This blog is about the efforts of anti-gun fanatics in the U. S. and local Governments to disarm the American people and steps we can take for self-defense without guns. If you have a story about someone successfully defending him/herself without a gun, but with or without a stun gun or pepper/tear gas spray, send it to raythomas101@yahoo.com/. If you have a URL to a news story about it, send it along. But it's not necessary.
Friday, October 25, 2013
Charged After Following Veep's Advice
Maybe what she had wasn’t a shotgun, but it seems to me that firing a gun in the air to protect her child should not get HER charged. A group of TEN boys attacked her daughter and, to stop the attack, she shot a handgun into the air, therefore dispersing the attackers. What should she have done? Shoot one or more of them? That would be self-defense, except for the atmosphere created by anti-gun fools. Did she have a license to have the gun? You shouldn’t have to have a license to do what the Constitution guarantees you as a RIGHT. Cops say she should have called 911. And waited . . .and waited while her daughter was being beaten up. Yes, firing in the air isn’t safe. But firing into the attackers is not safe for him. She could have fired into the soft ground just as easily. But it looks to me that the cops just wanted SOME KIND of a charge to put on HER. (Washington Times)
No comments:
Post a Comment