Punished for Self-Defense

In Massachusetts (where else but liberal-run Massachusetts?) a man was arrested and charged with every chickensh-t “crime” they could think of after he shot and killed a bear that was advancing on him when he confronted the bear while he (the bear) was raiding his bird feeder. I suppose he should have let that bear kill him to avoid punishment. They couldn’t charge him with killing the bear so they charged him with other “crimes.” It’s only in Liberal Land where you can be punished for defending yourself. One of the “charges” was having too much bird seed and “baiting” the bear. Another was having an unlicensed firearm (on his own property) because his license to own the shotgun was expired (I didn't know they expired). Liberals will “getcha” any way they can. (The Blaze)

No Gun Required

In Texas, where laws allow guns to be carried by more people (except on school campuses), EIGHT people were stabbed (some say 12) and ONE arrest has been made (They THINK one other person was involved and are searching for him). Anti-gun freaks will not make very much of this because it will not advance THEIR agenda. They never notice situations like this where guns are not involved. Nobody has died yet (at this writing) but I won’t be surprised if they do. This just goes to prove that the GUN is not the culprit the politicians make them out to be. In the absence of guns, PEOPLE will STILL try to kill people if they have to use a CLUB or their bare hands. (NBC News)

Child Punished for Lego Gun

“The other kids were traumatized” by this thing, said the “school officials.” Who suspended him, gave him detention, made him apologize to the bus driver, and roundly made a spectacle of themselves and this child. For a tiny Lego-shaped gun smaller than a quarter. If THAT “traumatized” those kids, they’re WIMPS. Made that way by this kind of “school official,” who over-reacted completely. “No tolerance” doesn’t mean punish a kid for bringing a harmless thing to school. The first recorded attempted school shooting in the 1800s was foiled by the fact that ALL the kids were armed and shot the bad guy to ribbons. Put THAT in your pipe and smoke it! (Oops, sorry PC Police. I used the word “smoke.”) (Town Hall)

"Anti-Gun Senator" Shoots Intruder

Are you surprised? I’m not. I’m used to hypocritical lawmakers making laws to limit what you or I may do while reserving the same rights for themselves. Remember Dianne Feinstein? The former SF mayor, now Senator? The one who scared the hell out of a crowd when she took a semi-automatic weapon and pointed it all around in one of her tirades against guns while trying to hide the bulge of the gun she carries for self defense? Remember the female TV star who gave speeches abut gun control and disparaged ANYBODY who was FOR carrying guns? The one who hired ARMED guards to “protect” her children? These people aren’t trying to keep guns out of the hands of CRIMINALS; they want to make criminals out of ALL of us if WE carry guns for self defense while they carry or hire armed guards who do. This particular Senator is the SECOND anti-gun Senator who shot an intruder. Then there was the anti-gun COLUMNIST who shot an intruder in HIS home. These people are HYPOCRITES; all of them. (Huffington Post)

"Security Director"

Every school needs to have a “security director” who is ARMED and is in full charge of making decisions and policies that are for the SECURITY of the school. Someone who is NOT in uniform and is not KNOWN to be armed so he/she cannot be “picked off” right at the start of a “Columbine-style” massacre. The key here is that NOBODY except maybe the principal and maybe the school board is even aware of the existence of an armed security agent who is properly trained for that position, and of his/her identity. If the Columbine principal had been armed and properly trained he could have “hunted down” both shooters and killed them before their “body count” was able to be so big.

He was actually able to sneak up on at least one and watch while he shot into a room. The same is true at all the other shooting sites. The presence of armed (non-uniformed) security at the Sandy Hook Elementary School could have significantly reduced the number of CHILDREN and teachers the shooter could have killed by seeking him out and killing HIM early on. Banning guns in such places will NEVER stop such things from happening because people who will do such things DON’T OBEY LAWS. Why should they? They have SET OUT to violate MANY laws when they plan to kill innocent people in bunches. Making schools “no-gun zones” is an INVITATION to people who want to go into a school and kill people. (Just common sense)

Another "One-Note Song"

Obama has assigned one of the worst “anti-gun fools” in his administration (besides himself, that is), Joe Biden, to be in charge of a commission to “address gun violence” in this country. What that means is Joe must come up with more and better anti-gun laws and ways to BAN GUNS. It doesn’t matter that NO amount of gun banning will keep guns out of the hands of criminals who wish to use them to commit crimes. All they will do is CONTINUE the practice of DISARMING honest people and keeping them from being able to defend themselves. Even Megyn Kelly of Fox News says Biden’s commission will “strike fear” into the NRA. Not even! The NRA knows the best way to approach “gun violence” and no amount of stupidity by Biden is going to “strike fear” into them. (Minute Man News)

NRA: "More Guns In the Hands of Good Guys"

As predicted, the National rifle Association (NRA) recommends “more guns in the hands of good guys” to protect our children from the “guns in the hands of bad guys.” LaPierre asked if you should have guns in the hands of good guys ten minutes away (as with calling the cops) or a gun in the hands of a good guy standing beside the bad guy (like a teacher)? The cops are always at LEAST ten minutes away and this “bad guy” can kill a lot of people in just a few minutes. The shooter in Newtown, CT killed all 26 people, including 20 CHILDREN in 3-1/2 minutes. Had there been a “good guy with a gun” there, that number could have been a lot smaller when that “good guy” put a couple in his head” as soon as he started shooting. The “anti-gun freaks” have always ridiculed this idea, but it is the ONLY idea that can be successful in dealing with these indiscriminate shooters.

An armed civilian is NOT as crazy as are these shooters just because they aren’t cops. This is the solution I have recommended all along. But nobody (in charge) is smart enough to take me up on it. Wayne LaPierre, perennial vice president of NRA, recommends armed police officers in every school—which is pretty much what they have now. But these officers are usually IN UNIFORM, which makes it easy for potential shooters to “take them out” FIRST, from ambush. I say they should be in civilian clothes, and people not suspected of being armed so a potential shooter cannot “single him out” and eliminate him before “doing his dirty deed.” Schools should NEVER be “gun-free zones.” That is an OPEN INVITATION to people who want to shoot them up. (Huffington Post)

All They Can Think of Is Guns

Every time somebody commits a mass shooting, all our INCOMPETENT “leaders” can think of is “BAN GUNS.” They’re all about “getting rid of guns.” They don’t even THINK about the SHOOTERS. Some people “give lip service” to improving mental health. But what they really want to do is BAN GUNS. That’s ALL they’re interested in. People like Wayne LaPierre (perennial VP of NRA) says there should be an armed cop in every school, but even a NON-uniformed one costs a lot of money because that will be all he/she does. Simply ALLOWING one or more STAFF to be armed and TRAINED costs a lot less and would work well. But they ridicule that, saying that staff member would be a “source of danger.” When are these incompetent people going to WAKE UP and get rid of the “no-gun zones” that are an OPEN INVITATION to people who want to come in and shoot up the schools? (Just common sense)

Too Far the Other Way

Incompetent politicians in Nelson, Georgia, instead of simply making it easier to get a “carry permit,” want to FORCE residents to BUY a gun. That’s how incompetent politicians with delusions of grandeur ALL seem to think: got a problem? FORCE somebody to do something, even if it’s the right thing. Thinking of the RIGHT WAY to limit gun violence, such as punishing USE of guns in crimes with no ability to “drop those gun charges” to obtain the criminal’s cooperation in convicting him in other crimes just seems to be something they cannot even THINK about. When are we going to start electing COMPETENT people to office? The new Nelson, GA ordinance specifies NO penalty, which makes it useless. And all you have to do to be allowed to ignore it is to object. They say they’re “just making a point.” What point does a stupid, AND useless ordinance make?(Mail.com)

Prosecute All Illegal Aliens As You find Them

One of the problems with illegal aliens is that there are so many of them (from the government ignoring their crime) it would be a monumental task to find, and deport all of them. It gets even harder when the feds IGNORE the problem with their “catch and release” policy that tells others they can come here illegally with impunity. The answer is to change the federal government policy of IGNORING  the problem and start PROSECUTING illegal aliens as you find them, and put them in PRISON for a few years, as Mexico does. THEN deport them after they serve their sentence. That would send a message to others that they CAN’T illegally come here with impunity. Maybe that wouldn’t SOLVE the problem right away, but it will make it BETTER and stop it from getting worse. (Just common sense)

Naked Man Stops Burglary With Gun

This should happen more often. A burglar was rummaging through Eric Martin’s house when Eric, who was completely naked, confronted him with his 9mm. The burglar ran, but became entangled and Eric told him not to move, that he had a gun. Eric held him at gunpoint until cops arrived. They got a good laugh out of it when they saw Eric. The burglar was apprehended and is now in jail. Eric had his clothes back on while the cops got a good laugh out of what could have been something much worse if Eric had not been armed, This is more evidence that more guns in the hands of responsible, honest people, could vastly reduce gun violence as well as other kinds of crime. (The Spectrum)

Am I "Tilting At Windmills?"

I write, day after day, to reveal the secrets our pro-socialist (communist, Fascist, Progressivist), anti-gun government doesn’t want us to know. They don’t even know I exist (Of course, they do, but they don’t count me as important enough to do anything about—yet). They just go on with their depredations, as if I didn’t exist. They do the same with people like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, and others who get to many more people than I do. It seems like what I, and others do, has NO EFFECT on the progress they make in remaking this country in the Soviet communist image. I’m getting old and tired. It takes more and more out of me to keep “ticky-tacking” at this computer, trying to let you know what your government is doing to you and what your media is keeping from you. It’s not as if I have no material. I have more material than I can ever find the energy to write down. But I’m losing my confidence in the power of truth. Is what I’m doing making ANY difference? I begin to wonder, but I can’t stop, until I am physically UNABLE to continue, which isn’t that far away. (Just common sense)

Timely Increase in "Gun Violence"

Does it seem to you there are more incidences of gun violence today than before Obama started talking about “ending gun violence,” which is code for “banning guns?” The gun violence didn’t begin with the Sandy Hook school shootings; it didn’t begin with Columbine, either. Nor Ft. Hood, where a proud Islamic terrorist who happened to be in the military killed a bunch of people (And Obama still refuses to call Ft. Hood Islamic terrorist even though the shooter was shouting "Allahu akbar!" and demonstrated his Islamic ties many times before the shooting). It began in the 1800s when a man went into a school to shoot the teacher and was killed by the children in the class, all of whom were armed. NONE of these incidents took place where it was legal for everybody to carry guns, but that little fact escapes our incompetent politicians, who only want to DISARM honest, responsible people so they can’t defend themselves. I’m not a “conspiracy theorist,” but some things like the sudden increase in gun violence at just the right time to help the “anti-gun Nazis push their favorite cause do not escape my attention and give me reason to suspect that certain “anti-gun extremists” just might be helping some of these fools who want to shoot up innocent people to do so, even ENCOURAGING them to help Obama “cry wolf” about “gun control, as if banning or more tightly controlling gun sales and ownership WOULD do anything about it. All those laws do is DISARM honest, responsible people who OBEY laws, while leaving them to be “easy prey” for CRIMINALS, who don’t. Think about it. (NRA)

Indictment of Gun Control

A legal immigrant recently testified before Congress and made this statement: “"If gun control actually did work, Washington, D.C. and Chicago would be the safest cities in your nation..." That is a really profound statement, but will fall on deaf ears in Washington. He also said, “Nobody saw the Third Reich coming until it was too late.” Another profound statement that they will not hear. Politicians have “selective deafness” that allows them to disregard ANYTHING that doesn’t promote THEIR agenda. Ong noted this: “Had the Koreans in the LA riots not had AR-15s and AK-47s with 30-round magazines — and Ruger 30s — their businesses would have burnt to the ground like all the other businesses in their neighborhoods. Theirs stood because they stood their ground.” This man sees things better than any politician out there, but will be ignored. (The Blaze)

Taking Your Guns

You think they’re not going to take your guns? Look at this story: Robert Adams, of Albuquerque, NM, was a gun collector and a licensed gun seller. He owned 1,500 firearms of different kinds. That frightened the feds. Anyone who had that many guns COULD be a definite danger to politicians who want to take what is yours. So, with the assistance of the local sheriff, they raided him and STOLE all his guns after “investigating" him for years. I say STOLE because they had NO reason for taking ALL his guns. It is said that verification of his license to sell guns has not been shown, but that’s no reason to “swoop in” and take his guns. The Constitution says “The right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT be infringed” (Forget that "militia” crap." the "militia," when the Constitution was adopted, was "ALL the people." There was NOT such a thing as a "state-authorized militia" then).

They had no “charges” to file against him, although, like most feds, they “mentioned” several things of which he was “suspected.” Though none rose to the point where they could charge him with any crime. So they just STOLE his guns, which put a huge financial detriment on him. Among the things they CLAIM they were “investigating” him for is gun smuggling, tax evasion, and violation of importation laws. Unfortunately for them, they could prove NONE of this. So they raided him and just TOOK his guns and put him out of business—for NO reason, except his guns frightened them. And they’ll come for YOUR guns one day too, as they get to everyone. They’re very good at making it SOUND like the people from whom they STEAL are “breaking the law,” when they are NOT. Let this be a warning to every gun owner in the land. They WILL eventually come after your guns, and they don’t NEED a real charge to lodge against you. They’ll just come and TAKE them, as they did here. (Freedom Outpost)

Who Cares?

Who cares if Obama is a “skeet shooter?” I don’t, and I’d guess that 98% of Americans don’t give a damn, either. But one reporter brought up the existence of a photo of Obama “skeet shooting,” and they decided to provide one, just to give us a "shiny object," something to argue about and keep our minds off his crimes; and he is guilty of many. I don’t “skeet shoot,” and neither do most Americans. And owning guns is NOT about “skeet shooting.” It’s about SELF-DEFENSE. Against ANY criminals who come to steal our property, even if they’re wearing badges. That was its purpose, regardless of ANY attempt to say it is NOT. As to that photo, it doesn’t prove ANYTHING except this administration is willing to “Photoshop” a photo that LOOKS like he might be “skeet shooting,” even though it is obvious he is NOT. To “shoot skeet,” he would be aiming upward. Not straight forward, as he seems to be in this phony photo unless he is a lousy shot, which he probably is. (Freedom Outpost)

Washington Gun Control Law Flops

Intelligent people know that gun bans do not work to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and crazies. Washington, DC and Chicago, IL gun bans prove it conclusively. When Washington imposed its ban, violent crime involving guns went up a staggering 156%! When Chicago did something similar, violent crime involving guns went up 41% at a time when the national murder rate went up only 18%. This proves conclusively that gun bans do not work, but don’t try and tell our current incompetent Politicians that. They’re “tone deaf” to truth. Their only “truth” is what they think. They ignore facts that tell them their agenda is false. They just call you a nasty name and move on as if nothing happened. They do it, anyway. And more people die. They’re fools, and maybe THEY ought to be the ones that die because of their fool mistakes. Mistakes that they INSIST on making. Maybe one of these days our incompetent politicians will "wise up" and start punishing the CROOKS and CRAZIES, not the average Americans who just want to protect themselves, their families, and their possessions. Violent crime is falling sharply in the 49 states whose more intelligent politicians have allowed "concealed carry" permits to be more easily obtained. Again proof that those INCOMPETENT politicians were WRONG. But they'll never admit that. They will go on making those deadly mistakes unless somebody uses an illegal gun on them. (Just common sense)

Choosing the Wrong Solution

Politicians have, for as long as I can remember, ALWAYS chosen the wrong solution to our problems. Most notable of those wrong choices is in “gun control.” ANYBODY with a modicum of intelligence knows you don’t defend yourself by DISARMING yourself. Not personally, and not nationally. Thus, making laws that only apply to people who do not break laws is useless. Yet everything they do does NOTHING to stop CRIMINALS from having guns because criminals do not obey laws. Another wrong solution is the one put forth to “solve the revenue problem” in Washington. Again, intelligent people know you don’t raise taxes in a recession; and that raising taxes does NOT increase the amount of revenue coming into the government,. Just the opposite, in fact. I’m just an “average guy” and I know that. So why don’t our incompetent politicians know?

Maybe it’s because they just want to run things, and making things worse gives them an opportunity to eliminate more of our rights while claiming to be “trying to solve the problem,” whatever that “problem” may be. Strangely, those “solutions” do nothing to “solve the problem” they are supposed to solve; and nobody seems to notice, except for people like me. Never try and point out to a politician (mostly Democrats) the “error of his ways”; he’ll just call you a name and ignore you. Illustration: the “global warming” fiasco. If you rightly disagree with AlGore’s false pronouncements, he calls you an “unbeliever” (just like Islamic terrorists) and goes right on preaching his nonsense. There are many more illustrations of incompetent governing, the best known is the fact that we’re ALWAYS in some kind of a “panic” and nothing ever gets “solved.” When are we going to get rid of these fools and get some politicians that AREN’T incompetent? Or maybe there aren’t any. (Just common sense)

Who Cares?

WHO CARES? Who cares if Obama is a “skeet shooter?” I don’t, and I’d guess that 98% of Americans don’t give a damn, either. But one reporter brought up the existence of a photo of Obama “skeet shooting,” and they decided to provide one, just to give us something to argue about and keep our minds off his crimes; and he is guilty of many. I don’t “skeet shoot,” and neither do most Americans. And owning guns is NOT about “skeet shooting.” It’s about SELF-DEFENSE. Against ANY criminals who come to steal our property, even if they’re wearing badges. That was its purpose, regardless of ANY attempt to say it is NOT. As to that photo, it doesn’t prove ANYTHING except this administration is willing to “Photoshop” a photo that LOOKS like he might be “skeet shooting,” even though it is obvious he is NOT. To “shoot skeet,” he would be aiming upward. Not straight forward, as he seems to be in this phony photo unless he is a lousy shot, which he probably is. (Freedom Outpost)

Washington Gun Control Ban Flops

Intelligent people know that gun bans do not work to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and crazies. Washington, DC and Chicago, IL gun bans prove it conclusively. When Washington imposed its ban, violent crime involving guns went up a staggering 156%! When Chicago did something similar, violent crime involving guns went up 41% at a time when the national murder rate went up only 18%. This proves conclusively that gun bans do not work, but don’t try and tell our current incompetent Politicians that. They’re “Tone deaf” to truth. Their only “truth” is what they think. They ignore facts that tell them their agenda is false. They just call you a nasty name and move on as if nothing happened. They do it, anyway. And more people die.

They’re fools, and maybe THEY ought to be the ones that die because of their fool mistakes. Mistakes that they INSIST on making. Maybe one of these days our incompetent politicians will "wise up" and start punishing the CROOKS and CRAZIES, not the average Americans who just want to protect themselves, their families, and their possessions. Violent crime is falling sharply in the 49 states whose more intelligent politicians have allowed "concealed carry" permits to be more easily obtained. Again proof that those INCOMPETENT politicians were WRONG. But they'll never admit that. They will go on making those deadly mistakes unless somebody uses an illegal gun on them. (Just common sense)

Telling Mexico the Lie

He even BRAGGED about it to the Mexicans during his stupid speech given in Mexico. But he didn’t say, in so many words, that most of them were sold at the ORDERS of the U. S. government (meaning himself) just so he could say that. What kind of a FOOL is this guy? Does he really think he can violate the law with impunity? I guess he does, since he violates the law daily and BRAGS about it. He tells gun dealers in Arizona to sell guns destined for the Mexican drug cartels to make the “drug wars” deadlier, then tells the world “moat of the guns in Mexico came from the U. S., not mentioning the fact that HE ordered them sold so he could now back up the FICTION. (Cowboy Byte)

NRA Speaker Freaks Left

The news media points out the advice given by one speaker at the NRA Convention that “freaked out” the left. But actually, it was the entire NRA Convention that “freaked out” the left. The NRA itself “freaks out” the left because the left is “freaked out” by GUNS and the NRA promotes the ownership of guns for self defense and other uses. The NRA promotes the right to SELF-DEFENSE and to own and carry the means to that self-defense, a gun. A knife won’t do it in most cases, because criminals mostly use their illegally-obtained guns to menace them. Liberals will never understand (on purpose) that laws against gun ownership will NEVER stop criminals and crazies who want to kill innocent people because such people don’t OBEY gun laws, or ANY laws. All they do, as now constituted, is guarantee criminals and crazies an unending supply of UNARMED VICTIMS.

So the NRA is a NEEDED organization to curb the actions of the left in limiting our constitutional tight to be armed for self-defense, even against the GOVERNMENT, if necessary. Without it, or one like it, the “anti-gun Nazis” would “run free”” and make it illegal for honest people to own and use guns for self-defense while doing NOTHING to limit the possession of guns by criminals. Criminals, in fact, LIKE gun laws that limit the ownership of guns by their intended victims. Guns are NOT solely for hunting and sports, as the left continues to insist, to make gun ownership less important in our lives. They are for SELF-DEFENSE. The sooner people realize that, the better off we’ll be. But they never will, so the NRA will always be needed, to ward off the fools. (The Blaze)

"Home Inspection" Soon to Be Law?

The government soon will have a law, in effect, that allows them to come to your home once a year or so and “look around,” searching for guns to “confiscate” (steal). Even liberals decry this law, that was “slipped into ”SB 5737,” the infamous “assault weapons ban” that was recently passed by the Senate. It’s not law yet, but if the House passes it and Obama signs it, it will BECOME law (It didn't pass, but anti-gunnera are promising to bring it up again and again until it passes). And I’ll tell you now, if “government agents” come to my door looking for guns, they’ll have to FORCE their way in because I will not open the door. I will not allow “government agents” to enter my house FOR ANY REASON without a warrant; ever. They’ll probably want to “talk to me” soon when they read this, and I’m sure they will, but they’ll still have to do it on the street OUTSIDE of my property or do it at GUNPOINT. This is exactly the same thing that STARTED the first revolution in this country and may even start the SECOND one. This government is taking in FAR too much territory, as did King George. Now it’s “King Obama.” (Cowboy Byte)

Baretta To Leave Maryland?

That’s what they’re threatening to do over Obama’s new gun laws. They say, “Why should we stay where the people who MAKE out guns can’t buy then?”  I agree wholly with that. More than 40 other gun companies are refusing to sell guns to the government. They say they won’t sell the government guns their customers can’t buy. Of course, you KNOW that’s going to “raise the ire” of our thin-skinned King—er, uh, president and he will make some new laws to FORCE them to sell to the government—or maybe even GIVE them to him. I think this kind of reaction will DEFEAT “King” Obama’s effort to DISARM Americans so his thugs can “screw them over” at will, without worrying about maybe being shot. (The Blaze)

Getting Ready for Gun Confiscation

In California, they’ve already confiscated thousands of legally-purchased firearms and in Washington State, the legislature is now considering legislation that will allow sheriffs to enter your house “one time a year” (without a warrant) and search for guns. How far will these officious politicians go to DISARM honest, responsible Americans? Even people who own specified weapons BEFORE the law was passed must store it in a specified way and let the local sheriff search their home at least once a year without a warrant. Of course, this law is unconstitutional, but today’s politicians don’t care about that. They violate the Constitution on a regular basis without any reprisals, so who cares? (Glenn Beck)

Oldster Kills Burglar

And the burglar’s family objects, saying he should have given the burglar “warning” that he had a gun and would use it. What a concept! Frankly, if I find someone breaking into my house and I’m an old man, I’m going to shoot, and to hell with any “warning.” That burglar wasn’t forced to break in. He made that decision on his own, and should have KNOWN there was the possibility that the homeowner might be armed. It’s HIS OWN fault he got killed. If he hadn’t decided to break into this man’s house (breaking the law) he wouldn’t have been shot. Bravo to the homeowner, who was not named in the report. This family member tried to make the burglar out to be the victim, as usual. He was not. (The Blaze)

Don't Throw Victim In Closet With HIs Guns

A thug broke into a man’s house, roughed him up, and threw him in a closet. BIG mistake; that was where he keeps his guns. Next thing they knew, he came out of the closet shooting. He wounded one and the others are still running for the “tall timber.” The neighborhood had suffered several break-ins recently, and they thought it would be a good idea to get armed and keep a close lookout on their neighbors. It worked; as it always will. Bad guys take notice: your victim might be armed and WILL kill you! (Houston Chronicle)

Baretta to Leave Maryland?

Not the television character, the gun company. That’s what they’re threatening to do over Obama’s new gun laws. They say, “Why should we stay where the people who MAKE out guns can’t buy then?”  I agree wholly with that. More than 40 other gun companies are refusing to sell guns to the government. They say they won’t sell the government guns their customers can’t buy. Of course, you KNOW that’s going to “raise the ire” of our thin-skinned King--er, uh,president and he will make some new laws to FORCE them to sell to the government—or maybe even GIVE them to him. I think this kind of reaction will DEFEAT “King” Obama’s effort to DISARM Americans so his thugs can “screw them over” at will, without worrying about maybe being shot. (The Blaze)

"No Will in Congress"

Liberals (Obama and his accomplices) say “there is no will in congress to pass an assault weapon ban.” And there should NOT be, because it is STUPID. People keep saying the shooter in the Aurora, Colorado theater shooting used an “assault weapon.” He did NOT. He had one in his CAR, but did not take it inside. And tell me, if you can, how much effect a law would have had on his shooting? Anybody who thinks it would is ignorant. He used HANDGUNS, which are easily available on ”the street.” I know. I live only about a mile away from this theater and have access to LOCAL media, which told the truth, before the national media were able to distort all reports. (Just common sense)

Anti-Gun Laws Don't Work!

All they do is provide the CRIMINALS, who do NOT obey laws, with an unending stream of defenseless victims. Where gun laws allow honest citizens to carry guns to defend themselves, violent crime goes down as the criminals, who are basically cowards, go into other lines of work, go to jail, or get killed. The Milwaukee County Sheriff said this in his refutation of Piers Morgan’s statements on television: “If they were serious about violence reduction, they would get behind me… and join me arm in arm in calling for longer periods of incarceration for repeat career criminals who have demonstrated over and over again that they are going to get a hand gun, that they are going to get a firearm and perpetrate violence.” Clarke noted. The Sheriff added that a recent Sikh temple shooting in his County a few months ago was perpetrated by an individual who passed a firearms background check. “My understanding is the creep in Aurora Colorado who shot up the theater, also passed a background check.” Clarke said. “This isn’t about background checks, of which the overwhelming majority of gun transfers go on anyway.” Which means that these ignorant politicians are going at it from exactly the WRONG direction. Instead of punishing HONEST people by denying them the right to have the means of self-protection, they SHOULD be further punishing the ILLEGALLY armed CRIMINALS for USING their illegally-obtained guns by adding more time to their sentences for USING a gun in the commission of their crimes. But our ignorant and incompetent politicians will never think of that, and ignore us when we suggest it, while continuing with their stupid “anti-gun laws” that further victimize the victims. (InfoWars)

The Sky IS Falling!

Because the voters in this country (a majority of whom seem to be ignorant MOOCHERS who want only to live at the expense of others, and elect FOOLS who will “keep the goodies coming” while our economy collapses from incompetent governing. And really ignorant people do things like “gun buyback programs” for not only REAL guns (which allows criminals to sell their broken guns to others and use the money to buy guns that WORK on the black market), but also for TOY GUNS, which is about as STUPID as I can think of. Soon this country’s government is going to collapse from incompetent governing and we will sink into COLLECTIVISM, which is a STUPID system that has been DISCREDITED in practice, everywhere it has been tried. Most notably lately in Russia, where its socialist “Soviet Union collapsed because there was no longer any INCENTIVE to produce anything, and everybody was just TAKING without producing. (Just common sense)

"Second American Revolution"

 That’s what the Milwaukee County sheriff says will happen if the “gun grabbers” have their way – and I agree with him. If Obama’s “gun grabbers” succeed in their efforts to disarm legally the HONEST, responsible people in America, those people should STILL “arm themselves,” however they can do it, legal or illegal so that, when Obama’s thugs come to steal their property they have recourse. I see a revolution coming, and I welcome it. If I were younger, I’d be one of the LEADERS. The gun laws as currently constituted (and how they will be constituted in the future under Obama and his “gang of thieves”) violate the Constitution’s Second Amendment in every way. But there’s no punishment for politicians who violate the Constitution, even though each one of them took an oath to DEFEND it. They could be impeached for violating it, but that takes people with “intestinal fortitude” to institute the action, which we do not have. (InfoWars)

What FOOLS They Be! (Again)

I think I’ve used that title before. But this story illustrates it better than anything else out there so far. I thought there was no limit at how STUPID liberals could be, and I was right. NOW A St. Louis pastor is sponsoring a “gun buyback program” . . .for children’s TOY GUNS! That’s right. You read it right—TOY GUNS! How STUPID is that? Buyback programs for real guns are stupid, but this takes the cake. This is an obvious attempt to BRAINWASH children against guns. It has no other purpose. Why do I automatically name them as liberals? Because only a liberal would be this stupid. As usual, they blame the gun, not the gunner. The true solution to gun violence is more guns in the hands of honest, reliable people. Then criminals would more often run into an ARMED person when they tried to victimize people. They would either change their way of living, or be dead and no longer a problem. Current gun laws do nothing but assure a criminal his intended victim will probably not be armed, and will be a defenseless victim. But don’t try and tell a liberal politician that, they’ll laugh at you and continue making their stupid laws to disarm the victims. I ran around "shooting" toy guns when I was a child, and I've never shot anybody with a real gun. Playing with toy guns does not pervert minds. The only perverted minds here are in the heads of people like this ignorant pastor. (The Blaze)

They Just Make It Up

If politicians (mostly Democrats and other liberals) can’t come up with real statistics to prove their point, they just make them up. Democrat Rep. (soon to be retired, thank Goodness) Charlie Rangel recently claimed that “MILLIONS of kids have been killed by automatic weapons.” That is such a STUPIDLY wild figure that even other DEMOCRATS don’t believe it, But Charlie “stands by it” even though he couldn’t prove it in a MILLION years. He blames the NRA, politics, and money for the failure of the new “assault rifle ban” bill. Personally, I “blame” the resurgence (somewhat) of common sense in Congress. Charlie repeats again the fantasy that the Second Amendment was written for hunters. It was NOT. It was written so that the people would be armed for the most part and not COMPLETELY defenseless when “government agents” (thugs) come after their property.

The facts are these: most murders are NOT committed by people with “assault weapons.” They are committed with HANDGUNS and knives. Guns criminals, who do not obey laws will get, whatever the law says. As politicians (mostly Democrats “flail around” doing their best (which isn’t very good) to disarm us all, criminals are improving the market in illegal weapons. Just as Al Capone did NOT want the repeal of the alcohol ban (it would ruin his business), criminals want weapons to continue to be banned for most honest people so they won’t meet a gun when they attempt to victimize people. (The Blaze)

Learning A Lesson

This guy learned a hard lesson in a few seconds when he tried to shoot a cop in the back while he was questioning a suspect. Of course, the lesson won’t help him much because he died learning it. He tried to kill three cops from behind with the usual illegally-gotten gun. He shot them but didn’t do them much damage because of his lack of skill with that gun. The cops were better and, though one was slightly wounded, their shots were right on target and he was killed. Which reinforces my opinion that most criminals, even if armed, aren’t very good with their guns. This situation also proves that it’s not a good idea to shoot at cops. I remember, many years ago, another guy made the same mistake while standing next to my car. He ended up dead with his hand leaning on my car. Fortunately, I was at home a few doors away. The cops had chased him for three miles before he crashed his car and aimed his gun at them. (The Blaze)

Why Are Politicians So Stupid?

I don’t know. Maybe it’s something in the air that only affects politicians. Unfortunately, it affects people like Michael Moore, too. People who want to make money on the STUPIDITY of certain people. It makes them think CRIMINALS, who break laws for a LIVING, would OBEY a law that says they can’t be armed. It causes those politicians to make laws that only disarm responsible and HONEST people and provide an unending stream of defenseless, UNARMED people for them to victimize. Their laws only apply to HONEST people, not to CRIMINALS, who don’t OBEY laws. They need to pass laws that give criminals stiffer sentences for USING a gun in the commission of a crime; laws that PREVENT cops from using those charges as “throwaways” to obtain a conviction in other crimes. They should be ADDED to the violent crime statutes in such a way that they CANNOT be discarded to obtain a conviction in other crimes. But if you suggest this to our INCOMPETENT politicians, they’ll laugh at you and continue on their INCOMPETENT ways, making laws to DISARM the populace. (Coloradoan)

Why Are Politicians So Stupid?

I don’t know. Maybe it’s something in the air that only affects politicians. Unfortunately, it affects people like Michael Moore, too. People who want to make money on the STUPIDITY of certain people. It makes them think CRIMINALS, who break laws for a LIVING, would OBEY a law that says they can’t be armed. It causes those politicians to make laws that only disarm responsible and HONEST people and provide an unending stream of defenseless, UNARMED people for them to victimize. Their laws only apply to HONEST people, not to CRIMINALS, who don’t OBEY laws. They need to pass laws that give criminals stiffer sentences for USING a gun in the commission of a crime; laws that PREVENT cops from using those charges as “throwaways” to obtain a conviction in other crimes. They should be ADDED to the violent crime statutes in such a way that they CANNOT be discarded to obtain a conviction in other crimes. But if you suggest this to our INCOMPETENT politicians, they’ll laugh at you and continue on their INCOMPETENT ways, making laws to DISARM the populace. (Coloradoan)

"One Bullet At A Time"

An 81-year-old man was confronted by an armed robber (or at least a man who wanted him to THINK he had a gun) who told him, “I want everything you’ve got.” So the old man gave him a couple of bullets, one at a time. A neighbor thought the robber was dead and called 911. they “saved” him and sent him to the hospital, where he is now recovering. I hope this man has learned his lesson, that he should not assume his intended victim is unarmed. If he comes after this man for shooting him, he might not survive the next time ha is shot. This again proves my thesis that an armed man, even an 81-year-old man, can stop a crime if he is armed. The news item doesn’t say if this man is LEGALLY armed, but being in Florida, I’d guess he was. In  any case, according to the cops, no charges have been filed against this man for defending himself, at least for now. (The Blaze)

Gaily (Daily) Making Useless Laws

That’s what Colorado lawmakers are doing. They recently considered SEVEN anti-gun laws (most of which failed), none of which will do ANYTHING to stop, or even slow down gun violence because criminals do not OBEY laws, taking advantage of recent mass shootings that creates an atmosphere favoring SOME KIND of “gun control. I’m sure legislators in other states, as well as Congress, are doing the same. The problem is, they don’t give a damn about criminals having guns. They want HONEST people not to have guns so criminals won’t fear DEATH at the hands of their intended victims. They want NO GUNS in the hands of honest citizens so that those criminals (some wearing BADGES) won’t meet DEATH when they come to take those honest people’s property. They KNOW their laws won’t do ANYTHING to stop CRIMINALS from getting guns because criminals don’t GET their guns legally. Nor do they OBEY laws. But disarming honest citizens will make those people DEFENSELESS against ALL criminals. (Just common sense)

The Gun Scam

What the politicians are doing right now is simply part of the scam to disarm the citizens of the United States so they cannot defend themselves when criminals (some wearing badges) come after their property. Those politicians don’t care about getting guns out of the hands of criminals, NOR stopping violent crimes. They just want to DISARM as many HONEST people as they can. They KNOW their laws so nothing to disarm criminals, who will get their guns in any case. Frankly, I don’t think there is a SINGLE criminal whose gun is legally owned. Nor do I think criminals REGISTER their gun ownership. But that’s what politicians concentrate on: taking guns away from RESPONSIBLE people. They KNOW increasing the penalty for USING a gun in a crime DOES work, but they ignore it and even use the CURRENT laws that do that as “throwaway charges” to obtain convictions for other crimes. There should be a law PREVENTING deals that cancel convictions for gun use. That targets GUN USE instead of DISARMING their victims. (Just common sense)