not only kept wearing it, but other students wore similar t-shirts in support of him. Basically, the cop arrested him because he wouldn’t shut up, thus “interfering with an officer.” Can cops really come in where they’re not needed and arrest somebody for “interfering” with them? It’s like a cop arresting someone for “resisting an arrest” being the only charge. NO other arrest for anything. How could someone “resist” a non-existing arrest? But then, fools don’t think about that. This is yet another case of “school officials” aided by officious cops, violating a student’s right to express himself by placing specious "charges" against him. I don't know how some of these stupid people sleep at night. (The Blaze)

Gun Ownership Is Best

More proof that gun ownership is best. This “little old lady” would have been defenseless as a man worked to break into her home while she begged the 911 dispatcher to get the police to her home as she watched him working to break in. Soon he was opening her door and no cops in sight. So she took a shot at him with her .357 Magnum as he started in her door and he fled in surprise. He didn’t expect her to be armed. Criminals usually don’t expect their potential victims to be armed, due to the efficiency of the government’s efforts to DISARM the populace and create more and more unarmed and therefore defenseless victims for them to victimize. It didn’t work in this case as she fired one shot from her .357 Magnum. His pants are probably still full and he may still be running, leaving a brown trail. (Mail.com)

Pushing Lies

Liberals spend all their time pushing LIES, and we (not me) believe them. Lies like “corporations are not people” and CRIMINALS, who break laws for a LIVING, will OBAY one that says they can't be armed when we KNOW corporations ARE people. What is it that MAKES UP corporations? Without people there would BE no corporations. They say large corporations want to kill the people who give them the money that keeps them in business. WHY? Do we ever ask the  WHY they think such damnfool things? If we do, they simply promote ANOTHER LIE, that “there are no absolutes.” That very STATEMENT is a “statement of an absolute.” When they SAY there are no absolutes, they want you to believe THAT as an absolute while denying the EXISTENCE of absolutes. They promote so many lies there isn’t room here, or anywhere else to list them all, let alone discuss the reasons they ARE lies, or even keep track of them. Yet they base their entire existence on these lies, and we BELIEVE them. If we (not me) weren’t stupid enough to BELIEVE their obvious lies, they couldn’t exist. Consequently we are “sowing the seeds” of our own destruction. Will people realize that and change? Nope. That would be ADMITTING they are doing something stupid. They’ll die rather than admit that. (Just common sense)

Going WAY Overboard

To the point of ridiculousness after Sandy Hook, “school authorities” go :”overboard” to the extent of suspending a student for the remainder of the school year for—making “shooting motions” with his HAND! How stupid do they have to BE to do this? I believe “school officials” are competing with each other for the stupidity of their actions regarding guns in school. Like one outfit holding a “gun buyback” for TOY guns! With others suspending small children for DRAWING a picture of a gun or tearing a piece of paper into the SHAPE of a gun! You can’t make this stuff up, folks! Reality is “stranger than fiction” today, if you consider what “school officials” do. Sheesh! (The Blaze)

The New World Order

That is something that was only whispered about when I came to my majority in the late fifties. To be exposed as being a person who FAVORED it was to be RUINED in politics—and sometimes in business, as well. Today, politicians OPENLY talk about “working toward a new world order.” The first President Bush called it openly “our fifth objective.” Vice President Joe Biden said, “The task we have now is to actually create a new world order.” But what they DON’T say is that a “new world order” means COMMUNISM (AKA: collectivism); something most people growing up today know nothing about and don’t even realize how dangerous it is. Communism is what RUINED Russia. Admittedly what they had wasn’t all that great (The Czars, or royalty, which Britain still has), but a real examination will tell you it was STILL better. Communism (and all other forms of collectivism) has FAILED everywhere it has been tried, eventually; After all the money STOLEN from citizens of other countries that is used to “prop up” FAILING collectivist (communist) governments runs out.

My advice to kids today becoming adults is to research communism; find out what it is, and what it did to Russia. The millions of people it MURDERED to stay in power until it ran out of its people’s money. Progressivism is another word for communism. It is an insidious cancer on the world, and America is in the process of “catching” it. It is growing like a tumor and must be “cut out” before it enslaves, and/or kills us. Socialism is a paler form of communism and IT is growing, too. If it wins, communism will be the later result. I can’t understand the APPEAL for collectivism in today’s world, except for the “promise” of a “free ride” to all who wish it to those who just don’t want to take care of themselves—and the number of those people voting is increasing apace. And they ARE voting. The evidence is the re-election of Barack Obama, something I consider to be one of the WORST moves this country (not me) has ever made.

My sister didn’t even know what socialism WAS, until I explained it to her. Now she is one of the most ardent foes of socialism on the planet. We need to bring this knowledge to more emerging adults before it is too late. Informing these youngsters is the most important thing you will ever do. If you do not, you will suffer one day under the same thing that inflicted the people who lived for 70 some years under the curse of the Soviet Union. Don’t let it happen. I won’t care for myself. I’ll be six feet under. But I sorrow for my descendants, who will have to live under communism, whatever they call it. This item began as a short item for “Ray’s Shorts,” as do many of the posts for this blog do. But sometimes I just can’t stop writing, in hopes of convincing SOMEBODY that we live in a dangerous age and are (not me) bringing it on ourselves, as usual. The “Ray’s Shorts” blog is confined to SHORT items of (my) opinion so this had to be moved. I’m thankful I HAVE this one for this purpose, if nothing else. (Just common sense)

Shot Him In the Butt

This homeowner was surprised when his doorbell rang twice and he took his gun with him the second time he opened his door. Good thing, because a robber attacked him as he opened the door, so he shot him in the butt. I guess the attacker thought he was making a “home invasion,” but all he got for his trouble was a bullet where he sits. When the cops (finally) got there, he was found with several wounds, one of them in his sitter. They took him to the hospital and, presumably, he will be charged. I don’t think he will sit down when he goes to court, unless it is a LONG time in the future. I guess he learned a hard lesson: don’t try to invade somebody’s home unless you have determined that he doesn’t have a gun. It could be very painful, in addition to the jail sentence. (The Blaze)

Again; We Need More Of This

A man came into a music store and started beating an elderly woman with a big stick. Whereupon her husband came in and shot him to death. Anti-gun freaks say this NEVER happens and ignore it when it does. If this man did not have a legally-obtained and owned gun, his wife (and he) would probably have been killed. Instead, the criminal career of this thug was ended, as it should have been. The cops are “investigating” this case of two 70-year-old people being attacked by a 32-year-old thug. Hopefully they won’t find an excuse to charge this man in the case. In any case, whatever happens next, there is one less thug out there with a big stick attacking elderly people on their own property. (KDKA/CBS)

Gun-Free Zones

Mass murderers have many things in common, but one glaring one is that they ALWAYS go to “gun-free zones.” That’s because they KNOW there is a great possibility that there will be no one here who can oppose them with their own guns so they can kill whomever they wish with impunity. I know of only one case where a would-be shooter in Indianapolis went into a gun store and shot a clerk, but I can’s ask him about it because he’s dead. Everybody in the store (all of whom were armed) got at least one bullet in him. When they took him out of the store in a “body bag,” he looked a lot like Swiss cheese. So why do lour politicians keep making “gun-free zones?” Because they’re incompetent and too ignorant to know it. Politicians like this are afflicted with two well-known afflictions, arrogance coupled with ignorance. Why do we keep electing such people to office? Because many of US are ignorant. Some only want a “free ride” and don’t care what kind of people they must elect in order to maintain it. That’s why Obama got his second term against all odds. (Just common sense)

Gun-Weilding Savior

"Charlie Blackmore was driving home around 4 a.m. when he spotted a woman being assaulted along the side of the road. A man had pushed her to the ground and was kicking her repeatedly in the head and stomach. Blackmore stopped his car and ordered the man to stop the attack. The assailant then turned his attention to Blackmore and began approaching him. Thanks to Wisconsin's new concealed-carry law, Blackmore was able to draw his pistol and hold the suspect at gunpoint until police arrived. The woman was treated for what appeared to be a broken nose and large laceration on her face. (NRA/The Armed Citizen/West Allis, WI, 3/15/13)

They Never Give Up!

Many of the recent gun control efforts failed. Why? Because the American people didn’t want them, and Congress recognized that, and voted accordingly (for a change). But the Democrats never give up when it comes to IMPOSING upon us things we’re violently opposed to. So they failed. But Democrat Senator Joe Manchin is not giving up. He has VOWED to bring it up again and again until it passes (he hopes he lives long enough). He doesn’t care if nobody wants it but the “anti-gun freaks” like himself. He’s going to push it until it passes. He says he will “urge senators to read the bill and tell me what they don’t like (which they normally don't do).” If they DID read it, likely the answer would be the WHOLE CONCEPT of the bill that the way to stop gun violence is not to punish USE of guns in crimes, but to punish innocent VICTIMS by disarming them in the face of ILLEGALLY-ARMED criminals. (The Blaze)

The "New World Order"

That is something that was only whispered about when I came to my majority in the late fifties. To be exposed as being a person who FAVORED it was to be RUINED in politics—and sometimes in business, as well. Today, politicians OPENLY talk about “working toward a new world order.” The first President Bush called it openly “our fifth objective.” Vice President Joe Biden said, “The task we have now is to actually create a new world order.” But what they DON’T say is that a “new world order” means COMMUNISM; something most people growing up today know nothing about and don’t even realize how dangerous that is. Communism is what RUINED Russia. Admittedly what they had before wasn’t all that great, but a real examination will tell you it was STILL better. Communism (and all other forms of collectivism) has FAILED everywhere it has been tried, eventually; After all the money STOLEN from citizens of other countries that is used to “prop up” FAILING collectivist (communist) governments runs out.

My advice to kids today becoming adults is to research communism and what it did to Russia. The millions of people it MURDERED to stay in power until it ran out of its people’s money. Progressivism is another word for communism. It is an insidious cancer on the world, and America is in the process of “catching” it. It is growing like a cancerous tumor and must be “cut out” before it kills us. Socialism is a paler form of communism and IT is growing, too. If it wins, communism will be the later result. I can’t understand the APPEAL for collectivism in today’s world, except for the “promise” of a “free ride” to all who wish it to those who just are too lazy to take care of themselves—and the number of those people voting is increasing apace. And they ARE voting. The evidence is the re-election of Barack Obama, something I consider to be one of the WORST moves this country (not me) has ever made.

My sister didn’t even know what socialism WAS, until I explained it to her. Now she is one of the most ardent foes of socialism on the planet. We need to bring this knowledge to more emerging adults before it is too late. Informing these youngsters is the most important thing you will ever do. If you do not, you will suffer one day under the same thing that inflicted the people who lived for 70 some years under the Soviet Union. Don’t let it happen. I won’t care for myself. I’ll be six feet under. But I sorrow for my descendants, who will have to live under communism, whatever they call it. This item began as a short item for “Ray’s Shorts,” as do many of the posts for this blog do. But somehow I just can’t stop writing, in hopes of convincing SOMEBODY that we live in a dangerous age and are (not me) bringing it on ourselves, as usual. The “Ray’s Shorts” blog is confined to SHORT items of (my) opinion so this had to be moved. I’m thankful I HAVE this one for this purpose, if nothing else. (Just common sense)

More Proof We Need to Defund the UN

Because there are many people who SHOULD be smarter than this getting paid to be “advisors” who have such STUPID theories, and vent them all the time. This guy is a “professor emeritus” at Princeton University, which usually would mean he is “smarter than the average bear,” but in this case it does not. Moreover, he is a member of the UN Human Rights Council. Unfortunately, there are MANY such professors teaching our impressionable youngsters such stupidities and "advising" the UN.. No WONDER our kids are spouting such nonsense themselves. the UN is being RUN by socialist DICTATORS and is not the kind of organization that should be allowed to change ONE IOTA of our policies. They should be SHUT DOWN in this country and not allowed to begin elsewhere with ANY of our money. But if liberals are allowed to continue to run things here, they will continue. They are doing the liberals' work. Falk should be REMOVED from the UN Human Rights Council and as a "professor emeritus" at Princeton because his views are not representative of their views; or are they? (Free Republic)

Pissant Bastard's Mad

Obama made yet another attempt to pass legislation that will do NOTHING to stop gun violence, but which WILL make it harder for reasonable, HONEST people to get the guns they need to defend themselves against CRIMINALS and crazies who don’t obey ANY laws. And he lost, after he told multiple LIES like the one about 85% of Americans FAVORING a universal  gun registration, which is a list of gun owners that can be used later to CONFISCATE guns when they’re “ready.”. They DO NOT favor it. Only in his TWISTED “studies” does it SEEM like they do. I’ve asked the same question for years of everybody I can think of including "anti-gun" politicians: “What makes ANYBODY think CRIMINALS and crazies will OBEY a law that says they can’t be armed when they don’t obey ANY other laws? NOBODY will give me a credible answer because they can’t.

The “anti-gun Nazis” just call me names and walk away, Other people just ignore the question and change the subject. Why do these FOOLS continue to bring out those old, tired laws they’ve had in their desk drawers for YEARS and try again and again to pass them, taking advantage of today’s calamities? Obama’s former chief of staff (now mayor of his home town (Chicago), which has some of the tightest gun laws, combined with the WORST gun murder rate in the nation), who once famously said, “Never let a good panic go to waste.” Obama and his “gang of thieves” never do. I don’t EVER expect to get an answer to my question because there IS no answer an honest man can give. Obama accuses the NRA of lying when they say gun registry will lead to gun confiscation. That is simply a DIFFERENCE OF OPINION, not a lie. Not like the MANY lies Obama told in his attempt to pass this useless legislation. (Washington Post/Jennifer Rubin)

Sheriff Arrested for Following the Law!

Liberty County, FL Sheriff Nick finch was arrested by Florida Governor Rick Scott (What amazes me is this governor is a REPUBLICAN!) I guess he’s just a FOOL, too, for arresting a sheriff for supporting the Constitution, which they both swore to support when being sworn in. I don’t know what he charged him with, or even if it will hold up in court (I doubt it). But the very act of arresting him will cost him a lot of money and time he could use much more profitably doing what sheriffs do. Is this what we’ve come to in this country? Where a sheriff can be arrested and charged for supporting the Constitution of the United States? (Liberty First)

Liar Lies About Being Lied To

The next day after the Congress “got a backbone” and rejected his fool gun control legislation, Obama went right to the rose Garden and whined and bitched and groaned about it, saying the Congress was manipulated and lied to by the “right” and needed to be “bypassed.” Of course, “bypassing” Congress is illegal and unconstitutional, but Obama has never cared about that. He bypasses Congress all the time. He “lied through his teeth” in that speech (just like all his other speeches). Especially when he said “90% of Americans are FOR universal background checks.” He calls those laws that were not passed, “common sense compromise that didn’t infringe on our Second Amendment rights.” (That’s ANOTHER lie). He used Gabby Giffords (a Democrat) and Sandy Hook families as “props” in this speech, He said people lied about this bill, (which they DIDN’T). The only one LYING about this bill is Obama. The Bill of Rights was upheld when this legislation was rejected. You can’t stand a free people telling you to “go to hell” with your useless legislation that did nothing but take our rights away from us. If you ever come up with some REAL legislation (doubtful), maybe we’ll listen to you. Legislation such as you present will NEVER do anything to stop criminal gun violence. All it will do is give CRIMINALS a steady stream of UNARMED victims.  (The Right Planet)

Typical Liberal Response

BAN IT! It doesn’t matter if it is usually a valuable piece of normal, everyday equipment; if it was used to do violence, blame IT and ban it: “In the WRONG HANDS these things can be EXTREMELY DANGEROUS and we as a society simply cannot afford to have pressure cookers out there that are completely uncontrolled. We are talking about some common sense laws. First, most people do not need high capacity pressure cookers. Limiting pressure cookers to a quart will make society safer. In addition, with all the documented instances of pressure cookers being used to construct explosive devices (I think), and in light of the numbers of killed and injured, two things are clear: pressure cookers are lethal and we are in the midst of a pressure cooker violence epidemic. There is no need for pressure cooker nuts to run around with their pressure cookers without any regulation and oversight. Mandatory mental health evaluations and federal background checks will help to ensure that a pressure cooker doesn't fall in the wrong hands.

Should people convicted of felonies and domestic violence misdemeanors be banned from owning pressure cookers? ABSOLUTELY! Even if it saves just one life, it's worth it. How about that soccer mom? Well, it depends. What if she loves soccer but hates America? Do you REALLY want THAT soccer mom to have unfettered access to something so potentially deadly?” Of course, it the item is something they, themselves USE every day, they conveniently ignore the deaths it causes; such as the automobile. This item actually APPEARED on CNN and got 2.400 “likes, vs. just 250 “dislikes.” This item was obviously (to intelligent people) satire, but way too few liberals recognized it as such (not being intelligent). In retrospect, after seeing what their friends SERIOUSLY said about it, they deny they were serious. But knowing liberals like I do, I think most of the “likes” meant they agreed with the concept of BANNING pressure cookers. You can see most of the ignorant anti-gun arguments in this item so liberals respond in a “knee-jerk” response. (Just common sense)

Nothing Would Have Stopped Newtown

Politicians in Washington and in every state are running around like chickens with their heads cut off to pass SOME law so they can convince their constituents that they’re DOING something. But NONE; not a single law that has been passed, or will be in the future (of the kind they're pushing), will do ANYTHING to stop such gun violence because they’re all aiming in the wrong direction. Instead of making laws to punish criminals who USE guns in the commission of a crime, their laws ALL punish people who have never done anything wrong by making it harder for them to have guns to protect themselves. This gives illegally armed criminals a steady stream of UNARMED victims. Violent criminals ALL want gun controls to get tighter because that reduces the number of possible armed potential victims while they get their guns ILLEGALLY. They break laws for a LIVING, so gun laws mean NOTHING to them except to make their crimes easier to commit without danger to themselves. Honest people should start buying their guns illegally, as criminals do, so they’ll be armed when the crooks come calling. (Just common sense)

Committing National Suicide

I can’t believe we did it. I didn’t think the American people were THAT stupid. We committed national suicide in the 2012 election and I know why. It was that 49% on the dole who would NEVER vote for somebody who would not “keep the goodies coming.” That’s why Democrats got so upset when they heard Romney actually SAY it. They were sorely worried that the rest of America would realize that there are enough AMERICANS so willing to be “kept” that they would re-elect a PROVEN incompetent to the presidency so he would “keep them in a style to which they have become accustomed (at least as long as they lived).” It’s going to happen, people! We are GOING to become a “socialist state” defenseless against the rest of the world as Obama and his crowd destroys our national defense and uses the money to prop up his “”giveaway programs.” If this sounds like “sour grapes,” maybe it is. We’re DOOMED to see Obama’s face everywhere we look and hear his voice on his captive media everywhere AGAIN for the next four years (again) and maybe longer.

But worse, we have given him the right to “finish what he started” in the next four years. He will continue in his effort to BANKRUPT the coal business), which will ALSO destroy the energy business and we will be plunged into darkness—LITERALLY, not figuratively. He will finish moving this country to socialism, which is just a little way from the COMMUNISM that destroyed Russia. He promised to “kill off” the oil business and he is well on his way to accomplishing that with his restrictive “regulations,” his continuing to BAN drilling on federal property ANYWHERE, his attempts to stop “fracking” and his refusal to allow the Canadian oil pipeline. Another four years with Obama in charge is one of the WORST things that can be visited upon us. While he’s “finishing what he started,” I will continue to try and convince myself “It isn’t that bad,” when it IS. I just hope the country survives him in some way. (Just common sense)

Self-Correcting Problem

Nobody ever said criminals were smart, but most are too smart to try and commit mass murder in a GUN STORE. This guy wasn’t. He came into Don’s Guns in Indianapolis to commit murder and got instantly shot himself. I’ve always said smart criminals never do their thing in a gun store, and this is why. This guy walked in and rented a gun and fired several boxes of bullets. Then he used it on a clerk, who immediately killed him, even as he was, himself, wounded. I don’t know what the shooter was on, but it got him killed. Thus my opinion that you don’t want to try and commit murder in a gun store is proven true. Smart criminals only try mass shootings in places where there are NOT a bunch of armed people around. They stay alive longer themselves that way. Other places where they BAN guns are a much safer environment for would-be mass murderers. (The Indy  Channel)

Home Owner Kills 2 of 4 Invaders

This is something that we should be able to read about more often: four thugs invade a man’s home and two of them meet their maker. The others are caught soon after without having gained anything but a good lesson: be careful: your intended victim might have his own gun. Then you’ll be dead. In Fayetteville, NC, two of four home invaders learned this lesson and died from the lesson. The other two have a long prison sentence in their future. Their careers as home invaders are over—at least for a few years. When they get out, I suggest they go into a different line of work—one not including guns. Next time they might be the two to meet their makers. (WTVD Raleigh)

Obama: Gun Enemy

Many people think Bush was a bad president; mostly because of the LIES the Democrats told about him. They did the same thing to Sarah Palin before she even had a chance to BE president. A DAY after Obama was re-elected, he signaled his willingness to sign that infamous UN treaty that could STRIP us of our right to self defense and to own and use the means to it, gun ownership. The first step toward a DICTATORSHIP. Step one toward DISMEMBERING our constitutional protections. If he succeeds, then he will go on to the next protection: the right to speak against your government in public with impunity; and we won't be able to do anything because we will have no guns. Meanwhile, blue-helmeted FOREIGN troops will come to your door with their OWN guns to take yours. Since he no longer has to worry about being elected again, he can DO such things. The same idea was “floated” in the Bush administration, but was soundly REJECTED. I have my own problems with George Bush, but all in all, he was NOT a “bad president”—and I DEFY anyone to PROVE to me that he was (Hint: “single-issue” people, don’t even bother).

Many liberals think the important thing about Obama is that “he cares.” He DOESN’T. He cares ONLY about things that advance HIS agenda. Example: the Benghazi massacre being a terrorist action did not advance his agenda so he (and all his lackeys including Susan Rice) lied about it until they could no longer do so. I think one of the things that will destroy this free republic is people who won’t even LOOK at something put out by an outfit with “Freedom” in its name. "The right to control your guns is not open for debate or for negotiation. It is a sovereign right that no foreign organization, including the United Nations has the right or the authority to undertake, just because a president gives the go ahead. When any president decides to destroy the nation’s U.S. Constitutional rights afforded to its citizens, which he has sworn to uphold, he no longer has the authority to represent the nation’s citizens. He must be impeached!" (Freedom Outpost)

More and More Such Stories

I’m seeing more and more such stories as more and more states make laws to make it easier for honest, responsible citizens to have the means to self-defense, a gun. In spite of the federal government’s best efforts to go against the First Amendment of the Constitution, more and more people ARE showing the REASON why the Founders tried to make sure they would ALWAYS have that right; and that should be. Criminals need to know that attacking  innocent citizens will no longer be as safe for them as it used to be when ignorant politicians consistently targeted innocent people with their “anti-gun laws.” In this case, the burglar wanted everything this guy had, and he gave it to him—one bullet at a time. (The Blaze)

Did Media Black Out NRA?

The National Rifle Association paid a lot of money to sponsor the NASCAR race in Texas, but I can remember only ONE mention of their name during the race. Why is this? It’s an excellent example of the power of the liberal media in all parts of the news. Usually, the name of the sponsor of a race is mentioned many times as a matter of course. But not in this case. Even after paying a lot of money to sponsor the race, their name was studiously IGNORED by people who are usually not “political.” How could that happen? Only if they were ORDERED to ignore the name because the “powers that be” want it that way. It would seem to me that NASCAR would be above such things, but apparently they aren’t. WTF? The NRA should sue NASCAR and make a lot of noise over this to get the media attention they SHOULD have gotten in the race where they PAID for the notice. They SAY that’s in line with how they usually handle sponsored race names, but, having watched EVERY race on TV, I know this to be a lie. And ONE race does not a system make. Auto racing is the ONE sport I like, so I don’t miss many races. (The Blaze)

An "End Run" Around the 2nd Amendment

This is the kind of underhanded thing Obama and his “gang of thieves” do on a regular basis. They can’t ban guns outright because of the Second Amendment; so they try and make guns useless by banning AMMUNITION. Ammunition is already in short supply because Obama’s government has been buying it up by the ton. Now they want to make it illegal to make ammunition containing LEAD, the most important ingredient in its manufacture. Thank God the Court was awake and put a stop to it. It didn’t even make it past the District Court. Do they really think we can’t figure out how to make ammunition? (New With Views)

It's NOT the Damned Guns!

I’m really getting tired of our incompetent politicians, the anti-gun fanatics, and the liberal media taking about banning guns to “stop gun violence.” It won’t work! People bent on doing violence with a gun WILL get their guns, no matter how tight gun laws are. They prove that at every turn. Each and every “successful” instance of gun violence has taken place where the anti-gun laws are tight. Laws against gun ownership only keep HONEST people from having guns for self-defense and provide criminals with a steady stream of unarmed victims. They do NOTHING to prevent people bent on violence from getting their guns. They just go out and find somebody in a back alley somewhere and buy the gun out of some guy’s car trunk at inflated prices. The article linked here says that 90% of the people favor tighter gun laws. I don’t buy that for a second. You can make “studies” say anything you want, and I think this one (like most) is rigged.

One case involved a drunk with a gun shooting his BROTHER after an argument. I think BOOZE is at much more fault than a gun. Sober people don’t allow a simple argument to escalate into gun violence. But then, our incompetent politicians will twist ANY situation to prove their thesis. The only UNSUCCESSFUL mass shooting lately happened in a GUN STORE, where the would-be killer was made to look like “Swiss cheese” by other people in the store when he shot a clerk. Most would-be killers don’t do their crimes where guns in the hands of their intended victims might be a problem for the killer; and for good reason. (Mail.com)

Obama Really Believes It!

He really DOES think if we disarm ourselves, crazy, power-mad dictators like Kim Jong Un or Ahmadinijerk will say to themselves, “Self, if Obama is willing to cut his nukes, maybe we should do so, too.” Obama has shown his abysmal STUPIDITY by just MENTIONING such a thing. People like Kim and Ahmadinijerk are BULLIES. They don’t respect anybody’s “moral rights.” If we disarm ourselves, these CRIMINALS, like ALL criminals, will take advantage of our weakness and take what they want from us, killing us while they do it. I always thought he knew that disarming ourselves was NOT the way to self defense while he disarmed US to keep himself and his thugs safe. But it has become obvious in his handling of the N. Korea-Iran situation, that he is not smart enough. (Patriot Post)

Little By LIttle, On Any Excuse

The “powers that be” (so far, mostly in LIBERAL strongholds like New York) are using ANY excuse they can think of to confiscate (steal) as many guns as they can. They use the mental problems suffered by ex military (in wars THEY started) with NO evidence those problems caused them to become violent, to stop them from owning guns. In New York, they’re taking guns away from ANYBODY who is prescribed “anxiety medication.” What’s next? Anybody who is constipated? Anybody who has gotten mad at ANYBODY, any time in their lives? This is “the camel’s nose in the tent, people! If we don’t stop them, soon the camel will be IN the tent and you’ll be outside, shivering. Criminals will come for your property, bearing ILLEGAL guns, and you’ll have NO means of defense. Every law being passed today “to take guns off the street” takes them way from law-abiding people, not criminals, who don’t OBEY laws, leaving us defenseless. (Fellowship of the Minds)

"Move And Go To the Morgue!"

I’m seeing more and more stories like this in the “alternative media” (never in the liberal media) as more and more states enact WORKABLE laws that allow more honest people to own and use guns in self-defense. This burglar was in the process of burglarizing this woman’s home when she “got the drop on him” and told him not to move. She held him at gunpoint until the cops (finally) arrived and arrested him. This guy won’t be a problem to anybody for a while because he is facing NINE YEARS in prison. I hear he complained that his intended victim actually had a gun. Poor baby! (The Blaze)

An Impeachable Offense

Obama is prompting the Congress (the Senate) into having an “up of down vote” on changing the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America. That is NOT possible. You don’t change the Constitution by a simple up or down vote, and to even SUGGEST it is an IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE! If the Congress does this and the president signs it, ALL who vote to change the Constitution should be IMPEACHED and removed from office for MALFEASANCE. Radio host Mark Levin rightly “goes nuclear” on it. If they attempt to ENFORCE it, Obama should be shot (legally). The U. S. Marshal Service should arrest him and imprison him, and, upon conviction, execute him. And they should do the same to EVERY member of Congress that votes FOR it. SOMEBODY needs to “rein in” this FOOL before he completes his plans for the DESTRUCTION of America as we know it. I know Obama will TWIST what I said here and make it look like a “death threat” to the president. That’s how he operates with his critics; NEVER answer them, discredit them and attack them. I look for some of his THUGS to “burst in my door” soon after this appears and his thugs read it on my blog. But SOMEBODY has to have the “intestinal fortitude” to DO something about his CRIMES, and if I’m the only one besides Levin, so be it. (Mark Levin)

With or Without Guns

Just as I have been saying all along, the absence of guns makes no difference. If the perp cannot get a gun he will use a knife—or something else to kill people (like a club or his bare hands). A man did this in Texas on a college campus. He used a KNIFE to stab up to 14 people and it’s not yet known if any of them died at this writing). Soon the fools in charge in this country will talk about (and maybe make laws against KNIVES) or, as California used to do (they might still do it, I don’t know) define dangerous weapons as “anything you can point at somebody in such a way as to make them uncomfortable or frighten them.” Under that definition, I would have to register and get a “carry permit for my HANDS, which, according to that law, are a “deadly weapon,” since I was trained in how to KILL somebody with my bare hands. I can LOOK at someone and make them nervous. So maybe I should license my “evil eye.” (Just common sense)

Typical Liberal School Stupidity

A five-year-old kid brought a CAP GUN to school and was INTERROGATED by “school officials” until he “uncharacteristically” wet his pants. People are constantly talking about “traumatizing” kids, but what is THIS but traumatizing a kid over their own stupidity? When will adults quit traumatizing kids because of their STUPID opinions? Punishing a child for bringing a LEGO gun (about the size of a quarter) to school or having a gun-shaped piece of PAPER! And they don’t even realize how stupid that is! The problem with stupid people is they have no idea they ARE stupid and will fight you if you so much as mention their stupidity. (The Blaze)